Bacterial colonization of penile prosthesis after its withdrawal due to mechanical failure
Prosthetic surgery to treat erectile dysfunction has a risk of infection of up to 3%, but this risk can increase to 18% when the surgery involves replacement. This increased risk of infection is attributed to the bacterial colonization of the prosthesis during the initial surgery. To analyse the pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Actas urologicas españolas 2017-12, Vol.41 (10), p.652-655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 655 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 652 |
container_title | Actas urologicas españolas |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B Torremadé-Barreda, J Pujol-Galarza, L Vigués-Julià, F |
description | Prosthetic surgery to treat erectile dysfunction has a risk of infection of up to 3%, but this risk can increase to 18% when the surgery involves replacement. This increased risk of infection is attributed to the bacterial colonization of the prosthesis during the initial surgery.
To analyse the presence of germs in the prosthesis that is withdrawn due to mechanical failure (not infection), as well as the surgical results and its progression.
A retrospective study was conducted of all replacements performed between 2013 and 2016 at a single centre. We analysed demographic data, prior type of prosthesis, surgical procedure, microbiological study and follow-up.
Of the 12 replacement procedures, a microbiological study of the extracted prosthesis was performed in a total of 10 cases. Of the 10 replacements, the cultures were positive in 5 cases (50%). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most prevalent germ. All patients underwent a flushing procedure, and an antibiotic-coated prosthesis was implanted. We recorded no infections with the new implanted device after a mean follow-up of 27.33 months (SD 4.13; 95% CI 18.22-36.43).
In our study population, we observed a high rate of bacterial colonization of the prostheses that were replaced due to mechanical failure. When a flushing procedure was performed during the replacement surgery, there were no more infections than those reported in treatment-naive cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.06.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920200213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920200213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-8ac5156839de977a3ced47de4945b6ebd36be01852d47f6e867860ca44cce2f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LxDAQhoMg7rr6CwTJ0UtrpmmT9KiLX7DgRS9eSppOaZa2qUnKor_eiutp4OGZ4X2HkCtgKTAQt_tUm9m7NGMgUyZSxrITsgZRloksFVuR8xD2C8y5kmdklSkJwAHW5ONem4je6p4a17vRfuto3UhdSyccbY908i7EDoMNVLeLSm0M9GBj13h9WNaaGWl0dEDT6dGahbTa9rPHC3La6j7g5XFuyPvjw9v2Odm9Pr1s73bJBDnERGlTQCEULxsspdTcYJPLBvMyL2qBdcNFjQxUkS24FaiEVIIZnefGYNZyviE3f3eXpJ8zhlgNNhjsez2im0MFZcaypTv8qtdHda4HbKrJ20H7r-r_H_wHxCVjHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920200213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial colonization of penile prosthesis after its withdrawal due to mechanical failure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B ; Torremadé-Barreda, J ; Pujol-Galarza, L ; Vigués-Julià, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B ; Torremadé-Barreda, J ; Pujol-Galarza, L ; Vigués-Julià, F</creatorcontrib><description>Prosthetic surgery to treat erectile dysfunction has a risk of infection of up to 3%, but this risk can increase to 18% when the surgery involves replacement. This increased risk of infection is attributed to the bacterial colonization of the prosthesis during the initial surgery.
To analyse the presence of germs in the prosthesis that is withdrawn due to mechanical failure (not infection), as well as the surgical results and its progression.
A retrospective study was conducted of all replacements performed between 2013 and 2016 at a single centre. We analysed demographic data, prior type of prosthesis, surgical procedure, microbiological study and follow-up.
Of the 12 replacement procedures, a microbiological study of the extracted prosthesis was performed in a total of 10 cases. Of the 10 replacements, the cultures were positive in 5 cases (50%). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most prevalent germ. All patients underwent a flushing procedure, and an antibiotic-coated prosthesis was implanted. We recorded no infections with the new implanted device after a mean follow-up of 27.33 months (SD 4.13; 95% CI 18.22-36.43).
In our study population, we observed a high rate of bacterial colonization of the prostheses that were replaced due to mechanical failure. When a flushing procedure was performed during the replacement surgery, there were no more infections than those reported in treatment-naive cases.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1699-7980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.06.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28711311</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Device Removal ; Equipment Contamination ; Erectile Dysfunction - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Penile Prosthesis - microbiology ; Prosthesis Failure ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Actas urologicas españolas, 2017-12, Vol.41 (10), p.652-655</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 AEU. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28711311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torremadé-Barreda, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujol-Galarza, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigués-Julià, F</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial colonization of penile prosthesis after its withdrawal due to mechanical failure</title><title>Actas urologicas españolas</title><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><description>Prosthetic surgery to treat erectile dysfunction has a risk of infection of up to 3%, but this risk can increase to 18% when the surgery involves replacement. This increased risk of infection is attributed to the bacterial colonization of the prosthesis during the initial surgery.
To analyse the presence of germs in the prosthesis that is withdrawn due to mechanical failure (not infection), as well as the surgical results and its progression.
A retrospective study was conducted of all replacements performed between 2013 and 2016 at a single centre. We analysed demographic data, prior type of prosthesis, surgical procedure, microbiological study and follow-up.
Of the 12 replacement procedures, a microbiological study of the extracted prosthesis was performed in a total of 10 cases. Of the 10 replacements, the cultures were positive in 5 cases (50%). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most prevalent germ. All patients underwent a flushing procedure, and an antibiotic-coated prosthesis was implanted. We recorded no infections with the new implanted device after a mean follow-up of 27.33 months (SD 4.13; 95% CI 18.22-36.43).
In our study population, we observed a high rate of bacterial colonization of the prostheses that were replaced due to mechanical failure. When a flushing procedure was performed during the replacement surgery, there were no more infections than those reported in treatment-naive cases.</description><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Penile Prosthesis - microbiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1699-7980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1LxDAQhoMg7rr6CwTJ0UtrpmmT9KiLX7DgRS9eSppOaZa2qUnKor_eiutp4OGZ4X2HkCtgKTAQt_tUm9m7NGMgUyZSxrITsgZRloksFVuR8xD2C8y5kmdklSkJwAHW5ONem4je6p4a17vRfuto3UhdSyccbY908i7EDoMNVLeLSm0M9GBj13h9WNaaGWl0dEDT6dGahbTa9rPHC3La6j7g5XFuyPvjw9v2Odm9Pr1s73bJBDnERGlTQCEULxsspdTcYJPLBvMyL2qBdcNFjQxUkS24FaiEVIIZnefGYNZyviE3f3eXpJ8zhlgNNhjsez2im0MFZcaypTv8qtdHda4HbKrJ20H7r-r_H_wHxCVjHw</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B</creator><creator>Torremadé-Barreda, J</creator><creator>Pujol-Galarza, L</creator><creator>Vigués-Julià, F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Bacterial colonization of penile prosthesis after its withdrawal due to mechanical failure</title><author>Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B ; Torremadé-Barreda, J ; Pujol-Galarza, L ; Vigués-Julià, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-8ac5156839de977a3ced47de4945b6ebd36be01852d47f6e867860ca44cce2f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Penile Prosthesis - microbiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torremadé-Barreda, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujol-Galarza, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigués-Julià, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etcheverry-Giadrosich, B</au><au>Torremadé-Barreda, J</au><au>Pujol-Galarza, L</au><au>Vigués-Julià, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial colonization of penile prosthesis after its withdrawal due to mechanical failure</atitle><jtitle>Actas urologicas españolas</jtitle><addtitle>Actas Urol Esp</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>652</spage><epage>655</epage><pages>652-655</pages><eissn>1699-7980</eissn><abstract>Prosthetic surgery to treat erectile dysfunction has a risk of infection of up to 3%, but this risk can increase to 18% when the surgery involves replacement. This increased risk of infection is attributed to the bacterial colonization of the prosthesis during the initial surgery.
To analyse the presence of germs in the prosthesis that is withdrawn due to mechanical failure (not infection), as well as the surgical results and its progression.
A retrospective study was conducted of all replacements performed between 2013 and 2016 at a single centre. We analysed demographic data, prior type of prosthesis, surgical procedure, microbiological study and follow-up.
Of the 12 replacement procedures, a microbiological study of the extracted prosthesis was performed in a total of 10 cases. Of the 10 replacements, the cultures were positive in 5 cases (50%). Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most prevalent germ. All patients underwent a flushing procedure, and an antibiotic-coated prosthesis was implanted. We recorded no infections with the new implanted device after a mean follow-up of 27.33 months (SD 4.13; 95% CI 18.22-36.43).
In our study population, we observed a high rate of bacterial colonization of the prostheses that were replaced due to mechanical failure. When a flushing procedure was performed during the replacement surgery, there were no more infections than those reported in treatment-naive cases.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>28711311</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acuro.2017.06.002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1699-7980 |
ispartof | Actas urologicas españolas, 2017-12, Vol.41 (10), p.652-655 |
issn | 1699-7980 |
language | eng ; spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920200213 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Bacteria - isolation & purification Device Removal Equipment Contamination Erectile Dysfunction - surgery Humans Male Middle Aged Penile Prosthesis - microbiology Prosthesis Failure Retrospective Studies |
title | Bacterial colonization of penile prosthesis after its withdrawal due to mechanical failure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A25%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20colonization%20of%20penile%20prosthesis%20after%20its%20withdrawal%20due%20to%20mechanical%20failure&rft.jtitle=Actas%20urologicas%20espa%C3%B1olas&rft.au=Etcheverry-Giadrosich,%20B&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=652&rft.epage=655&rft.pages=652-655&rft.eissn=1699-7980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acuro.2017.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1920200213%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920200213&rft_id=info:pmid/28711311&rfr_iscdi=true |