Branch propagation, not cladoptosis, permits dispersive, clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods
In riparian (floodplain) zones, physical disturbances of floods and ice-scour undercut and topple shrubs and trees into the river where branches are sheared off by tumbling and turbulence. These branch fragments are deposited downstream along bars with sediments that retain moisture and promote adve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest ecology and management 2003-12, Vol.186 (1), p.227-242 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 242 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | Forest ecology and management |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Rood, Stewart B Kalischuk, Andrea R Polzin, Mary Louise Braatne, Jeffrey H |
description | In riparian (floodplain) zones, physical disturbances of floods and ice-scour undercut and topple shrubs and trees into the river where branches are sheared off by tumbling and turbulence. These branch fragments are deposited downstream along bars with sediments that retain moisture and promote adventitious rooting to produce vigorous clonal saplings. We observed such ‘branch propagation’ along rivers of western North America for
Tacamahaca cottonwoods, being common for
P. balsamifera (balsam poplar) and
P. balsamifera subsp.
trichocarpa (black cottonwood) but less common for
Populus angustifolia (narrowleaf cottonwood). It was rare for the
Aigeiros cottonwoods,
P. deltoides (prairie cottonwood) or
P. fremontii (Fremont cottonwood). Branch propagation was sparse downstream from dams due to the trapping of branch fragments and sediments by the reservoirs combined with unfavorable patterns of flow regulation. Conversely, branch propagation was abundant after major floods such as for black cottonwoods along the Elk River, British Columbia, following the flood-of-record in 1995. In that case, excavation of saplings from branch fragments in 1997 revealed that 91% originated from sheared branches, 7% from beaver browse and only 1% included the basal enlargement characteristic of physiological abscission. Consistent with this minimal representation, only 3% of abscised branches from narrowleaf, prairie and black cottonwoods successfully propagated under favorable greenhouse conditions in moist sand, in contrast to 96% success of winter shoot cuttings from these species. These studies indicate that branch propagation enables dispersive clonal reproduction for riparian cottonwoods. It provides vigorous saplings and is promoted by geomorphic disturbance and beaver browse. These observations reject the concept of ‘cladoptosis’ which proposed that physiologically abscised cottonwood branches commonly serve as clonal propagules. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00276-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19213442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112703002767</els_id><sourcerecordid>19213442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c264a5203308eb2e51d243d75750c6ac4a3cca8c3849c392b89fc178f89a204b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhJyB8QiBtYPyR2DmhUrWAVIlD6dmaHTvFKBsH21vEv8fbRVw5zRyeZz5exl4KeCdADO9vQBnbCSHNG1BvAaQZOvOIbYQ1sjOg5WO2-Yc8Zc9K-QEAfa_thvmPGRf6ztecVrzDGtOy5UuqnGb0aa2pxLLla8j7WAv3sbS2xPuwbUBacOY5NNUf6GjyNPEcV8wRF06p1rT8SsmX5-zJhHMJL_7WM3Z7dfnt4nN3_fXTl4vz647UKGpHctDYS1AKbNjJ0AsvtfKmNz3QgKRREaElZfXYDLmz40TC2MmOKEHv1Bl7fZrbTvp5CKW6fSwU5hmXkA7FiVEKpbVsYH8CKadScpjcmuMe828nwB0zdQ-ZumNgDpR7yNSZ5r06eRMmh3c5Fnd7I0EogFGJQahGfDgRof15H0N2hWJYKPiYA1XnU_zPjj8Fg4jx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19213442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Branch propagation, not cladoptosis, permits dispersive, clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Rood, Stewart B ; Kalischuk, Andrea R ; Polzin, Mary Louise ; Braatne, Jeffrey H</creator><creatorcontrib>Rood, Stewart B ; Kalischuk, Andrea R ; Polzin, Mary Louise ; Braatne, Jeffrey H</creatorcontrib><description>In riparian (floodplain) zones, physical disturbances of floods and ice-scour undercut and topple shrubs and trees into the river where branches are sheared off by tumbling and turbulence. These branch fragments are deposited downstream along bars with sediments that retain moisture and promote adventitious rooting to produce vigorous clonal saplings. We observed such ‘branch propagation’ along rivers of western North America for
Tacamahaca cottonwoods, being common for
P. balsamifera (balsam poplar) and
P. balsamifera subsp.
trichocarpa (black cottonwood) but less common for
Populus angustifolia (narrowleaf cottonwood). It was rare for the
Aigeiros cottonwoods,
P. deltoides (prairie cottonwood) or
P. fremontii (Fremont cottonwood). Branch propagation was sparse downstream from dams due to the trapping of branch fragments and sediments by the reservoirs combined with unfavorable patterns of flow regulation. Conversely, branch propagation was abundant after major floods such as for black cottonwoods along the Elk River, British Columbia, following the flood-of-record in 1995. In that case, excavation of saplings from branch fragments in 1997 revealed that 91% originated from sheared branches, 7% from beaver browse and only 1% included the basal enlargement characteristic of physiological abscission. Consistent with this minimal representation, only 3% of abscised branches from narrowleaf, prairie and black cottonwoods successfully propagated under favorable greenhouse conditions in moist sand, in contrast to 96% success of winter shoot cuttings from these species. These studies indicate that branch propagation enables dispersive clonal reproduction for riparian cottonwoods. It provides vigorous saplings and is promoted by geomorphic disturbance and beaver browse. These observations reject the concept of ‘cladoptosis’ which proposed that physiologically abscised cottonwood branches commonly serve as clonal propagules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00276-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>abscission ; Aigeiros ; Aigeiros cottonwoods ; branch fragment deposition ; Branches ; Clones ; Cottonwoods ; Dams ; dams (hydrology) ; Elk River ; floodplains ; floods ; geographical distribution ; plant cuttings ; plant propagation ; plant reproduction ; Poplars ; Populus ; Populus angustifolia ; Populus balsamifera ; Populus balsamifera subsp. balsamifera ; Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa ; Populus deltoides ; Populus fremontii ; propagation material dispersion ; Reproduction ; Riparian ; riparian areas ; Rivers ; rooting ; sediment deposition ; shoots ; Tacamahaca ; Tacamahaca cottonwoods ; tree damage ; woodlands</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2003-12, Vol.186 (1), p.227-242</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c264a5203308eb2e51d243d75750c6ac4a3cca8c3849c392b89fc178f89a204b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c264a5203308eb2e51d243d75750c6ac4a3cca8c3849c392b89fc178f89a204b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00276-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rood, Stewart B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalischuk, Andrea R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzin, Mary Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braatne, Jeffrey H</creatorcontrib><title>Branch propagation, not cladoptosis, permits dispersive, clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>In riparian (floodplain) zones, physical disturbances of floods and ice-scour undercut and topple shrubs and trees into the river where branches are sheared off by tumbling and turbulence. These branch fragments are deposited downstream along bars with sediments that retain moisture and promote adventitious rooting to produce vigorous clonal saplings. We observed such ‘branch propagation’ along rivers of western North America for
Tacamahaca cottonwoods, being common for
P. balsamifera (balsam poplar) and
P. balsamifera subsp.
trichocarpa (black cottonwood) but less common for
Populus angustifolia (narrowleaf cottonwood). It was rare for the
Aigeiros cottonwoods,
P. deltoides (prairie cottonwood) or
P. fremontii (Fremont cottonwood). Branch propagation was sparse downstream from dams due to the trapping of branch fragments and sediments by the reservoirs combined with unfavorable patterns of flow regulation. Conversely, branch propagation was abundant after major floods such as for black cottonwoods along the Elk River, British Columbia, following the flood-of-record in 1995. In that case, excavation of saplings from branch fragments in 1997 revealed that 91% originated from sheared branches, 7% from beaver browse and only 1% included the basal enlargement characteristic of physiological abscission. Consistent with this minimal representation, only 3% of abscised branches from narrowleaf, prairie and black cottonwoods successfully propagated under favorable greenhouse conditions in moist sand, in contrast to 96% success of winter shoot cuttings from these species. These studies indicate that branch propagation enables dispersive clonal reproduction for riparian cottonwoods. It provides vigorous saplings and is promoted by geomorphic disturbance and beaver browse. These observations reject the concept of ‘cladoptosis’ which proposed that physiologically abscised cottonwood branches commonly serve as clonal propagules.</description><subject>abscission</subject><subject>Aigeiros</subject><subject>Aigeiros cottonwoods</subject><subject>branch fragment deposition</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>Clones</subject><subject>Cottonwoods</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>dams (hydrology)</subject><subject>Elk River</subject><subject>floodplains</subject><subject>floods</subject><subject>geographical distribution</subject><subject>plant cuttings</subject><subject>plant propagation</subject><subject>plant reproduction</subject><subject>Poplars</subject><subject>Populus</subject><subject>Populus angustifolia</subject><subject>Populus balsamifera</subject><subject>Populus balsamifera subsp. balsamifera</subject><subject>Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa</subject><subject>Populus deltoides</subject><subject>Populus fremontii</subject><subject>propagation material dispersion</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Riparian</subject><subject>riparian areas</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>rooting</subject><subject>sediment deposition</subject><subject>shoots</subject><subject>Tacamahaca</subject><subject>Tacamahaca cottonwoods</subject><subject>tree damage</subject><subject>woodlands</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EEkvhJyB8QiBtYPyR2DmhUrWAVIlD6dmaHTvFKBsH21vEv8fbRVw5zRyeZz5exl4KeCdADO9vQBnbCSHNG1BvAaQZOvOIbYQ1sjOg5WO2-Yc8Zc9K-QEAfa_thvmPGRf6ztecVrzDGtOy5UuqnGb0aa2pxLLla8j7WAv3sbS2xPuwbUBacOY5NNUf6GjyNPEcV8wRF06p1rT8SsmX5-zJhHMJL_7WM3Z7dfnt4nN3_fXTl4vz647UKGpHctDYS1AKbNjJ0AsvtfKmNz3QgKRREaElZfXYDLmz40TC2MmOKEHv1Bl7fZrbTvp5CKW6fSwU5hmXkA7FiVEKpbVsYH8CKadScpjcmuMe828nwB0zdQ-ZumNgDpR7yNSZ5r06eRMmh3c5Fnd7I0EogFGJQahGfDgRof15H0N2hWJYKPiYA1XnU_zPjj8Fg4jx</recordid><startdate>20031205</startdate><enddate>20031205</enddate><creator>Rood, Stewart B</creator><creator>Kalischuk, Andrea R</creator><creator>Polzin, Mary Louise</creator><creator>Braatne, Jeffrey H</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031205</creationdate><title>Branch propagation, not cladoptosis, permits dispersive, clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods</title><author>Rood, Stewart B ; Kalischuk, Andrea R ; Polzin, Mary Louise ; Braatne, Jeffrey H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c264a5203308eb2e51d243d75750c6ac4a3cca8c3849c392b89fc178f89a204b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>abscission</topic><topic>Aigeiros</topic><topic>Aigeiros cottonwoods</topic><topic>branch fragment deposition</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>Clones</topic><topic>Cottonwoods</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>dams (hydrology)</topic><topic>Elk River</topic><topic>floodplains</topic><topic>floods</topic><topic>geographical distribution</topic><topic>plant cuttings</topic><topic>plant propagation</topic><topic>plant reproduction</topic><topic>Poplars</topic><topic>Populus</topic><topic>Populus angustifolia</topic><topic>Populus balsamifera</topic><topic>Populus balsamifera subsp. balsamifera</topic><topic>Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa</topic><topic>Populus deltoides</topic><topic>Populus fremontii</topic><topic>propagation material dispersion</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Riparian</topic><topic>riparian areas</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>rooting</topic><topic>sediment deposition</topic><topic>shoots</topic><topic>Tacamahaca</topic><topic>Tacamahaca cottonwoods</topic><topic>tree damage</topic><topic>woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rood, Stewart B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalischuk, Andrea R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzin, Mary Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braatne, Jeffrey H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rood, Stewart B</au><au>Kalischuk, Andrea R</au><au>Polzin, Mary Louise</au><au>Braatne, Jeffrey H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Branch propagation, not cladoptosis, permits dispersive, clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2003-12-05</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>242</epage><pages>227-242</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><abstract>In riparian (floodplain) zones, physical disturbances of floods and ice-scour undercut and topple shrubs and trees into the river where branches are sheared off by tumbling and turbulence. These branch fragments are deposited downstream along bars with sediments that retain moisture and promote adventitious rooting to produce vigorous clonal saplings. We observed such ‘branch propagation’ along rivers of western North America for
Tacamahaca cottonwoods, being common for
P. balsamifera (balsam poplar) and
P. balsamifera subsp.
trichocarpa (black cottonwood) but less common for
Populus angustifolia (narrowleaf cottonwood). It was rare for the
Aigeiros cottonwoods,
P. deltoides (prairie cottonwood) or
P. fremontii (Fremont cottonwood). Branch propagation was sparse downstream from dams due to the trapping of branch fragments and sediments by the reservoirs combined with unfavorable patterns of flow regulation. Conversely, branch propagation was abundant after major floods such as for black cottonwoods along the Elk River, British Columbia, following the flood-of-record in 1995. In that case, excavation of saplings from branch fragments in 1997 revealed that 91% originated from sheared branches, 7% from beaver browse and only 1% included the basal enlargement characteristic of physiological abscission. Consistent with this minimal representation, only 3% of abscised branches from narrowleaf, prairie and black cottonwoods successfully propagated under favorable greenhouse conditions in moist sand, in contrast to 96% success of winter shoot cuttings from these species. These studies indicate that branch propagation enables dispersive clonal reproduction for riparian cottonwoods. It provides vigorous saplings and is promoted by geomorphic disturbance and beaver browse. These observations reject the concept of ‘cladoptosis’ which proposed that physiologically abscised cottonwood branches commonly serve as clonal propagules.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00276-7</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1127 |
ispartof | Forest ecology and management, 2003-12, Vol.186 (1), p.227-242 |
issn | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19213442 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | abscission Aigeiros Aigeiros cottonwoods branch fragment deposition Branches Clones Cottonwoods Dams dams (hydrology) Elk River floodplains floods geographical distribution plant cuttings plant propagation plant reproduction Poplars Populus Populus angustifolia Populus balsamifera Populus balsamifera subsp. balsamifera Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa Populus deltoides Populus fremontii propagation material dispersion Reproduction Riparian riparian areas Rivers rooting sediment deposition shoots Tacamahaca Tacamahaca cottonwoods tree damage woodlands |
title | Branch propagation, not cladoptosis, permits dispersive, clonal reproduction of riparian cottonwoods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A25%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Branch%20propagation,%20not%20cladoptosis,%20permits%20dispersive,%20clonal%20reproduction%20of%20riparian%20cottonwoods&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Rood,%20Stewart%20B&rft.date=2003-12-05&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=242&rft.pages=227-242&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00276-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19213442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19213442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112703002767&rfr_iscdi=true |