The value of ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer
An increasing number of breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) has lead clinicians to the dilemma how to provide patients with the best pathological, short-term and long-term outcomes, while at the same time improving the cosmetic outcome and the patients’ quality of life. A proposed solution is the use...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2017-09, Vol.216, p.198-203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 203 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology |
container_volume | 216 |
creator | Arko, Darja Čas Sikošek, Nina Kozar, Nejc Sobočan, Monika Takač, Iztok |
description | An increasing number of breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) has lead clinicians to the dilemma how to provide patients with the best pathological, short-term and long-term outcomes, while at the same time improving the cosmetic outcome and the patients’ quality of life. A proposed solution is the use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for lesion resection in palpable as well as non-palpable breast cancer.
This review identifies and compares evidence on palpation-guided/wire-guided vs. US-guided localization as well as stand-alone observational IOUS studies published between June 2001 and July 2017, indexed in Medline. A cornerstone of this review is the discussion on technology advancement as well as alternative IOUS approaches and their feasibility in treatment of patients with calcifications and multifocal lesions currently not treated with IOUS localization.
In comparison to other available methods, IOUS provided in most studies better rates of clear margins, lower rates of re-excisions as well as better cosmetic outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of available multicenter data on method comparisons as well as several limitations to the use of IOUS.
With a comparable follow-up rate of loco-regional recurrences and a higher reported long-term quality of life, IOUS should be a highly regarded method of localization in the planning of BCS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928517359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211517303688</els_id><sourcerecordid>1928517359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffc025ab9a4ba013bcac72999fa4369f03cab05011a23b8fdcf662afc165ed353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5Es3aTOI5NkNoIUX1BwU9fDPO7UhLRTZzKF_ntTUl16OXA359zD_RC6JXhOMCkf2jm0fh30nGJSzfEgVpyhKakrmlclL87RFDNMckoIn6CrGFs8DGPiEk1oXWNKKZ-ievUF2V51CTLvstT1QUWftjZfp8aCzWIKawiHzPmQ6QAq9plRWwPhGl041UW4Oe0Z-nx5Xi3e8uXH6_viaZkbVtI-d85gypUWqtAKE6aNMhUVQjhVsFI4zIzSmGNCFGW6dta4sqTKGVJysIyzGbof7-6C_04Qe7lpooGuU1vwKUoiaM1JxbgYrMVoNcHHGMDJXWg2KhwkwfLITLZyZCaPzCQexIohdndqSHoD9i_0C2kwPI4GGP7cNxBkNA0MEGwTwPTS-ub_hh-L-n8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928517359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Arko, Darja ; Čas Sikošek, Nina ; Kozar, Nejc ; Sobočan, Monika ; Takač, Iztok</creator><creatorcontrib>Arko, Darja ; Čas Sikošek, Nina ; Kozar, Nejc ; Sobočan, Monika ; Takač, Iztok</creatorcontrib><description>An increasing number of breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) has lead clinicians to the dilemma how to provide patients with the best pathological, short-term and long-term outcomes, while at the same time improving the cosmetic outcome and the patients’ quality of life. A proposed solution is the use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for lesion resection in palpable as well as non-palpable breast cancer.
This review identifies and compares evidence on palpation-guided/wire-guided vs. US-guided localization as well as stand-alone observational IOUS studies published between June 2001 and July 2017, indexed in Medline. A cornerstone of this review is the discussion on technology advancement as well as alternative IOUS approaches and their feasibility in treatment of patients with calcifications and multifocal lesions currently not treated with IOUS localization.
In comparison to other available methods, IOUS provided in most studies better rates of clear margins, lower rates of re-excisions as well as better cosmetic outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of available multicenter data on method comparisons as well as several limitations to the use of IOUS.
With a comparable follow-up rate of loco-regional recurrences and a higher reported long-term quality of life, IOUS should be a highly regarded method of localization in the planning of BCS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28802225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Breast malignancies ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative ultrasound ; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor localization ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2017-09, Vol.216, p.198-203</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffc025ab9a4ba013bcac72999fa4369f03cab05011a23b8fdcf662afc165ed353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffc025ab9a4ba013bcac72999fa4369f03cab05011a23b8fdcf662afc165ed353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211517303688$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28802225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arko, Darja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čas Sikošek, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozar, Nejc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobočan, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takač, Iztok</creatorcontrib><title>The value of ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer</title><title>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>An increasing number of breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) has lead clinicians to the dilemma how to provide patients with the best pathological, short-term and long-term outcomes, while at the same time improving the cosmetic outcome and the patients’ quality of life. A proposed solution is the use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for lesion resection in palpable as well as non-palpable breast cancer.
This review identifies and compares evidence on palpation-guided/wire-guided vs. US-guided localization as well as stand-alone observational IOUS studies published between June 2001 and July 2017, indexed in Medline. A cornerstone of this review is the discussion on technology advancement as well as alternative IOUS approaches and their feasibility in treatment of patients with calcifications and multifocal lesions currently not treated with IOUS localization.
In comparison to other available methods, IOUS provided in most studies better rates of clear margins, lower rates of re-excisions as well as better cosmetic outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of available multicenter data on method comparisons as well as several limitations to the use of IOUS.
With a comparable follow-up rate of loco-regional recurrences and a higher reported long-term quality of life, IOUS should be a highly regarded method of localization in the planning of BCS.</description><subject>Breast malignancies</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative ultrasound</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumor localization</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5Es3aTOI5NkNoIUX1BwU9fDPO7UhLRTZzKF_ntTUl16OXA359zD_RC6JXhOMCkf2jm0fh30nGJSzfEgVpyhKakrmlclL87RFDNMckoIn6CrGFs8DGPiEk1oXWNKKZ-ievUF2V51CTLvstT1QUWftjZfp8aCzWIKawiHzPmQ6QAq9plRWwPhGl041UW4Oe0Z-nx5Xi3e8uXH6_viaZkbVtI-d85gypUWqtAKE6aNMhUVQjhVsFI4zIzSmGNCFGW6dta4sqTKGVJysIyzGbof7-6C_04Qe7lpooGuU1vwKUoiaM1JxbgYrMVoNcHHGMDJXWg2KhwkwfLITLZyZCaPzCQexIohdndqSHoD9i_0C2kwPI4GGP7cNxBkNA0MEGwTwPTS-ub_hh-L-n8E</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Arko, Darja</creator><creator>Čas Sikošek, Nina</creator><creator>Kozar, Nejc</creator><creator>Sobočan, Monika</creator><creator>Takač, Iztok</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>The value of ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer</title><author>Arko, Darja ; Čas Sikošek, Nina ; Kozar, Nejc ; Sobočan, Monika ; Takač, Iztok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffc025ab9a4ba013bcac72999fa4369f03cab05011a23b8fdcf662afc165ed353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Breast malignancies</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative ultrasound</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumor localization</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arko, Darja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čas Sikošek, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozar, Nejc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobočan, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takač, Iztok</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arko, Darja</au><au>Čas Sikošek, Nina</au><au>Kozar, Nejc</au><au>Sobočan, Monika</au><au>Takač, Iztok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>216</volume><spage>198</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>198-203</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>An increasing number of breast-conserving surgeries (BCS) has lead clinicians to the dilemma how to provide patients with the best pathological, short-term and long-term outcomes, while at the same time improving the cosmetic outcome and the patients’ quality of life. A proposed solution is the use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for lesion resection in palpable as well as non-palpable breast cancer.
This review identifies and compares evidence on palpation-guided/wire-guided vs. US-guided localization as well as stand-alone observational IOUS studies published between June 2001 and July 2017, indexed in Medline. A cornerstone of this review is the discussion on technology advancement as well as alternative IOUS approaches and their feasibility in treatment of patients with calcifications and multifocal lesions currently not treated with IOUS localization.
In comparison to other available methods, IOUS provided in most studies better rates of clear margins, lower rates of re-excisions as well as better cosmetic outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of available multicenter data on method comparisons as well as several limitations to the use of IOUS.
With a comparable follow-up rate of loco-regional recurrences and a higher reported long-term quality of life, IOUS should be a highly regarded method of localization in the planning of BCS.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28802225</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.034</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-2115 |
ispartof | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2017-09, Vol.216, p.198-203 |
issn | 0301-2115 1872-7654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928517359 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Breast malignancies Breast Neoplasms - surgery Female Humans Intraoperative ultrasound Mastectomy, Segmental - methods Surgical outcomes Treatment Outcome Tumor localization Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods |
title | The value of ultrasound-guided surgery for breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A31%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20ultrasound-guided%20surgery%20for%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Arko,%20Darja&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=216&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=198-203&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928517359%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928517359&rft_id=info:pmid/28802225&rft_els_id=S0301211517303688&rfr_iscdi=true |