DISCONTOOLS: Identifying gaps in controlling bovine spongiform encephalopathy

Summary This article summarizes the 2016 update of the DISCONTOOLS project gap analysis on bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), which was based on a combination of literature review and expert knowledge. Uncertainty still exists in relation to the pathogenesis, immunology and epidemiology of BSE,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transboundary and emerging diseases 2018-05, Vol.65 (S1), p.9-21
Hauptverfasser: Simmons, M., Ru, G., Casalone, C., Iulini, B., Cassar, C., Seuberlich, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue S1
container_start_page 9
container_title Transboundary and emerging diseases
container_volume 65
creator Simmons, M.
Ru, G.
Casalone, C.
Iulini, B.
Cassar, C.
Seuberlich, T.
description Summary This article summarizes the 2016 update of the DISCONTOOLS project gap analysis on bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), which was based on a combination of literature review and expert knowledge. Uncertainty still exists in relation to the pathogenesis, immunology and epidemiology of BSE, but provided that infected material is prohibited from entering the animal feed chain, cases should continue to decline. BSE does not appear to spread between cattle, but if new strains with this ability appear then control would be considerably more difficult. Atypical types of BSE (L‐BSE and H‐BSE) have been identified, which have different molecular patterns and pathology, and do not display the same clinical signs as classical BSE. Laboratory transmission experiments indicate that the L‐BSE agent has zoonotic potential. There is no satisfactory conclusion regarding the origin of the BSE epidemic. C‐BSE case numbers declined rapidly following strict controls banning ruminant protein in animal feed, but occasional cases still occur. It is unclear whether these more recent cases indicate inadequate implementation of the bans, or the possibility that C‐BSE might occur spontaneously, as has been postulated for H‐ and L‐BSE. All of this will have implications once existing bans and levels of surveillance are both relaxed. Immunochemical tests can only be applied post‐mortem. There is no immunological basis for diagnosis in the live animal. All aspects of disease control are expensive, particularly surveillance, specified risk material removal and feed controls. There is pressure to relax feed controls, and concurrent pressure from other sources to reduce surveillance. While the cost benefit argument can be applied successfully to either of these approaches, it would be necessary to maintain the ban on intraspecies recycling and some baseline surveillance. However, the potential risk is not limited to intraspecies recycling; recycling with cross‐species transmission may be an ideal way to select or/and modify properties of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies agents in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tbed.12671
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1927837085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047456782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e953189786786dff829d83b759f49b0581bb05b9a3da99421c9f396ed89b2bf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwkAQxTdGI4he_ACmiRdjAu6fbrvrTQGVBO0BPG-67S6UlN3aLZp-excBDx6cTGYmk19eXh4AlwgOkK-7Rqp8gHAUoyPQRSyifRQxfPx7x2EHnDm3gjCCPKKnoINZzCmFvAteR5PZMHmbJ8l0dh9McmWaQreFWQSLtHJBYYLMmqa2Zbn9SftZGBW4yppFoW29DpTJVLVMS1ulzbI9Byc6LZ262O8eeH8az4cv_WnyPBk-TPsZ4QT1FacEMR6zyHeuNcM8Z0TGlOuQS0gZkn5KnpI85TzEKOOa8EjljEssNSE9cLPTrWr7sVGuEevCZaosU6PsxgnEccxIDBn16PUfdGU3tfHuBIZhHFLvAXvqdkdltXWuVlpUdbFO61YgKLYhi23I4idkD1_tJTdy7b8H9JCqB9AO-CpK1f4jJeaP49FO9BtDqYV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047456782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DISCONTOOLS: Identifying gaps in controlling bovine spongiform encephalopathy</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Simmons, M. ; Ru, G. ; Casalone, C. ; Iulini, B. ; Cassar, C. ; Seuberlich, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simmons, M. ; Ru, G. ; Casalone, C. ; Iulini, B. ; Cassar, C. ; Seuberlich, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary This article summarizes the 2016 update of the DISCONTOOLS project gap analysis on bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), which was based on a combination of literature review and expert knowledge. Uncertainty still exists in relation to the pathogenesis, immunology and epidemiology of BSE, but provided that infected material is prohibited from entering the animal feed chain, cases should continue to decline. BSE does not appear to spread between cattle, but if new strains with this ability appear then control would be considerably more difficult. Atypical types of BSE (L‐BSE and H‐BSE) have been identified, which have different molecular patterns and pathology, and do not display the same clinical signs as classical BSE. Laboratory transmission experiments indicate that the L‐BSE agent has zoonotic potential. There is no satisfactory conclusion regarding the origin of the BSE epidemic. C‐BSE case numbers declined rapidly following strict controls banning ruminant protein in animal feed, but occasional cases still occur. It is unclear whether these more recent cases indicate inadequate implementation of the bans, or the possibility that C‐BSE might occur spontaneously, as has been postulated for H‐ and L‐BSE. All of this will have implications once existing bans and levels of surveillance are both relaxed. Immunochemical tests can only be applied post‐mortem. There is no immunological basis for diagnosis in the live animal. All aspects of disease control are expensive, particularly surveillance, specified risk material removal and feed controls. There is pressure to relax feed controls, and concurrent pressure from other sources to reduce surveillance. While the cost benefit argument can be applied successfully to either of these approaches, it would be necessary to maintain the ban on intraspecies recycling and some baseline surveillance. However, the potential risk is not limited to intraspecies recycling; recycling with cross‐species transmission may be an ideal way to select or/and modify properties of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies agents in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-1674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-1682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12671</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28795509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Animal diseases ; Animal Feed ; Animals ; bovine ; Bovine spongiform encephalopathy ; Cattle ; Communicable Disease Control - methods ; Communicable Diseases - veterinary ; control ; Disease control ; encephalopathy ; Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - prevention &amp; control ; Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - transmission ; Epidemics ; Epidemiology ; Feeds ; Gap analysis ; Immunology ; Literature reviews ; Molecular chains ; Pathogenesis ; Pressure ; Proteins ; Recycling ; Risk Factors ; spongiform ; Surveillance ; transmissible ; Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2018-05, Vol.65 (S1), p.9-21</ispartof><rights>2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e953189786786dff829d83b759f49b0581bb05b9a3da99421c9f396ed89b2bf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e953189786786dff829d83b759f49b0581bb05b9a3da99421c9f396ed89b2bf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7369-5147</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftbed.12671$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftbed.12671$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28795509$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simmons, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ru, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalone, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iulini, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassar, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seuberlich, T.</creatorcontrib><title>DISCONTOOLS: Identifying gaps in controlling bovine spongiform encephalopathy</title><title>Transboundary and emerging diseases</title><addtitle>Transbound Emerg Dis</addtitle><description>Summary This article summarizes the 2016 update of the DISCONTOOLS project gap analysis on bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), which was based on a combination of literature review and expert knowledge. Uncertainty still exists in relation to the pathogenesis, immunology and epidemiology of BSE, but provided that infected material is prohibited from entering the animal feed chain, cases should continue to decline. BSE does not appear to spread between cattle, but if new strains with this ability appear then control would be considerably more difficult. Atypical types of BSE (L‐BSE and H‐BSE) have been identified, which have different molecular patterns and pathology, and do not display the same clinical signs as classical BSE. Laboratory transmission experiments indicate that the L‐BSE agent has zoonotic potential. There is no satisfactory conclusion regarding the origin of the BSE epidemic. C‐BSE case numbers declined rapidly following strict controls banning ruminant protein in animal feed, but occasional cases still occur. It is unclear whether these more recent cases indicate inadequate implementation of the bans, or the possibility that C‐BSE might occur spontaneously, as has been postulated for H‐ and L‐BSE. All of this will have implications once existing bans and levels of surveillance are both relaxed. Immunochemical tests can only be applied post‐mortem. There is no immunological basis for diagnosis in the live animal. All aspects of disease control are expensive, particularly surveillance, specified risk material removal and feed controls. There is pressure to relax feed controls, and concurrent pressure from other sources to reduce surveillance. While the cost benefit argument can be applied successfully to either of these approaches, it would be necessary to maintain the ban on intraspecies recycling and some baseline surveillance. However, the potential risk is not limited to intraspecies recycling; recycling with cross‐species transmission may be an ideal way to select or/and modify properties of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies agents in the future.</description><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bovine</subject><subject>Bovine spongiform encephalopathy</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Communicable Disease Control - methods</subject><subject>Communicable Diseases - veterinary</subject><subject>control</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>encephalopathy</subject><subject>Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - transmission</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Gap analysis</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Molecular chains</subject><subject>Pathogenesis</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>spongiform</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>transmissible</subject><subject>Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1865-1674</issn><issn>1865-1682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwkAQxTdGI4he_ACmiRdjAu6fbrvrTQGVBO0BPG-67S6UlN3aLZp-excBDx6cTGYmk19eXh4AlwgOkK-7Rqp8gHAUoyPQRSyifRQxfPx7x2EHnDm3gjCCPKKnoINZzCmFvAteR5PZMHmbJ8l0dh9McmWaQreFWQSLtHJBYYLMmqa2Zbn9SftZGBW4yppFoW29DpTJVLVMS1ulzbI9Byc6LZ262O8eeH8az4cv_WnyPBk-TPsZ4QT1FacEMR6zyHeuNcM8Z0TGlOuQS0gZkn5KnpI85TzEKOOa8EjljEssNSE9cLPTrWr7sVGuEevCZaosU6PsxgnEccxIDBn16PUfdGU3tfHuBIZhHFLvAXvqdkdltXWuVlpUdbFO61YgKLYhi23I4idkD1_tJTdy7b8H9JCqB9AO-CpK1f4jJeaP49FO9BtDqYV8</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Simmons, M.</creator><creator>Ru, G.</creator><creator>Casalone, C.</creator><creator>Iulini, B.</creator><creator>Cassar, C.</creator><creator>Seuberlich, T.</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-5147</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>DISCONTOOLS: Identifying gaps in controlling bovine spongiform encephalopathy</title><author>Simmons, M. ; Ru, G. ; Casalone, C. ; Iulini, B. ; Cassar, C. ; Seuberlich, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-e953189786786dff829d83b759f49b0581bb05b9a3da99421c9f396ed89b2bf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bovine</topic><topic>Bovine spongiform encephalopathy</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Communicable Disease Control - methods</topic><topic>Communicable Diseases - veterinary</topic><topic>control</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>encephalopathy</topic><topic>Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - transmission</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Gap analysis</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Molecular chains</topic><topic>Pathogenesis</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>spongiform</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>transmissible</topic><topic>Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simmons, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ru, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalone, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iulini, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassar, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seuberlich, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simmons, M.</au><au>Ru, G.</au><au>Casalone, C.</au><au>Iulini, B.</au><au>Cassar, C.</au><au>Seuberlich, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DISCONTOOLS: Identifying gaps in controlling bovine spongiform encephalopathy</atitle><jtitle>Transboundary and emerging diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Transbound Emerg Dis</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>9-21</pages><issn>1865-1674</issn><eissn>1865-1682</eissn><abstract>Summary This article summarizes the 2016 update of the DISCONTOOLS project gap analysis on bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), which was based on a combination of literature review and expert knowledge. Uncertainty still exists in relation to the pathogenesis, immunology and epidemiology of BSE, but provided that infected material is prohibited from entering the animal feed chain, cases should continue to decline. BSE does not appear to spread between cattle, but if new strains with this ability appear then control would be considerably more difficult. Atypical types of BSE (L‐BSE and H‐BSE) have been identified, which have different molecular patterns and pathology, and do not display the same clinical signs as classical BSE. Laboratory transmission experiments indicate that the L‐BSE agent has zoonotic potential. There is no satisfactory conclusion regarding the origin of the BSE epidemic. C‐BSE case numbers declined rapidly following strict controls banning ruminant protein in animal feed, but occasional cases still occur. It is unclear whether these more recent cases indicate inadequate implementation of the bans, or the possibility that C‐BSE might occur spontaneously, as has been postulated for H‐ and L‐BSE. All of this will have implications once existing bans and levels of surveillance are both relaxed. Immunochemical tests can only be applied post‐mortem. There is no immunological basis for diagnosis in the live animal. All aspects of disease control are expensive, particularly surveillance, specified risk material removal and feed controls. There is pressure to relax feed controls, and concurrent pressure from other sources to reduce surveillance. While the cost benefit argument can be applied successfully to either of these approaches, it would be necessary to maintain the ban on intraspecies recycling and some baseline surveillance. However, the potential risk is not limited to intraspecies recycling; recycling with cross‐species transmission may be an ideal way to select or/and modify properties of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies agents in the future.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>28795509</pmid><doi>10.1111/tbed.12671</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-5147</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1865-1674
ispartof Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2018-05, Vol.65 (S1), p.9-21
issn 1865-1674
1865-1682
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1927837085
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Animal diseases
Animal Feed
Animals
bovine
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
Cattle
Communicable Disease Control - methods
Communicable Diseases - veterinary
control
Disease control
encephalopathy
Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - prevention & control
Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform - transmission
Epidemics
Epidemiology
Feeds
Gap analysis
Immunology
Literature reviews
Molecular chains
Pathogenesis
Pressure
Proteins
Recycling
Risk Factors
spongiform
Surveillance
transmissible
Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy
Zoonoses
title DISCONTOOLS: Identifying gaps in controlling bovine spongiform encephalopathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A52%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DISCONTOOLS:%20Identifying%20gaps%20in%20controlling%20bovine%20spongiform%20encephalopathy&rft.jtitle=Transboundary%20and%20emerging%20diseases&rft.au=Simmons,%20M.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=9-21&rft.issn=1865-1674&rft.eissn=1865-1682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tbed.12671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2047456782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047456782&rft_id=info:pmid/28795509&rfr_iscdi=true