Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands

Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electrophoresis 2017-11, Vol.38 (22-23), p.2975-2980
Hauptverfasser: Amorim, Lúcia F. A., Gaspar, Rita, Pereira, Patrícia, Černigoj, Urh, Sousa, Fani, Queiroz, João António, Sousa, Ângela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2980
container_issue 22-23
container_start_page 2975
container_title Electrophoresis
container_volume 38
creator Amorim, Lúcia F. A.
Gaspar, Rita
Pereira, Patrícia
Černigoj, Urh
Sousa, Fani
Queiroz, João António
Sousa, Ângela
description Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/elps.201700147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917368320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917368320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB3ALUdGlcOWILHHhku3YmdibI1otLdJKrVTgGjmOvevK-cBOisKpEi_AM_IkeLVtD71wsjX-zciaPyHvGCwZAD83fohLDkwCMJQvyIIVnGdcrPKXZJHKeQarvDglr2O8BQAsEV-RU75KgAlYkN_rfehbNfa7oIa90_Ty-vvf-z9M0I0430g6eBVb19A7pbXrDB2m4KzTanR9R007-H523Y5uU8_exdE1B6S6hrJUqU33a_bp8uzZWte5cabe7RKNb8iJVT6atw_nGfn2efN1fZltry6-rD9tM41QYIZKC6Elq5UCnXNs6kJwbiSX2lpQK6wbLESJshC1NWi5ECYv024Yal2qMj8jH49zh9D_mEwcq9ZFbbxXnemnWLEy7SsthkOiH57R234KXfpdUhKKQgo8qOVR6dDHGIythuBaFeaKQXWIpzrEUz3FkxreP4yd6tY0T_wxjwTwCH46b-b_jKs22-sbwRHzf-5noDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970557640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Amorim, Lúcia F. A. ; Gaspar, Rita ; Pereira, Patrícia ; Černigoj, Urh ; Sousa, Fani ; Queiroz, João António ; Sousa, Ângela</creator><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Lúcia F. A. ; Gaspar, Rita ; Pereira, Patrícia ; Černigoj, Urh ; Sousa, Fani ; Queiroz, João António ; Sousa, Ângela</creatorcontrib><description>Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0173-0835</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/elps.201700147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28683160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Affinity ; Amino acids ; Aromatic compounds ; Binding ; Chromatography ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Elution ; Histidine ; Histidine‐based ligands ; Hydrophobicity ; Ions ; Ligands ; Monoliths ; Nucleic acids ; Phase transitions ; Plasmid DNA purification ; Plasmids ; Purification ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; RNA removal ; Sample displacement chromatography ; Selectivity ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Electrophoresis, 2017-11, Vol.38 (22-23), p.2975-2980</ispartof><rights>2017 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Felps.201700147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Felps.201700147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černigoj, Urh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Fani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, João António</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Ângela</creatorcontrib><title>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</title><title>Electrophoresis</title><addtitle>Electrophoresis</addtitle><description>Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support.</description><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Aromatic compounds</subject><subject>Binding</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Elution</subject><subject>Histidine</subject><subject>Histidine‐based ligands</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Monoliths</subject><subject>Nucleic acids</subject><subject>Phase transitions</subject><subject>Plasmid DNA purification</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA removal</subject><subject>Sample displacement chromatography</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0173-0835</issn><issn>1522-2683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1u1DAQB3ALUdGlcOWILHHhku3YmdibI1otLdJKrVTgGjmOvevK-cBOisKpEi_AM_IkeLVtD71wsjX-zciaPyHvGCwZAD83fohLDkwCMJQvyIIVnGdcrPKXZJHKeQarvDglr2O8BQAsEV-RU75KgAlYkN_rfehbNfa7oIa90_Ty-vvf-z9M0I0430g6eBVb19A7pbXrDB2m4KzTanR9R007-H523Y5uU8_exdE1B6S6hrJUqU33a_bp8uzZWte5cabe7RKNb8iJVT6atw_nGfn2efN1fZltry6-rD9tM41QYIZKC6Elq5UCnXNs6kJwbiSX2lpQK6wbLESJshC1NWi5ECYv024Yal2qMj8jH49zh9D_mEwcq9ZFbbxXnemnWLEy7SsthkOiH57R234KXfpdUhKKQgo8qOVR6dDHGIythuBaFeaKQXWIpzrEUz3FkxreP4yd6tY0T_wxjwTwCH46b-b_jKs22-sbwRHzf-5noDM</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</creator><creator>Gaspar, Rita</creator><creator>Pereira, Patrícia</creator><creator>Černigoj, Urh</creator><creator>Sousa, Fani</creator><creator>Queiroz, João António</creator><creator>Sousa, Ângela</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</title><author>Amorim, Lúcia F. A. ; Gaspar, Rita ; Pereira, Patrícia ; Černigoj, Urh ; Sousa, Fani ; Queiroz, João António ; Sousa, Ângela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-4ac66c71baa0c324db5622e727cff0a84bd45694756bfe4f266e3920114cc9a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Aromatic compounds</topic><topic>Binding</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Elution</topic><topic>Histidine</topic><topic>Histidine‐based ligands</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Monoliths</topic><topic>Nucleic acids</topic><topic>Phase transitions</topic><topic>Plasmid DNA purification</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA removal</topic><topic>Sample displacement chromatography</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaspar, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Černigoj, Urh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Fani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, João António</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Ângela</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Electrophoresis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amorim, Lúcia F. A.</au><au>Gaspar, Rita</au><au>Pereira, Patrícia</au><au>Černigoj, Urh</au><au>Sousa, Fani</au><au>Queiroz, João António</au><au>Sousa, Ângela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands</atitle><jtitle>Electrophoresis</jtitle><addtitle>Electrophoresis</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>22-23</issue><spage>2975</spage><epage>2980</epage><pages>2975-2980</pages><issn>0173-0835</issn><eissn>1522-2683</eissn><abstract>Affinity chromatography based on amino acids as interacting ligands was already indicated as an alternative compared to ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction for plasmid DNA purification. Understanding the recognition mechanisms occurring between histidine‐based ligands and nucleic acids enables more efficient purification of a DNA vaccine, as the binding and elution conditions can be adjusted in order to enhance the purification performance. Decreasing pH to slightly acidic conditions increases the positive charge of histidine ligand, what influences the type of interaction between chromatographic support and analytes. This was proven in this work, where hydrophobic effects established in the presence of ammonium sulfate were affected at pH 5.0 in comparison to pH 8.0, while electrostatic and cation‐π interactions were intensified. Histidine ligand at pH 5.0 interacts with phosphate groups or aromatic rings of plasmid DNA. Due to different responses of RNA and pDNA on mobile phase changes, the elution order between RNA and pDNA was changed with mobile phase pH decrease from 8.0 to 5.0. The phenomenon was more evident with L‐histidine ligand due to more hydrophilic character, leading to an improved selectivity of L‐histidine‐modified chromatographic monolith, allowing the product recovery with 99% of purity (RNA removal). With the 1‐benzyl‐ L‐histidine ligand, stronger and less selective interactions with the nucleic acids were observed due to the additional hydrophobicity associated with the phenyl aromatic ring. Optimization of sample displacement chromatography parameters (especially (NH4)2SO4 concentration) at slightly acidic pH enabled excellent isolation of pDNA, by the removal of RNA in a negative mode, with binding capacities above 1.5 mg pDNA per mL of chromatographic support.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28683160</pmid><doi>10.1002/elps.201700147</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0173-0835
ispartof Electrophoresis, 2017-11, Vol.38 (22-23), p.2975-2980
issn 0173-0835
1522-2683
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917368320
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Affinity
Amino acids
Aromatic compounds
Binding
Chromatography
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Elution
Histidine
Histidine‐based ligands
Hydrophobicity
Ions
Ligands
Monoliths
Nucleic acids
Phase transitions
Plasmid DNA purification
Plasmids
Purification
Ribonucleic acid
RNA
RNA removal
Sample displacement chromatography
Selectivity
Vaccines
title Chromatographic HPV‐16 E6/E7 plasmid vaccine purification employing L‐histidine and 1‐benzyl‐L‐histidine affinity ligands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A43%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chromatographic%20HPV%E2%80%9016%20E6/E7%20plasmid%20vaccine%20purification%20employing%20L%E2%80%90histidine%20and%201%E2%80%90benzyl%E2%80%90L%E2%80%90histidine%20affinity%20ligands&rft.jtitle=Electrophoresis&rft.au=Amorim,%20L%C3%BAcia%20F.%20A.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=22-23&rft.spage=2975&rft.epage=2980&rft.pages=2975-2980&rft.issn=0173-0835&rft.eissn=1522-2683&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/elps.201700147&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917368320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970557640&rft_id=info:pmid/28683160&rfr_iscdi=true