Great expectations: An analysis of researchers' and policy makers' perceptions of the potential value of the Australian indigenous burden of disease study for policy

Summary The “Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples” was commissioned by the Australian government as part of the Australian Burden of Disease study. This paper explores the extent to which key actors in the research and policy communities expected the Indigeno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of health planning and management 2018-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e181-e193
Hauptverfasser: Katz, Aaron, Gajjar, Deepa, Zwi, Anthony B., Hill, Peter S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e193
container_issue 1
container_start_page e181
container_title The International journal of health planning and management
container_volume 33
creator Katz, Aaron
Gajjar, Deepa
Zwi, Anthony B.
Hill, Peter S.
description Summary The “Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples” was commissioned by the Australian government as part of the Australian Burden of Disease study. This paper explores the extent to which key actors in the research and policy communities expected the Indigenous Burden of Disease study's findings to inform, influence, or drive federal decisions concerning Indigenous health in Australia. This qualitative research undertook interviews with 13 key informants with significant involvement in the Indigenous Burden of Disease study: six researchers, five policy makers, and two knowledge brokers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, and the findings were triangulated with a review of the literature. Policy makers and researchers anticipated that the Indigenous Burden of Disease study would improve the available information for policy deliberations about Indigenous health. Beyond that, their expectations about its policy influence differed substantially, with researchers more confident of the study's capacity to guide health priorities, and policy makers situating findings in the context of other critical inputs. Expectations of policy influence are shaped by the disciplinary perspectives of actors, and their relationship to policy outcomes and cannot be examined without also considering the policy, political, and financing context of the study being analyzed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hpm.2445
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924901874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2017671164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-eeb8b2cbba0e541fa96d97c3a3058e222edeedfd3a402f8b0bfc5178b8efaf5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi1ERbcFiV-ALHGglxTbidcOt1XVD6RWcIBzNLHHrIvzgZ0A-UH8T7zbLUhInEaaeeYZyy8hLzk754yJt9uxOxdVJZ-QFWd1XXAl-VOyYqqqi7WS5TE5SemesTzj9TNyLLSSWpRyRX5dR4SJ4s8RzQSTH_r0jm56Cj2EJflEB0cjJoRothjTmzywdByCNwvt4Ou-NWI0OO53d_i0xUxM2E8eAv0OYcbH9mZOU4Tgoae-t_4L9sOcaDtHi_2OsT5fSkjTNNuFuiEeTj0nRw5CwheHeko-X11-urgpbj9cv7_Y3BamVFoWiK1uhWlbYCgr7qBe21qZEkomNQoh0CJaZ0uomHC6Za0zkivdanTgpCtPydmDd4zDtxnT1HQ-GQwBeswvbXgtqppxraqMvv4HvR_mmH8tNYJxtVacr6u_QhOHlCK6Zoy-g7g0nDW76JocXbOLLqOvDsK57dD-AR-zykDxAPzwAZf_ipqbj3d74W98aKau</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017671164</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Great expectations: An analysis of researchers' and policy makers' perceptions of the potential value of the Australian indigenous burden of disease study for policy</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Katz, Aaron ; Gajjar, Deepa ; Zwi, Anthony B. ; Hill, Peter S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Katz, Aaron ; Gajjar, Deepa ; Zwi, Anthony B. ; Hill, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The “Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples” was commissioned by the Australian government as part of the Australian Burden of Disease study. This paper explores the extent to which key actors in the research and policy communities expected the Indigenous Burden of Disease study's findings to inform, influence, or drive federal decisions concerning Indigenous health in Australia. This qualitative research undertook interviews with 13 key informants with significant involvement in the Indigenous Burden of Disease study: six researchers, five policy makers, and two knowledge brokers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, and the findings were triangulated with a review of the literature. Policy makers and researchers anticipated that the Indigenous Burden of Disease study would improve the available information for policy deliberations about Indigenous health. Beyond that, their expectations about its policy influence differed substantially, with researchers more confident of the study's capacity to guide health priorities, and policy makers situating findings in the context of other critical inputs. Expectations of policy influence are shaped by the disciplinary perspectives of actors, and their relationship to policy outcomes and cannot be examined without also considering the policy, political, and financing context of the study being analyzed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-6753</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1099-1751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1751</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2445</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28758235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aboriginal Australians ; Administrative Personnel - psychology ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Australia ; Australia - epidemiology ; Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples ; burden of disease ; Comparative analysis ; Cost of Illness ; Disease ; evidence for policy ; Expectations ; Health ; Health Policy ; Health risk assessment ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Indigenous health ; Indigenous peoples ; Injuries ; Interviews as Topic ; Literature reviews ; policy ; Policy making ; Qualitative research ; Research Personnel - psychology ; Researchers ; Respondents</subject><ispartof>The International journal of health planning and management, 2018-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e181-e193</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-eeb8b2cbba0e541fa96d97c3a3058e222edeedfd3a402f8b0bfc5178b8efaf5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-eeb8b2cbba0e541fa96d97c3a3058e222edeedfd3a402f8b0bfc5178b8efaf5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhpm.2445$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhpm.2445$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28758235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katz, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajjar, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwi, Anthony B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><title>Great expectations: An analysis of researchers' and policy makers' perceptions of the potential value of the Australian indigenous burden of disease study for policy</title><title>The International journal of health planning and management</title><addtitle>Int J Health Plann Manage</addtitle><description>Summary The “Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples” was commissioned by the Australian government as part of the Australian Burden of Disease study. This paper explores the extent to which key actors in the research and policy communities expected the Indigenous Burden of Disease study's findings to inform, influence, or drive federal decisions concerning Indigenous health in Australia. This qualitative research undertook interviews with 13 key informants with significant involvement in the Indigenous Burden of Disease study: six researchers, five policy makers, and two knowledge brokers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, and the findings were triangulated with a review of the literature. Policy makers and researchers anticipated that the Indigenous Burden of Disease study would improve the available information for policy deliberations about Indigenous health. Beyond that, their expectations about its policy influence differed substantially, with researchers more confident of the study's capacity to guide health priorities, and policy makers situating findings in the context of other critical inputs. Expectations of policy influence are shaped by the disciplinary perspectives of actors, and their relationship to policy outcomes and cannot be examined without also considering the policy, political, and financing context of the study being analyzed.</description><subject>Aboriginal Australians</subject><subject>Administrative Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples</subject><subject>burden of disease</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>evidence for policy</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indigenous health</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><issn>0749-6753</issn><issn>1099-1751</issn><issn>1099-1751</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi1ERbcFiV-ALHGglxTbidcOt1XVD6RWcIBzNLHHrIvzgZ0A-UH8T7zbLUhInEaaeeYZyy8hLzk754yJt9uxOxdVJZ-QFWd1XXAl-VOyYqqqi7WS5TE5SemesTzj9TNyLLSSWpRyRX5dR4SJ4s8RzQSTH_r0jm56Cj2EJflEB0cjJoRothjTmzywdByCNwvt4Ou-NWI0OO53d_i0xUxM2E8eAv0OYcbH9mZOU4Tgoae-t_4L9sOcaDtHi_2OsT5fSkjTNNuFuiEeTj0nRw5CwheHeko-X11-urgpbj9cv7_Y3BamVFoWiK1uhWlbYCgr7qBe21qZEkomNQoh0CJaZ0uomHC6Za0zkivdanTgpCtPydmDd4zDtxnT1HQ-GQwBeswvbXgtqppxraqMvv4HvR_mmH8tNYJxtVacr6u_QhOHlCK6Zoy-g7g0nDW76JocXbOLLqOvDsK57dD-AR-zykDxAPzwAZf_ipqbj3d74W98aKau</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Katz, Aaron</creator><creator>Gajjar, Deepa</creator><creator>Zwi, Anthony B.</creator><creator>Hill, Peter S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Great expectations: An analysis of researchers' and policy makers' perceptions of the potential value of the Australian indigenous burden of disease study for policy</title><author>Katz, Aaron ; Gajjar, Deepa ; Zwi, Anthony B. ; Hill, Peter S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-eeb8b2cbba0e541fa96d97c3a3058e222edeedfd3a402f8b0bfc5178b8efaf5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aboriginal Australians</topic><topic>Administrative Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples</topic><topic>burden of disease</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>evidence for policy</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indigenous health</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katz, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajjar, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwi, Anthony B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Peter S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of health planning and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katz, Aaron</au><au>Gajjar, Deepa</au><au>Zwi, Anthony B.</au><au>Hill, Peter S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Great expectations: An analysis of researchers' and policy makers' perceptions of the potential value of the Australian indigenous burden of disease study for policy</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of health planning and management</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Health Plann Manage</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e181</spage><epage>e193</epage><pages>e181-e193</pages><issn>0749-6753</issn><issn>1099-1751</issn><eissn>1099-1751</eissn><abstract>Summary The “Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples” was commissioned by the Australian government as part of the Australian Burden of Disease study. This paper explores the extent to which key actors in the research and policy communities expected the Indigenous Burden of Disease study's findings to inform, influence, or drive federal decisions concerning Indigenous health in Australia. This qualitative research undertook interviews with 13 key informants with significant involvement in the Indigenous Burden of Disease study: six researchers, five policy makers, and two knowledge brokers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, and the findings were triangulated with a review of the literature. Policy makers and researchers anticipated that the Indigenous Burden of Disease study would improve the available information for policy deliberations about Indigenous health. Beyond that, their expectations about its policy influence differed substantially, with researchers more confident of the study's capacity to guide health priorities, and policy makers situating findings in the context of other critical inputs. Expectations of policy influence are shaped by the disciplinary perspectives of actors, and their relationship to policy outcomes and cannot be examined without also considering the policy, political, and financing context of the study being analyzed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28758235</pmid><doi>10.1002/hpm.2445</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-6753
ispartof The International journal of health planning and management, 2018-01, Vol.33 (1), p.e181-e193
issn 0749-6753
1099-1751
1099-1751
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924901874
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index
subjects Aboriginal Australians
Administrative Personnel - psychology
Attitude of Health Personnel
Australia
Australia - epidemiology
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
burden of disease
Comparative analysis
Cost of Illness
Disease
evidence for policy
Expectations
Health
Health Policy
Health risk assessment
Health Services Research
Humans
Indigenous health
Indigenous peoples
Injuries
Interviews as Topic
Literature reviews
policy
Policy making
Qualitative research
Research Personnel - psychology
Researchers
Respondents
title Great expectations: An analysis of researchers' and policy makers' perceptions of the potential value of the Australian indigenous burden of disease study for policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Great%20expectations:%20An%20analysis%20of%20researchers'%20and%20policy%20makers'%20perceptions%20of%20the%20potential%20value%20of%20the%20Australian%20indigenous%20burden%20of%20disease%20study%20for%20policy&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20health%20planning%20and%20management&rft.au=Katz,%20Aaron&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e181&rft.epage=e193&rft.pages=e181-e193&rft.issn=0749-6753&rft.eissn=1099-1751&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hpm.2445&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2017671164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017671164&rft_id=info:pmid/28758235&rfr_iscdi=true