Return‐on‐Investment (ROI) Analyses of an Inpatient Lay Health Worker Model on 30‐Day Readmission Rates in a Rural Community Hospital

Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the return‐on‐investment (ROI) of an inpatient lay health worker (LHW) model in a rural Appalachian community hospital impacting 30‐day readmission rates. Methods The Bridges to Home (BTH) study completed an evaluation in 2015 of an inpatient LHW model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of rural health 2018-09, Vol.34 (4), p.411-422
Hauptverfasser: Cardarelli, Roberto, Bausch, Gregory, Murdock, Joan, Chyatte, Michelle Renee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 422
container_issue 4
container_start_page 411
container_title The Journal of rural health
container_volume 34
creator Cardarelli, Roberto
Bausch, Gregory
Murdock, Joan
Chyatte, Michelle Renee
description Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the return‐on‐investment (ROI) of an inpatient lay health worker (LHW) model in a rural Appalachian community hospital impacting 30‐day readmission rates. Methods The Bridges to Home (BTH) study completed an evaluation in 2015 of an inpatient LHW model in a rural Kentucky hospital that demonstrated a reduction in 30‐day readmission rates by 47.7% compared to a baseline period. Using the hospital's utilization and financial data, a validated ROI calculator specific to care transition programs was used to assess the ROI of the BTH model comparing 3 types of payment models including Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)‐only payments, pay‐for‐performance (P4P) contracts, and accountable care organizations (ACOs). Findings The BTH program had a –$0.67 ROI if the hospital had only a DRG‐based payment model. If the hospital had P4P contracts with payers and 0.1% of its annual operating revenue was at risk, the ROI increased to $7.03 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. However, if the hospital was an ACO as was the case for this study's community hospital, the ROI significantly increased to $38.48 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. Conclusions The BTH model showed a viable ROI to be considered by community hospitals that are part of an ACO or P4P program. A LHW care transition model may be a cost‐effective alternative for impacting excess 30‐day readmissions and avoiding associated penalties for hospital systems with a value‐based payment model.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jrh.12250
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917361113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1917361113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4c2048a98679d26dec9e2b561c4ad33bd5c71d5753fc0eda8f53572343ff6e503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZfCgRdAlri0h7T-EzvOsVoou9WiShEIbpY3nqhZHHuxE6q9cefCM_Ik9XYLByR8sCXPp08z80PoFSXnNJ-LTbw9p4wJ8gTNaFWqgnBJn6IZUTUpKim-HKPnKW0IYbXi5TN0zJRUQgkyQz8bGKfof__4FfbX0n-HNA7gR3za3CzP8KU3bpcg4dBh4_HSb83Y78srs8MLMG68xZ9D_AoRfwgWHA4ec5JNb3O9AWOHPqU-fzZmzJbeY4ObKRqH52EYJt-PWRPSth-Ne4GOOuMSvHx8T9Cnq3cf54tidfN-Ob9cFS0XnBRly0ipTK1kVVsmLbQ1sLWQtC2N5XxtRVtRKyrBu5aANaoTXFSMl7zrJAjCT9DpwbuN4duU59W5yRacMx7ClDStaZUXSCnP6Jt_0E3I68rdaUapZJXkgmXq7EC1MaQUodPb2A8m7jQlep-Qzgnph4Qy-_rROK0HsH_JP5Fk4OIA3PUOdv836etmcVDeA3s5nGs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116276352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return‐on‐Investment (ROI) Analyses of an Inpatient Lay Health Worker Model on 30‐Day Readmission Rates in a Rural Community Hospital</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Cardarelli, Roberto ; Bausch, Gregory ; Murdock, Joan ; Chyatte, Michelle Renee</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardarelli, Roberto ; Bausch, Gregory ; Murdock, Joan ; Chyatte, Michelle Renee</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the return‐on‐investment (ROI) of an inpatient lay health worker (LHW) model in a rural Appalachian community hospital impacting 30‐day readmission rates. Methods The Bridges to Home (BTH) study completed an evaluation in 2015 of an inpatient LHW model in a rural Kentucky hospital that demonstrated a reduction in 30‐day readmission rates by 47.7% compared to a baseline period. Using the hospital's utilization and financial data, a validated ROI calculator specific to care transition programs was used to assess the ROI of the BTH model comparing 3 types of payment models including Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)‐only payments, pay‐for‐performance (P4P) contracts, and accountable care organizations (ACOs). Findings The BTH program had a –$0.67 ROI if the hospital had only a DRG‐based payment model. If the hospital had P4P contracts with payers and 0.1% of its annual operating revenue was at risk, the ROI increased to $7.03 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. However, if the hospital was an ACO as was the case for this study's community hospital, the ROI significantly increased to $38.48 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. Conclusions The BTH model showed a viable ROI to be considered by community hospitals that are part of an ACO or P4P program. A LHW care transition model may be a cost‐effective alternative for impacting excess 30‐day readmissions and avoiding associated penalties for hospital systems with a value‐based payment model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-0361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12250</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28685850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>30‐day readmission ; Accountability ; Accountable care organizations ; Appalachia ; care transition ; Community hospitals ; Contracts ; Diagnosis related groups ; DRGs ; Health care delivery ; Health care policy ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Income ; Investment ; Investments ; lay health worker ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical personnel ; Medical workers ; Payments ; Penalties ; Readmission ; Return on investment ; Revenue ; Risk ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural health care ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>The Journal of rural health, 2018-09, Vol.34 (4), p.411-422</ispartof><rights>2017 National Rural Health Association</rights><rights>2017 National Rural Health Association.</rights><rights>2018 National Rural Health Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4c2048a98679d26dec9e2b561c4ad33bd5c71d5753fc0eda8f53572343ff6e503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4c2048a98679d26dec9e2b561c4ad33bd5c71d5753fc0eda8f53572343ff6e503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjrh.12250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjrh.12250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27853,27911,27912,30986,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28685850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardarelli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bausch, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chyatte, Michelle Renee</creatorcontrib><title>Return‐on‐Investment (ROI) Analyses of an Inpatient Lay Health Worker Model on 30‐Day Readmission Rates in a Rural Community Hospital</title><title>The Journal of rural health</title><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the return‐on‐investment (ROI) of an inpatient lay health worker (LHW) model in a rural Appalachian community hospital impacting 30‐day readmission rates. Methods The Bridges to Home (BTH) study completed an evaluation in 2015 of an inpatient LHW model in a rural Kentucky hospital that demonstrated a reduction in 30‐day readmission rates by 47.7% compared to a baseline period. Using the hospital's utilization and financial data, a validated ROI calculator specific to care transition programs was used to assess the ROI of the BTH model comparing 3 types of payment models including Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)‐only payments, pay‐for‐performance (P4P) contracts, and accountable care organizations (ACOs). Findings The BTH program had a –$0.67 ROI if the hospital had only a DRG‐based payment model. If the hospital had P4P contracts with payers and 0.1% of its annual operating revenue was at risk, the ROI increased to $7.03 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. However, if the hospital was an ACO as was the case for this study's community hospital, the ROI significantly increased to $38.48 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. Conclusions The BTH model showed a viable ROI to be considered by community hospitals that are part of an ACO or P4P program. A LHW care transition model may be a cost‐effective alternative for impacting excess 30‐day readmissions and avoiding associated penalties for hospital systems with a value‐based payment model.</description><subject>30‐day readmission</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accountable care organizations</subject><subject>Appalachia</subject><subject>care transition</subject><subject>Community hospitals</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Diagnosis related groups</subject><subject>DRGs</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>lay health worker</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical workers</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Penalties</subject><subject>Readmission</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0890-765X</issn><issn>1748-0361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1ERZfCgRdAlri0h7T-EzvOsVoou9WiShEIbpY3nqhZHHuxE6q9cefCM_Ik9XYLByR8sCXPp08z80PoFSXnNJ-LTbw9p4wJ8gTNaFWqgnBJn6IZUTUpKim-HKPnKW0IYbXi5TN0zJRUQgkyQz8bGKfof__4FfbX0n-HNA7gR3za3CzP8KU3bpcg4dBh4_HSb83Y78srs8MLMG68xZ9D_AoRfwgWHA4ec5JNb3O9AWOHPqU-fzZmzJbeY4ObKRqH52EYJt-PWRPSth-Ne4GOOuMSvHx8T9Cnq3cf54tidfN-Ob9cFS0XnBRly0ipTK1kVVsmLbQ1sLWQtC2N5XxtRVtRKyrBu5aANaoTXFSMl7zrJAjCT9DpwbuN4duU59W5yRacMx7ClDStaZUXSCnP6Jt_0E3I68rdaUapZJXkgmXq7EC1MaQUodPb2A8m7jQlep-Qzgnph4Qy-_rROK0HsH_JP5Fk4OIA3PUOdv836etmcVDeA3s5nGs</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Cardarelli, Roberto</creator><creator>Bausch, Gregory</creator><creator>Murdock, Joan</creator><creator>Chyatte, Michelle Renee</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Return‐on‐Investment (ROI) Analyses of an Inpatient Lay Health Worker Model on 30‐Day Readmission Rates in a Rural Community Hospital</title><author>Cardarelli, Roberto ; Bausch, Gregory ; Murdock, Joan ; Chyatte, Michelle Renee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-4c2048a98679d26dec9e2b561c4ad33bd5c71d5753fc0eda8f53572343ff6e503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>30‐day readmission</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accountable care organizations</topic><topic>Appalachia</topic><topic>care transition</topic><topic>Community hospitals</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Diagnosis related groups</topic><topic>DRGs</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>lay health worker</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical workers</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Penalties</topic><topic>Readmission</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardarelli, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bausch, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chyatte, Michelle Renee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardarelli, Roberto</au><au>Bausch, Gregory</au><au>Murdock, Joan</au><au>Chyatte, Michelle Renee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return‐on‐Investment (ROI) Analyses of an Inpatient Lay Health Worker Model on 30‐Day Readmission Rates in a Rural Community Hospital</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>411-422</pages><issn>0890-765X</issn><eissn>1748-0361</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the return‐on‐investment (ROI) of an inpatient lay health worker (LHW) model in a rural Appalachian community hospital impacting 30‐day readmission rates. Methods The Bridges to Home (BTH) study completed an evaluation in 2015 of an inpatient LHW model in a rural Kentucky hospital that demonstrated a reduction in 30‐day readmission rates by 47.7% compared to a baseline period. Using the hospital's utilization and financial data, a validated ROI calculator specific to care transition programs was used to assess the ROI of the BTH model comparing 3 types of payment models including Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)‐only payments, pay‐for‐performance (P4P) contracts, and accountable care organizations (ACOs). Findings The BTH program had a –$0.67 ROI if the hospital had only a DRG‐based payment model. If the hospital had P4P contracts with payers and 0.1% of its annual operating revenue was at risk, the ROI increased to $7.03 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. However, if the hospital was an ACO as was the case for this study's community hospital, the ROI significantly increased to $38.48 for every $1 spent on the BTH program. Conclusions The BTH model showed a viable ROI to be considered by community hospitals that are part of an ACO or P4P program. A LHW care transition model may be a cost‐effective alternative for impacting excess 30‐day readmissions and avoiding associated penalties for hospital systems with a value‐based payment model.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28685850</pmid><doi>10.1111/jrh.12250</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-765X
ispartof The Journal of rural health, 2018-09, Vol.34 (4), p.411-422
issn 0890-765X
1748-0361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1917361113
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects 30‐day readmission
Accountability
Accountable care organizations
Appalachia
care transition
Community hospitals
Contracts
Diagnosis related groups
DRGs
Health care delivery
Health care policy
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Income
Investment
Investments
lay health worker
Medical diagnosis
Medical personnel
Medical workers
Payments
Penalties
Readmission
Return on investment
Revenue
Risk
Rural areas
Rural communities
Rural health care
Workforce
title Return‐on‐Investment (ROI) Analyses of an Inpatient Lay Health Worker Model on 30‐Day Readmission Rates in a Rural Community Hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A48%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%E2%80%90on%E2%80%90Investment%20(ROI)%20Analyses%20of%20an%20Inpatient%20Lay%20Health%20Worker%20Model%20on%2030%E2%80%90Day%20Readmission%20Rates%20in%20a%20Rural%20Community%20Hospital&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Cardarelli,%20Roberto&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=411-422&rft.issn=0890-765X&rft.eissn=1748-0361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jrh.12250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1917361113%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116276352&rft_id=info:pmid/28685850&rfr_iscdi=true