Thermal conductivity and heat transfer through the snow on the ice of the Beaufort Sea

Eighty‐nine point measurements of the thermal conductivity (ks) of the snow on the sea ice of the Beaufort Sea were made using a heated needle probe. Average values ranged from 0.078 W m−1 K−1 for new snow to 0.290 W m−1 K−1 for an ubiquitous wind slab. ks increased with increasing density, consiste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans 2002-10, Vol.107 (C10), p.SHE 19-1-SHE 19-17
Hauptverfasser: Sturm, Matthew, Perovich, Donald K., Holmgren, Jon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page SHE 19-17
container_issue C10
container_start_page SHE 19-1
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans
container_volume 107
creator Sturm, Matthew
Perovich, Donald K.
Holmgren, Jon
description Eighty‐nine point measurements of the thermal conductivity (ks) of the snow on the sea ice of the Beaufort Sea were made using a heated needle probe. Average values ranged from 0.078 W m−1 K−1 for new snow to 0.290 W m−1 K−1 for an ubiquitous wind slab. ks increased with increasing density, consistent with published equations, but could also be reliably estimated from the metamorphic state of the snow. Using measured values of ks and snow stratigraphy, the average bulk value for the full snowpack was 0.14 W m−1 K−1. In contrast, ks inferred from ice growth and temperature gradients in the snow was 0.33 W m−1 K−1. The mismatch arises in part because the second estimate is based on measurements from an aggregate scale that includes enhanced heat flow due to two‐ and three‐dimensional snow and ice geometry. A finite element model suggests that the complex geometry produces areas of concentrated heat loss at the snow surface. These “hot spots,” however, increase the apparent conductivity only by a factor of 1.4, not enough to fully explain the mismatch. Nonconductive heat transfer mechanisms, like natural and forced air convection, may also be operating in the snowpack, though the ubiquitous presence of low permeability wind slabs potentially limits their effectiveness. The relative contributions of effects due to snow and ice geometric and nonconductive processes within the snowpack remain uncertain.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2000JC000409
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919970765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1919970765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4394-efa7a48e74ab00569958a692c53bd1611aabf5968d1b4ae7e872eda1dd86b7a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1P4zAQBmALLRIV9MYP8Alx2IDtOP44QrUUEALxWW7WJJnQQBqDndDtv99AEdoTl5k5PO8cXkJ2OTvgTNhDwRg7nwxDMrtBRoJnKhGCiV9kxLg0CRNCb5FxjM_sA2VKMj4iD3dzDAtoaOHbsi-6-r3uVhTaks4ROtoFaGOFgXbz4Pun-bCRxtYvqW8_77pA6qvP8xihr3zo6C3CDtmsoIk4_trb5P7kz93kNLm4mp5Nji4SkKmVCVagQRrUEnLGMmVtZkBZUWRpXnLFOUBeZVaZkucSUKPRAkvgZWlUrkGk22R__fc1-LceY-cWdSywaaBF30fHLbdWM62yge79TI2RqVBqgL_XsAg-xoCVew31AsLKceY-qnb_Vz1wsebLusHVj9adT28mZmh-CCXrUB07_PsdgvDilE515maXU6fUTD5en86cTP8BDFONng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18843266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermal conductivity and heat transfer through the snow on the ice of the Beaufort Sea</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sturm, Matthew ; Perovich, Donald K. ; Holmgren, Jon</creator><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Matthew ; Perovich, Donald K. ; Holmgren, Jon</creatorcontrib><description>Eighty‐nine point measurements of the thermal conductivity (ks) of the snow on the sea ice of the Beaufort Sea were made using a heated needle probe. Average values ranged from 0.078 W m−1 K−1 for new snow to 0.290 W m−1 K−1 for an ubiquitous wind slab. ks increased with increasing density, consistent with published equations, but could also be reliably estimated from the metamorphic state of the snow. Using measured values of ks and snow stratigraphy, the average bulk value for the full snowpack was 0.14 W m−1 K−1. In contrast, ks inferred from ice growth and temperature gradients in the snow was 0.33 W m−1 K−1. The mismatch arises in part because the second estimate is based on measurements from an aggregate scale that includes enhanced heat flow due to two‐ and three‐dimensional snow and ice geometry. A finite element model suggests that the complex geometry produces areas of concentrated heat loss at the snow surface. These “hot spots,” however, increase the apparent conductivity only by a factor of 1.4, not enough to fully explain the mismatch. Nonconductive heat transfer mechanisms, like natural and forced air convection, may also be operating in the snowpack, though the ubiquitous presence of low permeability wind slabs potentially limits their effectiveness. The relative contributions of effects due to snow and ice geometric and nonconductive processes within the snowpack remain uncertain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2000JC000409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Arctic ocean ; heat flow ; Marine ; sea ice ; snow ; snow cover ; thermal conductivity</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans, 2002-10, Vol.107 (C10), p.SHE 19-1-SHE 19-17</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4394-efa7a48e74ab00569958a692c53bd1611aabf5968d1b4ae7e872eda1dd86b7a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4394-efa7a48e74ab00569958a692c53bd1611aabf5968d1b4ae7e872eda1dd86b7a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2000JC000409$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2000JC000409$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perovich, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmgren, Jon</creatorcontrib><title>Thermal conductivity and heat transfer through the snow on the ice of the Beaufort Sea</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Eighty‐nine point measurements of the thermal conductivity (ks) of the snow on the sea ice of the Beaufort Sea were made using a heated needle probe. Average values ranged from 0.078 W m−1 K−1 for new snow to 0.290 W m−1 K−1 for an ubiquitous wind slab. ks increased with increasing density, consistent with published equations, but could also be reliably estimated from the metamorphic state of the snow. Using measured values of ks and snow stratigraphy, the average bulk value for the full snowpack was 0.14 W m−1 K−1. In contrast, ks inferred from ice growth and temperature gradients in the snow was 0.33 W m−1 K−1. The mismatch arises in part because the second estimate is based on measurements from an aggregate scale that includes enhanced heat flow due to two‐ and three‐dimensional snow and ice geometry. A finite element model suggests that the complex geometry produces areas of concentrated heat loss at the snow surface. These “hot spots,” however, increase the apparent conductivity only by a factor of 1.4, not enough to fully explain the mismatch. Nonconductive heat transfer mechanisms, like natural and forced air convection, may also be operating in the snowpack, though the ubiquitous presence of low permeability wind slabs potentially limits their effectiveness. The relative contributions of effects due to snow and ice geometric and nonconductive processes within the snowpack remain uncertain.</description><subject>Arctic ocean</subject><subject>heat flow</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>sea ice</subject><subject>snow</subject><subject>snow cover</subject><subject>thermal conductivity</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1P4zAQBmALLRIV9MYP8Alx2IDtOP44QrUUEALxWW7WJJnQQBqDndDtv99AEdoTl5k5PO8cXkJ2OTvgTNhDwRg7nwxDMrtBRoJnKhGCiV9kxLg0CRNCb5FxjM_sA2VKMj4iD3dzDAtoaOHbsi-6-r3uVhTaks4ROtoFaGOFgXbz4Pun-bCRxtYvqW8_77pA6qvP8xihr3zo6C3CDtmsoIk4_trb5P7kz93kNLm4mp5Nji4SkKmVCVagQRrUEnLGMmVtZkBZUWRpXnLFOUBeZVaZkucSUKPRAkvgZWlUrkGk22R__fc1-LceY-cWdSywaaBF30fHLbdWM62yge79TI2RqVBqgL_XsAg-xoCVew31AsLKceY-qnb_Vz1wsebLusHVj9adT28mZmh-CCXrUB07_PsdgvDilE515maXU6fUTD5en86cTP8BDFONng</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Sturm, Matthew</creator><creator>Perovich, Donald K.</creator><creator>Holmgren, Jon</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Thermal conductivity and heat transfer through the snow on the ice of the Beaufort Sea</title><author>Sturm, Matthew ; Perovich, Donald K. ; Holmgren, Jon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4394-efa7a48e74ab00569958a692c53bd1611aabf5968d1b4ae7e872eda1dd86b7a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Arctic ocean</topic><topic>heat flow</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>sea ice</topic><topic>snow</topic><topic>snow cover</topic><topic>thermal conductivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perovich, Donald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmgren, Jon</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sturm, Matthew</au><au>Perovich, Donald K.</au><au>Holmgren, Jon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermal conductivity and heat transfer through the snow on the ice of the Beaufort Sea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>C10</issue><spage>SHE 19-1</spage><epage>SHE 19-17</epage><pages>SHE 19-1-SHE 19-17</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>Eighty‐nine point measurements of the thermal conductivity (ks) of the snow on the sea ice of the Beaufort Sea were made using a heated needle probe. Average values ranged from 0.078 W m−1 K−1 for new snow to 0.290 W m−1 K−1 for an ubiquitous wind slab. ks increased with increasing density, consistent with published equations, but could also be reliably estimated from the metamorphic state of the snow. Using measured values of ks and snow stratigraphy, the average bulk value for the full snowpack was 0.14 W m−1 K−1. In contrast, ks inferred from ice growth and temperature gradients in the snow was 0.33 W m−1 K−1. The mismatch arises in part because the second estimate is based on measurements from an aggregate scale that includes enhanced heat flow due to two‐ and three‐dimensional snow and ice geometry. A finite element model suggests that the complex geometry produces areas of concentrated heat loss at the snow surface. These “hot spots,” however, increase the apparent conductivity only by a factor of 1.4, not enough to fully explain the mismatch. Nonconductive heat transfer mechanisms, like natural and forced air convection, may also be operating in the snowpack, though the ubiquitous presence of low permeability wind slabs potentially limits their effectiveness. The relative contributions of effects due to snow and ice geometric and nonconductive processes within the snowpack remain uncertain.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2000JC000409</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans, 2002-10, Vol.107 (C10), p.SHE 19-1-SHE 19-17
issn 0148-0227
2169-9275
2156-2202
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919970765
source Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arctic ocean
heat flow
Marine
sea ice
snow
snow cover
thermal conductivity
title Thermal conductivity and heat transfer through the snow on the ice of the Beaufort Sea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T00%3A06%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermal%20conductivity%20and%20heat%20transfer%20through%20the%20snow%20on%20the%20ice%20of%20the%20Beaufort%20Sea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20C.%20Oceans&rft.au=Sturm,%20Matthew&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=C10&rft.spage=SHE%2019-1&rft.epage=SHE%2019-17&rft.pages=SHE%2019-1-SHE%2019-17&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2000JC000409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1919970765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18843266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true