Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings
INTRODUCTION: The coordination of team effort on shared tasks is an area of inquiry. A number of tests of team performance in challenging environments have been developed without comparison or standardization. This article provides a systematic review of the most accessible and usable low-to-medium...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Aerospace medicine and human performance 2017-08, Vol.88 (8), p.722-729 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 729 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 722 |
| container_title | Aerospace medicine and human performance |
| container_volume | 88 |
| creator | Lawson, Ben D. Britt, Thomas W. Kelley, Amanda M. Athy, Jeremy R. Legan, Shauna M. |
| description | INTRODUCTION: The coordination of team effort on shared tasks is an area of inquiry. A number of tests of team performance in challenging environments have been developed without comparison or standardization. This article provides a systematic review of the most accessible and
usable low-to-medium fidelity computerized tests of team performance and determines which are most applicable to military- and aviation-relevant research, such as studies of group command, control, communication, and crew coordination.METHODS: A search was conducted to identify
computerized measures of team performance. In addition to extensive literature searches (DTIC, Psychinfo, PubMed), the authors reached out to team performance researchers at conferences and through electronic communication.RESULTS: Identified were 57 potential tests according to
6 specific selection criteria (e.g., the requirement for automated collection of team performance and coordination processes, the use of military-relevant scenarios). The following seven tests (listed alphabetically) were considered most suitable for military needs: Agent Enabled Decision
Group Environment (AEDGE), C3Conflict, the C3 (Command, Control, & Communications) Interactive Task for Identifying Emerging Situations (NeoCITIES), Distributed Dynamic Decision Making (DDD), Duo Wondrous Original Method Basic Awareness/Airmanship Test (DuoWOMBAT), the Leader
Development Simulator (LDS), and the Planning Task for Teams (PLATT). Strengths and weaknesses of these tests are described and recommendations offered to help researchers identify the test most suitable for their particular needs.DISCUSSION: Adoption of a few standard computerized
test batteries to study team performance would facilitate the evaluation of interventions intended to enhance group performance in multiple challenging military and aerospace operational environments.Lawson BD, Britt TW, Kelley AM, Athy JR, Legan SM. Computerized tests of team performance and crew coordination suitable for military/aviation settings. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(8):722-729. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3357/AMHP.4786.2017 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920391267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>asma/amhp/2017/00000088/00000008/art00003</ingid><sourcerecordid>2013691659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9723d40ca494a7b92e8e7e50bd1cf5c29e78f4bd0373db9c685e720ebd3416a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1PHSEUxUlTU4267bKZpJtu3pOPYYDly6StJtqaqGvCDHcsZgZegbGpf72M79UmTcqGQzj3B_cehN4TvGaMi7PN1fn1uhayWVNMxBt0RJngq4ZR-vZVk_oQnab0gDEmNSGU83fokEpRKiQ5QrYN03bOEN0T2OoWUk5VGIowU3UNcQhxMr6HynhbtRF-VW0I0Tpvsgu-upldNt0IVfFVV24sp_j7bPPo9teQs_P36QQdDGZMcLrfj9Hdl8-37fnq8vvXi3ZzueprTvNKCcpsjXtTq9qITlGQIIDjzpJ-4D1VIORQdxYzwWyn-kZyKH1AZ1lNGiPZMfq0425j-DmXXvTkUg_jaDyEOWmiKGaK0EYU68d_rA9hjr78TpfJsEaRhqviWu9cfQwpRRj0Nrqp9KgJ1ksEeolALxEsZQv2wx47dxPYV_ufgRfDZmcocwGfzd9nTZqMNtOP7QtJ45cl5V5gqU3Mi2CF8e0_DNfvMEv2S_T6UUovC5ASLInSJX-mLQxmHrMuWen7J50Yewbqz6_D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2013691659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lawson, Ben D. ; Britt, Thomas W. ; Kelley, Amanda M. ; Athy, Jeremy R. ; Legan, Shauna M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Ben D. ; Britt, Thomas W. ; Kelley, Amanda M. ; Athy, Jeremy R. ; Legan, Shauna M.</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION: The coordination of team effort on shared tasks is an area of inquiry. A number of tests of team performance in challenging environments have been developed without comparison or standardization. This article provides a systematic review of the most accessible and
usable low-to-medium fidelity computerized tests of team performance and determines which are most applicable to military- and aviation-relevant research, such as studies of group command, control, communication, and crew coordination.METHODS: A search was conducted to identify
computerized measures of team performance. In addition to extensive literature searches (DTIC, Psychinfo, PubMed), the authors reached out to team performance researchers at conferences and through electronic communication.RESULTS: Identified were 57 potential tests according to
6 specific selection criteria (e.g., the requirement for automated collection of team performance and coordination processes, the use of military-relevant scenarios). The following seven tests (listed alphabetically) were considered most suitable for military needs: Agent Enabled Decision
Group Environment (AEDGE), C3Conflict, the C3 (Command, Control, & Communications) Interactive Task for Identifying Emerging Situations (NeoCITIES), Distributed Dynamic Decision Making (DDD), Duo Wondrous Original Method Basic Awareness/Airmanship Test (DuoWOMBAT), the Leader
Development Simulator (LDS), and the Planning Task for Teams (PLATT). Strengths and weaknesses of these tests are described and recommendations offered to help researchers identify the test most suitable for their particular needs.DISCUSSION: Adoption of a few standard computerized
test batteries to study team performance would facilitate the evaluation of interventions intended to enhance group performance in multiple challenging military and aerospace operational environments.Lawson BD, Britt TW, Kelley AM, Athy JR, Legan SM. Computerized tests of team performance and crew coordination suitable for military/aviation settings. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(8):722-729.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2375-6314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-6322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.4786.2017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28720181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Aerospace Medical Association</publisher><subject>Aviation ; Cognition ; Computer simulation ; Computers ; Decision Making ; Environmental law ; Group Performance ; Group Processes ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Interactive control ; Literature reviews ; Military ; Military aviation ; Military Performance ; Military Personnel ; Performance Assessment ; Researchers ; Shared Cognition ; Space life sciences ; Standardization ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Team Performance ; Test procedures</subject><ispartof>Aerospace medicine and human performance, 2017-08, Vol.88 (8), p.722-729</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aerospace Medical Association Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9723d40ca494a7b92e8e7e50bd1cf5c29e78f4bd0373db9c685e720ebd3416a83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Ben D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britt, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athy, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legan, Shauna M.</creatorcontrib><title>Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings</title><title>Aerospace medicine and human performance</title><addtitle>Aerosp Med Hum Perform</addtitle><description>INTRODUCTION: The coordination of team effort on shared tasks is an area of inquiry. A number of tests of team performance in challenging environments have been developed without comparison or standardization. This article provides a systematic review of the most accessible and
usable low-to-medium fidelity computerized tests of team performance and determines which are most applicable to military- and aviation-relevant research, such as studies of group command, control, communication, and crew coordination.METHODS: A search was conducted to identify
computerized measures of team performance. In addition to extensive literature searches (DTIC, Psychinfo, PubMed), the authors reached out to team performance researchers at conferences and through electronic communication.RESULTS: Identified were 57 potential tests according to
6 specific selection criteria (e.g., the requirement for automated collection of team performance and coordination processes, the use of military-relevant scenarios). The following seven tests (listed alphabetically) were considered most suitable for military needs: Agent Enabled Decision
Group Environment (AEDGE), C3Conflict, the C3 (Command, Control, & Communications) Interactive Task for Identifying Emerging Situations (NeoCITIES), Distributed Dynamic Decision Making (DDD), Duo Wondrous Original Method Basic Awareness/Airmanship Test (DuoWOMBAT), the Leader
Development Simulator (LDS), and the Planning Task for Teams (PLATT). Strengths and weaknesses of these tests are described and recommendations offered to help researchers identify the test most suitable for their particular needs.DISCUSSION: Adoption of a few standard computerized
test batteries to study team performance would facilitate the evaluation of interventions intended to enhance group performance in multiple challenging military and aerospace operational environments.Lawson BD, Britt TW, Kelley AM, Athy JR, Legan SM. Computerized tests of team performance and crew coordination suitable for military/aviation settings. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(8):722-729.</description><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Group Performance</subject><subject>Group Processes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Interactive control</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>Military aviation</subject><subject>Military Performance</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Performance Assessment</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Shared Cognition</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Team Performance</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><issn>2375-6314</issn><issn>2375-6322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1PHSEUxUlTU4267bKZpJtu3pOPYYDly6StJtqaqGvCDHcsZgZegbGpf72M79UmTcqGQzj3B_cehN4TvGaMi7PN1fn1uhayWVNMxBt0RJngq4ZR-vZVk_oQnab0gDEmNSGU83fokEpRKiQ5QrYN03bOEN0T2OoWUk5VGIowU3UNcQhxMr6HynhbtRF-VW0I0Tpvsgu-upldNt0IVfFVV24sp_j7bPPo9teQs_P36QQdDGZMcLrfj9Hdl8-37fnq8vvXi3ZzueprTvNKCcpsjXtTq9qITlGQIIDjzpJ-4D1VIORQdxYzwWyn-kZyKH1AZ1lNGiPZMfq0425j-DmXXvTkUg_jaDyEOWmiKGaK0EYU68d_rA9hjr78TpfJsEaRhqviWu9cfQwpRRj0Nrqp9KgJ1ksEeolALxEsZQv2wx47dxPYV_ufgRfDZmcocwGfzd9nTZqMNtOP7QtJ45cl5V5gqU3Mi2CF8e0_DNfvMEv2S_T6UUovC5ASLInSJX-mLQxmHrMuWen7J50Yewbqz6_D</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Lawson, Ben D.</creator><creator>Britt, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Kelley, Amanda M.</creator><creator>Athy, Jeremy R.</creator><creator>Legan, Shauna M.</creator><general>Aerospace Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings</title><author>Lawson, Ben D. ; Britt, Thomas W. ; Kelley, Amanda M. ; Athy, Jeremy R. ; Legan, Shauna M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-9723d40ca494a7b92e8e7e50bd1cf5c29e78f4bd0373db9c685e720ebd3416a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Group Performance</topic><topic>Group Processes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Interactive control</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>Military aviation</topic><topic>Military Performance</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Performance Assessment</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Shared Cognition</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Team Performance</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Ben D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Britt, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Amanda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athy, Jeremy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legan, Shauna M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aerospace medicine and human performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawson, Ben D.</au><au>Britt, Thomas W.</au><au>Kelley, Amanda M.</au><au>Athy, Jeremy R.</au><au>Legan, Shauna M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings</atitle><jtitle>Aerospace medicine and human performance</jtitle><addtitle>Aerosp Med Hum Perform</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>722-729</pages><issn>2375-6314</issn><eissn>2375-6322</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION: The coordination of team effort on shared tasks is an area of inquiry. A number of tests of team performance in challenging environments have been developed without comparison or standardization. This article provides a systematic review of the most accessible and
usable low-to-medium fidelity computerized tests of team performance and determines which are most applicable to military- and aviation-relevant research, such as studies of group command, control, communication, and crew coordination.METHODS: A search was conducted to identify
computerized measures of team performance. In addition to extensive literature searches (DTIC, Psychinfo, PubMed), the authors reached out to team performance researchers at conferences and through electronic communication.RESULTS: Identified were 57 potential tests according to
6 specific selection criteria (e.g., the requirement for automated collection of team performance and coordination processes, the use of military-relevant scenarios). The following seven tests (listed alphabetically) were considered most suitable for military needs: Agent Enabled Decision
Group Environment (AEDGE), C3Conflict, the C3 (Command, Control, & Communications) Interactive Task for Identifying Emerging Situations (NeoCITIES), Distributed Dynamic Decision Making (DDD), Duo Wondrous Original Method Basic Awareness/Airmanship Test (DuoWOMBAT), the Leader
Development Simulator (LDS), and the Planning Task for Teams (PLATT). Strengths and weaknesses of these tests are described and recommendations offered to help researchers identify the test most suitable for their particular needs.DISCUSSION: Adoption of a few standard computerized
test batteries to study team performance would facilitate the evaluation of interventions intended to enhance group performance in multiple challenging military and aerospace operational environments.Lawson BD, Britt TW, Kelley AM, Athy JR, Legan SM. Computerized tests of team performance and crew coordination suitable for military/aviation settings. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(8):722-729.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Aerospace Medical Association</pub><pmid>28720181</pmid><doi>10.3357/AMHP.4786.2017</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2375-6314 |
| ispartof | Aerospace medicine and human performance, 2017-08, Vol.88 (8), p.722-729 |
| issn | 2375-6314 2375-6322 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920391267 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Aviation Cognition Computer simulation Computers Decision Making Environmental law Group Performance Group Processes Humans Identification methods Interactive control Literature reviews Military Military aviation Military Performance Military Personnel Performance Assessment Researchers Shared Cognition Space life sciences Standardization Task Performance and Analysis Team Performance Test procedures |
| title | Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A35%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computerized%20Tests%20of%20Team%20Performance%20and%20Crew%20Coordination%20Suitable%20for%20Military/Aviation%20Settings&rft.jtitle=Aerospace%20medicine%20and%20human%20performance&rft.au=Lawson,%20Ben%20D.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=722-729&rft.issn=2375-6314&rft.eissn=2375-6322&rft_id=info:doi/10.3357/AMHP.4786.2017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2013691659%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2013691659&rft_id=info:pmid/28720181&rft_ingid=asma/amhp/2017/00000088/00000008/art00003&rfr_iscdi=true |