Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis
Background The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is strongly associated with infant abuse, but the biomechanics responsible for this injury have not been rigorously studied. Radiologic and CT-pathological correlates show that the distal tibial CML always involves the cortex near the subperiosteal bon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric radiology 2017-11, Vol.47 (12), p.1622-1630 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1630 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1622 |
container_title | Pediatric radiology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Tsai, Andy Coats, Brittany Kleinman, Paul K. |
description | Background
The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is strongly associated with infant abuse, but the biomechanics responsible for this injury have not been rigorously studied. Radiologic and CT-pathological correlates show that the distal tibial CML always involves the cortex near the subperiosteal bone collar, with variable extension of the fracture into the medullary cavity. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the primary site of bone failure is cortical, rather than intramedullary.
Objective
This study focuses on the strain patterns generated from finite element modeling to identify loading scenarios and regions of the cortex that are susceptible to bone failure.
Materials and methods
A geometric model was constructed from a normal 3-month-old infant’s distal tibia and fibula. The model’s boundary conditions were set to mimic forceful manipulation of the ankle with eight load modalities (tension, compression, internal rotation, external rotation, dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, valgus bending and varus bending).
Results
For all modalities except internal and external rotation, simulations showed increased cortical strains near the subperiosteal bone collar. Tension generated the largest magnitude of cortical strain (24%) that was uniformly distributed near the subperiosteal bone collar. Compression generated the same distribution of strain but to a lesser magnitude overall (15%). Dorsiflexion and plantar flexion generated high (22%) and moderate (14%) localized cortical strains, respectively, near the subperiosteal bone collar. Lower cortical strains resulted from valgus bending, varus bending, internal rotation and external rotation (8–10%). The highest valgus and varus bending cortical strains occurred medially.
Conclusion
These simulations suggest that the likelihood of the initial cortical bone failure of the CML is higher along the margin of the subperiosteal bone collar when the ankle is under tension, compression, valgus bending, varus bending, dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, but not under internal and external rotation. Focal cortical strains along the medial margins of the subperiosteal bone collar with varus and valgus bending may explain the known tendency for focal distal tibial CMLs to occur medially. Further research is needed to determine the threshold of applied forces required to produce this strong indicator of infant abuse. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920394040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957702486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6258ba553423c84cde4946b1b106bdb94f5c071b95f7299f4da741876bc8ebb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxEAQRRtRnPHxAW4k4MZNtPqRdNqdDr5AcOO-6e6pOD3kMaaSRf7eDKMigqta1Lm3isPYGYcrDqCvCUAonQLXqTSCp-Mem3MlRcqNKfbZHCTwFJQyM3ZEtAYAmXF5yGai0IIrLefs8S62NYaVa2KgpC2TfoVJqBxRDEmNvdusRkJXJRVSbJubpIxN7DHBCmts-sQ1rhop0gk7KF1FePo1j9nbw_3b4il9eX18Xty-pEFq0ae5yArvskwqIUOhwhKVUbnnnkPul96oMguguTdZqYUxpVo6rXihcx8K9F4es8td7aZrPwak3taRAlaVa7AdyHIjQBoFCib04g-6boduendLZVpP6op8oviOCl1L1GFpN12sXTdaDnYr2e4k20my3Uq245Q5_2oefI3Ln8S31QkQO4CmVfOO3a_T_7Z-AgFFhtc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957702486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tsai, Andy ; Coats, Brittany ; Kleinman, Paul K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Andy ; Coats, Brittany ; Kleinman, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is strongly associated with infant abuse, but the biomechanics responsible for this injury have not been rigorously studied. Radiologic and CT-pathological correlates show that the distal tibial CML always involves the cortex near the subperiosteal bone collar, with variable extension of the fracture into the medullary cavity. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the primary site of bone failure is cortical, rather than intramedullary.
Objective
This study focuses on the strain patterns generated from finite element modeling to identify loading scenarios and regions of the cortex that are susceptible to bone failure.
Materials and methods
A geometric model was constructed from a normal 3-month-old infant’s distal tibia and fibula. The model’s boundary conditions were set to mimic forceful manipulation of the ankle with eight load modalities (tension, compression, internal rotation, external rotation, dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, valgus bending and varus bending).
Results
For all modalities except internal and external rotation, simulations showed increased cortical strains near the subperiosteal bone collar. Tension generated the largest magnitude of cortical strain (24%) that was uniformly distributed near the subperiosteal bone collar. Compression generated the same distribution of strain but to a lesser magnitude overall (15%). Dorsiflexion and plantar flexion generated high (22%) and moderate (14%) localized cortical strains, respectively, near the subperiosteal bone collar. Lower cortical strains resulted from valgus bending, varus bending, internal rotation and external rotation (8–10%). The highest valgus and varus bending cortical strains occurred medially.
Conclusion
These simulations suggest that the likelihood of the initial cortical bone failure of the CML is higher along the margin of the subperiosteal bone collar when the ankle is under tension, compression, valgus bending, varus bending, dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, but not under internal and external rotation. Focal cortical strains along the medial margins of the subperiosteal bone collar with varus and valgus bending may explain the known tendency for focal distal tibial CMLs to occur medially. Further research is needed to determine the threshold of applied forces required to produce this strong indicator of infant abuse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28721473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abuse ; Ankle ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Boundary conditions ; Compression ; Computer simulation ; Correlation analysis ; Cortical bone ; Failure ; Fibula ; Fibula - diagnostic imaging ; Fibula - physiology ; Finite Element Analysis ; Finite element method ; Humans ; Imaging ; Infant ; Mathematical analysis ; Mechanical loading ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Models, Anatomic ; Neuroradiology ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pediatrics ; Plantar flexion ; Radiology ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tension ; Tibia ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tibia - physiology ; Ultrasound ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>Pediatric radiology, 2017-11, Vol.47 (12), p.1622-1630</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>Pediatric Radiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6258ba553423c84cde4946b1b106bdb94f5c071b95f7299f4da741876bc8ebb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6258ba553423c84cde4946b1b106bdb94f5c071b95f7299f4da741876bc8ebb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0089-6463</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coats, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis</title><title>Pediatric radiology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><description>Background
The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is strongly associated with infant abuse, but the biomechanics responsible for this injury have not been rigorously studied. Radiologic and CT-pathological correlates show that the distal tibial CML always involves the cortex near the subperiosteal bone collar, with variable extension of the fracture into the medullary cavity. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the primary site of bone failure is cortical, rather than intramedullary.
Objective
This study focuses on the strain patterns generated from finite element modeling to identify loading scenarios and regions of the cortex that are susceptible to bone failure.
Materials and methods
A geometric model was constructed from a normal 3-month-old infant’s distal tibia and fibula. The model’s boundary conditions were set to mimic forceful manipulation of the ankle with eight load modalities (tension, compression, internal rotation, external rotation, dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, valgus bending and varus bending).
Results
For all modalities except internal and external rotation, simulations showed increased cortical strains near the subperiosteal bone collar. Tension generated the largest magnitude of cortical strain (24%) that was uniformly distributed near the subperiosteal bone collar. Compression generated the same distribution of strain but to a lesser magnitude overall (15%). Dorsiflexion and plantar flexion generated high (22%) and moderate (14%) localized cortical strains, respectively, near the subperiosteal bone collar. Lower cortical strains resulted from valgus bending, varus bending, internal rotation and external rotation (8–10%). The highest valgus and varus bending cortical strains occurred medially.
Conclusion
These simulations suggest that the likelihood of the initial cortical bone failure of the CML is higher along the margin of the subperiosteal bone collar when the ankle is under tension, compression, valgus bending, varus bending, dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, but not under internal and external rotation. Focal cortical strains along the medial margins of the subperiosteal bone collar with varus and valgus bending may explain the known tendency for focal distal tibial CMLs to occur medially. Further research is needed to determine the threshold of applied forces required to produce this strong indicator of infant abuse.</description><subject>Abuse</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Cortical bone</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Fibula</subject><subject>Fibula - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fibula - physiology</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mechanical loading</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Plantar flexion</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tension</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>0301-0449</issn><issn>1432-1998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxEAQRRtRnPHxAW4k4MZNtPqRdNqdDr5AcOO-6e6pOD3kMaaSRf7eDKMigqta1Lm3isPYGYcrDqCvCUAonQLXqTSCp-Mem3MlRcqNKfbZHCTwFJQyM3ZEtAYAmXF5yGai0IIrLefs8S62NYaVa2KgpC2TfoVJqBxRDEmNvdusRkJXJRVSbJubpIxN7DHBCmts-sQ1rhop0gk7KF1FePo1j9nbw_3b4il9eX18Xty-pEFq0ae5yArvskwqIUOhwhKVUbnnnkPul96oMguguTdZqYUxpVo6rXihcx8K9F4es8td7aZrPwak3taRAlaVa7AdyHIjQBoFCib04g-6boduendLZVpP6op8oviOCl1L1GFpN12sXTdaDnYr2e4k20my3Uq245Q5_2oefI3Ln8S31QkQO4CmVfOO3a_T_7Z-AgFFhtc</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Tsai, Andy</creator><creator>Coats, Brittany</creator><creator>Kleinman, Paul K.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-6463</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis</title><author>Tsai, Andy ; Coats, Brittany ; Kleinman, Paul K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6258ba553423c84cde4946b1b106bdb94f5c071b95f7299f4da741876bc8ebb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abuse</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Cortical bone</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Fibula</topic><topic>Fibula - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fibula - physiology</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mechanical loading</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Plantar flexion</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tension</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coats, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, Paul K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsai, Andy</au><au>Coats, Brittany</au><au>Kleinman, Paul K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1622</spage><epage>1630</epage><pages>1622-1630</pages><issn>0301-0449</issn><eissn>1432-1998</eissn><abstract>Background
The classic metaphyseal lesion (CML) is strongly associated with infant abuse, but the biomechanics responsible for this injury have not been rigorously studied. Radiologic and CT-pathological correlates show that the distal tibial CML always involves the cortex near the subperiosteal bone collar, with variable extension of the fracture into the medullary cavity. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the primary site of bone failure is cortical, rather than intramedullary.
Objective
This study focuses on the strain patterns generated from finite element modeling to identify loading scenarios and regions of the cortex that are susceptible to bone failure.
Materials and methods
A geometric model was constructed from a normal 3-month-old infant’s distal tibia and fibula. The model’s boundary conditions were set to mimic forceful manipulation of the ankle with eight load modalities (tension, compression, internal rotation, external rotation, dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, valgus bending and varus bending).
Results
For all modalities except internal and external rotation, simulations showed increased cortical strains near the subperiosteal bone collar. Tension generated the largest magnitude of cortical strain (24%) that was uniformly distributed near the subperiosteal bone collar. Compression generated the same distribution of strain but to a lesser magnitude overall (15%). Dorsiflexion and plantar flexion generated high (22%) and moderate (14%) localized cortical strains, respectively, near the subperiosteal bone collar. Lower cortical strains resulted from valgus bending, varus bending, internal rotation and external rotation (8–10%). The highest valgus and varus bending cortical strains occurred medially.
Conclusion
These simulations suggest that the likelihood of the initial cortical bone failure of the CML is higher along the margin of the subperiosteal bone collar when the ankle is under tension, compression, valgus bending, varus bending, dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, but not under internal and external rotation. Focal cortical strains along the medial margins of the subperiosteal bone collar with varus and valgus bending may explain the known tendency for focal distal tibial CMLs to occur medially. Further research is needed to determine the threshold of applied forces required to produce this strong indicator of infant abuse.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28721473</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-6463</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-0449 |
ispartof | Pediatric radiology, 2017-11, Vol.47 (12), p.1622-1630 |
issn | 0301-0449 1432-1998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920394040 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abuse Ankle Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Boundary conditions Compression Computer simulation Correlation analysis Cortical bone Failure Fibula Fibula - diagnostic imaging Fibula - physiology Finite Element Analysis Finite element method Humans Imaging Infant Mathematical analysis Mechanical loading Medicine Medicine & Public Health Models, Anatomic Neuroradiology Nuclear Medicine Oncology Original Article Pediatrics Plantar flexion Radiology Stress, Mechanical Tension Tibia Tibia - diagnostic imaging Tibia - physiology Ultrasound X-Ray Microtomography |
title | Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A41%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanics%20of%20the%20classic%20metaphyseal%20lesion:%20finite%20element%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20radiology&rft.au=Tsai,%20Andy&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1622&rft.epage=1630&rft.pages=1622-1630&rft.issn=0301-0449&rft.eissn=1432-1998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957702486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957702486&rft_id=info:pmid/28721473&rfr_iscdi=true |