Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review

Background Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions. The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful cor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2017-09, Vol.18 (5), p.419-425
1. Verfasser: Spencer, Timothy R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 425
container_issue 5
container_start_page 419
container_title The journal of vascular access
container_volume 18
creator Spencer, Timothy R.
description Background Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions. The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning. Methods This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia. 7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions. Results There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition. Conclusions Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.5301/jva.5000748
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1926684293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.5301_jva.5000748</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1926684293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9PwjAUxxujEURP3k2PJmbaH-u6HskUMSHREPS6lLaDktHiukH87y0B9eKpL-nnfd57XwCuMbpnFOGH1VbeM4QQT_MT0MecpEmGKDmNNSYi4UTkPXARwgohIhhOz0GP5JzzFLM-2E7NxgfbWu-sW0BfwcK4tpE1_DDOdwEOlTIhwEeztbGAXdhjEo7tYpmMar-Do7oLSzgzaunsZ2dgEn-L2jqrouStkaqNjVA6DQsfWjiNIrO7BGeVrIO5Or4D8D56mhXjZPL6_FIMJ4mihLRJKhWilSKyyqiYE8441YiJXGRaZ0LKFAkkcaY0xZnmijKtZFWZecU0I5LkdABuD95N4-NyoS3XNihT19KZeF2JBcmyPCWCRvTugKrGh9CYqtw0di2brxKjch90GYMuj0FH-uYo7uZro3_Zn2T_Jge5MOXKd42Lh_7r-gaYI4YT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926684293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Spencer, Timothy R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions. The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning. Methods This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia. 7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions. Results There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition. Conclusions Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1129-7298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000748</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28777415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The journal of vascular access, 2017-09, Vol.18 (5), p.419-425</ispartof><rights>2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5301/jva.5000748$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5301/jva.5000748$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28777415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><title>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</title><title>The journal of vascular access</title><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><description>Background Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions. The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning. Methods This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia. 7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions. Results There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition. Conclusions Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.</description><issn>1129-7298</issn><issn>1724-6032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM9PwjAUxxujEURP3k2PJmbaH-u6HskUMSHREPS6lLaDktHiukH87y0B9eKpL-nnfd57XwCuMbpnFOGH1VbeM4QQT_MT0MecpEmGKDmNNSYi4UTkPXARwgohIhhOz0GP5JzzFLM-2E7NxgfbWu-sW0BfwcK4tpE1_DDOdwEOlTIhwEeztbGAXdhjEo7tYpmMar-Do7oLSzgzaunsZ2dgEn-L2jqrouStkaqNjVA6DQsfWjiNIrO7BGeVrIO5Or4D8D56mhXjZPL6_FIMJ4mihLRJKhWilSKyyqiYE8441YiJXGRaZ0LKFAkkcaY0xZnmijKtZFWZecU0I5LkdABuD95N4-NyoS3XNihT19KZeF2JBcmyPCWCRvTugKrGh9CYqtw0di2brxKjch90GYMuj0FH-uYo7uZro3_Zn2T_Jge5MOXKd42Lh_7r-gaYI4YT</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Spencer, Timothy R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</title><author>Spencer, Timothy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-4ac03fc2af639b27573d059896dd69aa4090a16cd316d7c35dcaffebf5d52a283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Timothy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spencer, Timothy R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review</atitle><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>419-425</pages><issn>1129-7298</issn><eissn>1724-6032</eissn><abstract>Background Malpositioned central venous access device (CVAD) tip locations can cause significant mechanical and chemical vessel-related injuries and complications if left in inappropriate positions. The aim of this study is to determine the use of a high-flow flush technique (HFFT) in successful correction of malpositioned catheters into the lower superior vena cava or cavoatrial junction and provide a cost comparison to interventional/fluoroscopic-based repositioning. Methods This is a retrospective chart and radiographic review of all inserted CVADs found malpositioned between 1996-2014 in a multi-specialty 1000-bed tertiary trauma center in Sydney, Australia. 7450 CVADs placed by a nurse-led vascular access service were reviewed. Catheters repositioned pre-2010 were excluded owing to radiology repositioning interventions. Results There were 3996 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and 3454 centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) placed. Seventy-four were malpositioned post-2010. Of these, 53 devices were repositioned using the studied technique; 86% (46/53) of catheters were successfully repositioned on the first HFFT attempt. There was supportive evidence that device insertion side is important in potential catheter malposition. Conclusions Clinical outcomes suggest that CICCs and PICCs may be successfully repositioned utilizing this technique, with no adverse events associated and a prospective cost saving benefit when compared to interventional-based repositioning procedures.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28777415</pmid><doi>10.5301/jva.5000748</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1129-7298
ispartof The journal of vascular access, 2017-09, Vol.18 (5), p.419-425
issn 1129-7298
1724-6032
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1926684293
source Access via SAGE
title Repositioning of Central Venous Access Devices using a High-Flow Flush Technique - a Clinical Practice and Cost Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repositioning%20of%20Central%20Venous%20Access%20Devices%20using%20a%20High-Flow%20Flush%20Technique%20-%20a%20Clinical%20Practice%20and%20Cost%20Review&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20vascular%20access&rft.au=Spencer,%20Timothy%20R.&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=419-425&rft.issn=1129-7298&rft.eissn=1724-6032&rft_id=info:doi/10.5301/jva.5000748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1926684293%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926684293&rft_id=info:pmid/28777415&rft_sage_id=10.5301_jva.5000748&rfr_iscdi=true