Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review
Goals of work The beneficial effects of exercise in cancer patients are reasonably well-established, although research in this field has predominantly investigated cancer patients in the earlier stages of disease. However, the most recent evidence surrounding exercise interventions in advanced cance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2017-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3031-3050 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3050 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3031 |
container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Heywood, Reginald McCarthy, Alexandra L. Skinner, Tina L. |
description | Goals of work
The beneficial effects of exercise in cancer patients are reasonably well-established, although research in this field has predominantly investigated cancer patients in the earlier stages of disease. However, the most recent evidence surrounding exercise interventions in advanced cancer populations has yet to be systematically evaluated. This review critically analyses the safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer.
Methods
All randomised, non-randomised and prospective observational trials of exercise training interventions in patients with advanced cancer were included. ‘Safety’ was defined as the number and severity of reported adverse events during exercise training. ‘Feasibility’ was determined by participant adherence, attendance and/or study completion rates.
Results
A total of 25 studies involving 1088 patients were included: 16 randomised controlled and nine prospective observational cohort trials. Seven studies included advanced lung cancer patients exclusively, while eight involved patients with various cancer diagnoses. Aerobic exercise was investigated in five studies, resistance training in two studies and combination training (aerobic and resistance) in 14 studies. Six minor adverse events were reported due to exercise. All of these were musculoskeletal in nature, resulting in two participants’ withdrawal from the study. Exercise adherence ranged from 65 to 89% but was only described in nine studies. Attendance at each exercise session was described in a further nine studies, ranging from 59 to 100%.
Conclusions
Implementation of exercise interventions appears to be safe and feasible in advanced cancer clinical practice, although targeted studies are required to determine the optimal exercise dose for specific cancer diagnoses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-017-3827-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1923114044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A502562239</galeid><sourcerecordid>A502562239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-fe404904411f381c716cf00ae643c4b3f6d46b721b0cad0458d1665095a5eb7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFH8AFWeLCJWX8FSfcqgoKUiUObc-W44yLq8RZbO-W_fd4teVTIB9GYz_vO2O9hLxkcMYA9NsMoDg0wHQjOq4beEJWTArRaCH6p2QFvWSNFEodk5Oc76GCWvFn5Jh3WjKm2xXx19Zj2VEbR-rR5jCEKdR-8RS_YXIhIw2xYNpiLGGJuXZ0bUuobaYPoXyhdtza6HCkbl_SO2pp3uWCc6UcTbgN-PCcHHk7ZXzxWE_J7Yf3Nxcfm6vPl58uzq8aJ0VfGo8SZA-yLudFx5xmrfMAFlspnByEb0fZDpqzAZwdQapuZG2roFdW4aBRnJI3B991Wr5uMBczh-xwmmzEZZMN67lgrA6RFX39F3q_bFKs21VKiE5x1Xa_qDs7oQnRLyVZtzc15woqwrnoK3X2D6qeEefglog-1Ps_BOwgcGnJOaE36xRmm3aGgdlnaw7ZmhqZ2WdroGpePS68GWYcfyp-hFkBfgByfYp3mH770X9dvwNbYaz-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933852568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Heywood, Reginald ; McCarthy, Alexandra L. ; Skinner, Tina L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Reginald ; McCarthy, Alexandra L. ; Skinner, Tina L.</creatorcontrib><description>Goals of work
The beneficial effects of exercise in cancer patients are reasonably well-established, although research in this field has predominantly investigated cancer patients in the earlier stages of disease. However, the most recent evidence surrounding exercise interventions in advanced cancer populations has yet to be systematically evaluated. This review critically analyses the safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer.
Methods
All randomised, non-randomised and prospective observational trials of exercise training interventions in patients with advanced cancer were included. ‘Safety’ was defined as the number and severity of reported adverse events during exercise training. ‘Feasibility’ was determined by participant adherence, attendance and/or study completion rates.
Results
A total of 25 studies involving 1088 patients were included: 16 randomised controlled and nine prospective observational cohort trials. Seven studies included advanced lung cancer patients exclusively, while eight involved patients with various cancer diagnoses. Aerobic exercise was investigated in five studies, resistance training in two studies and combination training (aerobic and resistance) in 14 studies. Six minor adverse events were reported due to exercise. All of these were musculoskeletal in nature, resulting in two participants’ withdrawal from the study. Exercise adherence ranged from 65 to 89% but was only described in nine studies. Attendance at each exercise session was described in a further nine studies, ranging from 59 to 100%.
Conclusions
Implementation of exercise interventions appears to be safe and feasible in advanced cancer clinical practice, although targeted studies are required to determine the optimal exercise dose for specific cancer diagnoses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3827-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28741176</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Cancer research ; Care and treatment ; Disease Progression ; Evidence-based medicine ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise therapy ; Exercise Therapy - adverse effects ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Exercise Tolerance - physiology ; Feasibility Studies ; Fitness training programs ; Humans ; Intervention ; Lung cancer ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Observational Studies as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Oncology ; Pain Medicine ; Patient safety ; Physical fitness ; Quality of Life ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Resistance Training - adverse effects ; Resistance Training - methods ; Review Article ; Systematic review ; Training ; Weight training</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2017-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3031-3050</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Supportive Care in Cancer is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-fe404904411f381c716cf00ae643c4b3f6d46b721b0cad0458d1665095a5eb7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-fe404904411f381c716cf00ae643c4b3f6d46b721b0cad0458d1665095a5eb7e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6628-3486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-017-3827-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-017-3827-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28741176$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Reginald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Alexandra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Tina L.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Goals of work
The beneficial effects of exercise in cancer patients are reasonably well-established, although research in this field has predominantly investigated cancer patients in the earlier stages of disease. However, the most recent evidence surrounding exercise interventions in advanced cancer populations has yet to be systematically evaluated. This review critically analyses the safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer.
Methods
All randomised, non-randomised and prospective observational trials of exercise training interventions in patients with advanced cancer were included. ‘Safety’ was defined as the number and severity of reported adverse events during exercise training. ‘Feasibility’ was determined by participant adherence, attendance and/or study completion rates.
Results
A total of 25 studies involving 1088 patients were included: 16 randomised controlled and nine prospective observational cohort trials. Seven studies included advanced lung cancer patients exclusively, while eight involved patients with various cancer diagnoses. Aerobic exercise was investigated in five studies, resistance training in two studies and combination training (aerobic and resistance) in 14 studies. Six minor adverse events were reported due to exercise. All of these were musculoskeletal in nature, resulting in two participants’ withdrawal from the study. Exercise adherence ranged from 65 to 89% but was only described in nine studies. Attendance at each exercise session was described in a further nine studies, ranging from 59 to 100%.
Conclusions
Implementation of exercise interventions appears to be safe and feasible in advanced cancer clinical practice, although targeted studies are required to determine the optimal exercise dose for specific cancer diagnoses.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise therapy</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Exercise Tolerance - physiology</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Fitness training programs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Resistance Training - adverse effects</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Weight training</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFH8AFWeLCJWX8FSfcqgoKUiUObc-W44yLq8RZbO-W_fd4teVTIB9GYz_vO2O9hLxkcMYA9NsMoDg0wHQjOq4beEJWTArRaCH6p2QFvWSNFEodk5Oc76GCWvFn5Jh3WjKm2xXx19Zj2VEbR-rR5jCEKdR-8RS_YXIhIw2xYNpiLGGJuXZ0bUuobaYPoXyhdtza6HCkbl_SO2pp3uWCc6UcTbgN-PCcHHk7ZXzxWE_J7Yf3Nxcfm6vPl58uzq8aJ0VfGo8SZA-yLudFx5xmrfMAFlspnByEb0fZDpqzAZwdQapuZG2roFdW4aBRnJI3B991Wr5uMBczh-xwmmzEZZMN67lgrA6RFX39F3q_bFKs21VKiE5x1Xa_qDs7oQnRLyVZtzc15woqwrnoK3X2D6qeEefglog-1Ps_BOwgcGnJOaE36xRmm3aGgdlnaw7ZmhqZ2WdroGpePS68GWYcfyp-hFkBfgByfYp3mH770X9dvwNbYaz-</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Heywood, Reginald</creator><creator>McCarthy, Alexandra L.</creator><creator>Skinner, Tina L.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-3486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review</title><author>Heywood, Reginald ; McCarthy, Alexandra L. ; Skinner, Tina L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-fe404904411f381c716cf00ae643c4b3f6d46b721b0cad0458d1665095a5eb7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise therapy</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Exercise Tolerance - physiology</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Fitness training programs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Resistance Training - adverse effects</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Weight training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Reginald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Alexandra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skinner, Tina L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heywood, Reginald</au><au>McCarthy, Alexandra L.</au><au>Skinner, Tina L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3031</spage><epage>3050</epage><pages>3031-3050</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Goals of work
The beneficial effects of exercise in cancer patients are reasonably well-established, although research in this field has predominantly investigated cancer patients in the earlier stages of disease. However, the most recent evidence surrounding exercise interventions in advanced cancer populations has yet to be systematically evaluated. This review critically analyses the safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer.
Methods
All randomised, non-randomised and prospective observational trials of exercise training interventions in patients with advanced cancer were included. ‘Safety’ was defined as the number and severity of reported adverse events during exercise training. ‘Feasibility’ was determined by participant adherence, attendance and/or study completion rates.
Results
A total of 25 studies involving 1088 patients were included: 16 randomised controlled and nine prospective observational cohort trials. Seven studies included advanced lung cancer patients exclusively, while eight involved patients with various cancer diagnoses. Aerobic exercise was investigated in five studies, resistance training in two studies and combination training (aerobic and resistance) in 14 studies. Six minor adverse events were reported due to exercise. All of these were musculoskeletal in nature, resulting in two participants’ withdrawal from the study. Exercise adherence ranged from 65 to 89% but was only described in nine studies. Attendance at each exercise session was described in a further nine studies, ranging from 59 to 100%.
Conclusions
Implementation of exercise interventions appears to be safe and feasible in advanced cancer clinical practice, although targeted studies are required to determine the optimal exercise dose for specific cancer diagnoses.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28741176</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-017-3827-0</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6628-3486</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2017-10, Vol.25 (10), p.3031-3050 |
issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1923114044 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Analysis Cancer Cancer patients Cancer research Care and treatment Disease Progression Evidence-based medicine Exercise Exercise - physiology Exercise therapy Exercise Therapy - adverse effects Exercise Therapy - methods Exercise Tolerance - physiology Feasibility Studies Fitness training programs Humans Intervention Lung cancer Medical diagnosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neoplasms - pathology Neoplasms - therapy Nursing Nursing Research Observational Studies as Topic - statistics & numerical data Oncology Pain Medicine Patient safety Physical fitness Quality of Life Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data Rehabilitation Medicine Resistance Training - adverse effects Resistance Training - methods Review Article Systematic review Training Weight training |
title | Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20feasibility%20of%20exercise%20interventions%20in%20patients%20with%20advanced%20cancer:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Heywood,%20Reginald&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3031&rft.epage=3050&rft.pages=3031-3050&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-017-3827-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA502562239%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933852568&rft_id=info:pmid/28741176&rft_galeid=A502562239&rfr_iscdi=true |