Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis

We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventiona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2017-11, Vol.30 (8), p.1072-1076
Hauptverfasser: Koo, Bon San, Song, Yoonah, Lee, Seunghun, Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung, Sung, Il‐Hoon, Jun, Jae‐Bum
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1076
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1072
container_title Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 30
creator Koo, Bon San
Song, Yoonah
Lee, Seunghun
Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung
Sung, Il‐Hoon
Jun, Jae‐Bum
description We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ca.22952
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920198735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920198735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQRkVpaW5vCn2CIuimG6caSbalZbj0JxBoFs3ayNK4VbCtVGM3-O2j5qYNFLoaGM4cZr5h7A2IMxBCfvDuTEpby2dsB8KaSqpaPWc7YWxbKSOaE_aK6EYIAN2al-xEmhY0iGbH7q4y_nIjzh65mwMPkZYc-3WJaeZp4ITkphQD79OM9IA475Eo5Y0noujH0i7g8gP5kNLCHfGAC-YpzljGtqL8Hhc38iVNiba5gBTplL0Y3Ej4-rHu2fWnj98OX6rLr58vDueXlVfaykor0_TaSUBoQlNLCMY764zRvh2UNmBcj-2gh6B161rfB2XQe4VeSxfqoPbs_dF7m9PPFWnppkgex9HNmFbqwEoB1rQlsD179w96k9Y8l-0KVQMoaxt4Evpczs84dLc5Ti5vHYju9zM677qHZxT07aNw7ScMf8E_6RegOgJ3ccTtv6LucH4U3gPQN5Pe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1951139961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Koo, Bon San ; Song, Yoonah ; Lee, Seunghun ; Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung ; Sung, Il‐Hoon ; Jun, Jae‐Bum</creator><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon San ; Song, Yoonah ; Lee, Seunghun ; Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung ; Sung, Il‐Hoon ; Jun, Jae‐Bum</creatorcontrib><description>We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ca.22952</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28714106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bones ; Feet ; Female ; Foot Bones - anatomy &amp; histology ; Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging ; foot joints ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Male ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy &amp; histology ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; sesamoid bone ; Sesamoid Bones - anatomy &amp; histology ; Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging ; tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2017-11, Vol.30 (8), p.1072-1076</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0208-0505 ; 0000-0002-4212-2634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fca.22952$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fca.22952$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28714106$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Il‐Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Jae‐Bum</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</title><title>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><description>We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot Bones - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>foot joints</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>sesamoid bone</subject><subject>Sesamoid Bones - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0897-3806</issn><issn>1098-2353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1q3TAQRkVpaW5vCn2CIuimG6caSbalZbj0JxBoFs3ayNK4VbCtVGM3-O2j5qYNFLoaGM4cZr5h7A2IMxBCfvDuTEpby2dsB8KaSqpaPWc7YWxbKSOaE_aK6EYIAN2al-xEmhY0iGbH7q4y_nIjzh65mwMPkZYc-3WJaeZp4ITkphQD79OM9IA475Eo5Y0noujH0i7g8gP5kNLCHfGAC-YpzljGtqL8Hhc38iVNiba5gBTplL0Y3Ej4-rHu2fWnj98OX6rLr58vDueXlVfaykor0_TaSUBoQlNLCMY764zRvh2UNmBcj-2gh6B161rfB2XQe4VeSxfqoPbs_dF7m9PPFWnppkgex9HNmFbqwEoB1rQlsD179w96k9Y8l-0KVQMoaxt4Evpczs84dLc5Ti5vHYju9zM677qHZxT07aNw7ScMf8E_6RegOgJ3ccTtv6LucH4U3gPQN5Pe</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Koo, Bon San</creator><creator>Song, Yoonah</creator><creator>Lee, Seunghun</creator><creator>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</creator><creator>Sung, Il‐Hoon</creator><creator>Jun, Jae‐Bum</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-0505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-2634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</title><author>Koo, Bon San ; Song, Yoonah ; Lee, Seunghun ; Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung ; Sung, Il‐Hoon ; Jun, Jae‐Bum</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3492-4386b4a21e16d6521d8ca9a884c7f34818abe7f4fd447a7cbd38ecc3ec42ad5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot Bones - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>foot joints</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>sesamoid bone</topic><topic>Sesamoid Bones - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koo, Bon San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yoonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seunghun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Il‐Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jun, Jae‐Bum</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koo, Bon San</au><au>Song, Yoonah</au><au>Lee, Seunghun</au><au>Sung, Yoon‐Kyoung</au><au>Sung, Il‐Hoon</au><au>Jun, Jae‐Bum</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1072</spage><epage>1076</epage><pages>1072-1076</pages><issn>0897-3806</issn><eissn>1098-2353</eissn><abstract>We previously reported that digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a reliable tool for evaluating bony structures of the hand. The current study aimed to identify the prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot using DTS and to compare the results to those of conventional radiography (CR). Foot images (DTS, 213; CR, 44) of 213 patients taken at a tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Sesamoid bones were identified in the metatarsaophalangeal (MTP), distal interphalangeal (DIP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the great (I), second (II), third (III), fourth (IV), and fifth (V) toes. Accessory ossicles were observed in the midfoot and hindfoot. The mean number of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles was 3.9 ± 1.3 for the left foot and 3.7 ± 1.0 for the right foot on CR; and 3.9 ± 1.4 for the left foot and 3.9 ± 1.3 for the right foot on DTS. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (5%), MTP III (2%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (14%), and IP (68%) on CR. Sesamoid bones were observed in MTP I (100%), MTP II (8%), MTP III (1%), MTP IV (2%), MTP V (25%), and IP I(65%) on DTS. Among accessory ossicles, the most common bone identified was os tibiale externum (23% on CR and 33% on DTS) andos peroneum (14% on CR and 21% on DTS), and os trigonum (32% on CR and 0.5% on DTS). DTS was useful for finding sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles, although there were some limitations in observing the hindfoot. Clin. Anat. 30:1072–1076, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28714106</pmid><doi>10.1002/ca.22952</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-0505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-2634</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0897-3806
ispartof Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2017-11, Vol.30 (8), p.1072-1076
issn 0897-3806
1098-2353
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1920198735
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Bones
Feet
Female
Foot Bones - anatomy & histology
Foot Bones - diagnostic imaging
foot joints
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Male
Metatarsophalangeal Joint - anatomy & histology
Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
sesamoid bone
Sesamoid Bones - anatomy & histology
Sesamoid Bones - diagnostic imaging
tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Prevalence and distribution of sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles of the foot as determined by digital tomosynthesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A38%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20distribution%20of%20sesamoid%20bones%20and%20accessory%20ossicles%20of%20the%20foot%20as%20determined%20by%20digital%20tomosynthesis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20anatomy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Koo,%20Bon%20San&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1072&rft.epage=1076&rft.pages=1072-1076&rft.issn=0897-3806&rft.eissn=1098-2353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ca.22952&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920198735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1951139961&rft_id=info:pmid/28714106&rfr_iscdi=true