Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games

Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed pop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of theoretical biology 2017-10, Vol.430, p.45-52
Hauptverfasser: Cazaubiel, Annette, Lütz, Alessandra F., Arenzon, Jeferson J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 52
container_issue
container_start_page 45
container_title Journal of theoretical biology
container_volume 430
creator Cazaubiel, Annette
Lütz, Alessandra F.
Arenzon, Jeferson J.
description Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917667766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022519317303272</els_id><sourcerecordid>1917667766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfZo5ddJ9nd7C54keIXFLzUc5gm05JlP2qSCv33prR6FGaY4eWdF-Zh7JZDxoHLhzZrw8pmAniVQSwQZ2zKoSnTuiz4OZtGRaQlb_IJu_K-BYCmyOUlm4ha1k3d8ClbzseuIx3sNyU-OAy0seQTHEyi97qzOjFjbwccNCV2SNDv-56Ci_rWkcEwujQu-8RvMVjskg325K_ZxRo7TzenOWOfL8_L-Vu6-Hh9nz8tUp2XMqRopISCGyhLjii0qERuSEjisoRqRVhosTJaAJRAtaSG8nrdVBxyQgA0-YzdH3O3bvzakQ-qt15T1-FA484r3vBKyip2tIqjVbvRe0drtXW2R7dXHNSBpmrVgaY60FQQC0Q8ujvl71Y9mb-TX3zR8Hg0UPzy25JTXluKrIx1Eaoyo_0v_wfGr4bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917667766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cazaubiel, Annette ; Lütz, Alessandra F. ; Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cazaubiel, Annette ; Lütz, Alessandra F. ; Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creatorcontrib><description>Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28689891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Collective hunting ; Competitive Behavior ; Cooperative Behavior ; Cyclic dominance ; Flocking ; Games, Experimental ; Models, Biological ; Models, Theoretical ; Population Dynamics ; Predatory Behavior ; Rock-Paper-Scissors game</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical biology, 2017-10, Vol.430, p.45-52</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519317303272$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28689891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cazaubiel, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lütz, Alessandra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creatorcontrib><title>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</title><title>Journal of theoretical biology</title><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><description>Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Collective hunting</subject><subject>Competitive Behavior</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Cyclic dominance</subject><subject>Flocking</subject><subject>Games, Experimental</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Rock-Paper-Scissors game</subject><issn>0022-5193</issn><issn>1095-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gAfZo5ddJ9nd7C54keIXFLzUc5gm05JlP2qSCv33prR6FGaY4eWdF-Zh7JZDxoHLhzZrw8pmAniVQSwQZ2zKoSnTuiz4OZtGRaQlb_IJu_K-BYCmyOUlm4ha1k3d8ClbzseuIx3sNyU-OAy0seQTHEyi97qzOjFjbwccNCV2SNDv-56Ci_rWkcEwujQu-8RvMVjskg325K_ZxRo7TzenOWOfL8_L-Vu6-Hh9nz8tUp2XMqRopISCGyhLjii0qERuSEjisoRqRVhosTJaAJRAtaSG8nrdVBxyQgA0-YzdH3O3bvzakQ-qt15T1-FA484r3vBKyip2tIqjVbvRe0drtXW2R7dXHNSBpmrVgaY60FQQC0Q8ujvl71Y9mb-TX3zR8Hg0UPzy25JTXluKrIx1Eaoyo_0v_wfGr4bQ</recordid><startdate>20171007</startdate><enddate>20171007</enddate><creator>Cazaubiel, Annette</creator><creator>Lütz, Alessandra F.</creator><creator>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171007</creationdate><title>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</title><author>Cazaubiel, Annette ; Lütz, Alessandra F. ; Arenzon, Jeferson J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ad66041d0551aa2c2723de26e16507bea4c2bdc20050e86e9e38f97103ea00ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Collective hunting</topic><topic>Competitive Behavior</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Cyclic dominance</topic><topic>Flocking</topic><topic>Games, Experimental</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Rock-Paper-Scissors game</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cazaubiel, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lütz, Alessandra F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cazaubiel, Annette</au><au>Lütz, Alessandra F.</au><au>Arenzon, Jeferson J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><date>2017-10-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>430</volume><spage>45</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>45-52</pages><issn>0022-5193</issn><eissn>1095-8541</eissn><abstract>Predators may attack isolated or grouped prey in a cooperative, collective way. Whether a gregarious behavior is advantageous to each species depends on several conditions and game theory is a useful tool to deal with such a problem. We here extend the Lett et al. (2004) to spatially distributed populations and compare the resulting behavior with their mean-field predictions for the coevolving densities of predator and prey strategies. Besides its richer behavior in the presence of spatial organization, we also show that the coexistence phase in which collective and individual strategies for each group are present is stable because of an effective, cyclic dominance mechanism similar to a well-studied generalization of the Rock-Paper-Scissors game with four species, a further example of how ubiquitous this coexistence mechanism is.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28689891</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5193
ispartof Journal of theoretical biology, 2017-10, Vol.430, p.45-52
issn 0022-5193
1095-8541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917667766
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Collective hunting
Competitive Behavior
Cooperative Behavior
Cyclic dominance
Flocking
Games, Experimental
Models, Biological
Models, Theoretical
Population Dynamics
Predatory Behavior
Rock-Paper-Scissors game
title Collective strategies and cyclic dominance in asymmetric predator-prey spatial games
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A45%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collective%20strategies%20and%20cyclic%20dominance%20in%20asymmetric%20predator-prey%20spatial%20games&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20biology&rft.au=Cazaubiel,%20Annette&rft.date=2017-10-07&rft.volume=430&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=45-52&rft.issn=0022-5193&rft.eissn=1095-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917667766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917667766&rft_id=info:pmid/28689891&rft_els_id=S0022519317303272&rfr_iscdi=true