Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years
The aim of this study was to compare marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive tissue-level implants (Straumann Dental Implants; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) after a mean of 81-month follow-up period. One hundred seven SLA and 68 SLActive implants were placed in 55 patien...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Implant dentistry 2017-08, Vol.26 (4), p.592-599 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 599 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 592 |
| container_title | Implant dentistry |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla Yamaner, Gökhan Sertgöz, Atilla Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih Özcan, Mutlu |
| description | The aim of this study was to compare marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive tissue-level implants (Straumann Dental Implants; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) after a mean of 81-month follow-up period.
One hundred seven SLA and 68 SLActive implants were placed in 55 patients and loaded with final restoration after 8 and 3 weeks of healing time, respectively. Marginal bone loss around implants was determined radiographically at initial and after a mean observation time ranging between 20 and 81 months. The effect of location (mandible vs maxilla), smoking habit, sex, implant length and diameter, and the type of prosthesis on the marginal bone loss was evaluated.
The overall cumulative survival rate was 98.2% being 99% for SLA implants and 97% for SLActive implants. After 20-month follow-up period, mean marginal bone loss values for the SLA and SLActive implants were 0.24 and 0.17 mm, respectively. After 81 months, mean marginal bone loss for the SLA and SLActive implants reached 0.71 and 0.53 mm, respectively. Marginal bone loss was affected by the length and type of implant and patients' smoking habit after a mean observation time of 20 months. However, none of the parameters had any significant effect on the marginal bone loss after a follow-up period of 81 months.
With both SLA and SLActive implants, successful clinical results could be achieved up to 6.5 years of follow-up period. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/ID.0000000000000625 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922511419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1922511419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-eefa93b5664261eeddcb1285bb2d97a3b9fd13907d6f83077b503a56ada4771a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCI8voCJOQjlxQ_ajvmVtoClYKQgB44RZvYqYLcuNhJUf-e8BRi9zC70szsahA6pWRIiVYX8-mQ_C3JxA46oIKnCdMp2-1nImQiqeQDdBjjCyGs73QfDViqOE21OkDxDsKybsDhK99YnPkY8Tj4rjF4BsFtk8yDsQY_ZmMMzSeWbb2xeL5aO2jaeIkfwNTe-WVd9i7X3jn_lizWeLYB10Fb-wb3W-uxHAr8bCHEY7RXgYv25BuP0OJ69jS5TbL7m_lknCUlE6JNrK1A80JIOWKSWmtMWVCWiqJgRivgha4M5ZooI6uUE6UKQTgICQZGSlHgR-j8y3cd_GtnY5uv6lha1_9tfRdzqhkTlI6o7qn8i1qGPoFgq3wd6hWEbU5J_pF2Pp_m_9PuVWffB7piZc2v5ide_g55B3kC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1922511419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years</title><source>Journals@OVID</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla ; Yamaner, Gökhan ; Sertgöz, Atilla ; Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih ; Özcan, Mutlu</creator><creatorcontrib>Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla ; Yamaner, Gökhan ; Sertgöz, Atilla ; Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih ; Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive tissue-level implants (Straumann Dental Implants; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) after a mean of 81-month follow-up period.
One hundred seven SLA and 68 SLActive implants were placed in 55 patients and loaded with final restoration after 8 and 3 weeks of healing time, respectively. Marginal bone loss around implants was determined radiographically at initial and after a mean observation time ranging between 20 and 81 months. The effect of location (mandible vs maxilla), smoking habit, sex, implant length and diameter, and the type of prosthesis on the marginal bone loss was evaluated.
The overall cumulative survival rate was 98.2% being 99% for SLA implants and 97% for SLActive implants. After 20-month follow-up period, mean marginal bone loss values for the SLA and SLActive implants were 0.24 and 0.17 mm, respectively. After 81 months, mean marginal bone loss for the SLA and SLActive implants reached 0.71 and 0.53 mm, respectively. Marginal bone loss was affected by the length and type of implant and patients' smoking habit after a mean observation time of 20 months. However, none of the parameters had any significant effect on the marginal bone loss after a follow-up period of 81 months.
With both SLA and SLActive implants, successful clinical results could be achieved up to 6.5 years of follow-up period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-6163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-2982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000625</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28731897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental ; Adult ; Aged ; Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging ; Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dentistry ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osseointegration - physiology ; Risk Factors ; Surface Properties ; Titanium ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Implant dentistry, 2017-08, Vol.26 (4), p.592-599</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-eefa93b5664261eeddcb1285bb2d97a3b9fd13907d6f83077b503a56ada4771a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28731897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaner, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sertgöz, Atilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><title>Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years</title><title>Implant dentistry</title><addtitle>Implant Dent</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive tissue-level implants (Straumann Dental Implants; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) after a mean of 81-month follow-up period.
One hundred seven SLA and 68 SLActive implants were placed in 55 patients and loaded with final restoration after 8 and 3 weeks of healing time, respectively. Marginal bone loss around implants was determined radiographically at initial and after a mean observation time ranging between 20 and 81 months. The effect of location (mandible vs maxilla), smoking habit, sex, implant length and diameter, and the type of prosthesis on the marginal bone loss was evaluated.
The overall cumulative survival rate was 98.2% being 99% for SLA implants and 97% for SLActive implants. After 20-month follow-up period, mean marginal bone loss values for the SLA and SLActive implants were 0.24 and 0.17 mm, respectively. After 81 months, mean marginal bone loss for the SLA and SLActive implants reached 0.71 and 0.53 mm, respectively. Marginal bone loss was affected by the length and type of implant and patients' smoking habit after a mean observation time of 20 months. However, none of the parameters had any significant effect on the marginal bone loss after a follow-up period of 81 months.
With both SLA and SLActive implants, successful clinical results could be achieved up to 6.5 years of follow-up period.</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osseointegration - physiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1056-6163</issn><issn>1538-2982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUMtOwzAQtBCI8voCJOQjlxQ_ajvmVtoClYKQgB44RZvYqYLcuNhJUf-e8BRi9zC70szsahA6pWRIiVYX8-mQ_C3JxA46oIKnCdMp2-1nImQiqeQDdBjjCyGs73QfDViqOE21OkDxDsKybsDhK99YnPkY8Tj4rjF4BsFtk8yDsQY_ZmMMzSeWbb2xeL5aO2jaeIkfwNTe-WVd9i7X3jn_lizWeLYB10Fb-wb3W-uxHAr8bCHEY7RXgYv25BuP0OJ69jS5TbL7m_lknCUlE6JNrK1A80JIOWKSWmtMWVCWiqJgRivgha4M5ZooI6uUE6UKQTgICQZGSlHgR-j8y3cd_GtnY5uv6lha1_9tfRdzqhkTlI6o7qn8i1qGPoFgq3wd6hWEbU5J_pF2Pp_m_9PuVWffB7piZc2v5ide_g55B3kC</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla</creator><creator>Yamaner, Gökhan</creator><creator>Sertgöz, Atilla</creator><creator>Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih</creator><creator>Özcan, Mutlu</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years</title><author>Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla ; Yamaner, Gökhan ; Sertgöz, Atilla ; Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih ; Özcan, Mutlu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-eefa93b5664261eeddcb1285bb2d97a3b9fd13907d6f83077b503a56ada4771a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osseointegration - physiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaner, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sertgöz, Atilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Implant dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şener-Yamaner, Işil Damla</au><au>Yamaner, Gökhan</au><au>Sertgöz, Atilla</au><au>Çanakçi, Cenk Fatih</au><au>Özcan, Mutlu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years</atitle><jtitle>Implant dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Implant Dent</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>592</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>592-599</pages><issn>1056-6163</issn><eissn>1538-2982</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare marginal bone loss around early-loaded SLA and SLActive tissue-level implants (Straumann Dental Implants; Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) after a mean of 81-month follow-up period.
One hundred seven SLA and 68 SLActive implants were placed in 55 patients and loaded with final restoration after 8 and 3 weeks of healing time, respectively. Marginal bone loss around implants was determined radiographically at initial and after a mean observation time ranging between 20 and 81 months. The effect of location (mandible vs maxilla), smoking habit, sex, implant length and diameter, and the type of prosthesis on the marginal bone loss was evaluated.
The overall cumulative survival rate was 98.2% being 99% for SLA implants and 97% for SLActive implants. After 20-month follow-up period, mean marginal bone loss values for the SLA and SLActive implants were 0.24 and 0.17 mm, respectively. After 81 months, mean marginal bone loss for the SLA and SLActive implants reached 0.71 and 0.53 mm, respectively. Marginal bone loss was affected by the length and type of implant and patients' smoking habit after a mean observation time of 20 months. However, none of the parameters had any significant effect on the marginal bone loss after a follow-up period of 81 months.
With both SLA and SLActive implants, successful clinical results could be achieved up to 6.5 years of follow-up period.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28731897</pmid><doi>10.1097/ID.0000000000000625</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1056-6163 |
| ispartof | Implant dentistry, 2017-08, Vol.26 (4), p.592-599 |
| issn | 1056-6163 1538-2982 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922511419 |
| source | Journals@OVID; MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Acid Etching, Dental Adult Aged Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology Dental Implants Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Restoration Failure Dentistry Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions Male Middle Aged Osseointegration - physiology Risk Factors Surface Properties Titanium Treatment Outcome |
| title | Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A20%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marginal%20Bone%20Loss%20Around%20Early-Loaded%20SLA%20and%20SLActive%20Implants:%20Radiological%20Follow-Up%20Evaluation%20Up%20to%206.5%20Years&rft.jtitle=Implant%20dentistry&rft.au=%C5%9Eener-Yamaner,%20I%C5%9Fil%20Damla&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=592&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=592-599&rft.issn=1056-6163&rft.eissn=1538-2982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ID.0000000000000625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1922511419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1922511419&rft_id=info:pmid/28731897&rfr_iscdi=true |