Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review
Background Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions. The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful cor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of vascular access 2017-09, Vol.18 (5), p.419-425 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 425 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | The journal of vascular access |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Spencer, Timothy R. |
description | Background
Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions.
The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning.
Methods
This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia.
7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions.
Results
There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition.
Conclusions
Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5301/jva.5000748 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1926684293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.5301_jva.5000748</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1926684293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9PwjAUxxujEURP3k2PJmbaH-u6HskUMSHREPS6lLaDktHiukH87y0B9eKpL-nnfd57XwCuMbpnFOGH1VbeM4QQT_MT0MecpEmGKDmNNSYi4UTkPXARwgohIhhOz0GP5JzzFLM-2E7NxgfbWu-sW0BfwcK4tpE1_DDOdwEOlTIhwEeztbGAXdhjEo7tYpmMar-Do7oLSzgzaunsZ2dgEn-L2jqrouStkaqNjVA6DQsfWjiNIrO7BGeVrIO5Or4D8D56mhXjZPL6_FIMJ4mihLRJKhWilSKyyqiYE8441YiJXGRaZ0LKFAkkcaY0xZnmijKtZFWZecU0I5LkdABuD95N4-NyoS3XNihT19KZeF2JBcmyPCWCRvTugKrGh9CYqtw0di2brxKjch90GYMuj0FH-uYo7uZro3_Zn2T_Jge5MOXKd42Lh_7r-gaYI4YT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926684293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Spencer, Timothy R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions.
The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning.
Methods
This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia.
7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions.
Results
There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition.
Conclusions
Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1129-7298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000748</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28777415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The journal of vascular access, 2017-09, Vol.18 (5), p.419-425</ispartof><rights>2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5301/jva.5000748$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5301/jva.5000748$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28777415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><title>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</title><title>The journal of vascular access</title><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><description>Background
Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions.
The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning.
Methods
This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia.
7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions.
Results
There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition.
Conclusions
Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.</description><issn>1129-7298</issn><issn>1724-6032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM9PwjAUxxujEURP3k2PJmbaH-u6HskUMSHREPS6lLaDktHiukH87y0B9eKpL-nnfd57XwCuMbpnFOGH1VbeM4QQT_MT0MecpEmGKDmNNSYi4UTkPXARwgohIhhOz0GP5JzzFLM-2E7NxgfbWu-sW0BfwcK4tpE1_DDOdwEOlTIhwEeztbGAXdhjEo7tYpmMar-Do7oLSzgzaunsZ2dgEn-L2jqrouStkaqNjVA6DQsfWjiNIrO7BGeVrIO5Or4D8D56mhXjZPL6_FIMJ4mihLRJKhWilSKyyqiYE8441YiJXGRaZ0LKFAkkcaY0xZnmijKtZFWZecU0I5LkdABuD95N4-NyoS3XNihT19KZeF2JBcmyPCWCRvTugKrGh9CYqtw0di2brxKjch90GYMuj0FH-uYo7uZro3_Zn2T_Jge5MOXKd42Lh_7r-gaYI4YT</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Spencer, Timothy R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</title><author>Spencer, Timothy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, Timothy R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</atitle><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>419-425</pages><issn>1129-7298</issn><eissn>1724-6032</eissn><abstract>Background
Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions.
The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning.
Methods
This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia.
7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions.
Results
There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition.
Conclusions
Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28777415</pmid><doi>10.5301/jva.5000748</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1129-7298 |
ispartof | The journal of vascular access, 2017-09, Vol.18 (5), p.419-425 |
issn | 1129-7298 1724-6032 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1926684293 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repositioning%20of%20Central%20Venous%20Access%20Devices%20using%20a%20High-Flow%20Flush%20Technique%20-%20a%20Clinical%20Practice%20and%20Cost%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20vascular%20access&rft.au=Spencer,%20Timothy%20R.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=419-425&rft.issn=1129-7298&rft.eissn=1724-6032&rft_id=info:doi/10.5301/jva.5000748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1926684293%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926684293&rft_id=info:pmid/28777415&rft_sage_id=10.5301_jva.5000748&rfr_iscdi=true |