Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults

Power training has been shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training for improving physical function in older adults; however, most trials have used pneumatic machines during training. Considering that the general public typically has access to plate-loaded machines, the effectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental gerontology 2017-11, Vol.98, p.134-142
Hauptverfasser: Balachandran, Anoop T., Gandia, Kristine, Jacobs, Kevin A., Streiner, David L., Eltoukhy, Moataz, Signorile, Joseph F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue
container_start_page 134
container_title Experimental gerontology
container_volume 98
creator Balachandran, Anoop T.
Gandia, Kristine
Jacobs, Kevin A.
Streiner, David L.
Eltoukhy, Moataz
Signorile, Joseph F.
description Power training has been shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training for improving physical function in older adults; however, most trials have used pneumatic machines during training. Considering that the general public typically has access to plate-loaded machines, the effectiveness and safety of power training using plate-loaded machines compared to pneumatic machines is an important consideration. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects of high-velocity training using pneumatic machines (Pn) versus standard plate-loaded machines (PL). Independently-living older adults, 60years or older were randomized into two groups: pneumatic machine (Pn, n=19) and plate-loaded machine (PL, n=17). After 12weeks of high-velocity training twice per week, groups were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. Primary outcomes were lower body power measured using a linear transducer and upper body power using medicine ball throw. Secondary outcomes included lower and upper body muscle muscle strength, the Physical Performance Battery (PPB), gallon jug test, the timed up-and-go test, and self-reported function using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and an online video questionnaire. Outcome assessors were blinded to group membership. Lower body power significantly improved in both groups (Pn: 19%, PL: 31%), with no significant difference between the groups (Cohen's d=0.4, 95% CI (−1.1, 0.3)). Upper body power significantly improved only in the PL group, but showed no significant difference between the groups (Pn: 3%, PL: 6%). For balance, there was a significant difference between the groups favoring the Pn group (d=0.7, 95% CI (0.1, 1.4)); however, there were no statistically significant differences between groups for PPB, gallon jug transfer, muscle muscle strength, timed up-and-go or self-reported function. No serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. Pneumatic and plate-loaded machines were effective in improving lower body power and physical function in older adults. The results suggest that power training can be safely and effectively performed by older adults using either pneumatic or plate-loaded machines. •Power training has shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training.•Pneumatic machines commonly used in research are not readily available for training.•Pneumatic machines and plate-loaded machines can effectively improve power and ADLs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928781467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0531556517300487</els_id><sourcerecordid>1928781467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-43702908989b51167567ba4ff10b5633143ff04e64e589849cefb95b3bd489953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP3TAQRq2qqNwCvwCp8rKbpOP4EXvBAqE-kJDKAtaW40zAV3lhJ5f239eXS-muG48ln2_Gcwg5Z1AyYOrLtsRfDxjLClhdgi4BzDuyYbrmhdJMvicbkJwVUip5TD6mtAUAVXH2gRxXWoMAoTYk3E7PGOkSXRjD-EDXtD_nEdfBLcHTwfnHMGKiu1TSuXcLFv3kWmz_vSwTDcMcpx3SYU2-Rzq_9Awjnfo2X1y79ks6JUed6xOevdYTcv_t693Vj-Lm5_frq8ubwnNplkLwGioD2mjTSMZULVXdONF1DBqpOGeCdx0IVAJlhoTx2DVGNrxphTZG8hPy-dA3f-lpxbTYISSPfe9GnNZkmal0rZlQdUb5AfVxSiliZ-cYBhd_WwZ279hu7Ytju3dsQdvsOKc-vQ5YmwHbt8xfqRm4OACY19yFHE8-4OixDRH9Ytsp_HfAH5Cujpk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928781467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Balachandran, Anoop T. ; Gandia, Kristine ; Jacobs, Kevin A. ; Streiner, David L. ; Eltoukhy, Moataz ; Signorile, Joseph F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balachandran, Anoop T. ; Gandia, Kristine ; Jacobs, Kevin A. ; Streiner, David L. ; Eltoukhy, Moataz ; Signorile, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><description>Power training has been shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training for improving physical function in older adults; however, most trials have used pneumatic machines during training. Considering that the general public typically has access to plate-loaded machines, the effectiveness and safety of power training using plate-loaded machines compared to pneumatic machines is an important consideration. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects of high-velocity training using pneumatic machines (Pn) versus standard plate-loaded machines (PL). Independently-living older adults, 60years or older were randomized into two groups: pneumatic machine (Pn, n=19) and plate-loaded machine (PL, n=17). After 12weeks of high-velocity training twice per week, groups were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. Primary outcomes were lower body power measured using a linear transducer and upper body power using medicine ball throw. Secondary outcomes included lower and upper body muscle muscle strength, the Physical Performance Battery (PPB), gallon jug test, the timed up-and-go test, and self-reported function using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and an online video questionnaire. Outcome assessors were blinded to group membership. Lower body power significantly improved in both groups (Pn: 19%, PL: 31%), with no significant difference between the groups (Cohen's d=0.4, 95% CI (−1.1, 0.3)). Upper body power significantly improved only in the PL group, but showed no significant difference between the groups (Pn: 3%, PL: 6%). For balance, there was a significant difference between the groups favoring the Pn group (d=0.7, 95% CI (0.1, 1.4)); however, there were no statistically significant differences between groups for PPB, gallon jug transfer, muscle muscle strength, timed up-and-go or self-reported function. No serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. Pneumatic and plate-loaded machines were effective in improving lower body power and physical function in older adults. The results suggest that power training can be safely and effectively performed by older adults using either pneumatic or plate-loaded machines. •Power training has shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training.•Pneumatic machines commonly used in research are not readily available for training.•Pneumatic machines and plate-loaded machines can effectively improve power and ADLs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0531-5565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28804046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Equipment Design ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Florida ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Contraction ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Older adults ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Physical function ; Power ; Power training ; Resistance Training - adverse effects ; Resistance Training - instrumentation ; Single-Blind Method ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Experimental gerontology, 2017-11, Vol.98, p.134-142</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-43702908989b51167567ba4ff10b5633143ff04e64e589849cefb95b3bd489953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-43702908989b51167567ba4ff10b5633143ff04e64e589849cefb95b3bd489953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28804046$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balachandran, Anoop T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandia, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Kevin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streiner, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eltoukhy, Moataz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorile, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><title>Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults</title><title>Experimental gerontology</title><addtitle>Exp Gerontol</addtitle><description>Power training has been shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training for improving physical function in older adults; however, most trials have used pneumatic machines during training. Considering that the general public typically has access to plate-loaded machines, the effectiveness and safety of power training using plate-loaded machines compared to pneumatic machines is an important consideration. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects of high-velocity training using pneumatic machines (Pn) versus standard plate-loaded machines (PL). Independently-living older adults, 60years or older were randomized into two groups: pneumatic machine (Pn, n=19) and plate-loaded machine (PL, n=17). After 12weeks of high-velocity training twice per week, groups were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. Primary outcomes were lower body power measured using a linear transducer and upper body power using medicine ball throw. Secondary outcomes included lower and upper body muscle muscle strength, the Physical Performance Battery (PPB), gallon jug test, the timed up-and-go test, and self-reported function using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and an online video questionnaire. Outcome assessors were blinded to group membership. Lower body power significantly improved in both groups (Pn: 19%, PL: 31%), with no significant difference between the groups (Cohen's d=0.4, 95% CI (−1.1, 0.3)). Upper body power significantly improved only in the PL group, but showed no significant difference between the groups (Pn: 3%, PL: 6%). For balance, there was a significant difference between the groups favoring the Pn group (d=0.7, 95% CI (0.1, 1.4)); however, there were no statistically significant differences between groups for PPB, gallon jug transfer, muscle muscle strength, timed up-and-go or self-reported function. No serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. Pneumatic and plate-loaded machines were effective in improving lower body power and physical function in older adults. The results suggest that power training can be safely and effectively performed by older adults using either pneumatic or plate-loaded machines. •Power training has shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training.•Pneumatic machines commonly used in research are not readily available for training.•Pneumatic machines and plate-loaded machines can effectively improve power and ADLs.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Physical function</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power training</subject><subject>Resistance Training - adverse effects</subject><subject>Resistance Training - instrumentation</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0531-5565</issn><issn>1873-6815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtP3TAQRq2qqNwCvwCp8rKbpOP4EXvBAqE-kJDKAtaW40zAV3lhJ5f239eXS-muG48ln2_Gcwg5Z1AyYOrLtsRfDxjLClhdgi4BzDuyYbrmhdJMvicbkJwVUip5TD6mtAUAVXH2gRxXWoMAoTYk3E7PGOkSXRjD-EDXtD_nEdfBLcHTwfnHMGKiu1TSuXcLFv3kWmz_vSwTDcMcpx3SYU2-Rzq_9Awjnfo2X1y79ks6JUed6xOevdYTcv_t693Vj-Lm5_frq8ubwnNplkLwGioD2mjTSMZULVXdONF1DBqpOGeCdx0IVAJlhoTx2DVGNrxphTZG8hPy-dA3f-lpxbTYISSPfe9GnNZkmal0rZlQdUb5AfVxSiliZ-cYBhd_WwZ279hu7Ytju3dsQdvsOKc-vQ5YmwHbt8xfqRm4OACY19yFHE8-4OixDRH9Ytsp_HfAH5Cujpk</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Balachandran, Anoop T.</creator><creator>Gandia, Kristine</creator><creator>Jacobs, Kevin A.</creator><creator>Streiner, David L.</creator><creator>Eltoukhy, Moataz</creator><creator>Signorile, Joseph F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults</title><author>Balachandran, Anoop T. ; Gandia, Kristine ; Jacobs, Kevin A. ; Streiner, David L. ; Eltoukhy, Moataz ; Signorile, Joseph F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-43702908989b51167567ba4ff10b5633143ff04e64e589849cefb95b3bd489953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Physical function</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power training</topic><topic>Resistance Training - adverse effects</topic><topic>Resistance Training - instrumentation</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balachandran, Anoop T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandia, Kristine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Kevin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streiner, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eltoukhy, Moataz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorile, Joseph F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental gerontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balachandran, Anoop T.</au><au>Gandia, Kristine</au><au>Jacobs, Kevin A.</au><au>Streiner, David L.</au><au>Eltoukhy, Moataz</au><au>Signorile, Joseph F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults</atitle><jtitle>Experimental gerontology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Gerontol</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>134</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>134-142</pages><issn>0531-5565</issn><eissn>1873-6815</eissn><abstract>Power training has been shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training for improving physical function in older adults; however, most trials have used pneumatic machines during training. Considering that the general public typically has access to plate-loaded machines, the effectiveness and safety of power training using plate-loaded machines compared to pneumatic machines is an important consideration. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects of high-velocity training using pneumatic machines (Pn) versus standard plate-loaded machines (PL). Independently-living older adults, 60years or older were randomized into two groups: pneumatic machine (Pn, n=19) and plate-loaded machine (PL, n=17). After 12weeks of high-velocity training twice per week, groups were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. Primary outcomes were lower body power measured using a linear transducer and upper body power using medicine ball throw. Secondary outcomes included lower and upper body muscle muscle strength, the Physical Performance Battery (PPB), gallon jug test, the timed up-and-go test, and self-reported function using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and an online video questionnaire. Outcome assessors were blinded to group membership. Lower body power significantly improved in both groups (Pn: 19%, PL: 31%), with no significant difference between the groups (Cohen's d=0.4, 95% CI (−1.1, 0.3)). Upper body power significantly improved only in the PL group, but showed no significant difference between the groups (Pn: 3%, PL: 6%). For balance, there was a significant difference between the groups favoring the Pn group (d=0.7, 95% CI (0.1, 1.4)); however, there were no statistically significant differences between groups for PPB, gallon jug transfer, muscle muscle strength, timed up-and-go or self-reported function. No serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. Pneumatic and plate-loaded machines were effective in improving lower body power and physical function in older adults. The results suggest that power training can be safely and effectively performed by older adults using either pneumatic or plate-loaded machines. •Power training has shown to be more effective than conventional resistance training.•Pneumatic machines commonly used in research are not readily available for training.•Pneumatic machines and plate-loaded machines can effectively improve power and ADLs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28804046</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.009</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0531-5565
ispartof Experimental gerontology, 2017-11, Vol.98, p.134-142
issn 0531-5565
1873-6815
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928781467
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Equipment Design
Exercise Test
Female
Florida
Geriatric Assessment
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Contraction
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Older adults
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Physical function
Power
Power training
Resistance Training - adverse effects
Resistance Training - instrumentation
Single-Blind Method
Time Factors
title Power training using pneumatic machines vs. plate-loaded machines to improve muscle power in older adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power%20training%20using%20pneumatic%20machines%20vs.%20plate-loaded%20machines%20to%20improve%20muscle%20power%20in%20older%20adults&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20gerontology&rft.au=Balachandran,%20Anoop%20T.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=134-142&rft.issn=0531-5565&rft.eissn=1873-6815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928781467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928781467&rft_id=info:pmid/28804046&rft_els_id=S0531556517300487&rfr_iscdi=true