Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis
We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventiona...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2017-11, Vol.30 (8), p.1072-1076 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1076 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1072 |
container_title | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Koo, Bon San Song, Yoonah Lee, Seunghun Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung Sung, Il‐Hoon Jun, Jae‐Bum |
description | We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ca.22952 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920198735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920198735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQRkVpaW5vCn2CIuimG6caSbalZbj0JxBoFs3ayNK4VbCtVGM3-O2j5qYNFLoaGM4cZr5h7A2IMxBCfvDuTEpby2dsB8KaSqpaPWc7YWxbKSOaE_aK6EYIAN2al-xEmhY0iGbH7q4y_nIjzh65mwMPkZYc-3WJaeZp4ITkphQD79OM9IA475Eo5Y0noujH0i7g8gP5kNLCHfGAC-YpzljGtqL8Hhc38iVNiba5gBTplL0Y3Ej4-rHu2fWnj98OX6rLr58vDueXlVfaykor0_TaSUBoQlNLCMY764zRvh2UNmBcj-2gh6B161rfB2XQe4VeSxfqoPbs_dF7m9PPFWnppkgex9HNmFbqwEoB1rQlsD179w96k9Y8l-0KVQMoaxt4Evpczs84dLc5Ti5vHYju9zM677qHZxT07aNw7ScMf8E_6RegOgJ3ccTtv6LucH4U3gPQN5Pe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1951139961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Koo, Bon San ; Song, Yoonah ; Lee, Seunghun ; Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung ; Sung, Il‐Hoon ; Jun, Jae‐Bum</creator><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon San ; Song, Yoonah ; Lee, Seunghun ; Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung ; Sung, Il‐Hoon ; Jun, Jae‐Bum</creatorcontrib><description>We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ca.22952</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28714106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bones ; Feet ; Female ; Foot Bones - anatomy & histology ; Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging ; foot joints ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Male ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy & histology ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; sesamoid bone ; Sesamoid Bones - anatomy & histology ; Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging ; tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2017-11, Vol.30 (8), p.1072-1076</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0208-0505 ; 0000-0002-4212-2634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fca.22952$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fca.22952$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28714106$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Il‐Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Jae‐Bum</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</title><title>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><description>We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot Bones - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>foot joints</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>sesamoid bone</subject><subject>Sesamoid Bones - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0897-3806</issn><issn>1098-2353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQRkVpaW5vCn2CIuimG6caSbalZbj0JxBoFs3ayNK4VbCtVGM3-O2j5qYNFLoaGM4cZr5h7A2IMxBCfvDuTEpby2dsB8KaSqpaPWc7YWxbKSOaE_aK6EYIAN2al-xEmhY0iGbH7q4y_nIjzh65mwMPkZYc-3WJaeZp4ITkphQD79OM9IA475Eo5Y0noujH0i7g8gP5kNLCHfGAC-YpzljGtqL8Hhc38iVNiba5gBTplL0Y3Ej4-rHu2fWnj98OX6rLr58vDueXlVfaykor0_TaSUBoQlNLCMY764zRvh2UNmBcj-2gh6B161rfB2XQe4VeSxfqoPbs_dF7m9PPFWnppkgex9HNmFbqwEoB1rQlsD179w96k9Y8l-0KVQMoaxt4Evpczs84dLc5Ti5vHYju9zM677qHZxT07aNw7ScMf8E_6RegOgJ3ccTtv6LucH4U3gPQN5Pe</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Koo, Bon San</creator><creator>Song, Yoonah</creator><creator>Lee, Seunghun</creator><creator>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</creator><creator>Sung, Il‐Hoon</creator><creator>Jun, Jae‐Bum</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-0505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-2634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</title><author>Koo, Bon San ; Song, Yoonah ; Lee, Seunghun ; Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung ; Sung, Il‐Hoon ; Jun, Jae‐Bum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot Bones - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>foot joints</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>sesamoid bone</topic><topic>Sesamoid Bones - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Il‐Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Jae‐Bum</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koo, Bon San</au><au>Song, Yoonah</au><au>Lee, Seunghun</au><au>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</au><au>Sung, Il‐Hoon</au><au>Jun, Jae‐Bum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1072</spage><epage>1076</epage><pages>1072-1076</pages><issn>0897-3806</issn><eissn>1098-2353</eissn><abstract>We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28714106</pmid><doi>10.1002/ca.22952</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-0505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-2634</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-3806 |
ispartof | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2017-11, Vol.30 (8), p.1072-1076 |
issn | 0897-3806 1098-2353 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920198735 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Bones Feet Female Foot Bones - anatomy & histology Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging foot joints Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Male Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy & histology Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging Radiography Retrospective Studies sesamoid bone Sesamoid Bones - anatomy & histology Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A38%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20distribution%20of%20sesamoid%20bones%20and%20accessory%20ossicles%20of%20the%20foot%20as%20determined%20by%20digital%20tomosynthesis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20anatomy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Koo,%20Bon%20San&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1072&rft.epage=1076&rft.pages=1072-1076&rft.issn=0897-3806&rft.eissn=1098-2353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ca.22952&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920198735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1951139961&rft_id=info:pmid/28714106&rfr_iscdi=true |