Rating of perceived exertion in kayaking ergometry

Rating of perceived exertion in kayaking ergometry

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the use or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) to estimate and regulate exercise intensity during kayaking ergometry. Nine competitive male kayakers (mean age 28.6 yrs plus or minus 6.3) completed two kayaking trials on an ergometer. The first...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kinesiology (Zagreb, Croatia) Croatia), 2007-07, Vol.39 (1), p.21-27
Hauptverfasser: Diafas, V, Chrysikopoulos, K, Diamanti, V, Bachev, V, Kaloupsis, S, Polykratis, M, Villiotis, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Kinesiology (Zagreb, Croatia)
container_volume 39
creator Diafas, V
Chrysikopoulos, K
Diamanti, V
Bachev, V
Kaloupsis, S
Polykratis, M
Villiotis, A
description The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the use or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) to estimate and regulate exercise intensity during kayaking ergometry. Nine competitive male kayakers (mean age 28.6 yrs plus or minus 6.3) completed two kayaking trials on an ergometer. The first trial (estimation) consisted of an incremental protocol designed to elicit a range of work outputs (WO) and heart rates (HR). The subjects indicated their perception of effort using a 15-point scale at each intensity level. In the second trial (produc-tion), 7-14 days later, the subjects were asked to produce exercise intensities corresponding to the five levels of RPE: 15, 11, 17, 13 and 19. Data analysis revealed high Pearson correlation coefficients between HR and RPE (r=0.95, P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19290204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19290204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_192902043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsKwjAYBtAMCtbLO2RyKyRpLHQWxVncS6hfS2ya1Pyp2LcXwQdwOstZsEwWhcyl1nLF1kQPIfShVGXG1NUk6zseWj4iNrAv3DneiMkGz63nvZlN_x2IXRiQ4rxly9Y4wu7nhu3Pp9vxko8xPCdQqgdLDZwzHmGiWlaqEkro4u_4AQLaNsM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19290204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rating of perceived exertion in kayaking ergometry</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Diafas, V ; Chrysikopoulos, K ; Diamanti, V ; Bachev, V ; Kaloupsis, S ; Polykratis, M ; Villiotis, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Diafas, V ; Chrysikopoulos, K ; Diamanti, V ; Bachev, V ; Kaloupsis, S ; Polykratis, M ; Villiotis, A</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the use or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) to estimate and regulate exercise intensity during kayaking ergometry. Nine competitive male kayakers (mean age 28.6 yrs plus or minus 6.3) completed two kayaking trials on an ergometer. The first trial (estimation) consisted of an incremental protocol designed to elicit a range of work outputs (WO) and heart rates (HR). The subjects indicated their perception of effort using a 15-point scale at each intensity level. In the second trial (produc-tion), 7-14 days later, the subjects were asked to produce exercise intensities corresponding to the five levels of RPE: 15, 11, 17, 13 and 19. Data analysis revealed high Pearson correlation coefficients between HR and RPE (r=0.95, P&lt;0.01) and WO and RPE (r=0.96, P&lt;0.01) during the estimation trial. In addition, significant correlations (P&lt;0.01) were obtained between the estimation and production trials for HR (r=0.82) and WO (r=0.84). Post-hoc analysis of variance revealed that the observed differences in the mean HR were not signif-icant (P&gt;0.05) at three of the five intensity levels (RPE 15, 17 and 19), but were at the two lowest RPE levels (11 and 13). Significant mean differences in WO were seen at all but RPE 17. These data support the validity of the RPE scale as a measure of physiological strain among competitive male kayakers, and offer support for its use as a method of regulating the intensity of kayaking ergometry, especially at higher levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1331-1441</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Kinesiology (Zagreb, Croatia), 2007-07, Vol.39 (1), p.21-27</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diafas, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrysikopoulos, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamanti, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachev, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaloupsis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polykratis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villiotis, A</creatorcontrib><title>Rating of perceived exertion in kayaking ergometry</title><title>Kinesiology (Zagreb, Croatia)</title><description>The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the use or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) to estimate and regulate exercise intensity during kayaking ergometry. Nine competitive male kayakers (mean age 28.6 yrs plus or minus 6.3) completed two kayaking trials on an ergometer. The first trial (estimation) consisted of an incremental protocol designed to elicit a range of work outputs (WO) and heart rates (HR). The subjects indicated their perception of effort using a 15-point scale at each intensity level. In the second trial (produc-tion), 7-14 days later, the subjects were asked to produce exercise intensities corresponding to the five levels of RPE: 15, 11, 17, 13 and 19. Data analysis revealed high Pearson correlation coefficients between HR and RPE (r=0.95, P&lt;0.01) and WO and RPE (r=0.96, P&lt;0.01) during the estimation trial. In addition, significant correlations (P&lt;0.01) were obtained between the estimation and production trials for HR (r=0.82) and WO (r=0.84). Post-hoc analysis of variance revealed that the observed differences in the mean HR were not signif-icant (P&gt;0.05) at three of the five intensity levels (RPE 15, 17 and 19), but were at the two lowest RPE levels (11 and 13). Significant mean differences in WO were seen at all but RPE 17. These data support the validity of the RPE scale as a measure of physiological strain among competitive male kayakers, and offer support for its use as a method of regulating the intensity of kayaking ergometry, especially at higher levels.</description><issn>1331-1441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyrsKwjAYBtAMCtbLO2RyKyRpLHQWxVncS6hfS2ya1Pyp2LcXwQdwOstZsEwWhcyl1nLF1kQPIfShVGXG1NUk6zseWj4iNrAv3DneiMkGz63nvZlN_x2IXRiQ4rxly9Y4wu7nhu3Pp9vxko8xPCdQqgdLDZwzHmGiWlaqEkro4u_4AQLaNsM</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Diafas, V</creator><creator>Chrysikopoulos, K</creator><creator>Diamanti, V</creator><creator>Bachev, V</creator><creator>Kaloupsis, S</creator><creator>Polykratis, M</creator><creator>Villiotis, A</creator><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Rating of perceived exertion in kayaking ergometry</title><author>Diafas, V ; Chrysikopoulos, K ; Diamanti, V ; Bachev, V ; Kaloupsis, S ; Polykratis, M ; Villiotis, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_192902043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diafas, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrysikopoulos, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamanti, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachev, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaloupsis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polykratis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villiotis, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Kinesiology (Zagreb, Croatia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diafas, V</au><au>Chrysikopoulos, K</au><au>Diamanti, V</au><au>Bachev, V</au><au>Kaloupsis, S</au><au>Polykratis, M</au><au>Villiotis, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rating of perceived exertion in kayaking ergometry</atitle><jtitle>Kinesiology (Zagreb, Croatia)</jtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>21-27</pages><issn>1331-1441</issn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the use or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) to estimate and regulate exercise intensity during kayaking ergometry. Nine competitive male kayakers (mean age 28.6 yrs plus or minus 6.3) completed two kayaking trials on an ergometer. The first trial (estimation) consisted of an incremental protocol designed to elicit a range of work outputs (WO) and heart rates (HR). The subjects indicated their perception of effort using a 15-point scale at each intensity level. In the second trial (produc-tion), 7-14 days later, the subjects were asked to produce exercise intensities corresponding to the five levels of RPE: 15, 11, 17, 13 and 19. Data analysis revealed high Pearson correlation coefficients between HR and RPE (r=0.95, P&lt;0.01) and WO and RPE (r=0.96, P&lt;0.01) during the estimation trial. In addition, significant correlations (P&lt;0.01) were obtained between the estimation and production trials for HR (r=0.82) and WO (r=0.84). Post-hoc analysis of variance revealed that the observed differences in the mean HR were not signif-icant (P&gt;0.05) at three of the five intensity levels (RPE 15, 17 and 19), but were at the two lowest RPE levels (11 and 13). Significant mean differences in WO were seen at all but RPE 17. These data support the validity of the RPE scale as a measure of physiological strain among competitive male kayakers, and offer support for its use as a method of regulating the intensity of kayaking ergometry, especially at higher levels.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1331-1441
ispartof Kinesiology (Zagreb, Croatia), 2007-07, Vol.39 (1), p.21-27
issn 1331-1441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19290204
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Rating of perceived exertion in kayaking ergometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A39%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rating%20of%20perceived%20exertion%20in%20kayaking%20ergometry&rft.jtitle=Kinesiology%20(Zagreb,%20Croatia)&rft.au=Diafas,%20V&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=21-27&rft.issn=1331-1441&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E19290204%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19290204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true