Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands
Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electrophoresis 2017-11, Vol.38 (22-23), p.2975-2980 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2980 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22-23 |
container_start_page | 2975 |
container_title | Electrophoresis |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Amorim, Lúcia F. A. Gaspar, Rita Pereira, Patrícia Černigoj, Urh Sousa, Fani Queiroz, João António Sousa, Ângela |
description | Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/elps.201700147 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917368320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917368320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB3ALUdGlcOWILHHhku3YmdibI1otLdJKrVTgGjmOvevK-cBOisKpEi_AM_IkeLVtD71wsjX-zciaPyHvGCwZAD83fohLDkwCMJQvyIIVnGdcrPKXZJHKeQarvDglr2O8BQAsEV-RU75KgAlYkN_rfehbNfa7oIa90_Ty-vvf-z9M0I0430g6eBVb19A7pbXrDB2m4KzTanR9R007-H523Y5uU8_exdE1B6S6hrJUqU33a_bp8uzZWte5cabe7RKNb8iJVT6atw_nGfn2efN1fZltry6-rD9tM41QYIZKC6Elq5UCnXNs6kJwbiSX2lpQK6wbLESJshC1NWi5ECYv024Yal2qMj8jH49zh9D_mEwcq9ZFbbxXnemnWLEy7SsthkOiH57R234KXfpdUhKKQgo8qOVR6dDHGIythuBaFeaKQXWIpzrEUz3FkxreP4yd6tY0T_wxjwTwCH46b-b_jKs22-sbwRHzf-5noDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970557640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Amorim, Lúcia F. A. ; Gaspar, Rita ; Pereira, Patrícia ; Černigoj, Urh ; Sousa, Fani ; Queiroz, João António ; Sousa, Ângela</creator><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Lúcia F. A. ; Gaspar, Rita ; Pereira, Patrícia ; Černigoj, Urh ; Sousa, Fani ; Queiroz, João António ; Sousa, Ângela</creatorcontrib><description>Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0173-0835</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/elps.201700147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28683160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Affinity ; Amino acids ; Aromatic compounds ; Binding ; Chromatography ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Elution ; Histidine ; Histidine‐based ligands ; Hydrophobicity ; Ions ; Ligands ; Monoliths ; Nucleic acids ; Phase transitions ; Plasmid DNA purification ; Plasmids ; Purification ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; RNA removal ; Sample displacement chromatography ; Selectivity ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Electrophoresis, 2017-11, Vol.38 (22-23), p.2975-2980</ispartof><rights>2017 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Felps.201700147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Felps.201700147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černigoj, Urh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Fani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, João António</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Ângela</creatorcontrib><title>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</title><title>Electrophoresis</title><addtitle>Electrophoresis</addtitle><description>Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support.</description><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Aromatic compounds</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Elution</subject><subject>Histidine</subject><subject>Histidine‐based ligands</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Monoliths</subject><subject>Nucleic acids</subject><subject>Phase transitions</subject><subject>Plasmid DNA purification</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA removal</subject><subject>Sample displacement chromatography</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0173-0835</issn><issn>1522-2683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB3ALUdGlcOWILHHhku3YmdibI1otLdJKrVTgGjmOvevK-cBOisKpEi_AM_IkeLVtD71wsjX-zciaPyHvGCwZAD83fohLDkwCMJQvyIIVnGdcrPKXZJHKeQarvDglr2O8BQAsEV-RU75KgAlYkN_rfehbNfa7oIa90_Ty-vvf-z9M0I0430g6eBVb19A7pbXrDB2m4KzTanR9R007-H523Y5uU8_exdE1B6S6hrJUqU33a_bp8uzZWte5cabe7RKNb8iJVT6atw_nGfn2efN1fZltry6-rD9tM41QYIZKC6Elq5UCnXNs6kJwbiSX2lpQK6wbLESJshC1NWi5ECYv024Yal2qMj8jH49zh9D_mEwcq9ZFbbxXnemnWLEy7SsthkOiH57R234KXfpdUhKKQgo8qOVR6dDHGIythuBaFeaKQXWIpzrEUz3FkxreP4yd6tY0T_wxjwTwCH46b-b_jKs22-sbwRHzf-5noDM</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</creator><creator>Gaspar, Rita</creator><creator>Pereira, Patrícia</creator><creator>Černigoj, Urh</creator><creator>Sousa, Fani</creator><creator>Queiroz, João António</creator><creator>Sousa, Ângela</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</title><author>Amorim, Lúcia F. A. ; Gaspar, Rita ; Pereira, Patrícia ; Černigoj, Urh ; Sousa, Fani ; Queiroz, João António ; Sousa, Ângela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Aromatic compounds</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Elution</topic><topic>Histidine</topic><topic>Histidine‐based ligands</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Monoliths</topic><topic>Nucleic acids</topic><topic>Phase transitions</topic><topic>Plasmid DNA purification</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA removal</topic><topic>Sample displacement chromatography</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černigoj, Urh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Fani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, João António</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Ângela</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Electrophoresis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</au><au>Gaspar, Rita</au><au>Pereira, Patrícia</au><au>Černigoj, Urh</au><au>Sousa, Fani</au><au>Queiroz, João António</au><au>Sousa, Ângela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</atitle><jtitle>Electrophoresis</jtitle><addtitle>Electrophoresis</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>22-23</issue><spage>2975</spage><epage>2980</epage><pages>2975-2980</pages><issn>0173-0835</issn><eissn>1522-2683</eissn><abstract>Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28683160</pmid><doi>10.1002/elps.201700147</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0173-0835 |
ispartof | Electrophoresis, 2017-11, Vol.38 (22-23), p.2975-2980 |
issn | 0173-0835 1522-2683 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917368320 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Affinity Amino acids Aromatic compounds Binding Chromatography Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Elution Histidine Histidine‐based ligands Hydrophobicity Ions Ligands Monoliths Nucleic acids Phase transitions Plasmid DNA purification Plasmids Purification Ribonucleic acid RNA RNA removal Sample displacement chromatography Selectivity Vaccines |
title | Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chromatographic%20HPV%E2%80%9016%20E6/E7%20plasmid%20vaccine%20purification%20employing%20L%E2%80%90histidine%20and%201%E2%80%90benzyl%E2%80%90L%E2%80%90histidine%20affinity%20ligands&rft.jtitle=Electrophoresis&rft.au=Amorim,%20L%C3%BAcia%20F.%20A.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=22-23&rft.spage=2975&rft.epage=2980&rft.pages=2975-2980&rft.issn=0173-0835&rft.eissn=1522-2683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/elps.201700147&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917368320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970557640&rft_id=info:pmid/28683160&rfr_iscdi=true |