Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability

Aims and objectives To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients. Background Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical nursing 2018-02, Vol.27 (3-4), p.e427-e436
Hauptverfasser: Mahoney, Catherine, Veitch, Linda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e436
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page e427
container_title Journal of clinical nursing
container_volume 27
creator Mahoney, Catherine
Veitch, Linda
description Aims and objectives To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients. Background Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised. Design Integrative literature review. Method Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches. Results Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients. Conclusion Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development. Relevance to clinical practice Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jocn.14013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1927834326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2006986168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhi3UCgLlwg-oLPWCkJb6I_EHNxS1QIXKpZwtr3ccOd3Ywd4E8u_rbYBDDx1pNJpXz7wa6UXojJJLWuvrMrl4SaeE8gM0oVzMGiYJ-4AmRAvWUCLkETouZUkqwRg_REdMSc25JhP0chcHyFuIQ0ixYJ8yXtkQh9ohLnC0JS1sGXJw2AN0o2Z9vcBVS7_hCl9HXHFYZDuELeAM2wDPOHkM3oMbtQilYBs7bJ2D9WDb0Idh9wl99LYvcPo6T9Dj92-_5rfN_cPN3fz6vnG8vti0XmjfKaaItkJpbbV3rZKdpXo2JZqBllIoSeiUEjKDVra6brOWSs5Z1wp-gs73vuucnjZQBrMKxUHf2whpUwzVTCo-5WxEv_yDLtMmx_qdYYQIrQQVqlIXe8rlVEoGb9Y5rGzeGUrMmIcZ8zB_86jw51fLTbuC7h19C6ACdA88hx52_7EyPx7mP_emfwAFQ5Yp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2006986168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Mahoney, Catherine ; Veitch, Linda</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Catherine ; Veitch, Linda</creatorcontrib><description>Aims and objectives To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients. Background Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised. Design Integrative literature review. Method Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches. Results Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients. Conclusion Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development. Relevance to clinical practice Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28793390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>acceptability ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Clinical medicine ; Deglutition Disorders - therapy ; Dysphagia ; Enteral nutrition ; Enteral Nutrition - methods ; Enteral Nutrition - psychology ; feeding ; Female ; hand mittens ; Humans ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods ; Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; nasal loop ; nasogastric tube ; Nursing ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; restraint ; Stroke ; Stroke - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2018-02, Vol.27 (3-4), p.e427-e436</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3084-0812</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocn.14013$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocn.14013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28793390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veitch, Linda</creatorcontrib><title>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aims and objectives To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients. Background Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised. Design Integrative literature review. Method Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches. Results Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients. Conclusion Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development. Relevance to clinical practice Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families.</description><subject>acceptability</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Deglutition Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Enteral nutrition</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - methods</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition - psychology</subject><subject>feeding</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>hand mittens</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods</subject><subject>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nasal loop</subject><subject>nasogastric tube</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>restraint</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhi3UCgLlwg-oLPWCkJb6I_EHNxS1QIXKpZwtr3ccOd3Ywd4E8u_rbYBDDx1pNJpXz7wa6UXojJJLWuvrMrl4SaeE8gM0oVzMGiYJ-4AmRAvWUCLkETouZUkqwRg_REdMSc25JhP0chcHyFuIQ0ixYJ8yXtkQh9ohLnC0JS1sGXJw2AN0o2Z9vcBVS7_hCl9HXHFYZDuELeAM2wDPOHkM3oMbtQilYBs7bJ2D9WDb0Idh9wl99LYvcPo6T9Dj92-_5rfN_cPN3fz6vnG8vti0XmjfKaaItkJpbbV3rZKdpXo2JZqBllIoSeiUEjKDVra6brOWSs5Z1wp-gs73vuucnjZQBrMKxUHf2whpUwzVTCo-5WxEv_yDLtMmx_qdYYQIrQQVqlIXe8rlVEoGb9Y5rGzeGUrMmIcZ8zB_86jw51fLTbuC7h19C6ACdA88hx52_7EyPx7mP_emfwAFQ5Yp</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Mahoney, Catherine</creator><creator>Veitch, Linda</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0812</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</title><author>Mahoney, Catherine ; Veitch, Linda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-bf69fd82809a6899a9fcb87da1954092e9776870141005eb7b98705b17332db63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>acceptability</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Deglutition Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Enteral nutrition</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - methods</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition - psychology</topic><topic>feeding</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>hand mittens</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods</topic><topic>Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nasal loop</topic><topic>nasogastric tube</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>restraint</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veitch, Linda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahoney, Catherine</au><au>Veitch, Linda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>e427</spage><epage>e436</epage><pages>e427-e436</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aims and objectives To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of interventions for maintaining nasogastric tubes in adult stroke patients. Background Internationally, incidence of cerebral vascular disease continues to increase and stroke is the largest cause of complex disability in adults. Dysphagia is common following a stroke which necessitates feeding via a nasogastric tube. Nasogastric tubes are not well tolerated by stroke patients and may be frequently dislodged. Hence, interventions such as tape, the nasal bridle/loop or hand mittens may be used to maintain nasogastric tube position. However, evidence around the effectiveness and acceptability of these interventions has not been reviewed and synthesised. Design Integrative literature review. Method Database searches in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane and EMBASE; manual reference list searches. Results Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Evidence for the effectiveness of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to maintain nasogastric tube position in patients after a stroke is spare and methodologically poor, and especially limited around hand mittens use. There is insufficient evidence about the acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients. Conclusion Current clinical practice is underpinned by assumptions around the acceptability of nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens to secure nasogastric tubes. This results in reliance on consensual judgement between professional, patients and their families to guide their use among individuals with dysphagia after stroke. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness of hand mittens and acceptability of both nasal bridle/loop and hand mittens among stroke patients to inform guideline development. Relevance to clinical practice Given the lack of evidence on the acceptability of hand mittens and nasal bridle/loop among stroke patients to inform evidence‐based guidelines and protocols, healthcare professionals should reach consensus on their use by exercising clinical judgement and through consultation with patients (if possible) and their families.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28793390</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocn.14013</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0812</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-1067
ispartof Journal of clinical nursing, 2018-02, Vol.27 (3-4), p.e427-e436
issn 0962-1067
1365-2702
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1927834326
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects acceptability
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical medicine
Deglutition Disorders - therapy
Dysphagia
Enteral nutrition
Enteral Nutrition - methods
Enteral Nutrition - psychology
feeding
Female
hand mittens
Humans
Intubation, Gastrointestinal - methods
Intubation, Gastrointestinal - psychology
Male
Middle Aged
nasal loop
nasogastric tube
Nursing
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
restraint
Stroke
Stroke - therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Interventions for maintaining nasogastric feeding after stroke: An integrative review of effectiveness and acceptability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions%20for%20maintaining%20nasogastric%20feeding%20after%20stroke:%20An%20integrative%20review%20of%20effectiveness%20and%20acceptability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Mahoney,%20Catherine&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=e427&rft.epage=e436&rft.pages=e427-e436&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocn.14013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2006986168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2006986168&rft_id=info:pmid/28793390&rfr_iscdi=true