Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability
Aims and objectives To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients. Background Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical nursing 2018-02, Vol.27 (3-4), p.e427-e436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e436 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | e427 |
container_title | Journal of clinical nursing |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Mahoney, Catherine Veitch, Linda |
description | Aims and objectives
To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients.
Background
Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised.
Design
Integrative literature review.
Method
Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches.
Results
Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients.
Conclusion
Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development.
Relevance to clinical practice
Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jocn.14013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1927834326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2006986168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhi3UCgLlwg-oLPWCkJb6I_EHNxS1QIXKpZwtr3ccOd3Ywd4E8u_rbYBDDx1pNJpXz7wa6UXojJJLWuvrMrl4SaeE8gM0oVzMGiYJ-4AmRAvWUCLkETouZUkqwRg_REdMSc25JhP0chcHyFuIQ0ixYJ8yXtkQh9ohLnC0JS1sGXJw2AN0o2Z9vcBVS7_hCl9HXHFYZDuELeAM2wDPOHkM3oMbtQilYBs7bJ2D9WDb0Idh9wl99LYvcPo6T9Dj92-_5rfN_cPN3fz6vnG8vti0XmjfKaaItkJpbbV3rZKdpXo2JZqBllIoSeiUEjKDVra6brOWSs5Z1wp-gs73vuucnjZQBrMKxUHf2whpUwzVTCo-5WxEv_yDLtMmx_qdYYQIrQQVqlIXe8rlVEoGb9Y5rGzeGUrMmIcZ8zB_86jw51fLTbuC7h19C6ACdA88hx52_7EyPx7mP_emfwAFQ5Yp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2006986168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Mahoney, Catherine ; Veitch, Linda</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Catherine ; Veitch, Linda</creatorcontrib><description>Aims and objectives
To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients.
Background
Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised.
Design
Integrative literature review.
Method
Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches.
Results
Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients.
Conclusion
Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development.
Relevance to clinical practice
Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28793390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>acceptability ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinical medicine ; Deglutition Disorders - therapy ; Dysphagia ; Enteral nutrition ; Enteral Nutrition - methods ; Enteral Nutrition - psychology ; feeding ; Female ; hand mittens ; Humans ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; nasal loop ; nasogastric tube ; Nursing ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; restraint ; Stroke ; Stroke - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2018-02, Vol.27 (3-4), p.e427-e436</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3084-0812</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocn.14013$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocn.14013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veitch, Linda</creatorcontrib><title>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aims and objectives
To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients.
Background
Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised.
Design
Integrative literature review.
Method
Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches.
Results
Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients.
Conclusion
Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development.
Relevance to clinical practice
Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families.</description><subject>acceptability</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Enteral nutrition</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - methods</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - psychology</subject><subject>feeding</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hand mittens</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods</subject><subject>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nasal loop</subject><subject>nasogastric tube</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>restraint</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhi3UCgLlwg-oLPWCkJb6I_EHNxS1QIXKpZwtr3ccOd3Ywd4E8u_rbYBDDx1pNJpXz7wa6UXojJJLWuvrMrl4SaeE8gM0oVzMGiYJ-4AmRAvWUCLkETouZUkqwRg_REdMSc25JhP0chcHyFuIQ0ixYJ8yXtkQh9ohLnC0JS1sGXJw2AN0o2Z9vcBVS7_hCl9HXHFYZDuELeAM2wDPOHkM3oMbtQilYBs7bJ2D9WDb0Idh9wl99LYvcPo6T9Dj92-_5rfN_cPN3fz6vnG8vti0XmjfKaaItkJpbbV3rZKdpXo2JZqBllIoSeiUEjKDVra6brOWSs5Z1wp-gs73vuucnjZQBrMKxUHf2whpUwzVTCo-5WxEv_yDLtMmx_qdYYQIrQQVqlIXe8rlVEoGb9Y5rGzeGUrMmIcZ8zB_86jw51fLTbuC7h19C6ACdA88hx52_7EyPx7mP_emfwAFQ5Yp</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Mahoney, Catherine</creator><creator>Veitch, Linda</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0812</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</title><author>Mahoney, Catherine ; Veitch, Linda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>acceptability</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Enteral nutrition</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - methods</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - psychology</topic><topic>feeding</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hand mittens</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods</topic><topic>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nasal loop</topic><topic>nasogastric tube</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>restraint</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veitch, Linda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahoney, Catherine</au><au>Veitch, Linda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>e427</spage><epage>e436</epage><pages>e427-e436</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aims and objectives
To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients.
Background
Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised.
Design
Integrative literature review.
Method
Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches.
Results
Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients.
Conclusion
Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development.
Relevance to clinical practice
Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28793390</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocn.14013</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0812</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-1067 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical nursing, 2018-02, Vol.27 (3-4), p.e427-e436 |
issn | 0962-1067 1365-2702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1927834326 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | acceptability Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Clinical medicine Deglutition Disorders - therapy Dysphagia Enteral nutrition Enteral Nutrition - methods Enteral Nutrition - psychology feeding Female hand mittens Humans Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology Male Middle Aged nasal loop nasogastric tube Nursing Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data restraint Stroke Stroke - therapy Treatment Outcome |
title | Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions%20for%20maintaining%20nasogastric%20feeding%20after%20stroke:%20An%20integrative%20review%20of%20effectiveness%20and%20acceptability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Mahoney,%20Catherine&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=e427&rft.epage=e436&rft.pages=e427-e436&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocn.14013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2006986168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2006986168&rft_id=info:pmid/28793390&rfr_iscdi=true |