Comparison of impact of two decontamination solutions on the viability of the cells in human amnion

Human amniotic membrane (HAM) is used as an allograft in regenerative medicine or as a source of pluripotent cells for stem cell research. Various decontamination protocols and solutions are used to sterilize HAM before its application, but little is known about the toxicity of disinfectants on HAM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cell and tissue banking 2017-09, Vol.18 (3), p.413-423
Hauptverfasser: Smeringaiova, Ingrida, Trosan, Peter, Mrstinova, Miluse Berka, Matecha, Jan, Burkert, Jan, Bednar, Jan, Jirsova, Katerina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 423
container_issue 3
container_start_page 413
container_title Cell and tissue banking
container_volume 18
creator Smeringaiova, Ingrida
Trosan, Peter
Mrstinova, Miluse Berka
Matecha, Jan
Burkert, Jan
Bednar, Jan
Jirsova, Katerina
description Human amniotic membrane (HAM) is used as an allograft in regenerative medicine or as a source of pluripotent cells for stem cell research. Various decontamination protocols and solutions are used to sterilize HAM before its application, but little is known about the toxicity of disinfectants on HAM cells. In this study, we tested two decontamination solutions, commercial (BASE·128) and laboratory decontamination solution (LDS), with an analogous content of antimycotic/antibiotics for their cytotoxic effect on HAM epithelial (EC) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). HAM was processed in a standard way, placed on nitrocellulose scaffold, and decontaminated, following three protocols: (1) 6 h, 37 °C; (2) 24 h, room temperature; (3) 24 h, 4 °C. The viability of EC was assessed via trypan blue staining. The apoptotic cells were detected using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL). The mean % (±SD) of dead EC (%DEC) from six fresh placentas was 12.9 ± 18.1. Decontamination increased %DEC compared to culture medium. Decontamination with BASE·128 for 6 h, 37 °C led to the highest EC viability (81.7%). Treatment with LDS at 24 h, 4 °C resulted in the lowest EC viability (55.9%) in the set. MSC were more affected by apoptosis than EC. Although the BASE·128 expresses lower toxicity compared to LDS, we present LDS as an alternative decontamination solution with a satisfactory preservation of cell viability. The basic formula of LDS will be optimised by enrichment with nutrient components, such as glucose or vitamins, to improve cell viability.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10561-017-9636-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1916379252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1916379252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e36aa85b402a2b7ae7888190b83e90ca20da0dc7e713a214fb5f355cdbae2b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLxTAQhYMovn-AGym4cVOdZG6bdCkXXyC4cR-maaqRNrk2reK_N_WqiOAqZ5Jvzgw5jB1xOOMA8jxyKEqeA5d5VWKZ4wbb5YXEvFR8sZk0qiqvEHGH7cX4DCBACtxmO0KVUoKCXWaWoV_R4GLwWWgzlwozzmp8C1ljTfAj9c7T6BIQQzfNImapGJ9s9uqodp0b3z870oWxXRcz57OnqSefUe8TfsC2WuqiPfw699nD1eXD8ia_u7--XV7c5QalGHOLJZEq6gUIErUkK5VSvIJaoa3AkICGoDHSSo4k-KKtixaLwjQ1WVEvcJ-drm1XQ3iZbBx17-K8EHkbpqh5xUuUlShEQk_-oM9hGnxaLlFYcqEAZkO-pswQYhxsq1eD62l41xz0HIBeB6BTAHoOQGPqOf5ynureNj8d3z-eALEGYnryj3b4Nfpf1w9pbJEu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1936128004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of impact of two decontamination solutions on the viability of the cells in human amnion</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Smeringaiova, Ingrida ; Trosan, Peter ; Mrstinova, Miluse Berka ; Matecha, Jan ; Burkert, Jan ; Bednar, Jan ; Jirsova, Katerina</creator><creatorcontrib>Smeringaiova, Ingrida ; Trosan, Peter ; Mrstinova, Miluse Berka ; Matecha, Jan ; Burkert, Jan ; Bednar, Jan ; Jirsova, Katerina</creatorcontrib><description>Human amniotic membrane (HAM) is used as an allograft in regenerative medicine or as a source of pluripotent cells for stem cell research. Various decontamination protocols and solutions are used to sterilize HAM before its application, but little is known about the toxicity of disinfectants on HAM cells. In this study, we tested two decontamination solutions, commercial (BASE·128) and laboratory decontamination solution (LDS), with an analogous content of antimycotic/antibiotics for their cytotoxic effect on HAM epithelial (EC) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). HAM was processed in a standard way, placed on nitrocellulose scaffold, and decontaminated, following three protocols: (1) 6 h, 37 °C; (2) 24 h, room temperature; (3) 24 h, 4 °C. The viability of EC was assessed via trypan blue staining. The apoptotic cells were detected using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL). The mean % (±SD) of dead EC (%DEC) from six fresh placentas was 12.9 ± 18.1. Decontamination increased %DEC compared to culture medium. Decontamination with BASE·128 for 6 h, 37 °C led to the highest EC viability (81.7%). Treatment with LDS at 24 h, 4 °C resulted in the lowest EC viability (55.9%) in the set. MSC were more affected by apoptosis than EC. Although the BASE·128 expresses lower toxicity compared to LDS, we present LDS as an alternative decontamination solution with a satisfactory preservation of cell viability. The basic formula of LDS will be optimised by enrichment with nutrient components, such as glucose or vitamins, to improve cell viability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6814</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10561-017-9636-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28677080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Amnion ; Amniotic membrane ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Apoptosis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cell Biology ; Cell culture ; Cellulose esters ; Cellulose nitrate ; Cytotoxicity ; Decontamination ; Disinfectants ; DNA nucleotidylexotransferase ; Labeling ; Life Sciences ; Mesenchyme ; Nutrient enrichment ; Placenta ; Pluripotency ; Preservation ; Regenerative medicine ; Skin &amp; tissue grafts ; Stem cells ; Stromal cells ; Toxicity ; Transplant Surgery ; Vitamins</subject><ispartof>Cell and tissue banking, 2017-09, Vol.18 (3), p.413-423</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Cell and Tissue Banking is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e36aa85b402a2b7ae7888190b83e90ca20da0dc7e713a214fb5f355cdbae2b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e36aa85b402a2b7ae7888190b83e90ca20da0dc7e713a214fb5f355cdbae2b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9254-5571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10561-017-9636-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10561-017-9636-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28677080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smeringaiova, Ingrida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trosan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mrstinova, Miluse Berka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matecha, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkert, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bednar, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jirsova, Katerina</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of impact of two decontamination solutions on the viability of the cells in human amnion</title><title>Cell and tissue banking</title><addtitle>Cell Tissue Bank</addtitle><addtitle>Cell Tissue Bank</addtitle><description>Human amniotic membrane (HAM) is used as an allograft in regenerative medicine or as a source of pluripotent cells for stem cell research. Various decontamination protocols and solutions are used to sterilize HAM before its application, but little is known about the toxicity of disinfectants on HAM cells. In this study, we tested two decontamination solutions, commercial (BASE·128) and laboratory decontamination solution (LDS), with an analogous content of antimycotic/antibiotics for their cytotoxic effect on HAM epithelial (EC) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). HAM was processed in a standard way, placed on nitrocellulose scaffold, and decontaminated, following three protocols: (1) 6 h, 37 °C; (2) 24 h, room temperature; (3) 24 h, 4 °C. The viability of EC was assessed via trypan blue staining. The apoptotic cells were detected using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL). The mean % (±SD) of dead EC (%DEC) from six fresh placentas was 12.9 ± 18.1. Decontamination increased %DEC compared to culture medium. Decontamination with BASE·128 for 6 h, 37 °C led to the highest EC viability (81.7%). Treatment with LDS at 24 h, 4 °C resulted in the lowest EC viability (55.9%) in the set. MSC were more affected by apoptosis than EC. Although the BASE·128 expresses lower toxicity compared to LDS, we present LDS as an alternative decontamination solution with a satisfactory preservation of cell viability. The basic formula of LDS will be optimised by enrichment with nutrient components, such as glucose or vitamins, to improve cell viability.</description><subject>Amnion</subject><subject>Amniotic membrane</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cellulose esters</subject><subject>Cellulose nitrate</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Disinfectants</subject><subject>DNA nucleotidylexotransferase</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mesenchyme</subject><subject>Nutrient enrichment</subject><subject>Placenta</subject><subject>Pluripotency</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Regenerative medicine</subject><subject>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Stromal cells</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Transplant Surgery</subject><subject>Vitamins</subject><issn>1389-9333</issn><issn>1573-6814</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLxTAQhYMovn-AGym4cVOdZG6bdCkXXyC4cR-maaqRNrk2reK_N_WqiOAqZ5Jvzgw5jB1xOOMA8jxyKEqeA5d5VWKZ4wbb5YXEvFR8sZk0qiqvEHGH7cX4DCBACtxmO0KVUoKCXWaWoV_R4GLwWWgzlwozzmp8C1ljTfAj9c7T6BIQQzfNImapGJ9s9uqodp0b3z870oWxXRcz57OnqSefUe8TfsC2WuqiPfw699nD1eXD8ia_u7--XV7c5QalGHOLJZEq6gUIErUkK5VSvIJaoa3AkICGoDHSSo4k-KKtixaLwjQ1WVEvcJ-drm1XQ3iZbBx17-K8EHkbpqh5xUuUlShEQk_-oM9hGnxaLlFYcqEAZkO-pswQYhxsq1eD62l41xz0HIBeB6BTAHoOQGPqOf5ynureNj8d3z-eALEGYnryj3b4Nfpf1w9pbJEu</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Smeringaiova, Ingrida</creator><creator>Trosan, Peter</creator><creator>Mrstinova, Miluse Berka</creator><creator>Matecha, Jan</creator><creator>Burkert, Jan</creator><creator>Bednar, Jan</creator><creator>Jirsova, Katerina</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9254-5571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Comparison of impact of two decontamination solutions on the viability of the cells in human amnion</title><author>Smeringaiova, Ingrida ; Trosan, Peter ; Mrstinova, Miluse Berka ; Matecha, Jan ; Burkert, Jan ; Bednar, Jan ; Jirsova, Katerina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-e36aa85b402a2b7ae7888190b83e90ca20da0dc7e713a214fb5f355cdbae2b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amnion</topic><topic>Amniotic membrane</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cellulose esters</topic><topic>Cellulose nitrate</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Disinfectants</topic><topic>DNA nucleotidylexotransferase</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mesenchyme</topic><topic>Nutrient enrichment</topic><topic>Placenta</topic><topic>Pluripotency</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Regenerative medicine</topic><topic>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Stromal cells</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Transplant Surgery</topic><topic>Vitamins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smeringaiova, Ingrida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trosan, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mrstinova, Miluse Berka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matecha, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burkert, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bednar, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jirsova, Katerina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cell and tissue banking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smeringaiova, Ingrida</au><au>Trosan, Peter</au><au>Mrstinova, Miluse Berka</au><au>Matecha, Jan</au><au>Burkert, Jan</au><au>Bednar, Jan</au><au>Jirsova, Katerina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of impact of two decontamination solutions on the viability of the cells in human amnion</atitle><jtitle>Cell and tissue banking</jtitle><stitle>Cell Tissue Bank</stitle><addtitle>Cell Tissue Bank</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>413-423</pages><issn>1389-9333</issn><eissn>1573-6814</eissn><abstract>Human amniotic membrane (HAM) is used as an allograft in regenerative medicine or as a source of pluripotent cells for stem cell research. Various decontamination protocols and solutions are used to sterilize HAM before its application, but little is known about the toxicity of disinfectants on HAM cells. In this study, we tested two decontamination solutions, commercial (BASE·128) and laboratory decontamination solution (LDS), with an analogous content of antimycotic/antibiotics for their cytotoxic effect on HAM epithelial (EC) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). HAM was processed in a standard way, placed on nitrocellulose scaffold, and decontaminated, following three protocols: (1) 6 h, 37 °C; (2) 24 h, room temperature; (3) 24 h, 4 °C. The viability of EC was assessed via trypan blue staining. The apoptotic cells were detected using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL). The mean % (±SD) of dead EC (%DEC) from six fresh placentas was 12.9 ± 18.1. Decontamination increased %DEC compared to culture medium. Decontamination with BASE·128 for 6 h, 37 °C led to the highest EC viability (81.7%). Treatment with LDS at 24 h, 4 °C resulted in the lowest EC viability (55.9%) in the set. MSC were more affected by apoptosis than EC. Although the BASE·128 expresses lower toxicity compared to LDS, we present LDS as an alternative decontamination solution with a satisfactory preservation of cell viability. The basic formula of LDS will be optimised by enrichment with nutrient components, such as glucose or vitamins, to improve cell viability.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>28677080</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10561-017-9636-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9254-5571</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-9333
ispartof Cell and tissue banking, 2017-09, Vol.18 (3), p.413-423
issn 1389-9333
1573-6814
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1916379252
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Amnion
Amniotic membrane
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Apoptosis
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cell Biology
Cell culture
Cellulose esters
Cellulose nitrate
Cytotoxicity
Decontamination
Disinfectants
DNA nucleotidylexotransferase
Labeling
Life Sciences
Mesenchyme
Nutrient enrichment
Placenta
Pluripotency
Preservation
Regenerative medicine
Skin & tissue grafts
Stem cells
Stromal cells
Toxicity
Transplant Surgery
Vitamins
title Comparison of impact of two decontamination solutions on the viability of the cells in human amnion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A28%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20impact%20of%20two%20decontamination%20solutions%20on%20the%20viability%20of%20the%20cells%20in%20human%20amnion&rft.jtitle=Cell%20and%20tissue%20banking&rft.au=Smeringaiova,%20Ingrida&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=413-423&rft.issn=1389-9333&rft.eissn=1573-6814&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10561-017-9636-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1916379252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1936128004&rft_id=info:pmid/28677080&rfr_iscdi=true