communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality
We examined whether the quality (concentration) of incoming sucrose solutions returned by foraging honey bees affected the response thresholds of pre-foraging members of the colony. Six pairs of colonies were given ad libitum access to sucrose solution feeders. A colony from each pair was switched f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2004, Vol.55 (3), p.286-292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 292 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 286 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Pankiw, Tanya Nelson, Mindy Page, Robert E., Jr Fondrk, M. Kim |
description | We examined whether the quality (concentration) of incoming sucrose solutions returned by foraging honey bees affected the response thresholds of pre-foraging members of the colony. Six pairs of colonies were given ad libitum access to sucrose solution feeders. A colony from each pair was switched from 20–50% sugar concentration feeders while the other continued to have access to 20% sucrose feeders. Proboscis extension response (PER) scores to an increasing series of sucrose concentrations were significantly higher in pre-foragers of colonies foraging on 20% sucrose throughout compared to pre-foragers in colonies where foraging was switched to 50% sucrose. Although all colonies had honey stores, the concentration of sugar solution in non-foraging bees’ crops were significantly lower in bees from colonies foraging on 20% sucrose compared to those from colonies foraging on 50% sucrose. Because response thresholds to sugar of young bees were modulated by the concentration of sucrose solution returned to colonies, we repeated the 2000 study of Pankiw and Page that potentially confounded baseline response thresholds with modulated scores due to experience in the colony. Here, we examined PER scores to sucrose in bees within 6 h of emergence, prior to feeding experience, and their forage choice 2 to 3 weeks later. Pollen foragers had higher PER scores as newly emerged bees compared to bees that eventually became nectar foragers. These results confirm those of the 2000 study by Pankiw and Page. Combined, these experiments demonstrate that variation in pre-forager sucrose response thresholds are established prior to emerging as adults but may be modulated by incoming resources later on. Whether this modulation has long-term effects on foraging behavior is unknown but modulation has short-term effects and the potential to act as a means of communication among all bees in the colony. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-003-0714-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19227219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25063356</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25063356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f0b496c1717905200a5780b25923514195253374dd4c32590185c8aa73fb942a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUV2r1DAQDaLguvoDfBCDoG_VyVfT-iYXv-CCD3qfw2w23e3SJr2ZFtl_b0ovCjIPM5lz5gyZw9hLAe8FgP1AALI2FYCqwApdwSO2E1rJ8qrlY7YDpaEyWqun7BnRBQBq0TQ7Nvk0jkvEgfucpo98TMdlwLlPkaeO01K6FHgONKVYivlcynMajrTCUw5VlzKe-nji5xTDlR9CIP67n8-8j0V6BWLwM2Z-v-DQz9fn7EmHA4UXD3nP7r58_nXzrbr98fX7zafbyitr56qDg25rL6ywLRgJgMY2cJCmlcoILVojjVJWH4_aq9IF0RjfIFrVHVotUe3Zu013yul-CTS7sScfhgFjSAs50UpppWgL8c1_xEtacrkIubosknWjTSGJjbTeg3Lo3JT7EfPVCXCrAW4zwBUD3GqAgzLz9kEYyePQZYy-p3-DxoASJfbs1ca70JzyX1waqJUydcFfb3iHyeEpF427nxKEKRtl-Xuj_gD4mJe_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614126845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Pankiw, Tanya ; Nelson, Mindy ; Page, Robert E., Jr ; Fondrk, M. Kim</creator><creatorcontrib>Pankiw, Tanya ; Nelson, Mindy ; Page, Robert E., Jr ; Fondrk, M. Kim</creatorcontrib><description>We examined whether the quality (concentration) of incoming sucrose solutions returned by foraging honey bees affected the response thresholds of pre-foraging members of the colony. Six pairs of colonies were given ad libitum access to sucrose solution feeders. A colony from each pair was switched from 20–50% sugar concentration feeders while the other continued to have access to 20% sucrose feeders. Proboscis extension response (PER) scores to an increasing series of sucrose concentrations were significantly higher in pre-foragers of colonies foraging on 20% sucrose throughout compared to pre-foragers in colonies where foraging was switched to 50% sucrose. Although all colonies had honey stores, the concentration of sugar solution in non-foraging bees’ crops were significantly lower in bees from colonies foraging on 20% sucrose compared to those from colonies foraging on 50% sucrose. Because response thresholds to sugar of young bees were modulated by the concentration of sucrose solution returned to colonies, we repeated the 2000 study of Pankiw and Page that potentially confounded baseline response thresholds with modulated scores due to experience in the colony. Here, we examined PER scores to sucrose in bees within 6 h of emergence, prior to feeding experience, and their forage choice 2 to 3 weeks later. Pollen foragers had higher PER scores as newly emerged bees compared to bees that eventually became nectar foragers. These results confirm those of the 2000 study by Pankiw and Page. Combined, these experiments demonstrate that variation in pre-forager sucrose response thresholds are established prior to emerging as adults but may be modulated by incoming resources later on. Whether this modulation has long-term effects on foraging behavior is unknown but modulation has short-term effects and the potential to act as a means of communication among all bees in the colony.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-003-0714-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BESOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>adults ; Animal ethology ; Apidae ; Apis mellifera ; Apoidea ; Bees ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonies & territories ; crops ; Forage ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Honey ; Honey bee colonies ; Honey bees ; Insect behavior ; Insect brood ; Insect colonies ; long term effects ; Nectar ; Pollen ; proboscis ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; solutions ; Sucrose ; Sugar ; Worker insects</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2004, Vol.55 (3), p.286-292</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f0b496c1717905200a5780b25923514195253374dd4c32590185c8aa73fb942a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f0b496c1717905200a5780b25923514195253374dd4c32590185c8aa73fb942a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25063356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25063356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15503131$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pankiw, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Mindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Robert E., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fondrk, M. Kim</creatorcontrib><title>communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>We examined whether the quality (concentration) of incoming sucrose solutions returned by foraging honey bees affected the response thresholds of pre-foraging members of the colony. Six pairs of colonies were given ad libitum access to sucrose solution feeders. A colony from each pair was switched from 20–50% sugar concentration feeders while the other continued to have access to 20% sucrose feeders. Proboscis extension response (PER) scores to an increasing series of sucrose concentrations were significantly higher in pre-foragers of colonies foraging on 20% sucrose throughout compared to pre-foragers in colonies where foraging was switched to 50% sucrose. Although all colonies had honey stores, the concentration of sugar solution in non-foraging bees’ crops were significantly lower in bees from colonies foraging on 20% sucrose compared to those from colonies foraging on 50% sucrose. Because response thresholds to sugar of young bees were modulated by the concentration of sucrose solution returned to colonies, we repeated the 2000 study of Pankiw and Page that potentially confounded baseline response thresholds with modulated scores due to experience in the colony. Here, we examined PER scores to sucrose in bees within 6 h of emergence, prior to feeding experience, and their forage choice 2 to 3 weeks later. Pollen foragers had higher PER scores as newly emerged bees compared to bees that eventually became nectar foragers. These results confirm those of the 2000 study by Pankiw and Page. Combined, these experiments demonstrate that variation in pre-forager sucrose response thresholds are established prior to emerging as adults but may be modulated by incoming resources later on. Whether this modulation has long-term effects on foraging behavior is unknown but modulation has short-term effects and the potential to act as a means of communication among all bees in the colony.</description><subject>adults</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Apidae</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Apoidea</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonies & territories</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Honey</subject><subject>Honey bee colonies</subject><subject>Honey bees</subject><subject>Insect behavior</subject><subject>Insect brood</subject><subject>Insect colonies</subject><subject>long term effects</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>proboscis</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>solutions</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Worker insects</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUV2r1DAQDaLguvoDfBCDoG_VyVfT-iYXv-CCD3qfw2w23e3SJr2ZFtl_b0ovCjIPM5lz5gyZw9hLAe8FgP1AALI2FYCqwApdwSO2E1rJ8qrlY7YDpaEyWqun7BnRBQBq0TQ7Nvk0jkvEgfucpo98TMdlwLlPkaeO01K6FHgONKVYivlcynMajrTCUw5VlzKe-nji5xTDlR9CIP67n8-8j0V6BWLwM2Z-v-DQz9fn7EmHA4UXD3nP7r58_nXzrbr98fX7zafbyitr56qDg25rL6ywLRgJgMY2cJCmlcoILVojjVJWH4_aq9IF0RjfIFrVHVotUe3Zu013yul-CTS7sScfhgFjSAs50UpppWgL8c1_xEtacrkIubosknWjTSGJjbTeg3Lo3JT7EfPVCXCrAW4zwBUD3GqAgzLz9kEYyePQZYy-p3-DxoASJfbs1ca70JzyX1waqJUydcFfb3iHyeEpF427nxKEKRtl-Xuj_gD4mJe_</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Pankiw, Tanya</creator><creator>Nelson, Mindy</creator><creator>Page, Robert E., Jr</creator><creator>Fondrk, M. Kim</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality</title><author>Pankiw, Tanya ; Nelson, Mindy ; Page, Robert E., Jr ; Fondrk, M. Kim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f0b496c1717905200a5780b25923514195253374dd4c32590185c8aa73fb942a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>adults</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Apidae</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Apoidea</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonies & territories</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Honey</topic><topic>Honey bee colonies</topic><topic>Honey bees</topic><topic>Insect behavior</topic><topic>Insect brood</topic><topic>Insect colonies</topic><topic>long term effects</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>proboscis</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>solutions</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Worker insects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pankiw, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Mindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Robert E., Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fondrk, M. Kim</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pankiw, Tanya</au><au>Nelson, Mindy</au><au>Page, Robert E., Jr</au><au>Fondrk, M. Kim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>286-292</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><coden>BESOD6</coden><abstract>We examined whether the quality (concentration) of incoming sucrose solutions returned by foraging honey bees affected the response thresholds of pre-foraging members of the colony. Six pairs of colonies were given ad libitum access to sucrose solution feeders. A colony from each pair was switched from 20–50% sugar concentration feeders while the other continued to have access to 20% sucrose feeders. Proboscis extension response (PER) scores to an increasing series of sucrose concentrations were significantly higher in pre-foragers of colonies foraging on 20% sucrose throughout compared to pre-foragers in colonies where foraging was switched to 50% sucrose. Although all colonies had honey stores, the concentration of sugar solution in non-foraging bees’ crops were significantly lower in bees from colonies foraging on 20% sucrose compared to those from colonies foraging on 50% sucrose. Because response thresholds to sugar of young bees were modulated by the concentration of sucrose solution returned to colonies, we repeated the 2000 study of Pankiw and Page that potentially confounded baseline response thresholds with modulated scores due to experience in the colony. Here, we examined PER scores to sucrose in bees within 6 h of emergence, prior to feeding experience, and their forage choice 2 to 3 weeks later. Pollen foragers had higher PER scores as newly emerged bees compared to bees that eventually became nectar foragers. These results confirm those of the 2000 study by Pankiw and Page. Combined, these experiments demonstrate that variation in pre-forager sucrose response thresholds are established prior to emerging as adults but may be modulated by incoming resources later on. Whether this modulation has long-term effects on foraging behavior is unknown but modulation has short-term effects and the potential to act as a means of communication among all bees in the colony.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-003-0714-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2004, Vol.55 (3), p.286-292 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19227219 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | adults Animal ethology Apidae Apis mellifera Apoidea Bees Biological and medical sciences Colonies & territories crops Forage Foraging Foraging behavior Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Honey Honey bee colonies Honey bees Insect behavior Insect brood Insect colonies long term effects Nectar Pollen proboscis Protozoa. Invertebrata Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry solutions Sucrose Sugar Worker insects |
title | communal crop: modulation of sucrose response thresholds of pre-foraging honey bees with incoming nectar quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A29%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=communal%20crop:%20modulation%20of%20sucrose%20response%20thresholds%20of%20pre-foraging%20honey%20bees%20with%20incoming%20nectar%20quality&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Pankiw,%20Tanya&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=286-292&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft.coden=BESOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-003-0714-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25063356%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614126845&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25063356&rfr_iscdi=true |