Discoloration and Organic Matter Removal from Coffee Wastewater by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes
The coffee agro-industry generates a large volume of wastewater that is notable for its high organic strength as well as its color content. Due to the seasonal nature of the harvest (3–4 months per year), this particular industrial waste needs a treatment method that is both reliable and fast (in te...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2014-12, Vol.225 (12), p.1-11, Article 2204 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Water, air, and soil pollution |
container_volume | 225 |
creator | Villanueva-Rodríguez, M Bello-Mendoza, R Wareham, D. G Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J Maya-Treviño, M. L |
description | The coffee agro-industry generates a large volume of wastewater that is notable for its high organic strength as well as its color content. Due to the seasonal nature of the harvest (3–4 months per year), this particular industrial waste needs a treatment method that is both reliable and fast (in terms of start-up time). As part of investigating a system capable of treating a coffee wastewater, this research evaluated four electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) using boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. The processes were anodic oxidation (AO), anodic oxidation with electrogenerated H₂O₂(AO-H₂O₂), electro-Fenton (EF), and photoelectro-Fenton (PEF). Experimental conditions were as follows: 40 mA cm⁻²current density (all EAOPs), 0.3 mmol Fe²⁺L⁻¹(Fenton systems), 300 mL air min⁻¹(AO-H₂O₂, EF, PEF), and 500 μW cm⁻²UV irradiation (photo-Fenton systems). The performance of the four EAOP treatment methods (in terms of color and organic carbon removal) was compared against two conventional chemical oxidation methods, namely, Fenton and photo-Fenton. The research indicated that the four EAOPs were better at removing color (89–93 %) and total organic carbon (TOC) (73–84 %) than the respective chemical Fenton (58 and 4.8 %) and photo-Fenton (61 and 7 %) methods. The trend in performance was as follows: AO-H₂O₂ > AO > PEF ≈ EF. It appeared that the ferrous iron reagent formed a dark-colored complex with some coffee components, diminishing the effect of Fenton reactions. In addition, the dark color of the wastewater limited the effect of light in the UV-Fenton processes. Analysis showed that acceptable levels of Fe²⁺(0.3 mmol L⁻¹) and energy (0.082–0.098 kWh g⁻¹TOC) were required by the EAOPs after 4-h treatment time. In conclusion, the use of electrochemical methods (equipped with BDD electrodes) seems a promising method for the effective treatment of coffee wastewaters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11270-014-2204-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919964036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A395165459</galeid><sourcerecordid>A395165459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-b3d2060b3159f9bc4792fed1a31228e7f136a57b6e8603009f1ae6dc67002daa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS1EJZbCB-BEJC5cUvzf8XG1tIBU1Kql4mhNnPGSKomLnS302-MQDogDYB8szfzmyW_0CHnB6Amj1LzJjHFDa8pkzTmVtX5ENkwZUXMr-GOyoVTaWltjn5CnOd_ScmxjNiS-7bOPQ0ww93GqYOqqi7SHqffVR5hnTNUVjvEehiqkOFa7GAJi9RnyjN9gabcP1emAfk7Rf8Gx94XcdvcweSxK3_tu1b0sbcwZ8zNyFGDI-PzXe0xuzk4_7d7X5xfvPuy257WXppnrVnScatoKpmywbSlaHrBjIBjnDZrAhAZlWo2NpqJ4CQxQd14bSnkHII7J61X3LsWvB8yzG4tRHAaYMB6yY5ZZqyUV-t-o1mV7SjTqP1ChKG-MsgV99Qd6Gw9pKp4XyjRWSCULdbJSexjQ9VOIcwJfbrfsMk4Y-lLfCquYVvKnLFsHfIo5JwzuLvUjpAfHqFuS4NYkuJIEtyTBLQb5OpMLO-0x_faVvwy9XIcCRAf71Gd3c80pUyU5TFrJxQ-qPr3O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1637893454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discoloration and Organic Matter Removal from Coffee Wastewater by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Villanueva-Rodríguez, M ; Bello-Mendoza, R ; Wareham, D. G ; Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J ; Maya-Treviño, M. L</creator><creatorcontrib>Villanueva-Rodríguez, M ; Bello-Mendoza, R ; Wareham, D. G ; Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J ; Maya-Treviño, M. L</creatorcontrib><description>The coffee agro-industry generates a large volume of wastewater that is notable for its high organic strength as well as its color content. Due to the seasonal nature of the harvest (3–4 months per year), this particular industrial waste needs a treatment method that is both reliable and fast (in terms of start-up time). As part of investigating a system capable of treating a coffee wastewater, this research evaluated four electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) using boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. The processes were anodic oxidation (AO), anodic oxidation with electrogenerated H₂O₂(AO-H₂O₂), electro-Fenton (EF), and photoelectro-Fenton (PEF). Experimental conditions were as follows: 40 mA cm⁻²current density (all EAOPs), 0.3 mmol Fe²⁺L⁻¹(Fenton systems), 300 mL air min⁻¹(AO-H₂O₂, EF, PEF), and 500 μW cm⁻²UV irradiation (photo-Fenton systems). The performance of the four EAOP treatment methods (in terms of color and organic carbon removal) was compared against two conventional chemical oxidation methods, namely, Fenton and photo-Fenton. The research indicated that the four EAOPs were better at removing color (89–93 %) and total organic carbon (TOC) (73–84 %) than the respective chemical Fenton (58 and 4.8 %) and photo-Fenton (61 and 7 %) methods. The trend in performance was as follows: AO-H₂O₂ > AO > PEF ≈ EF. It appeared that the ferrous iron reagent formed a dark-colored complex with some coffee components, diminishing the effect of Fenton reactions. In addition, the dark color of the wastewater limited the effect of light in the UV-Fenton processes. Analysis showed that acceptable levels of Fe²⁺(0.3 mmol L⁻¹) and energy (0.082–0.098 kWh g⁻¹TOC) were required by the EAOPs after 4-h treatment time. In conclusion, the use of electrochemical methods (equipped with BDD electrodes) seems a promising method for the effective treatment of coffee wastewaters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11270-014-2204-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agricultural wastes ; air ; Analysis ; Anodizing ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Boron ; Carbon ; Chemical properties ; Chemical tests and reagents ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Coffee ; coffee (beverage) ; Color ; Current density ; Discoloration ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Electrochemistry ; Electrodes ; energy ; Environment ; Environmental monitoring ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Hydrogeology ; Industrial wastes ; iron ; Irradiation ; Organic carbon ; Organic matter ; Oxidation ; Oxidation-reduction reaction ; Production processes ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Total organic carbon ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Waste water ; Wastewater ; Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><ispartof>Water, air, and soil pollution, 2014-12, Vol.225 (12), p.1-11, Article 2204</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-b3d2060b3159f9bc4792fed1a31228e7f136a57b6e8603009f1ae6dc67002daa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-b3d2060b3159f9bc4792fed1a31228e7f136a57b6e8603009f1ae6dc67002daa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11270-014-2204-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11270-014-2204-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villanueva-Rodríguez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello-Mendoza, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wareham, D. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maya-Treviño, M. L</creatorcontrib><title>Discoloration and Organic Matter Removal from Coffee Wastewater by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes</title><title>Water, air, and soil pollution</title><addtitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</addtitle><description>The coffee agro-industry generates a large volume of wastewater that is notable for its high organic strength as well as its color content. Due to the seasonal nature of the harvest (3–4 months per year), this particular industrial waste needs a treatment method that is both reliable and fast (in terms of start-up time). As part of investigating a system capable of treating a coffee wastewater, this research evaluated four electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) using boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. The processes were anodic oxidation (AO), anodic oxidation with electrogenerated H₂O₂(AO-H₂O₂), electro-Fenton (EF), and photoelectro-Fenton (PEF). Experimental conditions were as follows: 40 mA cm⁻²current density (all EAOPs), 0.3 mmol Fe²⁺L⁻¹(Fenton systems), 300 mL air min⁻¹(AO-H₂O₂, EF, PEF), and 500 μW cm⁻²UV irradiation (photo-Fenton systems). The performance of the four EAOP treatment methods (in terms of color and organic carbon removal) was compared against two conventional chemical oxidation methods, namely, Fenton and photo-Fenton. The research indicated that the four EAOPs were better at removing color (89–93 %) and total organic carbon (TOC) (73–84 %) than the respective chemical Fenton (58 and 4.8 %) and photo-Fenton (61 and 7 %) methods. The trend in performance was as follows: AO-H₂O₂ > AO > PEF ≈ EF. It appeared that the ferrous iron reagent formed a dark-colored complex with some coffee components, diminishing the effect of Fenton reactions. In addition, the dark color of the wastewater limited the effect of light in the UV-Fenton processes. Analysis showed that acceptable levels of Fe²⁺(0.3 mmol L⁻¹) and energy (0.082–0.098 kWh g⁻¹TOC) were required by the EAOPs after 4-h treatment time. In conclusion, the use of electrochemical methods (equipped with BDD electrodes) seems a promising method for the effective treatment of coffee wastewaters.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural wastes</subject><subject>air</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anodizing</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Boron</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Chemical tests and reagents</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>coffee (beverage)</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Discoloration</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Industrial wastes</subject><subject>iron</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation-reduction reaction</subject><subject>Production processes</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Total organic carbon</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Waste water</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS1EJZbCB-BEJC5cUvzf8XG1tIBU1Kql4mhNnPGSKomLnS302-MQDogDYB8szfzmyW_0CHnB6Amj1LzJjHFDa8pkzTmVtX5ENkwZUXMr-GOyoVTaWltjn5CnOd_ScmxjNiS-7bOPQ0ww93GqYOqqi7SHqffVR5hnTNUVjvEehiqkOFa7GAJi9RnyjN9gabcP1emAfk7Rf8Gx94XcdvcweSxK3_tu1b0sbcwZ8zNyFGDI-PzXe0xuzk4_7d7X5xfvPuy257WXppnrVnScatoKpmywbSlaHrBjIBjnDZrAhAZlWo2NpqJ4CQxQd14bSnkHII7J61X3LsWvB8yzG4tRHAaYMB6yY5ZZqyUV-t-o1mV7SjTqP1ChKG-MsgV99Qd6Gw9pKp4XyjRWSCULdbJSexjQ9VOIcwJfbrfsMk4Y-lLfCquYVvKnLFsHfIo5JwzuLvUjpAfHqFuS4NYkuJIEtyTBLQb5OpMLO-0x_faVvwy9XIcCRAf71Gd3c80pUyU5TFrJxQ-qPr3O</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Villanueva-Rodríguez, M</creator><creator>Bello-Mendoza, R</creator><creator>Wareham, D. G</creator><creator>Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J</creator><creator>Maya-Treviño, M. L</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Discoloration and Organic Matter Removal from Coffee Wastewater by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes</title><author>Villanueva-Rodríguez, M ; Bello-Mendoza, R ; Wareham, D. G ; Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J ; Maya-Treviño, M. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-b3d2060b3159f9bc4792fed1a31228e7f136a57b6e8603009f1ae6dc67002daa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural wastes</topic><topic>air</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anodizing</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Boron</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Chemical tests and reagents</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>coffee (beverage)</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Discoloration</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Industrial wastes</topic><topic>iron</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation-reduction reaction</topic><topic>Production processes</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Total organic carbon</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Waste water</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villanueva-Rodríguez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello-Mendoza, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wareham, D. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maya-Treviño, M. L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villanueva-Rodríguez, M</au><au>Bello-Mendoza, R</au><au>Wareham, D. G</au><au>Ruiz-Ruiz, E. J</au><au>Maya-Treviño, M. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discoloration and Organic Matter Removal from Coffee Wastewater by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes</atitle><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle><stitle>Water Air Soil Pollut</stitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>225</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><artnum>2204</artnum><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><abstract>The coffee agro-industry generates a large volume of wastewater that is notable for its high organic strength as well as its color content. Due to the seasonal nature of the harvest (3–4 months per year), this particular industrial waste needs a treatment method that is both reliable and fast (in terms of start-up time). As part of investigating a system capable of treating a coffee wastewater, this research evaluated four electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) using boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. The processes were anodic oxidation (AO), anodic oxidation with electrogenerated H₂O₂(AO-H₂O₂), electro-Fenton (EF), and photoelectro-Fenton (PEF). Experimental conditions were as follows: 40 mA cm⁻²current density (all EAOPs), 0.3 mmol Fe²⁺L⁻¹(Fenton systems), 300 mL air min⁻¹(AO-H₂O₂, EF, PEF), and 500 μW cm⁻²UV irradiation (photo-Fenton systems). The performance of the four EAOP treatment methods (in terms of color and organic carbon removal) was compared against two conventional chemical oxidation methods, namely, Fenton and photo-Fenton. The research indicated that the four EAOPs were better at removing color (89–93 %) and total organic carbon (TOC) (73–84 %) than the respective chemical Fenton (58 and 4.8 %) and photo-Fenton (61 and 7 %) methods. The trend in performance was as follows: AO-H₂O₂ > AO > PEF ≈ EF. It appeared that the ferrous iron reagent formed a dark-colored complex with some coffee components, diminishing the effect of Fenton reactions. In addition, the dark color of the wastewater limited the effect of light in the UV-Fenton processes. Analysis showed that acceptable levels of Fe²⁺(0.3 mmol L⁻¹) and energy (0.082–0.098 kWh g⁻¹TOC) were required by the EAOPs after 4-h treatment time. In conclusion, the use of electrochemical methods (equipped with BDD electrodes) seems a promising method for the effective treatment of coffee wastewaters.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s11270-014-2204-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-6979 |
ispartof | Water, air, and soil pollution, 2014-12, Vol.225 (12), p.1-11, Article 2204 |
issn | 0049-6979 1573-2932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919964036 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural industry Agricultural wastes air Analysis Anodizing Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Boron Carbon Chemical properties Chemical tests and reagents Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Coffee coffee (beverage) Color Current density Discoloration Earth and Environmental Science Electrochemistry Electrodes energy Environment Environmental monitoring Hydrogen peroxide Hydrogeology Industrial wastes iron Irradiation Organic carbon Organic matter Oxidation Oxidation-reduction reaction Production processes Soil Science & Conservation Total organic carbon Ultraviolet radiation Waste water Wastewater Water Quality/Water Pollution |
title | Discoloration and Organic Matter Removal from Coffee Wastewater by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A46%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discoloration%20and%20Organic%20Matter%20Removal%20from%20Coffee%20Wastewater%20by%20Electrochemical%20Advanced%20Oxidation%20Processes&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air,%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=Villanueva-Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20M&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=225&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.artnum=2204&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11270-014-2204-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA395165459%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1637893454&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A395165459&rfr_iscdi=true |