Environmental conditions and bio-optical signature of a coccolithophorid bloom in the Patagonian shelf

In January 2008, a patch of high reflectance detected by ocean color satellite images was sampled during a cruise over the southern Argentinean continental shelf. High calcite concentrations (particulate inorganic carbon (PIC)) found at the patch were associated with dominance of the coccolithophori...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research 2011-03, Vol.116 (C3), p.n/a, Article C03025
Hauptverfasser: Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras, Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano, Dogliotti, Ana Inés, Ferreira, Amábile, Romero, Silvia I., Mannino, Antonio, Souza, Marcio S., Mata, Mauricio M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue C3
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research
container_volume 116
creator Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras
Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano
Dogliotti, Ana Inés
Ferreira, Amábile
Romero, Silvia I.
Mannino, Antonio
Souza, Marcio S.
Mata, Mauricio M.
description In January 2008, a patch of high reflectance detected by ocean color satellite images was sampled during a cruise over the southern Argentinean continental shelf. High calcite concentrations (particulate inorganic carbon (PIC)) found at the patch were associated with dominance of the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi. Relatively low chlorophyll concentrations (0.29 to 1.48 mg m−3) were found, but both particulate attenuation (0.27 to 1.15 m−1) and backscattering coefficients at 660 nm (0.003 to 0.042 m−1) were noticeably high. Particulate inorganic to organic carbon (POC) ratio (PIC:POC) was highly variable (0.02 to 1.1), but mostly high, showing a significant correlation with particulate backscattering coefficient at 660 nm (r = 0.83, p < 0.005). The spectral dependency of the backscattering coefficient followed Gordon et al. (2009). Both the time evolution analyses of normalized water leaving radiance at 551 nm (nLw551) and the high PIC:POC ratios suggested an advanced stage of the coccolithophorid bloom, therefore with high detached coccoliths:cell ratios. Moreover, this was supported by a strong correlation between PIC and both particulate backscattering (r = 0.81, p < 0.005) and particulate beam attenuation coefficient (r = 0.7, p < 0.05). Remote sensing reflectance data were strongly related to particle backscattering and backscattering ratio, but not to absorption. NASA operational algorithms overestimated chlorophyll by a factor of ∼2 and estimated PIC with a relatively high root‐mean‐square (RMS) error (RMS = 97.9 μg PIC L−1). Better estimates of PIC values (RMS = 81.5 μg PIC L−1) were achieved when we used the original PIC‐specific backscattering coefficient (Balch et al., 2005).
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2010JC006595
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919956253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2312732171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4384-f92d6f60f0adec6bdcfa27e0c887f031c46a985943b11b3a8e83241e54643e0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M9rVDEQB_AgFlxqb_4BwZMHn05-vuQoS91aitaiFHoJ2bykm_o2WZOs2v_eyIpID53LHObzHYZB6AWBNwSofkuBwPkSQAotnqAFJUIOlAJ9ihZAuBqA0vEZOqn1DnpxITmQBQqn6UcsOW19anbGLqcptphTxTZNeB3zkHctuj6q8TbZti8e54Btl87lObZN3m1yid3OOW9xTLhtPL60zd7mFG3CdePn8BwdBTtXf_K3H6Ov70-_LM-Gi0-rD8t3F4PlTPEhaDrJICGAnbyT68kFS0cPTqkxACOOS6uV0JytCVkzq7xilBMvuOTMg2fH6NVh767k73tfm9nG6vw82-TzvhqiidZCUsE6ffmA3uV9Sf06oySwvnIkHb0-IFdyrcUHsytxa8u9IWD-vN38__bO2YH_jLO_f9Sa89XVkhA18p4aDqlYm__1L2XLNyNHNgpz_XFlPpOrG3Gjrw1jvwH5PJK_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>860354671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental conditions and bio-optical signature of a coccolithophorid bloom in the Patagonian shelf</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras ; Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano ; Dogliotti, Ana Inés ; Ferreira, Amábile ; Romero, Silvia I. ; Mannino, Antonio ; Souza, Marcio S. ; Mata, Mauricio M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras ; Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano ; Dogliotti, Ana Inés ; Ferreira, Amábile ; Romero, Silvia I. ; Mannino, Antonio ; Souza, Marcio S. ; Mata, Mauricio M.</creatorcontrib><description>In January 2008, a patch of high reflectance detected by ocean color satellite images was sampled during a cruise over the southern Argentinean continental shelf. High calcite concentrations (particulate inorganic carbon (PIC)) found at the patch were associated with dominance of the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi. Relatively low chlorophyll concentrations (0.29 to 1.48 mg m−3) were found, but both particulate attenuation (0.27 to 1.15 m−1) and backscattering coefficients at 660 nm (0.003 to 0.042 m−1) were noticeably high. Particulate inorganic to organic carbon (POC) ratio (PIC:POC) was highly variable (0.02 to 1.1), but mostly high, showing a significant correlation with particulate backscattering coefficient at 660 nm (r = 0.83, p &lt; 0.005). The spectral dependency of the backscattering coefficient followed Gordon et al. (2009). Both the time evolution analyses of normalized water leaving radiance at 551 nm (nLw551) and the high PIC:POC ratios suggested an advanced stage of the coccolithophorid bloom, therefore with high detached coccoliths:cell ratios. Moreover, this was supported by a strong correlation between PIC and both particulate backscattering (r = 0.81, p &lt; 0.005) and particulate beam attenuation coefficient (r = 0.7, p &lt; 0.05). Remote sensing reflectance data were strongly related to particle backscattering and backscattering ratio, but not to absorption. NASA operational algorithms overestimated chlorophyll by a factor of ∼2 and estimated PIC with a relatively high root‐mean‐square (RMS) error (RMS = 97.9 μg PIC L−1). Better estimates of PIC values (RMS = 81.5 μg PIC L−1) were achieved when we used the original PIC‐specific backscattering coefficient (Balch et al., 2005).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2010JC006595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological oceanography ; Calcite ; Chemical oceanography ; Chlorophyll ; coccolithophorid bloom ; Continental shelves ; Environmental conditions ; Geobiology ; Geophysics ; Inorganic carbon ; Marine ; Oceanography ; optical properties ; Organic carbon ; Patagonian shelf ; Reflectance ; Remote sensing</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, 2011-03, Vol.116 (C3), p.n/a, Article C03025</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>Copyright 2011 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4384-f92d6f60f0adec6bdcfa27e0c887f031c46a985943b11b3a8e83241e54643e0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4384-f92d6f60f0adec6bdcfa27e0c887f031c46a985943b11b3a8e83241e54643e0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2010JC006595$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2010JC006595$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,11521,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46475,46840,46899</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogliotti, Ana Inés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Amábile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Silvia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannino, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Marcio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mata, Mauricio M.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental conditions and bio-optical signature of a coccolithophorid bloom in the Patagonian shelf</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>In January 2008, a patch of high reflectance detected by ocean color satellite images was sampled during a cruise over the southern Argentinean continental shelf. High calcite concentrations (particulate inorganic carbon (PIC)) found at the patch were associated with dominance of the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi. Relatively low chlorophyll concentrations (0.29 to 1.48 mg m−3) were found, but both particulate attenuation (0.27 to 1.15 m−1) and backscattering coefficients at 660 nm (0.003 to 0.042 m−1) were noticeably high. Particulate inorganic to organic carbon (POC) ratio (PIC:POC) was highly variable (0.02 to 1.1), but mostly high, showing a significant correlation with particulate backscattering coefficient at 660 nm (r = 0.83, p &lt; 0.005). The spectral dependency of the backscattering coefficient followed Gordon et al. (2009). Both the time evolution analyses of normalized water leaving radiance at 551 nm (nLw551) and the high PIC:POC ratios suggested an advanced stage of the coccolithophorid bloom, therefore with high detached coccoliths:cell ratios. Moreover, this was supported by a strong correlation between PIC and both particulate backscattering (r = 0.81, p &lt; 0.005) and particulate beam attenuation coefficient (r = 0.7, p &lt; 0.05). Remote sensing reflectance data were strongly related to particle backscattering and backscattering ratio, but not to absorption. NASA operational algorithms overestimated chlorophyll by a factor of ∼2 and estimated PIC with a relatively high root‐mean‐square (RMS) error (RMS = 97.9 μg PIC L−1). Better estimates of PIC values (RMS = 81.5 μg PIC L−1) were achieved when we used the original PIC‐specific backscattering coefficient (Balch et al., 2005).</description><subject>Biological oceanography</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Chemical oceanography</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>coccolithophorid bloom</subject><subject>Continental shelves</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Geobiology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Inorganic carbon</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>optical properties</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Patagonian shelf</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M9rVDEQB_AgFlxqb_4BwZMHn05-vuQoS91aitaiFHoJ2bykm_o2WZOs2v_eyIpID53LHObzHYZB6AWBNwSofkuBwPkSQAotnqAFJUIOlAJ9ihZAuBqA0vEZOqn1DnpxITmQBQqn6UcsOW19anbGLqcptphTxTZNeB3zkHctuj6q8TbZti8e54Btl87lObZN3m1yid3OOW9xTLhtPL60zd7mFG3CdePn8BwdBTtXf_K3H6Ov70-_LM-Gi0-rD8t3F4PlTPEhaDrJICGAnbyT68kFS0cPTqkxACOOS6uV0JytCVkzq7xilBMvuOTMg2fH6NVh767k73tfm9nG6vw82-TzvhqiidZCUsE6ffmA3uV9Sf06oySwvnIkHb0-IFdyrcUHsytxa8u9IWD-vN38__bO2YH_jLO_f9Sa89XVkhA18p4aDqlYm__1L2XLNyNHNgpz_XFlPpOrG3Gjrw1jvwH5PJK_</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras</creator><creator>Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano</creator><creator>Dogliotti, Ana Inés</creator><creator>Ferreira, Amábile</creator><creator>Romero, Silvia I.</creator><creator>Mannino, Antonio</creator><creator>Souza, Marcio S.</creator><creator>Mata, Mauricio M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Environmental conditions and bio-optical signature of a coccolithophorid bloom in the Patagonian shelf</title><author>Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras ; Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano ; Dogliotti, Ana Inés ; Ferreira, Amábile ; Romero, Silvia I. ; Mannino, Antonio ; Souza, Marcio S. ; Mata, Mauricio M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4384-f92d6f60f0adec6bdcfa27e0c887f031c46a985943b11b3a8e83241e54643e0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological oceanography</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Chemical oceanography</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>coccolithophorid bloom</topic><topic>Continental shelves</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Geobiology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Inorganic carbon</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>optical properties</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Patagonian shelf</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogliotti, Ana Inés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Amábile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Silvia I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannino, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Marcio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mata, Mauricio M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia, Carlos Alberto Eiras</au><au>Garcia, Virginia Maria Tavano</au><au>Dogliotti, Ana Inés</au><au>Ferreira, Amábile</au><au>Romero, Silvia I.</au><au>Mannino, Antonio</au><au>Souza, Marcio S.</au><au>Mata, Mauricio M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental conditions and bio-optical signature of a coccolithophorid bloom in the Patagonian shelf</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>C3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><artnum>C03025</artnum><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>In January 2008, a patch of high reflectance detected by ocean color satellite images was sampled during a cruise over the southern Argentinean continental shelf. High calcite concentrations (particulate inorganic carbon (PIC)) found at the patch were associated with dominance of the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi. Relatively low chlorophyll concentrations (0.29 to 1.48 mg m−3) were found, but both particulate attenuation (0.27 to 1.15 m−1) and backscattering coefficients at 660 nm (0.003 to 0.042 m−1) were noticeably high. Particulate inorganic to organic carbon (POC) ratio (PIC:POC) was highly variable (0.02 to 1.1), but mostly high, showing a significant correlation with particulate backscattering coefficient at 660 nm (r = 0.83, p &lt; 0.005). The spectral dependency of the backscattering coefficient followed Gordon et al. (2009). Both the time evolution analyses of normalized water leaving radiance at 551 nm (nLw551) and the high PIC:POC ratios suggested an advanced stage of the coccolithophorid bloom, therefore with high detached coccoliths:cell ratios. Moreover, this was supported by a strong correlation between PIC and both particulate backscattering (r = 0.81, p &lt; 0.005) and particulate beam attenuation coefficient (r = 0.7, p &lt; 0.05). Remote sensing reflectance data were strongly related to particle backscattering and backscattering ratio, but not to absorption. NASA operational algorithms overestimated chlorophyll by a factor of ∼2 and estimated PIC with a relatively high root‐mean‐square (RMS) error (RMS = 97.9 μg PIC L−1). Better estimates of PIC values (RMS = 81.5 μg PIC L−1) were achieved when we used the original PIC‐specific backscattering coefficient (Balch et al., 2005).</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2010JC006595</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research, 2011-03, Vol.116 (C3), p.n/a, Article C03025
issn 0148-0227
2169-9275
2156-2202
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1919956253
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological oceanography
Calcite
Chemical oceanography
Chlorophyll
coccolithophorid bloom
Continental shelves
Environmental conditions
Geobiology
Geophysics
Inorganic carbon
Marine
Oceanography
optical properties
Organic carbon
Patagonian shelf
Reflectance
Remote sensing
title Environmental conditions and bio-optical signature of a coccolithophorid bloom in the Patagonian shelf
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T22%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20conditions%20and%20bio-optical%20signature%20of%20a%20coccolithophorid%20bloom%20in%20the%20Patagonian%20shelf&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research&rft.au=Garcia,%20Carlos%20Alberto%20Eiras&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=C3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.artnum=C03025&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2010JC006595&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2312732171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=860354671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true