Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End‐Stage Liver Disease Patients
While regional organ availability dominates discussions of distribution policy, community‐level disparities remain poorly understood. We studied micro‐geographic determinants of survival risk and their distribution across Donor Service Areas (DSAs). Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients recor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of transplantation 2017-11, Vol.17 (11), p.2879-2889 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2889 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2879 |
container_title | American journal of transplantation |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ross, K. Patzer, R. E. Goldberg, D. S. Lynch, R. J. |
description | While regional organ availability dominates discussions of distribution policy, community‐level disparities remain poorly understood. We studied micro‐geographic determinants of survival risk and their distribution across Donor Service Areas (DSAs). Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records for all adults waitlisted for liver transplantation 2002–2014 were reviewed. The primary exposure variables were county‐level sociodemographic risk, as measured by the Community Health Score (CHS), a previously‐validated composite index local health conditions, and distance to listing transplant center. Among 114 347 patients, the median CHS was 19.4 (range: 0–40). Compared the lowest risk counties (CHS 1–10), highest‐risk counties (CHS 31–40) had more black (14.6% vs. 5.4%), publicly insured (44.9% vs. 33.0), and remote candidates (34.0% vs. 15.1% living >100 miles away). Higher‐CHS candidates had greater waitlist mortality in Cox multivariable (HR 1.16 for CHS 31–40, 95% CI 1.11–1.21) and competing risks analysis (sHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.14). Post‐transplant survival was similar across CHS quartiles. Living >25 miles from the transplant center conferred excess mortality risk (sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.12). Proposed distribution changes would disproportionately impact DSAs with more high‐CHS or distant candidates. Low‐income, rural and minority patients experience excess mortality while awaiting transplant, and risk disproportionately worse outcomes with reduced organ availability under current proposals.
The authors examine the mortality risk associated with a sociodemographically disadvantaged place of residence for liver transplant candidates, as well as implications of liver redistribution on transplant access for these patients. See the editorial from Axelrod and Yeh on page 2759 . |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajt.14421 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917960584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917960584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-50c489947c59554f35e6bbd533729e5d575f89f40ce3840456fef93e637ee693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1OGzEURq0KVGjaBS-ALLGhi4A99vWMlxFQfhSpSInU5ciZuRMczYyD7QlixyP0GfskNQRYIHE3vpKPjj_5I-SAsxOe5tSs4gmXMuNfyD5XjI0Vl2LnfRewR76FsGKM51mRfSV7WaE0KA77pJ-5yroaO7f0Zn1nK3qOEX1ne9PHQF1D_xgbWxsiNX1Nb12I0Zs-rNt0T2eD39iNaemkc_2SXvT1v6e_s2iWSKd2g56e24AmIL010WISfie7jWkD_ng9R2T-62J-djWe_r68PptMx5UoCj4GVslCa5lXoAFkIwDVYlGDEHmmEWrIoSl0I1mFopBMgmqw0QKVyBGVFiNyvNWuvbsfMMSys6HCNoVGN4SSa55rxaCQCT36gK7c4PsULlGQZxIgPTsiP7dU5V0IHpty7W1n_GPJWfncQZk6KF86SOzhq3FYdFi_k2-fnoDTLfBgW3z83FRObuZb5X99XZEk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957245553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End‐Stage Liver Disease Patients</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ross, K. ; Patzer, R. E. ; Goldberg, D. S. ; Lynch, R. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, K. ; Patzer, R. E. ; Goldberg, D. S. ; Lynch, R. J.</creatorcontrib><description>While regional organ availability dominates discussions of distribution policy, community‐level disparities remain poorly understood. We studied micro‐geographic determinants of survival risk and their distribution across Donor Service Areas (DSAs). Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records for all adults waitlisted for liver transplantation 2002–2014 were reviewed. The primary exposure variables were county‐level sociodemographic risk, as measured by the Community Health Score (CHS), a previously‐validated composite index local health conditions, and distance to listing transplant center. Among 114 347 patients, the median CHS was 19.4 (range: 0–40). Compared the lowest risk counties (CHS 1–10), highest‐risk counties (CHS 31–40) had more black (14.6% vs. 5.4%), publicly insured (44.9% vs. 33.0), and remote candidates (34.0% vs. 15.1% living >100 miles away). Higher‐CHS candidates had greater waitlist mortality in Cox multivariable (HR 1.16 for CHS 31–40, 95% CI 1.11–1.21) and competing risks analysis (sHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.14). Post‐transplant survival was similar across CHS quartiles. Living >25 miles from the transplant center conferred excess mortality risk (sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.12). Proposed distribution changes would disproportionately impact DSAs with more high‐CHS or distant candidates. Low‐income, rural and minority patients experience excess mortality while awaiting transplant, and risk disproportionately worse outcomes with reduced organ availability under current proposals.
The authors examine the mortality risk associated with a sociodemographically disadvantaged place of residence for liver transplant candidates, as well as implications of liver redistribution on transplant access for these patients. See the editorial from Axelrod and Yeh on page 2759 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14421</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28695615</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>End Stage Liver Disease - mortality ; End Stage Liver Disease - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Services Accessibility ; health services and outcomes research ; Humans ; liver disease ; Liver diseases ; Liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - mortality ; liver transplantation/hepatology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; organ allocation ; organ procurement and allocation ; Prognosis ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sociodemographics ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; Tissue Donors - supply & distribution ; Transplant Recipients ; Transplantation ; Transplants & implants ; Waiting Lists ; waitlist management</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2017-11, Vol.17 (11), p.2879-2889</ispartof><rights>2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons</rights><rights>2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-50c489947c59554f35e6bbd533729e5d575f89f40ce3840456fef93e637ee693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-50c489947c59554f35e6bbd533729e5d575f89f40ce3840456fef93e637ee693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajt.14421$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajt.14421$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28695615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzer, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, D. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, R. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End‐Stage Liver Disease Patients</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>While regional organ availability dominates discussions of distribution policy, community‐level disparities remain poorly understood. We studied micro‐geographic determinants of survival risk and their distribution across Donor Service Areas (DSAs). Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records for all adults waitlisted for liver transplantation 2002–2014 were reviewed. The primary exposure variables were county‐level sociodemographic risk, as measured by the Community Health Score (CHS), a previously‐validated composite index local health conditions, and distance to listing transplant center. Among 114 347 patients, the median CHS was 19.4 (range: 0–40). Compared the lowest risk counties (CHS 1–10), highest‐risk counties (CHS 31–40) had more black (14.6% vs. 5.4%), publicly insured (44.9% vs. 33.0), and remote candidates (34.0% vs. 15.1% living >100 miles away). Higher‐CHS candidates had greater waitlist mortality in Cox multivariable (HR 1.16 for CHS 31–40, 95% CI 1.11–1.21) and competing risks analysis (sHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.14). Post‐transplant survival was similar across CHS quartiles. Living >25 miles from the transplant center conferred excess mortality risk (sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.12). Proposed distribution changes would disproportionately impact DSAs with more high‐CHS or distant candidates. Low‐income, rural and minority patients experience excess mortality while awaiting transplant, and risk disproportionately worse outcomes with reduced organ availability under current proposals.
The authors examine the mortality risk associated with a sociodemographically disadvantaged place of residence for liver transplant candidates, as well as implications of liver redistribution on transplant access for these patients. See the editorial from Axelrod and Yeh on page 2759 .</description><subject>End Stage Liver Disease - mortality</subject><subject>End Stage Liver Disease - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>health services and outcomes research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>liver disease</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>liver transplantation/hepatology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>organ allocation</subject><subject>organ procurement and allocation</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - supply & distribution</subject><subject>Transplant Recipients</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Waiting Lists</subject><subject>waitlist management</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1OGzEURq0KVGjaBS-ALLGhi4A99vWMlxFQfhSpSInU5ciZuRMczYyD7QlixyP0GfskNQRYIHE3vpKPjj_5I-SAsxOe5tSs4gmXMuNfyD5XjI0Vl2LnfRewR76FsGKM51mRfSV7WaE0KA77pJ-5yroaO7f0Zn1nK3qOEX1ne9PHQF1D_xgbWxsiNX1Nb12I0Zs-rNt0T2eD39iNaemkc_2SXvT1v6e_s2iWSKd2g56e24AmIL010WISfie7jWkD_ng9R2T-62J-djWe_r68PptMx5UoCj4GVslCa5lXoAFkIwDVYlGDEHmmEWrIoSl0I1mFopBMgmqw0QKVyBGVFiNyvNWuvbsfMMSys6HCNoVGN4SSa55rxaCQCT36gK7c4PsULlGQZxIgPTsiP7dU5V0IHpty7W1n_GPJWfncQZk6KF86SOzhq3FYdFi_k2-fnoDTLfBgW3z83FRObuZb5X99XZEk</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Ross, K.</creator><creator>Patzer, R. E.</creator><creator>Goldberg, D. S.</creator><creator>Lynch, R. J.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End‐Stage Liver Disease Patients</title><author>Ross, K. ; Patzer, R. E. ; Goldberg, D. S. ; Lynch, R. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-50c489947c59554f35e6bbd533729e5d575f89f40ce3840456fef93e637ee693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>End Stage Liver Disease - mortality</topic><topic>End Stage Liver Disease - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>health services and outcomes research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>liver disease</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>liver transplantation/hepatology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>organ allocation</topic><topic>organ procurement and allocation</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - supply & distribution</topic><topic>Transplant Recipients</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Waiting Lists</topic><topic>waitlist management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patzer, R. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, D. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, R. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, K.</au><au>Patzer, R. E.</au><au>Goldberg, D. S.</au><au>Lynch, R. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End‐Stage Liver Disease Patients</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2879</spage><epage>2889</epage><pages>2879-2889</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>While regional organ availability dominates discussions of distribution policy, community‐level disparities remain poorly understood. We studied micro‐geographic determinants of survival risk and their distribution across Donor Service Areas (DSAs). Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients records for all adults waitlisted for liver transplantation 2002–2014 were reviewed. The primary exposure variables were county‐level sociodemographic risk, as measured by the Community Health Score (CHS), a previously‐validated composite index local health conditions, and distance to listing transplant center. Among 114 347 patients, the median CHS was 19.4 (range: 0–40). Compared the lowest risk counties (CHS 1–10), highest‐risk counties (CHS 31–40) had more black (14.6% vs. 5.4%), publicly insured (44.9% vs. 33.0), and remote candidates (34.0% vs. 15.1% living >100 miles away). Higher‐CHS candidates had greater waitlist mortality in Cox multivariable (HR 1.16 for CHS 31–40, 95% CI 1.11–1.21) and competing risks analysis (sHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.14). Post‐transplant survival was similar across CHS quartiles. Living >25 miles from the transplant center conferred excess mortality risk (sHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03–1.12). Proposed distribution changes would disproportionately impact DSAs with more high‐CHS or distant candidates. Low‐income, rural and minority patients experience excess mortality while awaiting transplant, and risk disproportionately worse outcomes with reduced organ availability under current proposals.
The authors examine the mortality risk associated with a sociodemographically disadvantaged place of residence for liver transplant candidates, as well as implications of liver redistribution on transplant access for these patients. See the editorial from Axelrod and Yeh on page 2759 .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>28695615</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajt.14421</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1600-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of transplantation, 2017-11, Vol.17 (11), p.2879-2889 |
issn | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917960584 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | End Stage Liver Disease - mortality End Stage Liver Disease - surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Health Services Accessibility health services and outcomes research Humans liver disease Liver diseases Liver transplantation Liver Transplantation - mortality liver transplantation/hepatology Male Middle Aged Mortality organ allocation organ procurement and allocation Prognosis Registries Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Sociodemographics Socioeconomic Factors Survival Survival Rate Tissue and Organ Procurement Tissue Donors - supply & distribution Transplant Recipients Transplantation Transplants & implants Waiting Lists waitlist management |
title | Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End‐Stage Liver Disease Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A56%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sociodemographic%20Determinants%20of%20Waitlist%20and%20Posttransplant%20Survival%20Among%20End%E2%80%90Stage%20Liver%20Disease%20Patients&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Ross,%20K.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2879&rft.epage=2889&rft.pages=2879-2889&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajt.14421&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917960584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957245553&rft_id=info:pmid/28695615&rfr_iscdi=true |