Anesthesia Adverse Events Voluntarily Reported in the Veterans Health Administration and Lessons Learned

BACKGROUND:Anesthesia providers have long been pioneers in patient safety. Despite remarkable efforts, anesthesia errors still occur, resulting in complications, injuries, and even death. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Center of Patient Safety uses root cause analysis (RCA) to exa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2018-02, Vol.126 (2), p.471-477
Hauptverfasser: Neily, Julia, Silla, Elda S, Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T, Reedy, Roberta, Paull, Douglas E, Mazzia, Lisa, Mills, Peter D, Hemphill, Robin R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 477
container_issue 2
container_start_page 471
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 126
creator Neily, Julia
Silla, Elda S
Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T
Reedy, Roberta
Paull, Douglas E
Mazzia, Lisa
Mills, Peter D
Hemphill, Robin R
description BACKGROUND:Anesthesia providers have long been pioneers in patient safety. Despite remarkable efforts, anesthesia errors still occur, resulting in complications, injuries, and even death. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Center of Patient Safety uses root cause analysis (RCA) to examine why system-related adverse events occur and how to prevent future similar events. This study describes the types of anesthesia adverse events reported in VHA hospitals and their root causes and preventative actions. METHODS:RCA reports from VHA hospitals from May 30, 2012, to May 1, 2015, were reviewed for root causes, severity of patient outcomes, and actions. These elements were coded by consensus and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS:During the study period, 3228 RCAs were submitted, of which 292 involved an anesthesia provider. Thirty-six of these were specific to anesthesia care. We reviewed these 36 RCA reports of adverse events specific to anesthesia care. Types of event included medication errors (28%, 10), regional blocks (14%, 5), airway management (14%, 5), skin integrity or position (11%, 4), other (11%, 4), consent issues (8%, 3), equipment (8%, 3), and intravenous access and anesthesia awareness (3%, 1 each). Of the 36 anesthesia events reported, 5 (14%) were identified as being catastrophic, 10 (28%) major, 12 (34%) moderate, and 9 (26%) minor. The majority of root causes identified a need for improved standardization of processes. CONCLUSIONS:This analysis points to the need for systemwide implementation of human factors engineering–based approaches to work toward further eliminating anesthesia-related adverse events. Such actions include standardization of processes, forcing functions, separating storage of look-alike sound-alike medications, limiting stock of high-risk medication strengths, bar coding medications, use of cognitive aids such as checklists, and high-fidelity simulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1916380653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1916380653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-cc756ad2df078c47ef9feb0de3f60e5b24983491c879c08da217cd93c6119203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUiOXrbmYzebHEupVigKUnpd0mSWrm6zNdlt6b832iriwVyGDM87wzwIXVMypIzyu9HTZEh-PUZTdYL6NGMiyTMlT1E_dnnClFI9dBHCa_xSIsU56jEpckmE7KPVyEFoVxAqjUd2Cz4AnmzBtQEvmrpzrfZVvccvsGl8CxZXDkcaL6AFr13AU9B1u4rRdeWq0HrdVo3D2lk8gxCaSMxAewf2Ep2Vug5wdawDNL-fzMfTZPb88DgezRLDM6ESY_JMaMtsSXJp0hxKVcKSWOClIJAtWaokTxU1MleGSKsZzY1V3AhKFSN8gG4PYze-ee_iacW6CgbqWjtoulBQRQWPp2c8oukBNb4JwUNZbHy11n5fUFJ8Ki6i4uKv4hi7OW7olmuwP6FvpxGQB2DX1NFSeKu7Hfhi9WXq_9kfl6GIvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1916380653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anesthesia Adverse Events Voluntarily Reported in the Veterans Health Administration and Lessons Learned</title><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Neily, Julia ; Silla, Elda S ; Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T ; Reedy, Roberta ; Paull, Douglas E ; Mazzia, Lisa ; Mills, Peter D ; Hemphill, Robin R</creator><creatorcontrib>Neily, Julia ; Silla, Elda S ; Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T ; Reedy, Roberta ; Paull, Douglas E ; Mazzia, Lisa ; Mills, Peter D ; Hemphill, Robin R</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Anesthesia providers have long been pioneers in patient safety. Despite remarkable efforts, anesthesia errors still occur, resulting in complications, injuries, and even death. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Center of Patient Safety uses root cause analysis (RCA) to examine why system-related adverse events occur and how to prevent future similar events. This study describes the types of anesthesia adverse events reported in VHA hospitals and their root causes and preventative actions. METHODS:RCA reports from VHA hospitals from May 30, 2012, to May 1, 2015, were reviewed for root causes, severity of patient outcomes, and actions. These elements were coded by consensus and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS:During the study period, 3228 RCAs were submitted, of which 292 involved an anesthesia provider. Thirty-six of these were specific to anesthesia care. We reviewed these 36 RCA reports of adverse events specific to anesthesia care. Types of event included medication errors (28%, 10), regional blocks (14%, 5), airway management (14%, 5), skin integrity or position (11%, 4), other (11%, 4), consent issues (8%, 3), equipment (8%, 3), and intravenous access and anesthesia awareness (3%, 1 each). Of the 36 anesthesia events reported, 5 (14%) were identified as being catastrophic, 10 (28%) major, 12 (34%) moderate, and 9 (26%) minor. The majority of root causes identified a need for improved standardization of processes. CONCLUSIONS:This analysis points to the need for systemwide implementation of human factors engineering–based approaches to work toward further eliminating anesthesia-related adverse events. Such actions include standardization of processes, forcing functions, separating storage of look-alike sound-alike medications, limiting stock of high-risk medication strengths, bar coding medications, use of cognitive aids such as checklists, and high-fidelity simulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28678068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018-02, Vol.126 (2), p.471-477</ispartof><rights>2018 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-cc756ad2df078c47ef9feb0de3f60e5b24983491c879c08da217cd93c6119203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-cc756ad2df078c47ef9feb0de3f60e5b24983491c879c08da217cd93c6119203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28678068$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neily, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silla, Elda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reedy, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paull, Douglas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzia, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemphill, Robin R</creatorcontrib><title>Anesthesia Adverse Events Voluntarily Reported in the Veterans Health Administration and Lessons Learned</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Anesthesia providers have long been pioneers in patient safety. Despite remarkable efforts, anesthesia errors still occur, resulting in complications, injuries, and even death. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Center of Patient Safety uses root cause analysis (RCA) to examine why system-related adverse events occur and how to prevent future similar events. This study describes the types of anesthesia adverse events reported in VHA hospitals and their root causes and preventative actions. METHODS:RCA reports from VHA hospitals from May 30, 2012, to May 1, 2015, were reviewed for root causes, severity of patient outcomes, and actions. These elements were coded by consensus and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS:During the study period, 3228 RCAs were submitted, of which 292 involved an anesthesia provider. Thirty-six of these were specific to anesthesia care. We reviewed these 36 RCA reports of adverse events specific to anesthesia care. Types of event included medication errors (28%, 10), regional blocks (14%, 5), airway management (14%, 5), skin integrity or position (11%, 4), other (11%, 4), consent issues (8%, 3), equipment (8%, 3), and intravenous access and anesthesia awareness (3%, 1 each). Of the 36 anesthesia events reported, 5 (14%) were identified as being catastrophic, 10 (28%) major, 12 (34%) moderate, and 9 (26%) minor. The majority of root causes identified a need for improved standardization of processes. CONCLUSIONS:This analysis points to the need for systemwide implementation of human factors engineering–based approaches to work toward further eliminating anesthesia-related adverse events. Such actions include standardization of processes, forcing functions, separating storage of look-alike sound-alike medications, limiting stock of high-risk medication strengths, bar coding medications, use of cognitive aids such as checklists, and high-fidelity simulation.</description><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gUiOXrbmYzebHEupVigKUnpd0mSWrm6zNdlt6b832iriwVyGDM87wzwIXVMypIzyu9HTZEh-PUZTdYL6NGMiyTMlT1E_dnnClFI9dBHCa_xSIsU56jEpckmE7KPVyEFoVxAqjUd2Cz4AnmzBtQEvmrpzrfZVvccvsGl8CxZXDkcaL6AFr13AU9B1u4rRdeWq0HrdVo3D2lk8gxCaSMxAewf2Ep2Vug5wdawDNL-fzMfTZPb88DgezRLDM6ESY_JMaMtsSXJp0hxKVcKSWOClIJAtWaokTxU1MleGSKsZzY1V3AhKFSN8gG4PYze-ee_iacW6CgbqWjtoulBQRQWPp2c8oukBNb4JwUNZbHy11n5fUFJ8Ki6i4uKv4hi7OW7olmuwP6FvpxGQB2DX1NFSeKu7Hfhi9WXq_9kfl6GIvg</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Neily, Julia</creator><creator>Silla, Elda S</creator><creator>Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T</creator><creator>Reedy, Roberta</creator><creator>Paull, Douglas E</creator><creator>Mazzia, Lisa</creator><creator>Mills, Peter D</creator><creator>Hemphill, Robin R</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Anesthesia Adverse Events Voluntarily Reported in the Veterans Health Administration and Lessons Learned</title><author>Neily, Julia ; Silla, Elda S ; Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T ; Reedy, Roberta ; Paull, Douglas E ; Mazzia, Lisa ; Mills, Peter D ; Hemphill, Robin R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-cc756ad2df078c47ef9feb0de3f60e5b24983491c879c08da217cd93c6119203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neily, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silla, Elda S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reedy, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paull, Douglas E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzia, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemphill, Robin R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neily, Julia</au><au>Silla, Elda S</au><au>Sum-Ping, Sam (John) T</au><au>Reedy, Roberta</au><au>Paull, Douglas E</au><au>Mazzia, Lisa</au><au>Mills, Peter D</au><au>Hemphill, Robin R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anesthesia Adverse Events Voluntarily Reported in the Veterans Health Administration and Lessons Learned</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>471-477</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Anesthesia providers have long been pioneers in patient safety. Despite remarkable efforts, anesthesia errors still occur, resulting in complications, injuries, and even death. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Center of Patient Safety uses root cause analysis (RCA) to examine why system-related adverse events occur and how to prevent future similar events. This study describes the types of anesthesia adverse events reported in VHA hospitals and their root causes and preventative actions. METHODS:RCA reports from VHA hospitals from May 30, 2012, to May 1, 2015, were reviewed for root causes, severity of patient outcomes, and actions. These elements were coded by consensus and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS:During the study period, 3228 RCAs were submitted, of which 292 involved an anesthesia provider. Thirty-six of these were specific to anesthesia care. We reviewed these 36 RCA reports of adverse events specific to anesthesia care. Types of event included medication errors (28%, 10), regional blocks (14%, 5), airway management (14%, 5), skin integrity or position (11%, 4), other (11%, 4), consent issues (8%, 3), equipment (8%, 3), and intravenous access and anesthesia awareness (3%, 1 each). Of the 36 anesthesia events reported, 5 (14%) were identified as being catastrophic, 10 (28%) major, 12 (34%) moderate, and 9 (26%) minor. The majority of root causes identified a need for improved standardization of processes. CONCLUSIONS:This analysis points to the need for systemwide implementation of human factors engineering–based approaches to work toward further eliminating anesthesia-related adverse events. Such actions include standardization of processes, forcing functions, separating storage of look-alike sound-alike medications, limiting stock of high-risk medication strengths, bar coding medications, use of cognitive aids such as checklists, and high-fidelity simulation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>28678068</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000002149</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2018-02, Vol.126 (2), p.471-477
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1916380653
source Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Anesthesia Adverse Events Voluntarily Reported in the Veterans Health Administration and Lessons Learned
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A45%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anesthesia%20Adverse%20Events%20Voluntarily%20Reported%20in%20the%20Veterans%20Health%20Administration%20and%20Lessons%20Learned&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Neily,%20Julia&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=471-477&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1916380653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1916380653&rft_id=info:pmid/28678068&rfr_iscdi=true