Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice

The benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based prostate cancer screening are controversial. We sought to determine the change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with the release of the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against screening in a high-volume co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologic oncology 2017-11, Vol.35 (11), p.663.e1-663.e7
Hauptverfasser: Gaylis, Franklin D., Choi, Jae E., Hamilton, Zachary, Dato, Paul, Cohen, Edward, Calabrese, Renee, Prime, Hilary, Rosenbaum, Aaron, Kader, Andrew Karim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 663.e7
container_issue 11
container_start_page 663.e1
container_title Urologic oncology
container_volume 35
creator Gaylis, Franklin D.
Choi, Jae E.
Hamilton, Zachary
Dato, Paul
Cohen, Edward
Calabrese, Renee
Prime, Hilary
Rosenbaum, Aaron
Kader, Andrew Karim
description The benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based prostate cancer screening are controversial. We sought to determine the change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with the release of the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against screening in a high-volume community-based urology practice. Characteristics of men presenting for an elevated PSA at a community urology practice from August 2011 to August 2015 were queried from a prospectively collected database. A retrospective analysis of presenting PSA, Gleason grade at biopsy, and prostatectomy as well as clinical and pathologic stage was performed. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Referrals for elevated PSA decreased from 933 in year 1 to 816 by year 4 (12.5% decrease) with a concomitant reduction in biopsies performed in newly referred men from 461 to 356 (22.8% decrease, P = 0.02). The proportion of men presenting with PSAs>10 increased from 28.1% to 36.8% (P = 0.009). First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased from 48.4% to 62.4% with a rise in the proportion having Gleason≥7 from 51.6% to 69.7% (P = 0.0001). Of the 578 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, there was a 19.4% increase in Gleason≥7 tumors (P = 0.01). Our findings demonstrate a decrease in elevated PSA referrals, increase in PSA at the time of referral, decrease in detection of low-risk disease, and increase in detection of intermediate-/high-risk disease in a high-volume, multisite, community-based urology practice, coinciding with the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against PSA screening. •Referral patterns for elevated PSA at a community urology practice were studied.•The time frame of data coincided with USPSTF recommendations against PSA screening.•PSA referrals decreased, whereas PSA values at the time of referral increased.•First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased, as did rate of Gleason≥7 on biopsy.•Coinciding with USPSTF release, referral patterns for elevated PSA are affected.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1923106329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078143917303447</els_id><sourcerecordid>1923106329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4e21a486fe95a13b2cdb7db393d024aa03e08d06e2f7c00b417a7bcbfa0e2cfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qVfn8CSAfe0kY24mTnBBalYKERCXgbDn2ZPFq41DbodpD_ztedsuVk-1Xz8x4HkLOGJQMmLxYlXOY1pM3JQfWlCBLqLsv5JC1jSh41cmv-Q5NW7BKdAfkKMYVAKtaxr6TA54hyWs4JP8Wz9ovkTpPX8IUk05IjfYGQ35jRJ8TN3lqJueNs84v6V-XnunTw--Hx2saTUD02zSgmcYRvX3nI9WJarqNZu_Spuh1REvfv7zc5NbaJGfwhHwb9Dri6f48Jk_XPx8XN8Xd_a_bxdVdYYSsU1EhZ7pq5YBdrZnoubF9Y3vRCQu80hoEQmtBIh8aA9BXrNFNb_pBA3IzaHFMfuz65h3_zBiTGl00uF5rj9McFeu4YCAF7zJa71CTdcSAg3oJbtRhoxiorXm1UnvzamtegVTZfK4734-Y-xHtR9V_1Rm43AGYF311GFQ0DrNp67K7pOzkPhnxBn79mzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1923106329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Gaylis, Franklin D. ; Choi, Jae E. ; Hamilton, Zachary ; Dato, Paul ; Cohen, Edward ; Calabrese, Renee ; Prime, Hilary ; Rosenbaum, Aaron ; Kader, Andrew Karim</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaylis, Franklin D. ; Choi, Jae E. ; Hamilton, Zachary ; Dato, Paul ; Cohen, Edward ; Calabrese, Renee ; Prime, Hilary ; Rosenbaum, Aaron ; Kader, Andrew Karim</creatorcontrib><description>The benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based prostate cancer screening are controversial. We sought to determine the change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with the release of the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against screening in a high-volume community-based urology practice. Characteristics of men presenting for an elevated PSA at a community urology practice from August 2011 to August 2015 were queried from a prospectively collected database. A retrospective analysis of presenting PSA, Gleason grade at biopsy, and prostatectomy as well as clinical and pathologic stage was performed. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Referrals for elevated PSA decreased from 933 in year 1 to 816 by year 4 (12.5% decrease) with a concomitant reduction in biopsies performed in newly referred men from 461 to 356 (22.8% decrease, P = 0.02). The proportion of men presenting with PSAs&gt;10 increased from 28.1% to 36.8% (P = 0.009). First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased from 48.4% to 62.4% with a rise in the proportion having Gleason≥7 from 51.6% to 69.7% (P = 0.0001). Of the 578 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, there was a 19.4% increase in Gleason≥7 tumors (P = 0.01). Our findings demonstrate a decrease in elevated PSA referrals, increase in PSA at the time of referral, decrease in detection of low-risk disease, and increase in detection of intermediate-/high-risk disease in a high-volume, multisite, community-based urology practice, coinciding with the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against PSA screening. •Referral patterns for elevated PSA at a community urology practice were studied.•The time frame of data coincided with USPSTF recommendations against PSA screening.•PSA referrals decreased, whereas PSA values at the time of referral increased.•First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased, as did rate of Gleason≥7 on biopsy.•Coinciding with USPSTF release, referral patterns for elevated PSA are affected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2496</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28736250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Community Health Services - methods ; Diagnosis ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Grade ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate - surgery ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; PSA ; Retrospective Studies ; Screening ; United States</subject><ispartof>Urologic oncology, 2017-11, Vol.35 (11), p.663.e1-663.e7</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4e21a486fe95a13b2cdb7db393d024aa03e08d06e2f7c00b417a7bcbfa0e2cfa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4e21a486fe95a13b2cdb7db393d024aa03e08d06e2f7c00b417a7bcbfa0e2cfa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28736250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaylis, Franklin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jae E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dato, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabrese, Renee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prime, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kader, Andrew Karim</creatorcontrib><title>Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice</title><title>Urologic oncology</title><addtitle>Urol Oncol</addtitle><description>The benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based prostate cancer screening are controversial. We sought to determine the change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with the release of the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against screening in a high-volume community-based urology practice. Characteristics of men presenting for an elevated PSA at a community urology practice from August 2011 to August 2015 were queried from a prospectively collected database. A retrospective analysis of presenting PSA, Gleason grade at biopsy, and prostatectomy as well as clinical and pathologic stage was performed. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Referrals for elevated PSA decreased from 933 in year 1 to 816 by year 4 (12.5% decrease) with a concomitant reduction in biopsies performed in newly referred men from 461 to 356 (22.8% decrease, P = 0.02). The proportion of men presenting with PSAs&gt;10 increased from 28.1% to 36.8% (P = 0.009). First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased from 48.4% to 62.4% with a rise in the proportion having Gleason≥7 from 51.6% to 69.7% (P = 0.0001). Of the 578 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, there was a 19.4% increase in Gleason≥7 tumors (P = 0.01). Our findings demonstrate a decrease in elevated PSA referrals, increase in PSA at the time of referral, decrease in detection of low-risk disease, and increase in detection of intermediate-/high-risk disease in a high-volume, multisite, community-based urology practice, coinciding with the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against PSA screening. •Referral patterns for elevated PSA at a community urology practice were studied.•The time frame of data coincided with USPSTF recommendations against PSA screening.•PSA referrals decreased, whereas PSA values at the time of referral increased.•First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased, as did rate of Gleason≥7 on biopsy.•Coinciding with USPSTF release, referral patterns for elevated PSA are affected.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Community Health Services - methods</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Grade</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate - surgery</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>PSA</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1078-1439</issn><issn>1873-2496</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qVfn8CSAfe0kY24mTnBBalYKERCXgbDn2ZPFq41DbodpD_ztedsuVk-1Xz8x4HkLOGJQMmLxYlXOY1pM3JQfWlCBLqLsv5JC1jSh41cmv-Q5NW7BKdAfkKMYVAKtaxr6TA54hyWs4JP8Wz9ovkTpPX8IUk05IjfYGQ35jRJ8TN3lqJueNs84v6V-XnunTw--Hx2saTUD02zSgmcYRvX3nI9WJarqNZu_Spuh1REvfv7zc5NbaJGfwhHwb9Dri6f48Jk_XPx8XN8Xd_a_bxdVdYYSsU1EhZ7pq5YBdrZnoubF9Y3vRCQu80hoEQmtBIh8aA9BXrNFNb_pBA3IzaHFMfuz65h3_zBiTGl00uF5rj9McFeu4YCAF7zJa71CTdcSAg3oJbtRhoxiorXm1UnvzamtegVTZfK4734-Y-xHtR9V_1Rm43AGYF311GFQ0DrNp67K7pOzkPhnxBn79mzw</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Gaylis, Franklin D.</creator><creator>Choi, Jae E.</creator><creator>Hamilton, Zachary</creator><creator>Dato, Paul</creator><creator>Cohen, Edward</creator><creator>Calabrese, Renee</creator><creator>Prime, Hilary</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, Aaron</creator><creator>Kader, Andrew Karim</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice</title><author>Gaylis, Franklin D. ; Choi, Jae E. ; Hamilton, Zachary ; Dato, Paul ; Cohen, Edward ; Calabrese, Renee ; Prime, Hilary ; Rosenbaum, Aaron ; Kader, Andrew Karim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4e21a486fe95a13b2cdb7db393d024aa03e08d06e2f7c00b417a7bcbfa0e2cfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Community Health Services - methods</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Grade</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate - surgery</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>PSA</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaylis, Franklin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jae E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dato, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calabrese, Renee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prime, Hilary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kader, Andrew Karim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaylis, Franklin D.</au><au>Choi, Jae E.</au><au>Hamilton, Zachary</au><au>Dato, Paul</au><au>Cohen, Edward</au><au>Calabrese, Renee</au><au>Prime, Hilary</au><au>Rosenbaum, Aaron</au><au>Kader, Andrew Karim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice</atitle><jtitle>Urologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>663.e1</spage><epage>663.e7</epage><pages>663.e1-663.e7</pages><issn>1078-1439</issn><eissn>1873-2496</eissn><abstract>The benefits of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based prostate cancer screening are controversial. We sought to determine the change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with the release of the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against screening in a high-volume community-based urology practice. Characteristics of men presenting for an elevated PSA at a community urology practice from August 2011 to August 2015 were queried from a prospectively collected database. A retrospective analysis of presenting PSA, Gleason grade at biopsy, and prostatectomy as well as clinical and pathologic stage was performed. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Referrals for elevated PSA decreased from 933 in year 1 to 816 by year 4 (12.5% decrease) with a concomitant reduction in biopsies performed in newly referred men from 461 to 356 (22.8% decrease, P = 0.02). The proportion of men presenting with PSAs&gt;10 increased from 28.1% to 36.8% (P = 0.009). First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased from 48.4% to 62.4% with a rise in the proportion having Gleason≥7 from 51.6% to 69.7% (P = 0.0001). Of the 578 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, there was a 19.4% increase in Gleason≥7 tumors (P = 0.01). Our findings demonstrate a decrease in elevated PSA referrals, increase in PSA at the time of referral, decrease in detection of low-risk disease, and increase in detection of intermediate-/high-risk disease in a high-volume, multisite, community-based urology practice, coinciding with the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommendations against PSA screening. •Referral patterns for elevated PSA at a community urology practice were studied.•The time frame of data coincided with USPSTF recommendations against PSA screening.•PSA referrals decreased, whereas PSA values at the time of referral increased.•First-time biopsy-positivity rate increased, as did rate of Gleason≥7 on biopsy.•Coinciding with USPSTF release, referral patterns for elevated PSA are affected.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28736250</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.059</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1439
ispartof Urologic oncology, 2017-11, Vol.35 (11), p.663.e1-663.e7
issn 1078-1439
1873-2496
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1923106329
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Community Health Services - methods
Diagnosis
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Grade
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prostate - pathology
Prostate - surgery
Prostate cancer
Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - prevention & control
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
PSA
Retrospective Studies
Screening
United States
title Change in prostate cancer presentation coinciding with USPSTF screening recommendations at a community-based urology practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T08%3A17%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Change%20in%20prostate%20cancer%20presentation%20coinciding%20with%20USPSTF%20screening%20recommendations%20at%20a%20community-based%20urology%20practice&rft.jtitle=Urologic%20oncology&rft.au=Gaylis,%20Franklin%20D.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=663.e1&rft.epage=663.e7&rft.pages=663.e1-663.e7&rft.issn=1078-1439&rft.eissn=1873-2496&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1923106329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1923106329&rft_id=info:pmid/28736250&rft_els_id=S1078143917303447&rfr_iscdi=true