Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success

Objectives: To estimate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) following repeated assisted reproductive technology (ART) ovarian stimulation cycles, including all fresh and frozen/thaw embryo transfers (complete cycles). Design, setting and participants: Prospective follow‐up of 56 652 women commencing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of Australia 2017-08, Vol.207 (3), p.114-118
Hauptverfasser: Chambers, Georgina M, Paul, Repon C, Harris, Katie, Fitzgerald, Oisin, Boothroyd, Clare V, Rombauts, Luk, Chapman, Michael G, Jorm, Louisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118
container_issue 3
container_start_page 114
container_title Medical journal of Australia
container_volume 207
creator Chambers, Georgina M
Paul, Repon C
Harris, Katie
Fitzgerald, Oisin
Boothroyd, Clare V
Rombauts, Luk
Chapman, Michael G
Jorm, Louisa
description Objectives: To estimate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) following repeated assisted reproductive technology (ART) ovarian stimulation cycles, including all fresh and frozen/thaw embryo transfers (complete cycles). Design, setting and participants: Prospective follow‐up of 56 652 women commencing ART in Australian and New Zealand during 2009–2012, and followed until 2014 or the first treatment‐dependent live birth. Main outcome measures: CLBRs and cycle‐specific live birth rates were calculated for up to eight cycles, stratified by the age of the women ( 44 years). Conservative CLBRs assumed that women discontinuing treatment had no chance of achieving a live birth if had they continued treatment; optimal CLBRs assumed that they would have had the same chance as women who continued treatment. Results: The overall CLBR was 32.7% (95% CI, 32.2–33.1%) in the first cycle, rising by the eighth cycle to 54.3% (95% CI, 53.9–54.7%) (conservative) and 77.2% (95% CI, 76.5–77.9%) (optimal). The CLBR decreased with age and number of complete cycles. For women who commenced ART treatment before 30 years of age, the CLBR for the first complete cycle was 43.7% (95% CI, 42.6–44.7%), rising to 69.2% (95% CI, 68.2–70.1%) (conservative) and 92.8% (95% CI, 91.6–94.0) (optimal) for the seventh cycle. For women aged 40–44 years, the CLBR was 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1–11.3%) for the first complete cycle, rising to 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2–21.8%) (conservative) and 37.9% (95% CI, 35.9–39.9%) (optimal) for the eighth cycle. Conclusion: CLBRs based on complete cycles are meaningful estimates of ART success, reflecting contemporary clinical practice and encouraging safe practice. These estimates can be used when counselling patients and to inform public policy on ART treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.5694/mja16.01435
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1925514543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1925514543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3744-4e903445436a69e50f22f474e2e2028f59fe3a8e1482af6e38b0a57227a6f0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPHDEQhK0oKGwgp9wjHyNFQ_z2TG4bBHmIxwUkxGXU622HQTM74B4H7b_Hu0ty5FIuS5-r28XYRymOrGvM1-EepDsS0mj7hs2kVq6y2vu3bCaEspVXzc0-e090X67SKv-O7avaO-NkM2OPc6KOJlzyhA9pXOYwdX-RTxjuVmM__lnzbsXnmaYEfQccVkt-gU_8FqEv_hsPecg9bN_0G1l0abrjCSYkDsQHBMqp-DFyyiEg0SHbi9ATfng5D9j16cnV8c_q7PLHr-P5WRW0N6Yy2AhtjDXagWvQiqhUNN6gQiVUHW0TUUON0tQKokNdLwRYr5QHF0UAfcA-73LLtx4z0tQOHQXsy944Zmplo6yVmwEF_bJDQxqJEsb2IXUDpHUrRbvpuN123G47LvSnl-C8GHD5n_1XagH8Dnjqely_ltWe_56rq-9bL4s8AygOiMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1925514543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chambers, Georgina M ; Paul, Repon C ; Harris, Katie ; Fitzgerald, Oisin ; Boothroyd, Clare V ; Rombauts, Luk ; Chapman, Michael G ; Jorm, Louisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Georgina M ; Paul, Repon C ; Harris, Katie ; Fitzgerald, Oisin ; Boothroyd, Clare V ; Rombauts, Luk ; Chapman, Michael G ; Jorm, Louisa</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To estimate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) following repeated assisted reproductive technology (ART) ovarian stimulation cycles, including all fresh and frozen/thaw embryo transfers (complete cycles). Design, setting and participants: Prospective follow‐up of 56 652 women commencing ART in Australian and New Zealand during 2009–2012, and followed until 2014 or the first treatment‐dependent live birth. Main outcome measures: CLBRs and cycle‐specific live birth rates were calculated for up to eight cycles, stratified by the age of the women (&lt; 30, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, &gt; 44 years). Conservative CLBRs assumed that women discontinuing treatment had no chance of achieving a live birth if had they continued treatment; optimal CLBRs assumed that they would have had the same chance as women who continued treatment. Results: The overall CLBR was 32.7% (95% CI, 32.2–33.1%) in the first cycle, rising by the eighth cycle to 54.3% (95% CI, 53.9–54.7%) (conservative) and 77.2% (95% CI, 76.5–77.9%) (optimal). The CLBR decreased with age and number of complete cycles. For women who commenced ART treatment before 30 years of age, the CLBR for the first complete cycle was 43.7% (95% CI, 42.6–44.7%), rising to 69.2% (95% CI, 68.2–70.1%) (conservative) and 92.8% (95% CI, 91.6–94.0) (optimal) for the seventh cycle. For women aged 40–44 years, the CLBR was 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1–11.3%) for the first complete cycle, rising to 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2–21.8%) (conservative) and 37.9% (95% CI, 35.9–39.9%) (optimal) for the eighth cycle. Conclusion: CLBRs based on complete cycles are meaningful estimates of ART success, reflecting contemporary clinical practice and encouraging safe practice. These estimates can be used when counselling patients and to inform public policy on ART treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-729X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1326-5377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5694/mja16.01435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28764619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Adult ; Australia ; Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Live Birth ; Middle Aged ; New Zealand ; Ovulation Induction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Women's health</subject><ispartof>Medical journal of Australia, 2017-08, Vol.207 (3), p.114-118</ispartof><rights>2017 AMPCo Pty Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3744-4e903445436a69e50f22f474e2e2028f59fe3a8e1482af6e38b0a57227a6f0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3744-4e903445436a69e50f22f474e2e2028f59fe3a8e1482af6e38b0a57227a6f0ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.5694%2Fmja16.01435$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5694%2Fmja16.01435$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Georgina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Repon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Oisin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boothroyd, Clare V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombauts, Luk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorm, Louisa</creatorcontrib><title>Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success</title><title>Medical journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><description>Objectives: To estimate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) following repeated assisted reproductive technology (ART) ovarian stimulation cycles, including all fresh and frozen/thaw embryo transfers (complete cycles). Design, setting and participants: Prospective follow‐up of 56 652 women commencing ART in Australian and New Zealand during 2009–2012, and followed until 2014 or the first treatment‐dependent live birth. Main outcome measures: CLBRs and cycle‐specific live birth rates were calculated for up to eight cycles, stratified by the age of the women (&lt; 30, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, &gt; 44 years). Conservative CLBRs assumed that women discontinuing treatment had no chance of achieving a live birth if had they continued treatment; optimal CLBRs assumed that they would have had the same chance as women who continued treatment. Results: The overall CLBR was 32.7% (95% CI, 32.2–33.1%) in the first cycle, rising by the eighth cycle to 54.3% (95% CI, 53.9–54.7%) (conservative) and 77.2% (95% CI, 76.5–77.9%) (optimal). The CLBR decreased with age and number of complete cycles. For women who commenced ART treatment before 30 years of age, the CLBR for the first complete cycle was 43.7% (95% CI, 42.6–44.7%), rising to 69.2% (95% CI, 68.2–70.1%) (conservative) and 92.8% (95% CI, 91.6–94.0) (optimal) for the seventh cycle. For women aged 40–44 years, the CLBR was 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1–11.3%) for the first complete cycle, rising to 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2–21.8%) (conservative) and 37.9% (95% CI, 35.9–39.9%) (optimal) for the eighth cycle. Conclusion: CLBRs based on complete cycles are meaningful estimates of ART success, reflecting contemporary clinical practice and encouraging safe practice. These estimates can be used when counselling patients and to inform public policy on ART treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Live Birth</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Women's health</subject><issn>0025-729X</issn><issn>1326-5377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPHDEQhK0oKGwgp9wjHyNFQ_z2TG4bBHmIxwUkxGXU622HQTM74B4H7b_Hu0ty5FIuS5-r28XYRymOrGvM1-EepDsS0mj7hs2kVq6y2vu3bCaEspVXzc0-e090X67SKv-O7avaO-NkM2OPc6KOJlzyhA9pXOYwdX-RTxjuVmM__lnzbsXnmaYEfQccVkt-gU_8FqEv_hsPecg9bN_0G1l0abrjCSYkDsQHBMqp-DFyyiEg0SHbi9ATfng5D9j16cnV8c_q7PLHr-P5WRW0N6Yy2AhtjDXagWvQiqhUNN6gQiVUHW0TUUON0tQKokNdLwRYr5QHF0UAfcA-73LLtx4z0tQOHQXsy944Zmplo6yVmwEF_bJDQxqJEsb2IXUDpHUrRbvpuN123G47LvSnl-C8GHD5n_1XagH8Dnjqely_ltWe_56rq-9bL4s8AygOiMo</recordid><startdate>20170807</startdate><enddate>20170807</enddate><creator>Chambers, Georgina M</creator><creator>Paul, Repon C</creator><creator>Harris, Katie</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Oisin</creator><creator>Boothroyd, Clare V</creator><creator>Rombauts, Luk</creator><creator>Chapman, Michael G</creator><creator>Jorm, Louisa</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170807</creationdate><title>Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success</title><author>Chambers, Georgina M ; Paul, Repon C ; Harris, Katie ; Fitzgerald, Oisin ; Boothroyd, Clare V ; Rombauts, Luk ; Chapman, Michael G ; Jorm, Louisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3744-4e903445436a69e50f22f474e2e2028f59fe3a8e1482af6e38b0a57227a6f0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Live Birth</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Women's health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Georgina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Repon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Oisin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boothroyd, Clare V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombauts, Luk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Michael G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorm, Louisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chambers, Georgina M</au><au>Paul, Repon C</au><au>Harris, Katie</au><au>Fitzgerald, Oisin</au><au>Boothroyd, Clare V</au><au>Rombauts, Luk</au><au>Chapman, Michael G</au><au>Jorm, Louisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success</atitle><jtitle>Medical journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Med J Aust</addtitle><date>2017-08-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>207</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>114-118</pages><issn>0025-729X</issn><eissn>1326-5377</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To estimate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) following repeated assisted reproductive technology (ART) ovarian stimulation cycles, including all fresh and frozen/thaw embryo transfers (complete cycles). Design, setting and participants: Prospective follow‐up of 56 652 women commencing ART in Australian and New Zealand during 2009–2012, and followed until 2014 or the first treatment‐dependent live birth. Main outcome measures: CLBRs and cycle‐specific live birth rates were calculated for up to eight cycles, stratified by the age of the women (&lt; 30, 30–34, 35–39, 40–44, &gt; 44 years). Conservative CLBRs assumed that women discontinuing treatment had no chance of achieving a live birth if had they continued treatment; optimal CLBRs assumed that they would have had the same chance as women who continued treatment. Results: The overall CLBR was 32.7% (95% CI, 32.2–33.1%) in the first cycle, rising by the eighth cycle to 54.3% (95% CI, 53.9–54.7%) (conservative) and 77.2% (95% CI, 76.5–77.9%) (optimal). The CLBR decreased with age and number of complete cycles. For women who commenced ART treatment before 30 years of age, the CLBR for the first complete cycle was 43.7% (95% CI, 42.6–44.7%), rising to 69.2% (95% CI, 68.2–70.1%) (conservative) and 92.8% (95% CI, 91.6–94.0) (optimal) for the seventh cycle. For women aged 40–44 years, the CLBR was 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1–11.3%) for the first complete cycle, rising to 21.0% (95% CI, 20.2–21.8%) (conservative) and 37.9% (95% CI, 35.9–39.9%) (optimal) for the eighth cycle. Conclusion: CLBRs based on complete cycles are meaningful estimates of ART success, reflecting contemporary clinical practice and encouraging safe practice. These estimates can be used when counselling patients and to inform public policy on ART treatment.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>28764619</pmid><doi>10.5694/mja16.01435</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-729X
ispartof Medical journal of Australia, 2017-08, Vol.207 (3), p.114-118
issn 0025-729X
1326-5377
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1925514543
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Australia
Embryo Transfer - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Live Birth
Middle Aged
New Zealand
Ovulation Induction - statistics & numerical data
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Women's health
title Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A11%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20in%20Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand:%20cumulative%20live%20birth%20rates%20as%20measures%20of%20success&rft.jtitle=Medical%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Chambers,%20Georgina%20M&rft.date=2017-08-07&rft.volume=207&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=114-118&rft.issn=0025-729X&rft.eissn=1326-5377&rft_id=info:doi/10.5694/mja16.01435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1925514543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1925514543&rft_id=info:pmid/28764619&rfr_iscdi=true