Effects of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip formulations on protozoan survival and bacterial survival and growth
Sheep dipping with organophosphate or synthetic pyrethroid-based formulations is still widely used by farmers in the UK to control ectoparasites and results in 175–220 million litres of spent sheep dip produced each year. Spent sheep dip may be diluted in animal slurry or water prior to disposal ont...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | FEMS microbiology ecology 2004-01, Vol.47 (1), p.121-127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 127 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | FEMS microbiology ecology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Boucard, Tatiana K. Parry, Jackie Jones, Keith Semple, Kirk T. |
description | Sheep dipping with organophosphate or synthetic pyrethroid-based formulations is still widely used by farmers in the UK to control ectoparasites and results in 175–220 million litres of spent sheep dip produced each year. Spent sheep dip may be diluted in animal slurry or water prior to disposal onto land. However, the effects of this practice on the microbial ecology of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems are still relatively unknown. This paper investigated the effect of Bayticol (synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip) and Ectomort (organophosphate sheep dip) concentrations on (i) the survival of 15 protozoan species, (ii) the recovery of the four species of amoebae, and (iii) bacterial survival and growth. This investigation found that overall Bayticol was less toxic to protozoa than Ectomort, with minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 0.03% (v/v) and 0.005 to 0.06% (v/v), respectively. Amoebic cysts remained viable and emerged from dormancy, thereby pointing to the potential for recovery of protozoan communities in contaminated environments. The presence of sheep dips did not affect bacterial survival and growth on agar; however, the five test bacteria were not able to utilise the sheep dips as sole carbon sources. These findings have implications for the contamination of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems, in that there is the potential for significant increases in microbial numbers, containing putative pathogens due to the diminution of bacteriophagous protozoan populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00253-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19244272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00253-8</oup_id><els_id>S0168649603002538</els_id><sourcerecordid>19244272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-bf3ac7c97b18d0b252c94ff34948ec530ddd5ef53aef602e6dc9142810be3dc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAURiMEotPCI4CyAZVFwL9JvKpQNQWkIhbA2nLs68YoEwfbmWpY8uR4JiOqSkhlY8vWOfde63NRvMDoLUa4fvc1L21VM1GfI_oGIcJp1T4qVpg3rKoFw4-L1V_kpDiN8QdCmFOGnhYnWDSYUE5Xxe-1taBTLL0tfbhRo596H6deJSjVaMq4G1MPyely2gVIffAuX_YAU2ncVFofNvOgkvNjLjGWU_DJ__JqLOMctm6rhkOVTukEweXTveub4G9T_6x4YtUQ4flxPyu-X62_XX6srr98-HT5_rrSXGBcdZYq3WjRdLg1qCOcaMGspUywFjSnyBjDwXKqwNaIQG20wIy0GHVATQbOitdL3TzkzxlikhsXNQyDGsHPUWJBGCMNeRhkDSIINRnkC6iDjzGAlVNwGxV2EiO5T0keUpL7CCSi8pCSbLP38thg7jZg7qxjLBl4dQRU1GqwQY3axTuOU1FjijMnFu7WDbD7v-7yav0Zk72LFtfP07_N6p5Z7ee-WBTIMW0dBBm1g1GDcSF_Imm8e-DlfwBQw9CW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14702007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip formulations on protozoan survival and bacterial survival and growth</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford Open</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Boucard, Tatiana K. ; Parry, Jackie ; Jones, Keith ; Semple, Kirk T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boucard, Tatiana K. ; Parry, Jackie ; Jones, Keith ; Semple, Kirk T.</creatorcontrib><description>Sheep dipping with organophosphate or synthetic pyrethroid-based formulations is still widely used by farmers in the UK to control ectoparasites and results in 175–220 million litres of spent sheep dip produced each year. Spent sheep dip may be diluted in animal slurry or water prior to disposal onto land. However, the effects of this practice on the microbial ecology of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems are still relatively unknown. This paper investigated the effect of Bayticol (synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip) and Ectomort (organophosphate sheep dip) concentrations on (i) the survival of 15 protozoan species, (ii) the recovery of the four species of amoebae, and (iii) bacterial survival and growth. This investigation found that overall Bayticol was less toxic to protozoa than Ectomort, with minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 0.03% (v/v) and 0.005 to 0.06% (v/v), respectively. Amoebic cysts remained viable and emerged from dormancy, thereby pointing to the potential for recovery of protozoan communities in contaminated environments. The presence of sheep dips did not affect bacterial survival and growth on agar; however, the five test bacteria were not able to utilise the sheep dips as sole carbon sources. These findings have implications for the contamination of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems, in that there is the potential for significant increases in microbial numbers, containing putative pathogens due to the diminution of bacteriophagous protozoan populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-6496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1574-6941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00253-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19712353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Action of physical and chemical agents on bacteria ; Agar ; Amoeba - classification ; Amoeba - drug effects ; Amoeba - growth & development ; Amoeba - isolation & purification ; Animals ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - growth & development ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bacteriology ; Bacterium ; Biological and medical sciences ; Culture Media ; Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control ; Environmental Pollutants - pharmacology ; Environmental Pollution ; Eukaryota - classification ; Eukaryota - drug effects ; Eukaryota - growth & development ; Eukaryota - isolation & purification ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Organophosphates - administration & dosage ; Organophosphates - pharmacology ; Parasitic Sensitivity Tests ; Protozoon ; Pyrethrins - administration & dosage ; Pyrethrins - pharmacology ; Risk Assessment ; Sheep dip formulation ; Sheep Diseases - parasitology ; Sheep Diseases - prevention & control ; Toxicity]]></subject><ispartof>FEMS microbiology ecology, 2004-01, Vol.47 (1), p.121-127</ispartof><rights>2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies</rights><rights>2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. 2003</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-bf3ac7c97b18d0b252c94ff34948ec530ddd5ef53aef602e6dc9142810be3dc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-bf3ac7c97b18d0b252c94ff34948ec530ddd5ef53aef602e6dc9142810be3dc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2FS0168-6496%2803%2900253-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2FS0168-6496%2803%2900253-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15396131$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19712353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boucard, Tatiana K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semple, Kirk T.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip formulations on protozoan survival and bacterial survival and growth</title><title>FEMS microbiology ecology</title><addtitle>FEMS Microbiol Ecol</addtitle><description>Sheep dipping with organophosphate or synthetic pyrethroid-based formulations is still widely used by farmers in the UK to control ectoparasites and results in 175–220 million litres of spent sheep dip produced each year. Spent sheep dip may be diluted in animal slurry or water prior to disposal onto land. However, the effects of this practice on the microbial ecology of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems are still relatively unknown. This paper investigated the effect of Bayticol (synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip) and Ectomort (organophosphate sheep dip) concentrations on (i) the survival of 15 protozoan species, (ii) the recovery of the four species of amoebae, and (iii) bacterial survival and growth. This investigation found that overall Bayticol was less toxic to protozoa than Ectomort, with minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 0.03% (v/v) and 0.005 to 0.06% (v/v), respectively. Amoebic cysts remained viable and emerged from dormancy, thereby pointing to the potential for recovery of protozoan communities in contaminated environments. The presence of sheep dips did not affect bacterial survival and growth on agar; however, the five test bacteria were not able to utilise the sheep dips as sole carbon sources. These findings have implications for the contamination of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems, in that there is the potential for significant increases in microbial numbers, containing putative pathogens due to the diminution of bacteriophagous protozoan populations.</description><subject>Action of physical and chemical agents on bacteria</subject><subject>Agar</subject><subject>Amoeba - classification</subject><subject>Amoeba - drug effects</subject><subject>Amoeba - growth & development</subject><subject>Amoeba - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth & development</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Bacterium</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution</subject><subject>Eukaryota - classification</subject><subject>Eukaryota - drug effects</subject><subject>Eukaryota - growth & development</subject><subject>Eukaryota - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organophosphates - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Organophosphates - pharmacology</subject><subject>Parasitic Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Protozoon</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pyrethrins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sheep dip formulation</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>0168-6496</issn><issn>1574-6941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAURiMEotPCI4CyAZVFwL9JvKpQNQWkIhbA2nLs68YoEwfbmWpY8uR4JiOqSkhlY8vWOfde63NRvMDoLUa4fvc1L21VM1GfI_oGIcJp1T4qVpg3rKoFw4-L1V_kpDiN8QdCmFOGnhYnWDSYUE5Xxe-1taBTLL0tfbhRo596H6deJSjVaMq4G1MPyely2gVIffAuX_YAU2ncVFofNvOgkvNjLjGWU_DJ__JqLOMctm6rhkOVTukEweXTveub4G9T_6x4YtUQ4flxPyu-X62_XX6srr98-HT5_rrSXGBcdZYq3WjRdLg1qCOcaMGspUywFjSnyBjDwXKqwNaIQG20wIy0GHVATQbOitdL3TzkzxlikhsXNQyDGsHPUWJBGCMNeRhkDSIINRnkC6iDjzGAlVNwGxV2EiO5T0keUpL7CCSi8pCSbLP38thg7jZg7qxjLBl4dQRU1GqwQY3axTuOU1FjijMnFu7WDbD7v-7yav0Zk72LFtfP07_N6p5Z7ee-WBTIMW0dBBm1g1GDcSF_Imm8e-DlfwBQw9CW</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Boucard, Tatiana K.</creator><creator>Parry, Jackie</creator><creator>Jones, Keith</creator><creator>Semple, Kirk T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Effects of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip formulations on protozoan survival and bacterial survival and growth</title><author>Boucard, Tatiana K. ; Parry, Jackie ; Jones, Keith ; Semple, Kirk T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5911-bf3ac7c97b18d0b252c94ff34948ec530ddd5ef53aef602e6dc9142810be3dc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Action of physical and chemical agents on bacteria</topic><topic>Agar</topic><topic>Amoeba - classification</topic><topic>Amoeba - drug effects</topic><topic>Amoeba - growth & development</topic><topic>Amoeba - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth & development</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Bacterium</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution</topic><topic>Eukaryota - classification</topic><topic>Eukaryota - drug effects</topic><topic>Eukaryota - growth & development</topic><topic>Eukaryota - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organophosphates - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Organophosphates - pharmacology</topic><topic>Parasitic Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Protozoon</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pyrethrins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sheep dip formulation</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boucard, Tatiana K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semple, Kirk T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>FEMS microbiology ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boucard, Tatiana K.</au><au>Parry, Jackie</au><au>Jones, Keith</au><au>Semple, Kirk T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip formulations on protozoan survival and bacterial survival and growth</atitle><jtitle>FEMS microbiology ecology</jtitle><addtitle>FEMS Microbiol Ecol</addtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>121-127</pages><issn>0168-6496</issn><eissn>1574-6941</eissn><abstract>Sheep dipping with organophosphate or synthetic pyrethroid-based formulations is still widely used by farmers in the UK to control ectoparasites and results in 175–220 million litres of spent sheep dip produced each year. Spent sheep dip may be diluted in animal slurry or water prior to disposal onto land. However, the effects of this practice on the microbial ecology of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems are still relatively unknown. This paper investigated the effect of Bayticol (synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip) and Ectomort (organophosphate sheep dip) concentrations on (i) the survival of 15 protozoan species, (ii) the recovery of the four species of amoebae, and (iii) bacterial survival and growth. This investigation found that overall Bayticol was less toxic to protozoa than Ectomort, with minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 0.03% (v/v) and 0.005 to 0.06% (v/v), respectively. Amoebic cysts remained viable and emerged from dormancy, thereby pointing to the potential for recovery of protozoan communities in contaminated environments. The presence of sheep dips did not affect bacterial survival and growth on agar; however, the five test bacteria were not able to utilise the sheep dips as sole carbon sources. These findings have implications for the contamination of animal slurries, soil and aquatic systems, in that there is the potential for significant increases in microbial numbers, containing putative pathogens due to the diminution of bacteriophagous protozoan populations.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19712353</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00253-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-6496 |
ispartof | FEMS microbiology ecology, 2004-01, Vol.47 (1), p.121-127 |
issn | 0168-6496 1574-6941 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19244272 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford Open; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Action of physical and chemical agents on bacteria Agar Amoeba - classification Amoeba - drug effects Amoeba - growth & development Amoeba - isolation & purification Animals Bacteria - classification Bacteria - drug effects Bacteria - growth & development Bacteria - isolation & purification Bacteriology Bacterium Biological and medical sciences Culture Media Ectoparasitic Infestations - prevention & control Environmental Pollutants - pharmacology Environmental Pollution Eukaryota - classification Eukaryota - drug effects Eukaryota - growth & development Eukaryota - isolation & purification Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Microbial Sensitivity Tests Microbiology Miscellaneous Organophosphates - administration & dosage Organophosphates - pharmacology Parasitic Sensitivity Tests Protozoon Pyrethrins - administration & dosage Pyrethrins - pharmacology Risk Assessment Sheep dip formulation Sheep Diseases - parasitology Sheep Diseases - prevention & control Toxicity |
title | Effects of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip formulations on protozoan survival and bacterial survival and growth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A34%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20organophosphate%20and%20synthetic%20pyrethroid%20sheep%20dip%20formulations%20on%20protozoan%20survival%20and%20bacterial%20survival%20and%20growth&rft.jtitle=FEMS%20microbiology%20ecology&rft.au=Boucard,%20Tatiana%20K.&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=121-127&rft.issn=0168-6496&rft.eissn=1574-6941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00253-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19244272%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14702007&rft_id=info:pmid/19712353&rft_oup_id=10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00253-8&rft_els_id=S0168649603002538&rfr_iscdi=true |