Measuring flow velocity under straw mulch using the improved electrolyte tracer method

•The improved electrolyte tracer method (Lei et al., 2010) estimates flow velocity well.•Mulch reduced flow velocities by 0.81 on average as compared with bare soil.•The method minimizes disturbance of the mulch, reducing edge effects.•The method would be ideal for making multiple rapid measurements...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2013-07, Vol.495, p.121-125
Hauptverfasser: Rahma, Abbas E., Lei, Tingwu, Shi, Xiaonan, Dong, Yuequn, Zhou, Shumei, Zhao, Jun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue
container_start_page 121
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 495
creator Rahma, Abbas E.
Lei, Tingwu
Shi, Xiaonan
Dong, Yuequn
Zhou, Shumei
Zhao, Jun
description •The improved electrolyte tracer method (Lei et al., 2010) estimates flow velocity well.•Mulch reduced flow velocities by 0.81 on average as compared with bare soil.•The method minimizes disturbance of the mulch, reducing edge effects.•The method would be ideal for making multiple rapid measurements of covered flows. Most conventional methods cannot measure flow velocities under a canopy without disturbing it. Use of mulch that reduces runoff and soil losses is a common land management practice. It is useful to study flow velocity beneath the mulch canopy to understand the processes involved. An improved method to measure flow velocity that uses an electrolyte tracer was proposed by Lei et al. (2010, J. Hydrology 390, 45–56). This study was designed to illustrate the application of that method by measuring flow velocity under wheat straw mulch. Tap water at flow rates of 2, 4 or 8Lmin−1 entered the upper end of flumes (1m long, 0.25m wide) set at three slope gradients (5°, 10° or 15°), which contained soil with or without a mulch cover (0.4kgm−2). Flow velocity was measured at three different distances from the electrolyte injector. The results obtained were qualitatively as expected. In all cases, the mean flow velocity was significantly lower under the mulch than over the bare soil. The flow velocity over the bare soil was found to be on average 23% higher than that under the mulch regardless of the slope gradient or the flow rate. However, flow velocity was significantly affected by the slope gradient and flow rate. The diameter of the sensors (about 4mm) meant that flow velocity could be measured with minimal disturbance of the mulch, thereby reducing edge effects that can affect the water flow. Therefore, the improved electrolyte tracer method was found to be suitable for conditions where overland flow cannot be observed directly. Thus, the method can be applied in the field to study flow velocity distributions under canopies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919970174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169413003545</els_id><sourcerecordid>1919970174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-c701081dbfba58d923147ee47a51c1462ec078a33e80603eca535a9ee931b5483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCEXwUvXpEmb5iSy-A9WvKjXkE2nNiVt16Tdpd_eLLt4dRiYy-_Nm3kIXVOyoITmd82iqafS926REsoWhMeWJ2hGCyGTVBBximaEpGlCc8nP0UUIDYnFGJ-hrzfQYfS2-8aV63d4C643dpjw2JXgcRi83uF2dKbGY9hTQw3Ythvfb6HE4MAM0XgaAEfSREULQ92Xl-is0i7A1XHO0efT48fyJVm9P78uH1aJZjIbEiMIJQUt19VaZ0UpU0a5AOBCZ9RQnqdgiCg0Y1CQnDAwOmOZlgCS0XXGCzZHt4e98aCfEcKgWhsMOKc76MegqKRSRhPBI5odUOP7EDxUauNtq_2kKFH7HFWjjjmqfY6K8Ngy6m6OFjoY7SqvO2PDnzgVPC8ytt9_f-Ag_ru14FUwFjoDpfUxJVX29h-nX6dnjKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1919970174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring flow velocity under straw mulch using the improved electrolyte tracer method</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rahma, Abbas E. ; Lei, Tingwu ; Shi, Xiaonan ; Dong, Yuequn ; Zhou, Shumei ; Zhao, Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahma, Abbas E. ; Lei, Tingwu ; Shi, Xiaonan ; Dong, Yuequn ; Zhou, Shumei ; Zhao, Jun</creatorcontrib><description>•The improved electrolyte tracer method (Lei et al., 2010) estimates flow velocity well.•Mulch reduced flow velocities by 0.81 on average as compared with bare soil.•The method minimizes disturbance of the mulch, reducing edge effects.•The method would be ideal for making multiple rapid measurements of covered flows. Most conventional methods cannot measure flow velocities under a canopy without disturbing it. Use of mulch that reduces runoff and soil losses is a common land management practice. It is useful to study flow velocity beneath the mulch canopy to understand the processes involved. An improved method to measure flow velocity that uses an electrolyte tracer was proposed by Lei et al. (2010, J. Hydrology 390, 45–56). This study was designed to illustrate the application of that method by measuring flow velocity under wheat straw mulch. Tap water at flow rates of 2, 4 or 8Lmin−1 entered the upper end of flumes (1m long, 0.25m wide) set at three slope gradients (5°, 10° or 15°), which contained soil with or without a mulch cover (0.4kgm−2). Flow velocity was measured at three different distances from the electrolyte injector. The results obtained were qualitatively as expected. In all cases, the mean flow velocity was significantly lower under the mulch than over the bare soil. The flow velocity over the bare soil was found to be on average 23% higher than that under the mulch regardless of the slope gradient or the flow rate. However, flow velocity was significantly affected by the slope gradient and flow rate. The diameter of the sensors (about 4mm) meant that flow velocity could be measured with minimal disturbance of the mulch, thereby reducing edge effects that can affect the water flow. Therefore, the improved electrolyte tracer method was found to be suitable for conditions where overland flow cannot be observed directly. Thus, the method can be applied in the field to study flow velocity distributions under canopies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.049</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Electrical conductivity sensors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flow rate ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Shallow overland flow ; Slope gradient ; Wheat straw mulch</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2013-07, Vol.495, p.121-125</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-c701081dbfba58d923147ee47a51c1462ec078a33e80603eca535a9ee931b5483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-c701081dbfba58d923147ee47a51c1462ec078a33e80603eca535a9ee931b5483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27468534$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahma, Abbas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Tingwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiaonan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yuequn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shumei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring flow velocity under straw mulch using the improved electrolyte tracer method</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•The improved electrolyte tracer method (Lei et al., 2010) estimates flow velocity well.•Mulch reduced flow velocities by 0.81 on average as compared with bare soil.•The method minimizes disturbance of the mulch, reducing edge effects.•The method would be ideal for making multiple rapid measurements of covered flows. Most conventional methods cannot measure flow velocities under a canopy without disturbing it. Use of mulch that reduces runoff and soil losses is a common land management practice. It is useful to study flow velocity beneath the mulch canopy to understand the processes involved. An improved method to measure flow velocity that uses an electrolyte tracer was proposed by Lei et al. (2010, J. Hydrology 390, 45–56). This study was designed to illustrate the application of that method by measuring flow velocity under wheat straw mulch. Tap water at flow rates of 2, 4 or 8Lmin−1 entered the upper end of flumes (1m long, 0.25m wide) set at three slope gradients (5°, 10° or 15°), which contained soil with or without a mulch cover (0.4kgm−2). Flow velocity was measured at three different distances from the electrolyte injector. The results obtained were qualitatively as expected. In all cases, the mean flow velocity was significantly lower under the mulch than over the bare soil. The flow velocity over the bare soil was found to be on average 23% higher than that under the mulch regardless of the slope gradient or the flow rate. However, flow velocity was significantly affected by the slope gradient and flow rate. The diameter of the sensors (about 4mm) meant that flow velocity could be measured with minimal disturbance of the mulch, thereby reducing edge effects that can affect the water flow. Therefore, the improved electrolyte tracer method was found to be suitable for conditions where overland flow cannot be observed directly. Thus, the method can be applied in the field to study flow velocity distributions under canopies.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity sensors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flow rate</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Shallow overland flow</subject><subject>Slope gradient</subject><subject>Wheat straw mulch</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCEXwUvXpEmb5iSy-A9WvKjXkE2nNiVt16Tdpd_eLLt4dRiYy-_Nm3kIXVOyoITmd82iqafS926REsoWhMeWJ2hGCyGTVBBximaEpGlCc8nP0UUIDYnFGJ-hrzfQYfS2-8aV63d4C643dpjw2JXgcRi83uF2dKbGY9hTQw3Ythvfb6HE4MAM0XgaAEfSREULQ92Xl-is0i7A1XHO0efT48fyJVm9P78uH1aJZjIbEiMIJQUt19VaZ0UpU0a5AOBCZ9RQnqdgiCg0Y1CQnDAwOmOZlgCS0XXGCzZHt4e98aCfEcKgWhsMOKc76MegqKRSRhPBI5odUOP7EDxUauNtq_2kKFH7HFWjjjmqfY6K8Ngy6m6OFjoY7SqvO2PDnzgVPC8ytt9_f-Ag_ru14FUwFjoDpfUxJVX29h-nX6dnjKU</recordid><startdate>20130712</startdate><enddate>20130712</enddate><creator>Rahma, Abbas E.</creator><creator>Lei, Tingwu</creator><creator>Shi, Xiaonan</creator><creator>Dong, Yuequn</creator><creator>Zhou, Shumei</creator><creator>Zhao, Jun</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130712</creationdate><title>Measuring flow velocity under straw mulch using the improved electrolyte tracer method</title><author>Rahma, Abbas E. ; Lei, Tingwu ; Shi, Xiaonan ; Dong, Yuequn ; Zhou, Shumei ; Zhao, Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-c701081dbfba58d923147ee47a51c1462ec078a33e80603eca535a9ee931b5483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity sensors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flow rate</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Shallow overland flow</topic><topic>Slope gradient</topic><topic>Wheat straw mulch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahma, Abbas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Tingwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Xiaonan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yuequn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Shumei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahma, Abbas E.</au><au>Lei, Tingwu</au><au>Shi, Xiaonan</au><au>Dong, Yuequn</au><au>Zhou, Shumei</au><au>Zhao, Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring flow velocity under straw mulch using the improved electrolyte tracer method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2013-07-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>495</volume><spage>121</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>121-125</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>•The improved electrolyte tracer method (Lei et al., 2010) estimates flow velocity well.•Mulch reduced flow velocities by 0.81 on average as compared with bare soil.•The method minimizes disturbance of the mulch, reducing edge effects.•The method would be ideal for making multiple rapid measurements of covered flows. Most conventional methods cannot measure flow velocities under a canopy without disturbing it. Use of mulch that reduces runoff and soil losses is a common land management practice. It is useful to study flow velocity beneath the mulch canopy to understand the processes involved. An improved method to measure flow velocity that uses an electrolyte tracer was proposed by Lei et al. (2010, J. Hydrology 390, 45–56). This study was designed to illustrate the application of that method by measuring flow velocity under wheat straw mulch. Tap water at flow rates of 2, 4 or 8Lmin−1 entered the upper end of flumes (1m long, 0.25m wide) set at three slope gradients (5°, 10° or 15°), which contained soil with or without a mulch cover (0.4kgm−2). Flow velocity was measured at three different distances from the electrolyte injector. The results obtained were qualitatively as expected. In all cases, the mean flow velocity was significantly lower under the mulch than over the bare soil. The flow velocity over the bare soil was found to be on average 23% higher than that under the mulch regardless of the slope gradient or the flow rate. However, flow velocity was significantly affected by the slope gradient and flow rate. The diameter of the sensors (about 4mm) meant that flow velocity could be measured with minimal disturbance of the mulch, thereby reducing edge effects that can affect the water flow. Therefore, the improved electrolyte tracer method was found to be suitable for conditions where overland flow cannot be observed directly. Thus, the method can be applied in the field to study flow velocity distributions under canopies.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.049</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2013-07, Vol.495, p.121-125
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919970174
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Electrical conductivity sensors
Exact sciences and technology
Flow rate
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Shallow overland flow
Slope gradient
Wheat straw mulch
title Measuring flow velocity under straw mulch using the improved electrolyte tracer method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A06%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20flow%20velocity%20under%20straw%20mulch%20using%20the%20improved%20electrolyte%20tracer%20method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Rahma,%20Abbas%20E.&rft.date=2013-07-12&rft.volume=495&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=121-125&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1919970174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1919970174&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169413003545&rfr_iscdi=true