A systematic review of ultrasound‐guided methods for brachial plexus blockade
Summary We systematically reviewed 25 randomised controlled trials of ultrasound‐guided brachial plexus blockade that recruited 1948 participants: either one approach vs another (axillary, infraclavicular or supraclavicular); or one injection vs multiple injections. There were no differences in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia 2016-02, Vol.71 (2), p.213-227 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
We systematically reviewed 25 randomised controlled trials of ultrasound‐guided brachial plexus blockade that recruited 1948 participants: either one approach vs another (axillary, infraclavicular or supraclavicular); or one injection vs multiple injections. There were no differences in the rates of successful blockade with approach, relative risk (95% CI): axillary vs infraclavicular, 1.0 (1.0–1.1), p = 0.97; axillary vs supraclavicular, 1.0 (1.0–1.1), p = 0.68; and infraclavicular vs supraclavicular, 1.0 (1.0–1.1), p = 0.32. There was no difference in the rate of successful blockade with the number of injections, relative risk (95% CI) 1.0 (1.0–1.0), p = 0.69, for one vs multiple injections. The rate of procedural paraesthesia was less with one injection than multiple injections, relative risk (95% CI) 0.6 (0.4–0.9), p = 0.004.
☛ CPD available at http://www.learnataagbi.org |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-2409 1365-2044 |
DOI: | 10.1111/anae.13347 |