The variability of currents in the Yucatan Channel: Analysis of results from a numerical ocean model

The flow through the Yucatan Channel and into the Gulf of Mexico is a major component of the Gulf Stream and the subtropical gyre circulation. Surprisingly, however, little is known about the forcing and physical parameters that affect the current structures in the Channel. This paper attempts to im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans 2003-01, Vol.108 (C1), p.12.1-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ezer, Tal, Oey, Lie-Yauw, Lee, Hyun-Chul, Sturges, Wilton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue C1
container_start_page 12.1
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans
container_volume 108
creator Ezer, Tal
Oey, Lie-Yauw
Lee, Hyun-Chul
Sturges, Wilton
description The flow through the Yucatan Channel and into the Gulf of Mexico is a major component of the Gulf Stream and the subtropical gyre circulation. Surprisingly, however, little is known about the forcing and physical parameters that affect the current structures in the Channel. This paper attempts to improve our understanding of the flow through the Channel with a detailed analysis of the currents obtained from a primitive‐equation model that includes the Gulf and the entire Caribbean Sea and forced by 6‐hourly wind from ECMWF. The analysis includes two parts: First, the overall statistics of the model results, including the Loop Current (LC) variability, the frequency of LC eddy‐shedding, and the means and standard deviations (SD) of transports and currents, are compared with observations. Secondly, an Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis attempts to identify the physical parameters responsible for the dominant modal fluctuations in the Channel. The model LC sheds seven eddies in 4 years at irregular time intervals (6.6, 7.1, 5.3, 11.9, 4.2, 10.9 months). The model's upper (thickness ∼800 m) inflow into the Gulf of Mexico occupies two‐thirds of the Channel on the western side, with a near‐surface maximum (4‐year) mean of around 1.5 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.4 m s−1. Three (return) outflow regions are identified, one in the upper layer (thickness ∼600 m) on the eastern third of the Channel, with mean near the surface of about 0.2 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.14 m s−1, and two deep outflow cores, along the western and eastern slopes of the Channel, with (Mean, SD) ≈ (0.17, 0.05) and (0.09, 0.07) m s−1, respectively. The total modeled Channel transport varies from 16 to 34 Sv (1 Sverdrup = 106 m3 s−1) with a mean around 25 Sv. The above velocity and transport values agree quite well with observations by Maul et al. [1985], Ochoa et al. [2001], and Sheinbaum et al. [2002]. The deep return transport below 800 m was found to correlate with changes in the Loop Current extension area, in agreement with the observational analysis by Bunge et al. [2002]. The EOF mode#1 of the along‐channel currents contains 50% of the total energy. It is surface‐trapped, is 180° out of phase across the channel, and correlates well (correlation coefficient γ ≈ 0.8) with the cross‐channel vacillations of the LC frontal position. The EOF mode#2 contains 18% of the energy, and its structure mimics that of the mean flow: dominated by two vertically more coherent regions that are 180° out of phase across
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2002JC001509
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919965210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1919965210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4698-94b022dfe3783b5bd4b2025e17e09a53765fb42e74ac5579cc856c224792b2273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq2KSh1RdjyAN626IK3t-CfuDgU6LUIgjUAINpbjuREGxwE7Kczb12hQ2xV348U959P1h9A-JV8pYfobI4SdtIRQQfQ7tGBUyIoxwnbQglDeVIQx9QHt5XxHynAhOaELtL64BfzbJm87H_y0wWOP3ZwSxCljH_FU1tezs5ONuL21MUL4jg-jDZvs8wucIM-hsH0aB2xxnAdI3tmARwfFGcY1hI_ofW9Dhr3Xdxdd_ji-aH9Wp-fLX-3haWW51E2leVeOXPdQq6buRLfmXblfAFVAtBW1kqLvOAPFrRNCaecaIR1jXGnWld_Vu-jLNvchjY8z5MkMPjsIwUYY52yoplpLwSgp6Oe30abhTChRwIMt6NKYc4LePCQ_2LQxlJiX4s3_xRf802uuzaWFPtnofP7ncEUVkaxwbMs9-QCbNzPNyXLValo3Raq2ks8TPP-VbLo3UtVKmKuzpblZnamVJLU5qv8APwueOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18842575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The variability of currents in the Yucatan Channel: Analysis of results from a numerical ocean model</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ezer, Tal ; Oey, Lie-Yauw ; Lee, Hyun-Chul ; Sturges, Wilton</creator><creatorcontrib>Ezer, Tal ; Oey, Lie-Yauw ; Lee, Hyun-Chul ; Sturges, Wilton</creatorcontrib><description>The flow through the Yucatan Channel and into the Gulf of Mexico is a major component of the Gulf Stream and the subtropical gyre circulation. Surprisingly, however, little is known about the forcing and physical parameters that affect the current structures in the Channel. This paper attempts to improve our understanding of the flow through the Channel with a detailed analysis of the currents obtained from a primitive‐equation model that includes the Gulf and the entire Caribbean Sea and forced by 6‐hourly wind from ECMWF. The analysis includes two parts: First, the overall statistics of the model results, including the Loop Current (LC) variability, the frequency of LC eddy‐shedding, and the means and standard deviations (SD) of transports and currents, are compared with observations. Secondly, an Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis attempts to identify the physical parameters responsible for the dominant modal fluctuations in the Channel. The model LC sheds seven eddies in 4 years at irregular time intervals (6.6, 7.1, 5.3, 11.9, 4.2, 10.9 months). The model's upper (thickness ∼800 m) inflow into the Gulf of Mexico occupies two‐thirds of the Channel on the western side, with a near‐surface maximum (4‐year) mean of around 1.5 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.4 m s−1. Three (return) outflow regions are identified, one in the upper layer (thickness ∼600 m) on the eastern third of the Channel, with mean near the surface of about 0.2 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.14 m s−1, and two deep outflow cores, along the western and eastern slopes of the Channel, with (Mean, SD) ≈ (0.17, 0.05) and (0.09, 0.07) m s−1, respectively. The total modeled Channel transport varies from 16 to 34 Sv (1 Sverdrup = 106 m3 s−1) with a mean around 25 Sv. The above velocity and transport values agree quite well with observations by Maul et al. [1985], Ochoa et al. [2001], and Sheinbaum et al. [2002]. The deep return transport below 800 m was found to correlate with changes in the Loop Current extension area, in agreement with the observational analysis by Bunge et al. [2002]. The EOF mode#1 of the along‐channel currents contains 50% of the total energy. It is surface‐trapped, is 180° out of phase across the channel, and correlates well (correlation coefficient γ ≈ 0.8) with the cross‐channel vacillations of the LC frontal position. The EOF mode#2 contains 18% of the energy, and its structure mimics that of the mean flow: dominated by two vertically more coherent regions that are 180° out of phase across the Channel. The mode is dominated by two periods, approximately 11 months and 2 months respectively, and correlates (γ ≈ 0.7) with the upper‐channel inflow transport. The third and fourth modes, together, account for 18% of the total energy. Their combined time series correlates (γ ≈ 0.66) with the deep current over the sill, and is dominated by fluctuations with a period ≈205 days coincident with the dominant low‐frequency fluctuations inherent in Maul et al.'s [1985] sill measurement. Thus the dominant mode of flow fluctuations in the Yucatan Channel is caused by LC cross‐frontal movements which may not be directly related to LC eddy‐sheddings, while higher modes correspond to transport fluctuations that affect eddy‐sheddings, and to bottom‐trapped current fluctuations, the cause of which has yet to be fully uncovered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2002JC001509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Coastal oceanography, estuaries. Regional oceanography ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Gulf of Mexico ; Loop Current ; Marine ; numerical modeling ; Physics of the oceans ; Yucatan Channel</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans, 2003-01, Vol.108 (C1), p.12.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4698-94b022dfe3783b5bd4b2025e17e09a53765fb42e74ac5579cc856c224792b2273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4698-94b022dfe3783b5bd4b2025e17e09a53765fb42e74ac5579cc856c224792b2273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2002JC001509$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2002JC001509$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,11518,27928,27929,45578,45579,46413,46472,46837,46896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14717062$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ezer, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oey, Lie-Yauw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturges, Wilton</creatorcontrib><title>The variability of currents in the Yucatan Channel: Analysis of results from a numerical ocean model</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>The flow through the Yucatan Channel and into the Gulf of Mexico is a major component of the Gulf Stream and the subtropical gyre circulation. Surprisingly, however, little is known about the forcing and physical parameters that affect the current structures in the Channel. This paper attempts to improve our understanding of the flow through the Channel with a detailed analysis of the currents obtained from a primitive‐equation model that includes the Gulf and the entire Caribbean Sea and forced by 6‐hourly wind from ECMWF. The analysis includes two parts: First, the overall statistics of the model results, including the Loop Current (LC) variability, the frequency of LC eddy‐shedding, and the means and standard deviations (SD) of transports and currents, are compared with observations. Secondly, an Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis attempts to identify the physical parameters responsible for the dominant modal fluctuations in the Channel. The model LC sheds seven eddies in 4 years at irregular time intervals (6.6, 7.1, 5.3, 11.9, 4.2, 10.9 months). The model's upper (thickness ∼800 m) inflow into the Gulf of Mexico occupies two‐thirds of the Channel on the western side, with a near‐surface maximum (4‐year) mean of around 1.5 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.4 m s−1. Three (return) outflow regions are identified, one in the upper layer (thickness ∼600 m) on the eastern third of the Channel, with mean near the surface of about 0.2 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.14 m s−1, and two deep outflow cores, along the western and eastern slopes of the Channel, with (Mean, SD) ≈ (0.17, 0.05) and (0.09, 0.07) m s−1, respectively. The total modeled Channel transport varies from 16 to 34 Sv (1 Sverdrup = 106 m3 s−1) with a mean around 25 Sv. The above velocity and transport values agree quite well with observations by Maul et al. [1985], Ochoa et al. [2001], and Sheinbaum et al. [2002]. The deep return transport below 800 m was found to correlate with changes in the Loop Current extension area, in agreement with the observational analysis by Bunge et al. [2002]. The EOF mode#1 of the along‐channel currents contains 50% of the total energy. It is surface‐trapped, is 180° out of phase across the channel, and correlates well (correlation coefficient γ ≈ 0.8) with the cross‐channel vacillations of the LC frontal position. The EOF mode#2 contains 18% of the energy, and its structure mimics that of the mean flow: dominated by two vertically more coherent regions that are 180° out of phase across the Channel. The mode is dominated by two periods, approximately 11 months and 2 months respectively, and correlates (γ ≈ 0.7) with the upper‐channel inflow transport. The third and fourth modes, together, account for 18% of the total energy. Their combined time series correlates (γ ≈ 0.66) with the deep current over the sill, and is dominated by fluctuations with a period ≈205 days coincident with the dominant low‐frequency fluctuations inherent in Maul et al.'s [1985] sill measurement. Thus the dominant mode of flow fluctuations in the Yucatan Channel is caused by LC cross‐frontal movements which may not be directly related to LC eddy‐sheddings, while higher modes correspond to transport fluctuations that affect eddy‐sheddings, and to bottom‐trapped current fluctuations, the cause of which has yet to be fully uncovered.</description><subject>Coastal oceanography, estuaries. Regional oceanography</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Gulf of Mexico</subject><subject>Loop Current</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>numerical modeling</subject><subject>Physics of the oceans</subject><subject>Yucatan Channel</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq2KSh1RdjyAN626IK3t-CfuDgU6LUIgjUAINpbjuREGxwE7Kczb12hQ2xV348U959P1h9A-JV8pYfobI4SdtIRQQfQ7tGBUyIoxwnbQglDeVIQx9QHt5XxHynAhOaELtL64BfzbJm87H_y0wWOP3ZwSxCljH_FU1tezs5ONuL21MUL4jg-jDZvs8wucIM-hsH0aB2xxnAdI3tmARwfFGcY1hI_ofW9Dhr3Xdxdd_ji-aH9Wp-fLX-3haWW51E2leVeOXPdQq6buRLfmXblfAFVAtBW1kqLvOAPFrRNCaecaIR1jXGnWld_Vu-jLNvchjY8z5MkMPjsIwUYY52yoplpLwSgp6Oe30abhTChRwIMt6NKYc4LePCQ_2LQxlJiX4s3_xRf802uuzaWFPtnofP7ncEUVkaxwbMs9-QCbNzPNyXLValo3Raq2ks8TPP-VbLo3UtVKmKuzpblZnamVJLU5qv8APwueOQ</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Ezer, Tal</creator><creator>Oey, Lie-Yauw</creator><creator>Lee, Hyun-Chul</creator><creator>Sturges, Wilton</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>The variability of currents in the Yucatan Channel: Analysis of results from a numerical ocean model</title><author>Ezer, Tal ; Oey, Lie-Yauw ; Lee, Hyun-Chul ; Sturges, Wilton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4698-94b022dfe3783b5bd4b2025e17e09a53765fb42e74ac5579cc856c224792b2273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Coastal oceanography, estuaries. Regional oceanography</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Gulf of Mexico</topic><topic>Loop Current</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>numerical modeling</topic><topic>Physics of the oceans</topic><topic>Yucatan Channel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ezer, Tal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oey, Lie-Yauw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturges, Wilton</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ezer, Tal</au><au>Oey, Lie-Yauw</au><au>Lee, Hyun-Chul</au><au>Sturges, Wilton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The variability of currents in the Yucatan Channel: Analysis of results from a numerical ocean model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>C1</issue><spage>12.1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>12.1-n/a</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>The flow through the Yucatan Channel and into the Gulf of Mexico is a major component of the Gulf Stream and the subtropical gyre circulation. Surprisingly, however, little is known about the forcing and physical parameters that affect the current structures in the Channel. This paper attempts to improve our understanding of the flow through the Channel with a detailed analysis of the currents obtained from a primitive‐equation model that includes the Gulf and the entire Caribbean Sea and forced by 6‐hourly wind from ECMWF. The analysis includes two parts: First, the overall statistics of the model results, including the Loop Current (LC) variability, the frequency of LC eddy‐shedding, and the means and standard deviations (SD) of transports and currents, are compared with observations. Secondly, an Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis attempts to identify the physical parameters responsible for the dominant modal fluctuations in the Channel. The model LC sheds seven eddies in 4 years at irregular time intervals (6.6, 7.1, 5.3, 11.9, 4.2, 10.9 months). The model's upper (thickness ∼800 m) inflow into the Gulf of Mexico occupies two‐thirds of the Channel on the western side, with a near‐surface maximum (4‐year) mean of around 1.5 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.4 m s−1. Three (return) outflow regions are identified, one in the upper layer (thickness ∼600 m) on the eastern third of the Channel, with mean near the surface of about 0.2 m s−1 and SD ≈ 0.14 m s−1, and two deep outflow cores, along the western and eastern slopes of the Channel, with (Mean, SD) ≈ (0.17, 0.05) and (0.09, 0.07) m s−1, respectively. The total modeled Channel transport varies from 16 to 34 Sv (1 Sverdrup = 106 m3 s−1) with a mean around 25 Sv. The above velocity and transport values agree quite well with observations by Maul et al. [1985], Ochoa et al. [2001], and Sheinbaum et al. [2002]. The deep return transport below 800 m was found to correlate with changes in the Loop Current extension area, in agreement with the observational analysis by Bunge et al. [2002]. The EOF mode#1 of the along‐channel currents contains 50% of the total energy. It is surface‐trapped, is 180° out of phase across the channel, and correlates well (correlation coefficient γ ≈ 0.8) with the cross‐channel vacillations of the LC frontal position. The EOF mode#2 contains 18% of the energy, and its structure mimics that of the mean flow: dominated by two vertically more coherent regions that are 180° out of phase across the Channel. The mode is dominated by two periods, approximately 11 months and 2 months respectively, and correlates (γ ≈ 0.7) with the upper‐channel inflow transport. The third and fourth modes, together, account for 18% of the total energy. Their combined time series correlates (γ ≈ 0.66) with the deep current over the sill, and is dominated by fluctuations with a period ≈205 days coincident with the dominant low‐frequency fluctuations inherent in Maul et al.'s [1985] sill measurement. Thus the dominant mode of flow fluctuations in the Yucatan Channel is caused by LC cross‐frontal movements which may not be directly related to LC eddy‐sheddings, while higher modes correspond to transport fluctuations that affect eddy‐sheddings, and to bottom‐trapped current fluctuations, the cause of which has yet to be fully uncovered.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2002JC001509</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. C. Oceans, 2003-01, Vol.108 (C1), p.12.1-n/a
issn 0148-0227
2169-9275
2156-2202
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919965210
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Coastal oceanography, estuaries. Regional oceanography
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Gulf of Mexico
Loop Current
Marine
numerical modeling
Physics of the oceans
Yucatan Channel
title The variability of currents in the Yucatan Channel: Analysis of results from a numerical ocean model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T08%3A02%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20variability%20of%20currents%20in%20the%20Yucatan%20Channel:%20Analysis%20of%20results%20from%20a%20numerical%20ocean%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20C.%20Oceans&rft.au=Ezer,%20Tal&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=C1&rft.spage=12.1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=12.1-n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2002JC001509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1919965210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18842575&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true