Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax® for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler

Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists are commonly used for the treatment of asthma and COPD. However, the most frequently prescribed dry powder inhaler delivering this medicine – Symbicort® (budesonide and formoterol, BF) Turbuhaler® – is associated with poo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory medicine 2017-08, Vol.129, p.179-188
Hauptverfasser: Lewis, A., Torvinen, S., Dekhuijzen, P.N.R., Chrystyn, H., Melani, A., Zöllner, Y., Kolbe, K., Watson, A.T., Blackney, M., Plich, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 188
container_issue
container_start_page 179
container_title Respiratory medicine
container_volume 129
creator Lewis, A.
Torvinen, S.
Dekhuijzen, P.N.R.
Chrystyn, H.
Melani, A.
Zöllner, Y.
Kolbe, K.
Watson, A.T.
Blackney, M.
Plich, A.
description Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists are commonly used for the treatment of asthma and COPD. However, the most frequently prescribed dry powder inhaler delivering this medicine – Symbicort® (budesonide and formoterol, BF) Turbuhaler® – is associated with poor inhalation technique, which can lead to poor disease control and high disease management costs. A recent study showed that patients make fewer inhaler errors when using the novel DuoResp® (BF) Spiromax® inhaler, compared with BF Turbuhaler®. Therefore switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® could improve inhalation technique, and potentially lead to better disease control and healthcare cost savings. A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of reducing poor inhalation technique by switching asthma and COPD patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® over three years in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK. The model estimated changes to the number, and associated cost, of unscheduled healthcare events. The model considered two scenarios: in Scenario 1, all patients were immediately switched from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax®; in Scenario 2, 4%, 8% and 12% of patients were switched in years 1, 2 and 3 of the model, respectively. In Scenario 1, per patient cost savings amounted to €60.10, €49.67, €94.14 and €38.20 in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK, respectively. Total cost savings in each country were €100.86 million, €19.42 million, €36.65 million and €15.44 million over three years, respectively, with an estimated 597,754, 151,480, 228,986 and 122,368 healthcare events avoided. In Scenario 2, cost savings totalled €8.07 million, €1.55 million, €2.93 million and €1.23 million over three years, respectively, with 47,850, 12,118, 18,319, and 9789 healthcare events avoided. Savings per patient were €4.81, €3.97, €7.53 and €3.06. We demonstrated that reductions in poor inhalation technique by switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® are likely to improve patients' disease control and generate considerable cost savings through healthcare events avoided. •An economic analysis of poor inhalation technique with asthma and COPD inhalers.•Switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® may reduce inhaler errors.•Cost savings from fewer inhaler errors may reach €15–100 million over 3 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.06.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922509424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0954611117301853</els_id><sourcerecordid>1922874288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3438-1dd5ac949bd0d6e047fedff6985b34ce96f2b94cbb7a956cec49b6c5c288db973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb2O1DAUhSMEYoeFF6BAlmiQ0ATbcZwY0cDwK620SAy15dg3G48Se7CdAd5mn4CHmI63wmF2GwoqF_7Op6N7iuIxwSXBhL_YlWECU1JMmhLzEpP2TrEidUXXFebsbrHComZrTgg5Kx7EuMMYC8bw_eKMtk1FWypWxe83s4HonTVwvH5-vO59mHyC4EdkYLQHCGDQwSr0ZW-Dn9SP4y-UGZQGQJNy6gomcAn5HqmYhkkh5QzaXH5--xJtM7LPLpesGpGd9kpn0KHZRT2AmcdsHkCNadAqANI-priIMhn8wborZN2gRpVsDiXQg7Pf5oXLpqXVd5sGtJ1DN2cKwsPiXq_GCI9u3vPi6_t3283H9cXlh0-b1xdrXbGqXRNjaqUFE53BhgNmTQ-m77lo665iGgTvaSeY7rpGiZpr0Bnluta0bU0nmuq8eHby5pa5T0xyslHDOCoHfo6SCErrfGjKMvr0H3Tn5-Byu79U27AszRQ9UTr4GAP0ch_spMJPSbBchpY7uQwtl6El5jIPnUNPbtRzt_zdRm6XzcCrEwD5FgcLQUZtwWkwNoBO0nj7P_8fBvTBUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1922874288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax® for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lewis, A. ; Torvinen, S. ; Dekhuijzen, P.N.R. ; Chrystyn, H. ; Melani, A. ; Zöllner, Y. ; Kolbe, K. ; Watson, A.T. ; Blackney, M. ; Plich, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, A. ; Torvinen, S. ; Dekhuijzen, P.N.R. ; Chrystyn, H. ; Melani, A. ; Zöllner, Y. ; Kolbe, K. ; Watson, A.T. ; Blackney, M. ; Plich, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists are commonly used for the treatment of asthma and COPD. However, the most frequently prescribed dry powder inhaler delivering this medicine – Symbicort® (budesonide and formoterol, BF) Turbuhaler® – is associated with poor inhalation technique, which can lead to poor disease control and high disease management costs. A recent study showed that patients make fewer inhaler errors when using the novel DuoResp® (BF) Spiromax® inhaler, compared with BF Turbuhaler®. Therefore switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® could improve inhalation technique, and potentially lead to better disease control and healthcare cost savings. A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of reducing poor inhalation technique by switching asthma and COPD patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® over three years in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK. The model estimated changes to the number, and associated cost, of unscheduled healthcare events. The model considered two scenarios: in Scenario 1, all patients were immediately switched from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax®; in Scenario 2, 4%, 8% and 12% of patients were switched in years 1, 2 and 3 of the model, respectively. In Scenario 1, per patient cost savings amounted to €60.10, €49.67, €94.14 and €38.20 in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK, respectively. Total cost savings in each country were €100.86 million, €19.42 million, €36.65 million and €15.44 million over three years, respectively, with an estimated 597,754, 151,480, 228,986 and 122,368 healthcare events avoided. In Scenario 2, cost savings totalled €8.07 million, €1.55 million, €2.93 million and €1.23 million over three years, respectively, with 47,850, 12,118, 18,319, and 9789 healthcare events avoided. Savings per patient were €4.81, €3.97, €7.53 and €3.06. We demonstrated that reductions in poor inhalation technique by switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® are likely to improve patients' disease control and generate considerable cost savings through healthcare events avoided. •An economic analysis of poor inhalation technique with asthma and COPD inhalers.•Switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® may reduce inhaler errors.•Cost savings from fewer inhaler errors may reach €15–100 million over 3 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.06.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28732829</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - therapeutic use ; Asthma ; Asthma - drug therapy ; Asthma - economics ; Asthma - epidemiology ; Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use ; Budesonide ; Budesonide - administration &amp; dosage ; Budesonide - therapeutic use ; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - administration &amp; dosage ; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - economics ; Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - therapeutic use ; Budget impact ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; COPD ; Corticoids ; Corticosteroids ; Cost control ; Cost engineering ; Cost reduction ; Disease control ; Drug therapy ; Dry Powder Inhalers - economics ; Dry Powder Inhalers - utilization ; Formoterol ; Formoterol Fumarate - administration &amp; dosage ; Formoterol Fumarate - therapeutic use ; Germany ; Glucocorticoids - therapeutic use ; Health Care Costs - trends ; Health care expenditures ; Humans ; Inhalation ; Inhalation technique ; Inhalers ; Italy ; Patients ; Powder ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - epidemiology ; Respiration ; Respiratory therapy ; Spiromax ; Sweden</subject><ispartof>Respiratory medicine, 2017-08, Vol.129, p.179-188</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3438-1dd5ac949bd0d6e047fedff6985b34ce96f2b94cbb7a956cec49b6c5c288db973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3438-1dd5ac949bd0d6e047fedff6985b34ce96f2b94cbb7a956cec49b6c5c288db973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611117301853$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28732829$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torvinen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekhuijzen, P.N.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrystyn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zöllner, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, A.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackney, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plich, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax® for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler</title><title>Respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><description>Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists are commonly used for the treatment of asthma and COPD. However, the most frequently prescribed dry powder inhaler delivering this medicine – Symbicort® (budesonide and formoterol, BF) Turbuhaler® – is associated with poor inhalation technique, which can lead to poor disease control and high disease management costs. A recent study showed that patients make fewer inhaler errors when using the novel DuoResp® (BF) Spiromax® inhaler, compared with BF Turbuhaler®. Therefore switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® could improve inhalation technique, and potentially lead to better disease control and healthcare cost savings. A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of reducing poor inhalation technique by switching asthma and COPD patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® over three years in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK. The model estimated changes to the number, and associated cost, of unscheduled healthcare events. The model considered two scenarios: in Scenario 1, all patients were immediately switched from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax®; in Scenario 2, 4%, 8% and 12% of patients were switched in years 1, 2 and 3 of the model, respectively. In Scenario 1, per patient cost savings amounted to €60.10, €49.67, €94.14 and €38.20 in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK, respectively. Total cost savings in each country were €100.86 million, €19.42 million, €36.65 million and €15.44 million over three years, respectively, with an estimated 597,754, 151,480, 228,986 and 122,368 healthcare events avoided. In Scenario 2, cost savings totalled €8.07 million, €1.55 million, €2.93 million and €1.23 million over three years, respectively, with 47,850, 12,118, 18,319, and 9789 healthcare events avoided. Savings per patient were €4.81, €3.97, €7.53 and €3.06. We demonstrated that reductions in poor inhalation technique by switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® are likely to improve patients' disease control and generate considerable cost savings through healthcare events avoided. •An economic analysis of poor inhalation technique with asthma and COPD inhalers.•Switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® may reduce inhaler errors.•Cost savings from fewer inhaler errors may reach €15–100 million over 3 years.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Asthma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Asthma - economics</subject><subject>Asthma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Budesonide</subject><subject>Budesonide - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Budesonide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - economics</subject><subject>Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Budget impact</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>COPD</subject><subject>Corticoids</subject><subject>Corticosteroids</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Dry Powder Inhalers - economics</subject><subject>Dry Powder Inhalers - utilization</subject><subject>Formoterol</subject><subject>Formoterol Fumarate - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Formoterol Fumarate - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - trends</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>Inhalation technique</subject><subject>Inhalers</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Powder</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - epidemiology</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Spiromax</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><issn>0954-6111</issn><issn>1532-3064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb2O1DAUhSMEYoeFF6BAlmiQ0ATbcZwY0cDwK620SAy15dg3G48Se7CdAd5mn4CHmI63wmF2GwoqF_7Op6N7iuIxwSXBhL_YlWECU1JMmhLzEpP2TrEidUXXFebsbrHComZrTgg5Kx7EuMMYC8bw_eKMtk1FWypWxe83s4HonTVwvH5-vO59mHyC4EdkYLQHCGDQwSr0ZW-Dn9SP4y-UGZQGQJNy6gomcAn5HqmYhkkh5QzaXH5--xJtM7LPLpesGpGd9kpn0KHZRT2AmcdsHkCNadAqANI-priIMhn8wborZN2gRpVsDiXQg7Pf5oXLpqXVd5sGtJ1DN2cKwsPiXq_GCI9u3vPi6_t3283H9cXlh0-b1xdrXbGqXRNjaqUFE53BhgNmTQ-m77lo665iGgTvaSeY7rpGiZpr0Bnluta0bU0nmuq8eHby5pa5T0xyslHDOCoHfo6SCErrfGjKMvr0H3Tn5-Byu79U27AszRQ9UTr4GAP0ch_spMJPSbBchpY7uQwtl6El5jIPnUNPbtRzt_zdRm6XzcCrEwD5FgcLQUZtwWkwNoBO0nj7P_8fBvTBUQ</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Lewis, A.</creator><creator>Torvinen, S.</creator><creator>Dekhuijzen, P.N.R.</creator><creator>Chrystyn, H.</creator><creator>Melani, A.</creator><creator>Zöllner, Y.</creator><creator>Kolbe, K.</creator><creator>Watson, A.T.</creator><creator>Blackney, M.</creator><creator>Plich, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax® for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler</title><author>Lewis, A. ; Torvinen, S. ; Dekhuijzen, P.N.R. ; Chrystyn, H. ; Melani, A. ; Zöllner, Y. ; Kolbe, K. ; Watson, A.T. ; Blackney, M. ; Plich, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3438-1dd5ac949bd0d6e047fedff6985b34ce96f2b94cbb7a956cec49b6c5c288db973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Asthma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Asthma - economics</topic><topic>Asthma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Budesonide</topic><topic>Budesonide - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Budesonide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - economics</topic><topic>Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Budget impact</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>COPD</topic><topic>Corticoids</topic><topic>Corticosteroids</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Dry Powder Inhalers - economics</topic><topic>Dry Powder Inhalers - utilization</topic><topic>Formoterol</topic><topic>Formoterol Fumarate - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Formoterol Fumarate - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - trends</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>Inhalation technique</topic><topic>Inhalers</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Powder</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - epidemiology</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Spiromax</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torvinen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekhuijzen, P.N.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrystyn, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zöllner, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolbe, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, A.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackney, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plich, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, A.</au><au>Torvinen, S.</au><au>Dekhuijzen, P.N.R.</au><au>Chrystyn, H.</au><au>Melani, A.</au><au>Zöllner, Y.</au><au>Kolbe, K.</au><au>Watson, A.T.</au><au>Blackney, M.</au><au>Plich, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax® for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>129</volume><spage>179</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>179-188</pages><issn>0954-6111</issn><eissn>1532-3064</eissn><abstract>Fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists are commonly used for the treatment of asthma and COPD. However, the most frequently prescribed dry powder inhaler delivering this medicine – Symbicort® (budesonide and formoterol, BF) Turbuhaler® – is associated with poor inhalation technique, which can lead to poor disease control and high disease management costs. A recent study showed that patients make fewer inhaler errors when using the novel DuoResp® (BF) Spiromax® inhaler, compared with BF Turbuhaler®. Therefore switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® could improve inhalation technique, and potentially lead to better disease control and healthcare cost savings. A model was developed to estimate the budget impact of reducing poor inhalation technique by switching asthma and COPD patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® over three years in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK. The model estimated changes to the number, and associated cost, of unscheduled healthcare events. The model considered two scenarios: in Scenario 1, all patients were immediately switched from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax®; in Scenario 2, 4%, 8% and 12% of patients were switched in years 1, 2 and 3 of the model, respectively. In Scenario 1, per patient cost savings amounted to €60.10, €49.67, €94.14 and €38.20 in Germany, Italy, Sweden and the UK, respectively. Total cost savings in each country were €100.86 million, €19.42 million, €36.65 million and €15.44 million over three years, respectively, with an estimated 597,754, 151,480, 228,986 and 122,368 healthcare events avoided. In Scenario 2, cost savings totalled €8.07 million, €1.55 million, €2.93 million and €1.23 million over three years, respectively, with 47,850, 12,118, 18,319, and 9789 healthcare events avoided. Savings per patient were €4.81, €3.97, €7.53 and €3.06. We demonstrated that reductions in poor inhalation technique by switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® are likely to improve patients' disease control and generate considerable cost savings through healthcare events avoided. •An economic analysis of poor inhalation technique with asthma and COPD inhalers.•Switching patients from BF Turbuhaler® to BF Spiromax® may reduce inhaler errors.•Cost savings from fewer inhaler errors may reach €15–100 million over 3 years.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28732829</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rmed.2017.06.018</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-6111
ispartof Respiratory medicine, 2017-08, Vol.129, p.179-188
issn 0954-6111
1532-3064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922509424
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists - therapeutic use
Asthma
Asthma - drug therapy
Asthma - economics
Asthma - epidemiology
Bronchodilator Agents - therapeutic use
Budesonide
Budesonide - administration & dosage
Budesonide - therapeutic use
Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - administration & dosage
Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - economics
Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination - therapeutic use
Budget impact
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
COPD
Corticoids
Corticosteroids
Cost control
Cost engineering
Cost reduction
Disease control
Drug therapy
Dry Powder Inhalers - economics
Dry Powder Inhalers - utilization
Formoterol
Formoterol Fumarate - administration & dosage
Formoterol Fumarate - therapeutic use
Germany
Glucocorticoids - therapeutic use
Health Care Costs - trends
Health care expenditures
Humans
Inhalation
Inhalation technique
Inhalers
Italy
Patients
Powder
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - epidemiology
Respiration
Respiratory therapy
Spiromax
Sweden
title Budesonide + formoterol delivered via Spiromax® for the management of asthma and COPD: The potential impact on unscheduled healthcare costs of improving inhalation technique compared with Turbuhaler
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A32%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Budesonide%C2%A0+%C2%A0formoterol%20delivered%20via%20Spiromax%C2%AE%20for%20the%20management%20of%20asthma%20and%20COPD:%20The%20potential%20impact%20on%20unscheduled%20healthcare%20costs%20of%20improving%20inhalation%20technique%20compared%20with%20Turbuhaler&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=Lewis,%20A.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=179-188&rft.issn=0954-6111&rft.eissn=1532-3064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rmed.2017.06.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1922874288%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1922874288&rft_id=info:pmid/28732829&rft_els_id=S0954611117301853&rfr_iscdi=true