MEASURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN WHITE'S TREE FROGS (LITORIA CAERULEA) BY REBOUND TONOMETRY: COMPARING DEVICE, TIME OF DAY, AND MANUAL VERSUS CHEMICAL RESTRAINT METHODS
Ocular diseases reported in frogs include uveitis and glaucoma, which are associated with changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). The objectives of this study were to characterize the normal IOP for White's tree frogs (Litoria caerulea) using two types of rebound tonometers, and to assess whethe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine 2017-06, Vol.48 (2), p.413-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 413 |
container_title | Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Hausmann, Jennifer C Krisp, Ashley Sladky, Kurt Miller, Paul E Mans, Christoph |
description | Ocular diseases reported in frogs include uveitis and glaucoma, which are associated with changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). The objectives of this study were to characterize the normal IOP for White's tree frogs (Litoria caerulea) using two types of rebound tonometers, and to assess whether time of day or method of restraint affected IOP. Eighteen conscious, unrestrained, ophthalmologically normal frogs were used to measure IOP using TonoVet® and TonoLab® tonometers, at three time points during the day. In a subset of 12 frogs, IOP was measured while under manual restraint using the TonoVet. Anesthesia was induced in 9 frogs using two different concentrations of MS-222 (0.5 g/L and 2 g/L) in order to evaluate for changes in IOP with the TonoVet. Mean (± SD) IOP values for the TonoLab (16.8 ± 3.9 mm Hg) were significantly higher than TonoVet values (14.7 ± 1.6 mm Hg; P < 0.01). TonoVet IOP values did not significantly change with time of day. TonoLab values were significantly lower in the evening (1600–1800; 14.5 ± 3.1 mm Hg), compared with morning and midday measurements (0800–1000 and 1200–1400; 18.0 ± 3.8 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Manually restrained frogs had significantly lower IOP (13.4 ± 1.5 mm Hg) compared with unrestrained frogs (15.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Chemical restraint did not cause significant changes in IOP. Intraocular pressure can be measured with both types of rebound tonometers in White's tree frogs, but time of day and manual restraint can affect IOP values. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1638/2016-0268R.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924595575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26805636</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26805636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b348t-66c1a89654e82a39f26d63b84031729c50159536c186f8273966340bcf37b91e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v0zAYxi0EYmNw4wryjYGa4T-JY3PzUreNlMSTkwz1FCWZI3VqlxG3Bz4S3xJ3HXDjZPt9fn7eR3oAeI_RFWaUfyUIswARxs0VfgHOsaBxQDiJXvo7CkkQE4bOwBvn7pEnCQ5fgzPC41AQRs_Br1zJsjZpsYRpURmpkzqTBt4YVfqx8kP4fZVW6lMJK6MUXBi9LOFlllbapBImUpk6U_IzvF5Do651XcxhpQudq8qsv8FE5zfyyX2ubtNEzWCV5grqBZzL9QxKT-eyqGUGb5Up6xImK5WniX_7AD6OzwS91UrPy7fg1dBunX33fF6AeqGqZBVkenn8EXQ05PuAsR63XLAotJy0VAyE3THa8RBRHBPRRwhHIqKe4mzgJKaCMRqirh9o3Als6QW4PPk-TuOPg3X7Zrdxvd1u2wc7HlyDBQm9QxRHHp2d0H4anZvs0DxOm107_Wwwao7lNMdymqdyGuzxj8_Oh25n7_7Cf9rwwIcTcO_24_RPZxxFjDKvfznp3WYcH-z_t_0G6CGQxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924595575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MEASURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN WHITE'S TREE FROGS (LITORIA CAERULEA) BY REBOUND TONOMETRY: COMPARING DEVICE, TIME OF DAY, AND MANUAL VERSUS CHEMICAL RESTRAINT METHODS</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Hausmann, Jennifer C ; Krisp, Ashley ; Sladky, Kurt ; Miller, Paul E ; Mans, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Hausmann, Jennifer C ; Krisp, Ashley ; Sladky, Kurt ; Miller, Paul E ; Mans, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Ocular diseases reported in frogs include uveitis and glaucoma, which are associated with changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). The objectives of this study were to characterize the normal IOP for White's tree frogs (Litoria caerulea) using two types of rebound tonometers, and to assess whether time of day or method of restraint affected IOP. Eighteen conscious, unrestrained, ophthalmologically normal frogs were used to measure IOP using TonoVet® and TonoLab® tonometers, at three time points during the day. In a subset of 12 frogs, IOP was measured while under manual restraint using the TonoVet. Anesthesia was induced in 9 frogs using two different concentrations of MS-222 (0.5 g/L and 2 g/L) in order to evaluate for changes in IOP with the TonoVet. Mean (± SD) IOP values for the TonoLab (16.8 ± 3.9 mm Hg) were significantly higher than TonoVet values (14.7 ± 1.6 mm Hg; P < 0.01). TonoVet IOP values did not significantly change with time of day. TonoLab values were significantly lower in the evening (1600–1800; 14.5 ± 3.1 mm Hg), compared with morning and midday measurements (0800–1000 and 1200–1400; 18.0 ± 3.8 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Manually restrained frogs had significantly lower IOP (13.4 ± 1.5 mm Hg) compared with unrestrained frogs (15.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Chemical restraint did not cause significant changes in IOP. Intraocular pressure can be measured with both types of rebound tonometers in White's tree frogs, but time of day and manual restraint can affect IOP values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-7260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1638/2016-0268R.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28749263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</publisher><subject>Aminobenzoates - administration & dosage ; Aminobenzoates - pharmacology ; Anesthetics - administration & dosage ; Anesthetics - pharmacology ; Animals ; Circadian Rhythm ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; intraocular pressure ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Litoria caerulea ; MS-222 ; Ranidae - physiology ; rebound tonometry ; Restraint, Physical ; Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation ; Tonometry, Ocular - veterinary ; White's tree frogs</subject><ispartof>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine, 2017-06, Vol.48 (2), p.413-419</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2017 by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b348t-66c1a89654e82a39f26d63b84031729c50159536c186f8273966340bcf37b91e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b348t-66c1a89654e82a39f26d63b84031729c50159536c186f8273966340bcf37b91e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26805636$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26805636$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28749263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hausmann, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krisp, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sladky, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mans, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>MEASURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN WHITE'S TREE FROGS (LITORIA CAERULEA) BY REBOUND TONOMETRY: COMPARING DEVICE, TIME OF DAY, AND MANUAL VERSUS CHEMICAL RESTRAINT METHODS</title><title>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine</title><addtitle>J Zoo Wildl Med</addtitle><description>Ocular diseases reported in frogs include uveitis and glaucoma, which are associated with changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). The objectives of this study were to characterize the normal IOP for White's tree frogs (Litoria caerulea) using two types of rebound tonometers, and to assess whether time of day or method of restraint affected IOP. Eighteen conscious, unrestrained, ophthalmologically normal frogs were used to measure IOP using TonoVet® and TonoLab® tonometers, at three time points during the day. In a subset of 12 frogs, IOP was measured while under manual restraint using the TonoVet. Anesthesia was induced in 9 frogs using two different concentrations of MS-222 (0.5 g/L and 2 g/L) in order to evaluate for changes in IOP with the TonoVet. Mean (± SD) IOP values for the TonoLab (16.8 ± 3.9 mm Hg) were significantly higher than TonoVet values (14.7 ± 1.6 mm Hg; P < 0.01). TonoVet IOP values did not significantly change with time of day. TonoLab values were significantly lower in the evening (1600–1800; 14.5 ± 3.1 mm Hg), compared with morning and midday measurements (0800–1000 and 1200–1400; 18.0 ± 3.8 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Manually restrained frogs had significantly lower IOP (13.4 ± 1.5 mm Hg) compared with unrestrained frogs (15.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Chemical restraint did not cause significant changes in IOP. Intraocular pressure can be measured with both types of rebound tonometers in White's tree frogs, but time of day and manual restraint can affect IOP values.</description><subject>Aminobenzoates - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Aminobenzoates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anesthetics - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Litoria caerulea</subject><subject>MS-222</subject><subject>Ranidae - physiology</subject><subject>rebound tonometry</subject><subject>Restraint, Physical</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - veterinary</subject><subject>White's tree frogs</subject><issn>1042-7260</issn><issn>1937-2825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v0zAYxi0EYmNw4wryjYGa4T-JY3PzUreNlMSTkwz1FCWZI3VqlxG3Bz4S3xJ3HXDjZPt9fn7eR3oAeI_RFWaUfyUIswARxs0VfgHOsaBxQDiJXvo7CkkQE4bOwBvn7pEnCQ5fgzPC41AQRs_Br1zJsjZpsYRpURmpkzqTBt4YVfqx8kP4fZVW6lMJK6MUXBi9LOFlllbapBImUpk6U_IzvF5Do651XcxhpQudq8qsv8FE5zfyyX2ubtNEzWCV5grqBZzL9QxKT-eyqGUGb5Up6xImK5WniX_7AD6OzwS91UrPy7fg1dBunX33fF6AeqGqZBVkenn8EXQ05PuAsR63XLAotJy0VAyE3THa8RBRHBPRRwhHIqKe4mzgJKaCMRqirh9o3Als6QW4PPk-TuOPg3X7Zrdxvd1u2wc7HlyDBQm9QxRHHp2d0H4anZvs0DxOm107_Wwwao7lNMdymqdyGuzxj8_Oh25n7_7Cf9rwwIcTcO_24_RPZxxFjDKvfznp3WYcH-z_t_0G6CGQxw</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Hausmann, Jennifer C</creator><creator>Krisp, Ashley</creator><creator>Sladky, Kurt</creator><creator>Miller, Paul E</creator><creator>Mans, Christoph</creator><general>American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>MEASURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN WHITE'S TREE FROGS (LITORIA CAERULEA) BY REBOUND TONOMETRY: COMPARING DEVICE, TIME OF DAY, AND MANUAL VERSUS CHEMICAL RESTRAINT METHODS</title><author>Hausmann, Jennifer C ; Krisp, Ashley ; Sladky, Kurt ; Miller, Paul E ; Mans, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b348t-66c1a89654e82a39f26d63b84031729c50159536c186f8273966340bcf37b91e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aminobenzoates - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Aminobenzoates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anesthetics - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Litoria caerulea</topic><topic>MS-222</topic><topic>Ranidae - physiology</topic><topic>rebound tonometry</topic><topic>Restraint, Physical</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - veterinary</topic><topic>White's tree frogs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hausmann, Jennifer C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krisp, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sladky, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mans, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hausmann, Jennifer C</au><au>Krisp, Ashley</au><au>Sladky, Kurt</au><au>Miller, Paul E</au><au>Mans, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MEASURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN WHITE'S TREE FROGS (LITORIA CAERULEA) BY REBOUND TONOMETRY: COMPARING DEVICE, TIME OF DAY, AND MANUAL VERSUS CHEMICAL RESTRAINT METHODS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Zoo Wildl Med</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>413-419</pages><issn>1042-7260</issn><eissn>1937-2825</eissn><abstract>Ocular diseases reported in frogs include uveitis and glaucoma, which are associated with changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). The objectives of this study were to characterize the normal IOP for White's tree frogs (Litoria caerulea) using two types of rebound tonometers, and to assess whether time of day or method of restraint affected IOP. Eighteen conscious, unrestrained, ophthalmologically normal frogs were used to measure IOP using TonoVet® and TonoLab® tonometers, at three time points during the day. In a subset of 12 frogs, IOP was measured while under manual restraint using the TonoVet. Anesthesia was induced in 9 frogs using two different concentrations of MS-222 (0.5 g/L and 2 g/L) in order to evaluate for changes in IOP with the TonoVet. Mean (± SD) IOP values for the TonoLab (16.8 ± 3.9 mm Hg) were significantly higher than TonoVet values (14.7 ± 1.6 mm Hg; P < 0.01). TonoVet IOP values did not significantly change with time of day. TonoLab values were significantly lower in the evening (1600–1800; 14.5 ± 3.1 mm Hg), compared with morning and midday measurements (0800–1000 and 1200–1400; 18.0 ± 3.8 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Manually restrained frogs had significantly lower IOP (13.4 ± 1.5 mm Hg) compared with unrestrained frogs (15.3 ± 1.2 mm Hg; P < 0.01). Chemical restraint did not cause significant changes in IOP. Intraocular pressure can be measured with both types of rebound tonometers in White's tree frogs, but time of day and manual restraint can affect IOP values.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Zoo Veterinarians</pub><pmid>28749263</pmid><doi>10.1638/2016-0268R.1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-7260 |
ispartof | Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine, 2017-06, Vol.48 (2), p.413-419 |
issn | 1042-7260 1937-2825 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1924595575 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Aminobenzoates - administration & dosage Aminobenzoates - pharmacology Anesthetics - administration & dosage Anesthetics - pharmacology Animals Circadian Rhythm Dose-Response Relationship, Drug intraocular pressure Intraocular Pressure - physiology Litoria caerulea MS-222 Ranidae - physiology rebound tonometry Restraint, Physical Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation Tonometry, Ocular - veterinary White's tree frogs |
title | MEASURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN WHITE'S TREE FROGS (LITORIA CAERULEA) BY REBOUND TONOMETRY: COMPARING DEVICE, TIME OF DAY, AND MANUAL VERSUS CHEMICAL RESTRAINT METHODS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A59%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MEASURING%20INTRAOCULAR%20PRESSURE%20IN%20WHITE'S%20TREE%20FROGS%20(LITORIA%20CAERULEA)%20BY%20REBOUND%20TONOMETRY:%20COMPARING%20DEVICE,%20TIME%20OF%20DAY,%20AND%20MANUAL%20VERSUS%20CHEMICAL%20RESTRAINT%20METHODS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20zoo%20and%20wildlife%20medicine&rft.au=Hausmann,%20Jennifer%20C&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=413-419&rft.issn=1042-7260&rft.eissn=1937-2825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1638/2016-0268R.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26805636%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924595575&rft_id=info:pmid/28749263&rft_jstor_id=26805636&rfr_iscdi=true |