Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games
Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed pop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of theoretical biology 2017-10, Vol.430, p.45-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 52 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Journal of theoretical biology |
container_volume | 430 |
creator | Cazaubiel, Annette Lütz, Alessandra F. Arenzon, Jeferson J. |
description | Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917667766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022519317303272</els_id><sourcerecordid>1917667766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfZo5ddJ9nd7C54keIXFLzUc5gm05JlP2qSCv33prR6FGaY4eWdF-Zh7JZDxoHLhzZrw8pmAniVQSwQZ2zKoSnTuiz4OZtGRaQlb_IJu_K-BYCmyOUlm4ha1k3d8ClbzseuIx3sNyU-OAy0seQTHEyi97qzOjFjbwccNCV2SNDv-56Ci_rWkcEwujQu-8RvMVjskg325K_ZxRo7TzenOWOfL8_L-Vu6-Hh9nz8tUp2XMqRopISCGyhLjii0qERuSEjisoRqRVhosTJaAJRAtaSG8nrdVBxyQgA0-YzdH3O3bvzakQ-qt15T1-FA484r3vBKyip2tIqjVbvRe0drtXW2R7dXHNSBpmrVgaY60FQQC0Q8ujvl71Y9mb-TX3zR8Hg0UPzy25JTXluKrIx1Eaoyo_0v_wfGr4bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917667766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cazaubiel, Annette ; Lütz, Alessandra F. ; Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cazaubiel, Annette ; Lütz, Alessandra F. ; Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creatorcontrib><description>Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28689891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Collective hunting ; Competitive Behavior ; Cooperative Behavior ; Cyclic dominance ; Flocking ; Games, Experimental ; Models, Biological ; Models, Theoretical ; Population Dynamics ; Predatory Behavior ; Rock-Paper-Scissors game</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical biology, 2017-10, Vol.430, p.45-52</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519317303272$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28689891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cazaubiel, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lütz, Alessandra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creatorcontrib><title>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</title><title>Journal of theoretical biology</title><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><description>Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Collective hunting</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Cyclic dominance</subject><subject>Flocking</subject><subject>Games, Experimental</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Rock-Paper-Scissors game</subject><issn>0022-5193</issn><issn>1095-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfZo5ddJ9nd7C54keIXFLzUc5gm05JlP2qSCv33prR6FGaY4eWdF-Zh7JZDxoHLhzZrw8pmAniVQSwQZ2zKoSnTuiz4OZtGRaQlb_IJu_K-BYCmyOUlm4ha1k3d8ClbzseuIx3sNyU-OAy0seQTHEyi97qzOjFjbwccNCV2SNDv-56Ci_rWkcEwujQu-8RvMVjskg325K_ZxRo7TzenOWOfL8_L-Vu6-Hh9nz8tUp2XMqRopISCGyhLjii0qERuSEjisoRqRVhosTJaAJRAtaSG8nrdVBxyQgA0-YzdH3O3bvzakQ-qt15T1-FA484r3vBKyip2tIqjVbvRe0drtXW2R7dXHNSBpmrVgaY60FQQC0Q8ujvl71Y9mb-TX3zR8Hg0UPzy25JTXluKrIx1Eaoyo_0v_wfGr4bQ</recordid><startdate>20171007</startdate><enddate>20171007</enddate><creator>Cazaubiel, Annette</creator><creator>Lütz, Alessandra F.</creator><creator>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171007</creationdate><title>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</title><author>Cazaubiel, Annette ; Lütz, Alessandra F. ; Arenzon, Jeferson J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Collective hunting</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Cyclic dominance</topic><topic>Flocking</topic><topic>Games, Experimental</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Rock-Paper-Scissors game</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cazaubiel, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lütz, Alessandra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cazaubiel, Annette</au><au>Lütz, Alessandra F.</au><au>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><date>2017-10-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>430</volume><spage>45</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>45-52</pages><issn>0022-5193</issn><eissn>1095-8541</eissn><abstract>Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28689891</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5193 |
ispartof | Journal of theoretical biology, 2017-10, Vol.430, p.45-52 |
issn | 0022-5193 1095-8541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917667766 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Collective hunting Competitive Behavior Cooperative Behavior Cyclic dominance Flocking Games, Experimental Models, Biological Models, Theoretical Population Dynamics Predatory Behavior Rock-Paper-Scissors game |
title | Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A45%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collective%20strategies%20and%20cyclic%20dominance%20in%20asymmetric%20predator-prey%20spatial%20games&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20biology&rft.au=Cazaubiel,%20Annette&rft.date=2017-10-07&rft.volume=430&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=45-52&rft.issn=0022-5193&rft.eissn=1095-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917667766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917667766&rft_id=info:pmid/28689891&rft_els_id=S0022519317303272&rfr_iscdi=true |