Usefulness of the S–O clip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)
Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically one of the most complicated endoscopic procedures. Traction methods have been reported to be effective for ESD. A recent study revealed that the S–O clip allowed faster and safer colonic ESD. We assessed the efficacy and safety of gast...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2018-02, Vol.32 (2), p.908-914 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 914 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 908 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Hashimoto, Rintaro Hirasawa, Dai Iwaki, Tomoyuki Yamaoka, Hajime Nihei, Kousuke Tanaka, Ippei Chonan, Akimichi Takase, Kei |
description | Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically one of the most complicated endoscopic procedures. Traction methods have been reported to be effective for ESD. A recent study revealed that the S–O clip allowed faster and safer colonic ESD. We assessed the efficacy and safety of gastric ESD with the S–O clip for gastric epithelial neoplasm.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for gastric ESD using the S–O clip between September and November 2016 (SO group,
n
= 48). The subjects were matched with patients treated with conventional gastric ESD from September 2015 to August 2016 (control group,
n
= 258) at Sendai Kousei Hospital, a tertiary endoscopic center. The primary outcome was procedure time. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching analyses were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias for potential confounding factors differences like age, sex, lesion location, lesion position, presence of ulcer scarring, resected specimen size, and operator experiences.
Results
Forty-eight pairs were created after propensity score matching. The mean procedure time (including the S–O clip attachment time) was significantly shorter in the SO group (47.2 ± 24.6 vs. 69.2 ± 67.1 min,
p
= 0.035). The mean clip attachment time was 4.4 (range 2–15) min. There were no significant differences in other treatment outcomes (en-bloc resection rate: 100 vs. 100%,
p
= 1.000; perforation rate: 0 vs. 2.1%,
p
= 0.315; delayed bleeding rate: 2.1 vs. 4.3%,
p
= 0.558).
Conclusions
The S–O clip improved the speed of gastric ESD by approximately 25%, without increasing adverse events. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-017-5765-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922509871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1922509871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9f16f944d39d3dad7e112c546deb4423e22258ab4d3be19cc1e46785974b3563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerw8gBsJuNFFNbc2zVIO3kBw4WUb2mSqlZ7mmGkVd76Db-iTGDkqIrjKQL7_n-EjZJuzA86YPkTGVKEyxnWW6yLPzBKZcCVFJgQvl8mEGckyoY1aI-uIDyzhhuerZE2UWkqtzITc3iA0Y9cDIg0NHe6BXr2_vl1S17Vz2oRI7yocYuso9D6gC_M04ljPRhew6qhvEcENbejp3nM73NOn1kPY3yQrTdUhbH29G-Tm5Ph6epZdXJ6eT48uMie1GDIwDS8ao5SXxktfeQ2cC5erwkOtlJAghMjLqk5ADdw4x0EVusyNVrXMC7lB9ha98xgeR8DBzlp00HVVD2FEy03KM1NqntDdP-hDGGOfrktUElXkSotE8QXlYkCM0Nh5bGdVfLGc2U_pdiHdJun2U7o1KbPz1Zy8gP9JfFtOgFgAmL76O4i_Vv_b-gF8Oox_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993065472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of the S–O clip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hashimoto, Rintaro ; Hirasawa, Dai ; Iwaki, Tomoyuki ; Yamaoka, Hajime ; Nihei, Kousuke ; Tanaka, Ippei ; Chonan, Akimichi ; Takase, Kei</creator><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Rintaro ; Hirasawa, Dai ; Iwaki, Tomoyuki ; Yamaoka, Hajime ; Nihei, Kousuke ; Tanaka, Ippei ; Chonan, Akimichi ; Takase, Kei</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically one of the most complicated endoscopic procedures. Traction methods have been reported to be effective for ESD. A recent study revealed that the S–O clip allowed faster and safer colonic ESD. We assessed the efficacy and safety of gastric ESD with the S–O clip for gastric epithelial neoplasm.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for gastric ESD using the S–O clip between September and November 2016 (SO group,
n
= 48). The subjects were matched with patients treated with conventional gastric ESD from September 2015 to August 2016 (control group,
n
= 258) at Sendai Kousei Hospital, a tertiary endoscopic center. The primary outcome was procedure time. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching analyses were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias for potential confounding factors differences like age, sex, lesion location, lesion position, presence of ulcer scarring, resected specimen size, and operator experiences.
Results
Forty-eight pairs were created after propensity score matching. The mean procedure time (including the S–O clip attachment time) was significantly shorter in the SO group (47.2 ± 24.6 vs. 69.2 ± 67.1 min,
p
= 0.035). The mean clip attachment time was 4.4 (range 2–15) min. There were no significant differences in other treatment outcomes (en-bloc resection rate: 100 vs. 100%,
p
= 1.000; perforation rate: 0 vs. 2.1%,
p
= 0.315; delayed bleeding rate: 2.1 vs. 4.3%,
p
= 0.558).
Conclusions
The S–O clip improved the speed of gastric ESD by approximately 25%, without increasing adverse events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5765-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28733749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Adenoma - surgery ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - instrumentation ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Gastrectomy - instrumentation ; Gastrectomy - methods ; Gastric cancer ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Proctology ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2018-02, Vol.32 (2), p.908-914</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017</rights><rights>Surgical Endoscopy is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9f16f944d39d3dad7e112c546deb4423e22258ab4d3be19cc1e46785974b3563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9f16f944d39d3dad7e112c546deb4423e22258ab4d3be19cc1e46785974b3563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-017-5765-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-017-5765-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Rintaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirasawa, Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaoka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nihei, Kousuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ippei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chonan, Akimichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takase, Kei</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of the S–O clip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically one of the most complicated endoscopic procedures. Traction methods have been reported to be effective for ESD. A recent study revealed that the S–O clip allowed faster and safer colonic ESD. We assessed the efficacy and safety of gastric ESD with the S–O clip for gastric epithelial neoplasm.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for gastric ESD using the S–O clip between September and November 2016 (SO group,
n
= 48). The subjects were matched with patients treated with conventional gastric ESD from September 2015 to August 2016 (control group,
n
= 258) at Sendai Kousei Hospital, a tertiary endoscopic center. The primary outcome was procedure time. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching analyses were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias for potential confounding factors differences like age, sex, lesion location, lesion position, presence of ulcer scarring, resected specimen size, and operator experiences.
Results
Forty-eight pairs were created after propensity score matching. The mean procedure time (including the S–O clip attachment time) was significantly shorter in the SO group (47.2 ± 24.6 vs. 69.2 ± 67.1 min,
p
= 0.035). The mean clip attachment time was 4.4 (range 2–15) min. There were no significant differences in other treatment outcomes (en-bloc resection rate: 100 vs. 100%,
p
= 1.000; perforation rate: 0 vs. 2.1%,
p
= 0.315; delayed bleeding rate: 2.1 vs. 4.3%,
p
= 0.558).
Conclusions
The S–O clip improved the speed of gastric ESD by approximately 25%, without increasing adverse events.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Adenoma - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - instrumentation</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxTAQhoMoerw8gBsJuNFFNbc2zVIO3kBw4WUb2mSqlZ7mmGkVd76Db-iTGDkqIrjKQL7_n-EjZJuzA86YPkTGVKEyxnWW6yLPzBKZcCVFJgQvl8mEGckyoY1aI-uIDyzhhuerZE2UWkqtzITc3iA0Y9cDIg0NHe6BXr2_vl1S17Vz2oRI7yocYuso9D6gC_M04ljPRhew6qhvEcENbejp3nM73NOn1kPY3yQrTdUhbH29G-Tm5Ph6epZdXJ6eT48uMie1GDIwDS8ao5SXxktfeQ2cC5erwkOtlJAghMjLqk5ADdw4x0EVusyNVrXMC7lB9ha98xgeR8DBzlp00HVVD2FEy03KM1NqntDdP-hDGGOfrktUElXkSotE8QXlYkCM0Nh5bGdVfLGc2U_pdiHdJun2U7o1KbPz1Zy8gP9JfFtOgFgAmL76O4i_Vv_b-gF8Oox_</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Hashimoto, Rintaro</creator><creator>Hirasawa, Dai</creator><creator>Iwaki, Tomoyuki</creator><creator>Yamaoka, Hajime</creator><creator>Nihei, Kousuke</creator><creator>Tanaka, Ippei</creator><creator>Chonan, Akimichi</creator><creator>Takase, Kei</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Usefulness of the S–O clip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)</title><author>Hashimoto, Rintaro ; Hirasawa, Dai ; Iwaki, Tomoyuki ; Yamaoka, Hajime ; Nihei, Kousuke ; Tanaka, Ippei ; Chonan, Akimichi ; Takase, Kei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e9f16f944d39d3dad7e112c546deb4423e22258ab4d3be19cc1e46785974b3563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Adenoma - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - instrumentation</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Rintaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirasawa, Dai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Tomoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaoka, Hajime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nihei, Kousuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ippei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chonan, Akimichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takase, Kei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hashimoto, Rintaro</au><au>Hirasawa, Dai</au><au>Iwaki, Tomoyuki</au><au>Yamaoka, Hajime</au><au>Nihei, Kousuke</au><au>Tanaka, Ippei</au><au>Chonan, Akimichi</au><au>Takase, Kei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of the S–O clip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video)</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>908</spage><epage>914</epage><pages>908-914</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically one of the most complicated endoscopic procedures. Traction methods have been reported to be effective for ESD. A recent study revealed that the S–O clip allowed faster and safer colonic ESD. We assessed the efficacy and safety of gastric ESD with the S–O clip for gastric epithelial neoplasm.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for gastric ESD using the S–O clip between September and November 2016 (SO group,
n
= 48). The subjects were matched with patients treated with conventional gastric ESD from September 2015 to August 2016 (control group,
n
= 258) at Sendai Kousei Hospital, a tertiary endoscopic center. The primary outcome was procedure time. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching analyses were performed to reduce the effects of selection bias for potential confounding factors differences like age, sex, lesion location, lesion position, presence of ulcer scarring, resected specimen size, and operator experiences.
Results
Forty-eight pairs were created after propensity score matching. The mean procedure time (including the S–O clip attachment time) was significantly shorter in the SO group (47.2 ± 24.6 vs. 69.2 ± 67.1 min,
p
= 0.035). The mean clip attachment time was 4.4 (range 2–15) min. There were no significant differences in other treatment outcomes (en-bloc resection rate: 100 vs. 100%,
p
= 1.000; perforation rate: 0 vs. 2.1%,
p
= 0.315; delayed bleeding rate: 2.1 vs. 4.3%,
p
= 0.558).
Conclusions
The S–O clip improved the speed of gastric ESD by approximately 25%, without increasing adverse events.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28733749</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-017-5765-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2018-02, Vol.32 (2), p.908-914 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922509871 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Adenoma - surgery Aged Aged, 80 and over Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - instrumentation Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods Endoscopy Female Gastrectomy - instrumentation Gastrectomy - methods Gastric cancer Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Logistic Models Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Proctology Propensity Score Retrospective Studies Stomach Neoplasms - surgery Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Usefulness of the S–O clip for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T01%3A44%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20the%20S%E2%80%93O%20clip%20for%20gastric%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection%20(with%20video)&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Hashimoto,%20Rintaro&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=908&rft.epage=914&rft.pages=908-914&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-017-5765-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1922509871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993065472&rft_id=info:pmid/28733749&rfr_iscdi=true |