Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review

Summary Background The sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast is an undervalued topic in the field of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2017-09, Vol.70 (9), p.1229-1241
Hauptverfasser: Beugels, J, Cornelissen, A.J.M, Spiegel, A.J, Heuts, E.M, Piatkowski, A, van der Hulst, R.R.W.J, Tuinder, S.M.H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1241
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1229
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 70
creator Beugels, J
Cornelissen, A.J.M
Spiegel, A.J
Heuts, E.M
Piatkowski, A
van der Hulst, R.R.W.J
Tuinder, S.M.H
description Summary Background The sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast is an undervalued topic in the field of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions and to assess the possible benefits of sensory nerve coaptation compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible studies regarding the sensory recovery of all types of innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions. Results The search yielded 334 hits, of which 32 studies concerning 1,177 breast reconstructions were included. The amount of heterogeneity between studies was high and made pooling of data difficult. The studies indicated that spontaneous reinnervation of autologous breast reconstructions occurred to a variable extent, depending on how and when it was measured. Despite these variable results, the sensory recovery of innervated flaps however, was superior, started earlier and gradually improved over time with a higher chance of approaching normal values compared to non-innervated flaps. There was a lack of studies that assessed the return of erogenous sensation and quality of life. Conclusion The current evidence showed that nerve coaptation resulted in superior sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. This review illustrated that more standardized, high-quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to objectively evaluate the sensory recovery of the breast after autologous breast reconstructions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917363149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1748681517301730</els_id><sourcerecordid>1917363149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-b98b91aa6ac1004078e27d55cb7fe13d713d765f87b886e67597623813639f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBAVLYU_wAH5yCWpncQfQQipqqBFqsShvVuO8wIOWXuxnUX597W1LUI9cHjyyJ4ZeeYh9I6SmhLKL-Z6mPexbggVNWE1IfQFOqNSyIqwtn-ZsehkxSVlp-h1jDMhXUs79gqdNpJL0TB5hrY7cNGHDQcw_gAZ-Amnn4CHADomrKcEAVvnIBx0ghFrN2LnXfXv1Zr84n_4NT6pipmLKawm2Qw-4ksct5hgp5M1-fVg4c8bdDLpJcLbx_Mc3X_9cn91U91-v_52dXlbmU6IVA29HHqqNdeG5gBESGjEyJgZxAS0HUUZziYpBik5cMF6wZtW0pa3_dS35-jD0XYf_O8VYlI7Gw0si3aQf6xoT0Wm0q5QmyPVBB9jgEntg93psClKVGlczao0rkrjijCVG8-i94_-67CD8a_kqeJM-HQkQA6ZgwcVjQVnYLS5pqRGb__v__mZ3CzWWaOXX7BBnP0aXK5PURUbRdRd2XlZeU5FyrQP60GpBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1917363149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Beugels, J ; Cornelissen, A.J.M ; Spiegel, A.J ; Heuts, E.M ; Piatkowski, A ; van der Hulst, R.R.W.J ; Tuinder, S.M.H</creator><creatorcontrib>Beugels, J ; Cornelissen, A.J.M ; Spiegel, A.J ; Heuts, E.M ; Piatkowski, A ; van der Hulst, R.R.W.J ; Tuinder, S.M.H</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background The sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast is an undervalued topic in the field of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions and to assess the possible benefits of sensory nerve coaptation compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible studies regarding the sensory recovery of all types of innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions. Results The search yielded 334 hits, of which 32 studies concerning 1,177 breast reconstructions were included. The amount of heterogeneity between studies was high and made pooling of data difficult. The studies indicated that spontaneous reinnervation of autologous breast reconstructions occurred to a variable extent, depending on how and when it was measured. Despite these variable results, the sensory recovery of innervated flaps however, was superior, started earlier and gradually improved over time with a higher chance of approaching normal values compared to non-innervated flaps. There was a lack of studies that assessed the return of erogenous sensation and quality of life. Conclusion The current evidence showed that nerve coaptation resulted in superior sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. This review illustrated that more standardized, high-quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to objectively evaluate the sensory recovery of the breast after autologous breast reconstructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28687258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast - physiology ; Breast reconstruction ; Breast sensation ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Nerve coaptation ; Plastic Surgery ; Recovery of Function ; Sensory recovery ; Surgical Flaps - innervation ; Touch - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2017-09, Vol.70 (9), p.1229-1241</ispartof><rights>British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-b98b91aa6ac1004078e27d55cb7fe13d713d765f87b886e67597623813639f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-b98b91aa6ac1004078e27d55cb7fe13d713d765f87b886e67597623813639f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681517301730$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28687258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beugels, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelissen, A.J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuts, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piatkowski, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Hulst, R.R.W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuinder, S.M.H</creatorcontrib><title>Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Summary Background The sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast is an undervalued topic in the field of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions and to assess the possible benefits of sensory nerve coaptation compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible studies regarding the sensory recovery of all types of innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions. Results The search yielded 334 hits, of which 32 studies concerning 1,177 breast reconstructions were included. The amount of heterogeneity between studies was high and made pooling of data difficult. The studies indicated that spontaneous reinnervation of autologous breast reconstructions occurred to a variable extent, depending on how and when it was measured. Despite these variable results, the sensory recovery of innervated flaps however, was superior, started earlier and gradually improved over time with a higher chance of approaching normal values compared to non-innervated flaps. There was a lack of studies that assessed the return of erogenous sensation and quality of life. Conclusion The current evidence showed that nerve coaptation resulted in superior sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. This review illustrated that more standardized, high-quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to objectively evaluate the sensory recovery of the breast after autologous breast reconstructions.</description><subject>Breast - physiology</subject><subject>Breast reconstruction</subject><subject>Breast sensation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Nerve coaptation</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Sensory recovery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps - innervation</subject><subject>Touch - physiology</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBAVLYU_wAH5yCWpncQfQQipqqBFqsShvVuO8wIOWXuxnUX597W1LUI9cHjyyJ4ZeeYh9I6SmhLKL-Z6mPexbggVNWE1IfQFOqNSyIqwtn-ZsehkxSVlp-h1jDMhXUs79gqdNpJL0TB5hrY7cNGHDQcw_gAZ-Amnn4CHADomrKcEAVvnIBx0ghFrN2LnXfXv1Zr84n_4NT6pipmLKawm2Qw-4ksct5hgp5M1-fVg4c8bdDLpJcLbx_Mc3X_9cn91U91-v_52dXlbmU6IVA29HHqqNdeG5gBESGjEyJgZxAS0HUUZziYpBik5cMF6wZtW0pa3_dS35-jD0XYf_O8VYlI7Gw0si3aQf6xoT0Wm0q5QmyPVBB9jgEntg93psClKVGlczao0rkrjijCVG8-i94_-67CD8a_kqeJM-HQkQA6ZgwcVjQVnYLS5pqRGb__v__mZ3CzWWaOXX7BBnP0aXK5PURUbRdRd2XlZeU5FyrQP60GpBQ</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Beugels, J</creator><creator>Cornelissen, A.J.M</creator><creator>Spiegel, A.J</creator><creator>Heuts, E.M</creator><creator>Piatkowski, A</creator><creator>van der Hulst, R.R.W.J</creator><creator>Tuinder, S.M.H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review</title><author>Beugels, J ; Cornelissen, A.J.M ; Spiegel, A.J ; Heuts, E.M ; Piatkowski, A ; van der Hulst, R.R.W.J ; Tuinder, S.M.H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-b98b91aa6ac1004078e27d55cb7fe13d713d765f87b886e67597623813639f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Breast - physiology</topic><topic>Breast reconstruction</topic><topic>Breast sensation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Nerve coaptation</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Sensory recovery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps - innervation</topic><topic>Touch - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beugels, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelissen, A.J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuts, E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piatkowski, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Hulst, R.R.W.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuinder, S.M.H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beugels, J</au><au>Cornelissen, A.J.M</au><au>Spiegel, A.J</au><au>Heuts, E.M</au><au>Piatkowski, A</au><au>van der Hulst, R.R.W.J</au><au>Tuinder, S.M.H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1229</spage><epage>1241</epage><pages>1229-1241</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Summary Background The sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast is an undervalued topic in the field of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the available literature on the sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions and to assess the possible benefits of sensory nerve coaptation compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible studies regarding the sensory recovery of all types of innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions. Results The search yielded 334 hits, of which 32 studies concerning 1,177 breast reconstructions were included. The amount of heterogeneity between studies was high and made pooling of data difficult. The studies indicated that spontaneous reinnervation of autologous breast reconstructions occurred to a variable extent, depending on how and when it was measured. Despite these variable results, the sensory recovery of innervated flaps however, was superior, started earlier and gradually improved over time with a higher chance of approaching normal values compared to non-innervated flaps. There was a lack of studies that assessed the return of erogenous sensation and quality of life. Conclusion The current evidence showed that nerve coaptation resulted in superior sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. This review illustrated that more standardized, high-quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to objectively evaluate the sensory recovery of the breast after autologous breast reconstructions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28687258</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2017-09, Vol.70 (9), p.1229-1241
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917363149
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Breast - physiology
Breast reconstruction
Breast sensation
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty - methods
Nerve coaptation
Plastic Surgery
Recovery of Function
Sensory recovery
Surgical Flaps - innervation
Touch - physiology
title Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A46%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensory%20recovery%20of%20the%20breast%20after%20innervated%20and%20non-innervated%20autologous%20breast%20reconstructions:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Beugels,%20J&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1229&rft.epage=1241&rft.pages=1229-1241&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917363149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1917363149&rft_id=info:pmid/28687258&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1748681517301730&rfr_iscdi=true