Root fractures: epidemiological, clinical and radiographic aspects

Chronic root fractures are a relative frequent dental condition, occurring both in vital teeth and in teeth with root canal treatment, with a difficult and frustrating diagnosis. Two clinical forms are described: crown-root fractures with crown origin and vertical root fractures with root origin. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Romanian journal of morphology and embryology 2017, Vol.58 (2), p.501-506
Hauptverfasser: Popescu, Sanda Mihaela, Diaconu, Oana Andreea, Scrieciu, Monica, Marinescu, Iulia Roxana, Drăghici, Emma Cristina, Truşcă, Anca Gabriela, Bănică, Alexandra Carina, Vătu, Mihaela, MercuŢ, Veronica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 506
container_issue 2
container_start_page 501
container_title Romanian journal of morphology and embryology
container_volume 58
creator Popescu, Sanda Mihaela
Diaconu, Oana Andreea
Scrieciu, Monica
Marinescu, Iulia Roxana
Drăghici, Emma Cristina
Truşcă, Anca Gabriela
Bănică, Alexandra Carina
Vătu, Mihaela
MercuŢ, Veronica
description Chronic root fractures are a relative frequent dental condition, occurring both in vital teeth and in teeth with root canal treatment, with a difficult and frustrating diagnosis. Two clinical forms are described: crown-root fractures with crown origin and vertical root fractures with root origin. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth in two dental clinics with different profile [oral rehabilitation (OR) and endodontics (E)] and to present some particular aspects of the root fractures. A retrospective study over a period of five years was performed to determine the number of extracted teeth and the motives for extraction. For root fractured extracted teeth were noted: fracture type, tooth vitality, restoration type. Although the number of the patients with tooth extractions in the five years period was significantly higher in OR clinic than in E clinic, the number of tooth extractions was almost similar. Most of the teeth (70.6%) were extracted for caries complications. The prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth was 17.93%. In OR clinic, women had more root fractured extracted teeth compared with E clinic, where the number of root fractured extracted teeth was higher in men. Most extracted teeth for root fracture were teeth with prosthetic restorations followed by teeth with root canal treatment and dental fillings. The most extracted teeth for root fracture were maxillary premolars, almost similar for both sexes, followed by mandibular molars. The teeth with least extractions for root fractures were mandibular incisors and mandibular canine.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922509068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1922509068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-ebaaa498867a138839fc60c7dc77a4f477de651499bf942d85e21238d238989e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhHNQ3GXdvyA5erCQj7ZJvOmirrAgiJ7L2-TtGmmbmLQH_70V14Fh5vAwMGdkzYVgBauEWJFtzp9sUc0qJtUFWQmtJBOyXpP71xAm2iWw05ww31KM3uHgQx-O3kJ_Q23vx99GYXQ0gfPhmCB-eEshR7RTviTnHfQZt6fckPfHh7fdvji8PD3v7g5FFJxPBbYAUBqtawVcai1NZ2tmlbNKQdmVSjmsK14a03amFE5XKLiQ2i022qDckOu_3ZjC14x5agafLfY9jBjm3HAjRMUMq_WCXp3QuR3QNTH5AdJ38_9b_gCnklMT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1922509068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Root fractures: epidemiological, clinical and radiographic aspects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Popescu, Sanda Mihaela ; Diaconu, Oana Andreea ; Scrieciu, Monica ; Marinescu, Iulia Roxana ; Drăghici, Emma Cristina ; Truşcă, Anca Gabriela ; Bănică, Alexandra Carina ; Vătu, Mihaela ; MercuŢ, Veronica</creator><creatorcontrib>Popescu, Sanda Mihaela ; Diaconu, Oana Andreea ; Scrieciu, Monica ; Marinescu, Iulia Roxana ; Drăghici, Emma Cristina ; Truşcă, Anca Gabriela ; Bănică, Alexandra Carina ; Vătu, Mihaela ; MercuŢ, Veronica</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic root fractures are a relative frequent dental condition, occurring both in vital teeth and in teeth with root canal treatment, with a difficult and frustrating diagnosis. Two clinical forms are described: crown-root fractures with crown origin and vertical root fractures with root origin. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth in two dental clinics with different profile [oral rehabilitation (OR) and endodontics (E)] and to present some particular aspects of the root fractures. A retrospective study over a period of five years was performed to determine the number of extracted teeth and the motives for extraction. For root fractured extracted teeth were noted: fracture type, tooth vitality, restoration type. Although the number of the patients with tooth extractions in the five years period was significantly higher in OR clinic than in E clinic, the number of tooth extractions was almost similar. Most of the teeth (70.6%) were extracted for caries complications. The prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth was 17.93%. In OR clinic, women had more root fractured extracted teeth compared with E clinic, where the number of root fractured extracted teeth was higher in men. Most extracted teeth for root fracture were teeth with prosthetic restorations followed by teeth with root canal treatment and dental fillings. The most extracted teeth for root fracture were maxillary premolars, almost similar for both sexes, followed by mandibular molars. The teeth with least extractions for root fractures were mandibular incisors and mandibular canine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1220-0522</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28730236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Romania</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Tooth Fractures - epidemiology ; Tooth Root - pathology</subject><ispartof>Romanian journal of morphology and embryology, 2017, Vol.58 (2), p.501-506</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Popescu, Sanda Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaconu, Oana Andreea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scrieciu, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinescu, Iulia Roxana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drăghici, Emma Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truşcă, Anca Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bănică, Alexandra Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vătu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MercuŢ, Veronica</creatorcontrib><title>Root fractures: epidemiological, clinical and radiographic aspects</title><title>Romanian journal of morphology and embryology</title><addtitle>Rom J Morphol Embryol</addtitle><description>Chronic root fractures are a relative frequent dental condition, occurring both in vital teeth and in teeth with root canal treatment, with a difficult and frustrating diagnosis. Two clinical forms are described: crown-root fractures with crown origin and vertical root fractures with root origin. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth in two dental clinics with different profile [oral rehabilitation (OR) and endodontics (E)] and to present some particular aspects of the root fractures. A retrospective study over a period of five years was performed to determine the number of extracted teeth and the motives for extraction. For root fractured extracted teeth were noted: fracture type, tooth vitality, restoration type. Although the number of the patients with tooth extractions in the five years period was significantly higher in OR clinic than in E clinic, the number of tooth extractions was almost similar. Most of the teeth (70.6%) were extracted for caries complications. The prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth was 17.93%. In OR clinic, women had more root fractured extracted teeth compared with E clinic, where the number of root fractured extracted teeth was higher in men. Most extracted teeth for root fracture were teeth with prosthetic restorations followed by teeth with root canal treatment and dental fillings. The most extracted teeth for root fracture were maxillary premolars, almost similar for both sexes, followed by mandibular molars. The teeth with least extractions for root fractures were mandibular incisors and mandibular canine.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tooth Root - pathology</subject><issn>1220-0522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhHNQ3GXdvyA5erCQj7ZJvOmirrAgiJ7L2-TtGmmbmLQH_70V14Fh5vAwMGdkzYVgBauEWJFtzp9sUc0qJtUFWQmtJBOyXpP71xAm2iWw05ww31KM3uHgQx-O3kJ_Q23vx99GYXQ0gfPhmCB-eEshR7RTviTnHfQZt6fckPfHh7fdvji8PD3v7g5FFJxPBbYAUBqtawVcai1NZ2tmlbNKQdmVSjmsK14a03amFE5XKLiQ2i022qDckOu_3ZjC14x5agafLfY9jBjm3HAjRMUMq_WCXp3QuR3QNTH5AdJ38_9b_gCnklMT</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Popescu, Sanda Mihaela</creator><creator>Diaconu, Oana Andreea</creator><creator>Scrieciu, Monica</creator><creator>Marinescu, Iulia Roxana</creator><creator>Drăghici, Emma Cristina</creator><creator>Truşcă, Anca Gabriela</creator><creator>Bănică, Alexandra Carina</creator><creator>Vătu, Mihaela</creator><creator>MercuŢ, Veronica</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Root fractures: epidemiological, clinical and radiographic aspects</title><author>Popescu, Sanda Mihaela ; Diaconu, Oana Andreea ; Scrieciu, Monica ; Marinescu, Iulia Roxana ; Drăghici, Emma Cristina ; Truşcă, Anca Gabriela ; Bănică, Alexandra Carina ; Vătu, Mihaela ; MercuŢ, Veronica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-ebaaa498867a138839fc60c7dc77a4f477de651499bf942d85e21238d238989e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tooth Root - pathology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Popescu, Sanda Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaconu, Oana Andreea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scrieciu, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinescu, Iulia Roxana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drăghici, Emma Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truşcă, Anca Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bănică, Alexandra Carina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vătu, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MercuŢ, Veronica</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Romanian journal of morphology and embryology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Popescu, Sanda Mihaela</au><au>Diaconu, Oana Andreea</au><au>Scrieciu, Monica</au><au>Marinescu, Iulia Roxana</au><au>Drăghici, Emma Cristina</au><au>Truşcă, Anca Gabriela</au><au>Bănică, Alexandra Carina</au><au>Vătu, Mihaela</au><au>MercuŢ, Veronica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Root fractures: epidemiological, clinical and radiographic aspects</atitle><jtitle>Romanian journal of morphology and embryology</jtitle><addtitle>Rom J Morphol Embryol</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>501-506</pages><issn>1220-0522</issn><abstract>Chronic root fractures are a relative frequent dental condition, occurring both in vital teeth and in teeth with root canal treatment, with a difficult and frustrating diagnosis. Two clinical forms are described: crown-root fractures with crown origin and vertical root fractures with root origin. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth in two dental clinics with different profile [oral rehabilitation (OR) and endodontics (E)] and to present some particular aspects of the root fractures. A retrospective study over a period of five years was performed to determine the number of extracted teeth and the motives for extraction. For root fractured extracted teeth were noted: fracture type, tooth vitality, restoration type. Although the number of the patients with tooth extractions in the five years period was significantly higher in OR clinic than in E clinic, the number of tooth extractions was almost similar. Most of the teeth (70.6%) were extracted for caries complications. The prevalence of the root fractured extracted teeth was 17.93%. In OR clinic, women had more root fractured extracted teeth compared with E clinic, where the number of root fractured extracted teeth was higher in men. Most extracted teeth for root fracture were teeth with prosthetic restorations followed by teeth with root canal treatment and dental fillings. The most extracted teeth for root fracture were maxillary premolars, almost similar for both sexes, followed by mandibular molars. The teeth with least extractions for root fractures were mandibular incisors and mandibular canine.</abstract><cop>Romania</cop><pmid>28730236</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1220-0522
ispartof Romanian journal of morphology and embryology, 2017, Vol.58 (2), p.501-506
issn 1220-0522
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1922509068
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Retrospective Studies
Tooth Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Tooth Fractures - epidemiology
Tooth Root - pathology
title Root fractures: epidemiological, clinical and radiographic aspects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A58%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Root%20fractures:%20epidemiological,%20clinical%20and%20radiographic%20aspects&rft.jtitle=Romanian%20journal%20of%20morphology%20and%20embryology&rft.au=Popescu,%20Sanda%20Mihaela&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=501-506&rft.issn=1220-0522&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1922509068%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1922509068&rft_id=info:pmid/28730236&rfr_iscdi=true