Laboratory Animal Bite Anaphylaxis: A National Survey: Part 1: Case Series and Review of the Literature
OBJECTIVE:This study documents previously unreported cases of laboratory animal bite anaphylaxis in animal laboratory facilities in the United States. METHODS:An online survey was e-mailed to designated institutional officials at laboratory animal facilities identified by the National Institutes of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.728-738 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 738 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 728 |
| container_title | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Stave, Gregg M. Lee, Edward H. Darcey, Dennis J. |
| description | OBJECTIVE:This study documents previously unreported cases of laboratory animal bite anaphylaxis in animal laboratory facilities in the United States.
METHODS:An online survey was e-mailed to designated institutional officials at laboratory animal facilities identified by the National Institutes of Health Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
RESULTS:One hundred ninety eight organizations responded and 15 organizations indicated that workers had experienced anaphylaxis following an animal bite. Case report forms were completed by nine of these institutions for 14 cases, 13 for rodent bites, and one involving a needlestick from a horse. In half of the cases involving rodents, there was no prior history of animal allergy. All workers had uncomplicated recoveries. Treatment, testing, and work restrictions varied across cases.
CONCLUSIONS:While uncommon, anaphylaxis from laboratory animal bites occurs more frequently than suggested by the literature. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928512654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48501056</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48501056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2666-4049425148ce3ddea1ec148e1d0360d37cae18a436159e29ecb6f9823a0aec453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPAjEUhRujEUT_gRoSN24G-27HHRKfQVmo60mZuYTBgWI7I86_txMQDd303vSc77anCJ0S3CM4VldPo-ce_rcIxmIPtYlgMhIx1_uhxkpGVAnaQkfez4JGECwOUYtqzrBUuo3E0IytM6V1dbe_yOem6N7kJYTaLKd1Yb5zf93td19MmdtFOHyt3BfUx-hgYgoPJ5u9g97vbt8GD9FwdP846A-jlEopI455zKkgXKfAsgwMgTQ0QDLMJM6YSg0QbTiTRMRAY0jHchJrygw2kHLBOuhyzV06-1mBL5N57lMoCrMAW_mExFQLQqXgQXqxI53ZyoUrNyqmBVeUk6Dia1XqrPcOJsnShUe7OiE4aWJNQqzJbqzBdr6BV-M5ZFvTb45_3JUtSnD-o6hW4JIpmKKcNjzOlOQRxURhHdqoQctgO1vbZj78wBbLtQhzhWQ_fWKI1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938547241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory Animal Bite Anaphylaxis: A National Survey: Part 1: Case Series and Review of the Literature</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Stave, Gregg M. ; Lee, Edward H. ; Darcey, Dennis J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stave, Gregg M. ; Lee, Edward H. ; Darcey, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:This study documents previously unreported cases of laboratory animal bite anaphylaxis in animal laboratory facilities in the United States.
METHODS:An online survey was e-mailed to designated institutional officials at laboratory animal facilities identified by the National Institutes of Health Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
RESULTS:One hundred ninety eight organizations responded and 15 organizations indicated that workers had experienced anaphylaxis following an animal bite. Case report forms were completed by nine of these institutions for 14 cases, 13 for rodent bites, and one involving a needlestick from a horse. In half of the cases involving rodents, there was no prior history of animal allergy. All workers had uncomplicated recoveries. Treatment, testing, and work restrictions varied across cases.
CONCLUSIONS:While uncommon, anaphylaxis from laboratory animal bites occurs more frequently than suggested by the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-2752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28430678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</publisher><subject>Allergies ; Anaphylaxis ; Animal bites ; Animal welfare ; Institutions ; Laboratories ; Literature reviews ; Occupational health ; Organizations ; Original Article ; Rodents ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.728-738</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2666-4049425148ce3ddea1ec148e1d0360d37cae18a436159e29ecb6f9823a0aec453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48501056$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48501056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28430678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stave, Gregg M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Edward H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darcey, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory Animal Bite Anaphylaxis: A National Survey: Part 1: Case Series and Review of the Literature</title><title>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</title><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:This study documents previously unreported cases of laboratory animal bite anaphylaxis in animal laboratory facilities in the United States.
METHODS:An online survey was e-mailed to designated institutional officials at laboratory animal facilities identified by the National Institutes of Health Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
RESULTS:One hundred ninety eight organizations responded and 15 organizations indicated that workers had experienced anaphylaxis following an animal bite. Case report forms were completed by nine of these institutions for 14 cases, 13 for rodent bites, and one involving a needlestick from a horse. In half of the cases involving rodents, there was no prior history of animal allergy. All workers had uncomplicated recoveries. Treatment, testing, and work restrictions varied across cases.
CONCLUSIONS:While uncommon, anaphylaxis from laboratory animal bites occurs more frequently than suggested by the literature.</description><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis</subject><subject>Animal bites</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1076-2752</issn><issn>1536-5948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUtPAjEUhRujEUT_gRoSN24G-27HHRKfQVmo60mZuYTBgWI7I86_txMQDd303vSc77anCJ0S3CM4VldPo-ce_rcIxmIPtYlgMhIx1_uhxkpGVAnaQkfez4JGECwOUYtqzrBUuo3E0IytM6V1dbe_yOem6N7kJYTaLKd1Yb5zf93td19MmdtFOHyt3BfUx-hgYgoPJ5u9g97vbt8GD9FwdP846A-jlEopI455zKkgXKfAsgwMgTQ0QDLMJM6YSg0QbTiTRMRAY0jHchJrygw2kHLBOuhyzV06-1mBL5N57lMoCrMAW_mExFQLQqXgQXqxI53ZyoUrNyqmBVeUk6Dia1XqrPcOJsnShUe7OiE4aWJNQqzJbqzBdr6BV-M5ZFvTb45_3JUtSnD-o6hW4JIpmKKcNjzOlOQRxURhHdqoQctgO1vbZj78wBbLtQhzhWQ_fWKI1Q</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Stave, Gregg M.</creator><creator>Lee, Edward H.</creator><creator>Darcey, Dennis J.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</general><general>Copyright by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Laboratory Animal Bite Anaphylaxis: A National Survey</title><author>Stave, Gregg M. ; Lee, Edward H. ; Darcey, Dennis J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2666-4049425148ce3ddea1ec148e1d0360d37cae18a436159e29ecb6f9823a0aec453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis</topic><topic>Animal bites</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stave, Gregg M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Edward H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darcey, Dennis J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stave, Gregg M.</au><au>Lee, Edward H.</au><au>Darcey, Dennis J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory Animal Bite Anaphylaxis: A National Survey: Part 1: Case Series and Review of the Literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational and environmental medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>728</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>728-738</pages><issn>1076-2752</issn><eissn>1536-5948</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:This study documents previously unreported cases of laboratory animal bite anaphylaxis in animal laboratory facilities in the United States.
METHODS:An online survey was e-mailed to designated institutional officials at laboratory animal facilities identified by the National Institutes of Health Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
RESULTS:One hundred ninety eight organizations responded and 15 organizations indicated that workers had experienced anaphylaxis following an animal bite. Case report forms were completed by nine of these institutions for 14 cases, 13 for rodent bites, and one involving a needlestick from a horse. In half of the cases involving rodents, there was no prior history of animal allergy. All workers had uncomplicated recoveries. Treatment, testing, and work restrictions varied across cases.
CONCLUSIONS:While uncommon, anaphylaxis from laboratory animal bites occurs more frequently than suggested by the literature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a business of Wolters Kluwer Health</pub><pmid>28430678</pmid><doi>10.1097/JOM.0000000000001005</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1076-2752 |
| ispartof | Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.728-738 |
| issn | 1076-2752 1536-5948 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1928512654 |
| source | Journals@Ovid Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Allergies Anaphylaxis Animal bites Animal welfare Institutions Laboratories Literature reviews Occupational health Organizations Original Article Rodents Workers |
| title | Laboratory Animal Bite Anaphylaxis: A National Survey: Part 1: Case Series and Review of the Literature |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A09%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20Animal%20Bite%20Anaphylaxis:%20A%20National%20Survey:%20Part%201:%20Case%20Series%20and%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine&rft.au=Stave,%20Gregg%20M.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=728&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=728-738&rft.issn=1076-2752&rft.eissn=1536-5948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001005&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48501056%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938547241&rft_id=info:pmid/28430678&rft_jstor_id=48501056&rfr_iscdi=true |