Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment
Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.546-563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 563 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 546 |
container_title | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Colen, David L. Lin, Ines C. Levin, L. Scott Chang, Benjamin |
description | Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915556939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036350231630805X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1915556939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlZfwIXM0oUzJpOfdsSN1lqFglDqOqTJHU2ZTmoyU-jbm7HVpYtL7gnnHLgfQpcEZwQTcbvKVp9BZTkmwwyzDJP8CPUJpyQVXLBj1MdU0JTjnPbQWQgrjGOK8lPUy0dCFCzHfVTNlbGqSmau_rBNa2wdxROUVluo9e4umYOGuolfW6jcZh33cJOMXd14twUfLESpahMnmWytiSFIH1UAk0zbKJPGJQsPqumS5-ikVFWAi8M7QO_Pk8X4JZ29TV_HD7NUUy6alAIBTMxyxEpWKiKAssLwXCjQRhSj4ZJE3whjYBpzBUsCrOQFK4GXxdAYRQfoet-78e6rhdDItQ0aqkrV4NogSUE456KgRbTme6v2LgQPpdx4u1Z-JwmWHWW5kh1l2VGWmMlIOYauDv3tcg3mL_KLNRru9waIV24teBl-eIKxHnQjjbP_9X8DvvWPJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915556939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Colen, David L. ; Lin, Ines C. ; Levin, L. Scott ; Chang, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Colen, David L. ; Lin, Ines C. ; Levin, L. Scott ; Chang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28669420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>centralization ; Humans ; pollicization ; Radial dysplasia ; radial longitudinal deficiency ; Radius - abnormalities ; thumb hypoplasia ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.546-563</ispartof><rights>2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28669420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colen, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ines C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</title><title>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><description>Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.</description><subject>centralization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>pollicization</subject><subject>Radial dysplasia</subject><subject>radial longitudinal deficiency</subject><subject>Radius - abnormalities</subject><subject>thumb hypoplasia</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy</subject><issn>0363-5023</issn><issn>1531-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlZfwIXM0oUzJpOfdsSN1lqFglDqOqTJHU2ZTmoyU-jbm7HVpYtL7gnnHLgfQpcEZwQTcbvKVp9BZTkmwwyzDJP8CPUJpyQVXLBj1MdU0JTjnPbQWQgrjGOK8lPUy0dCFCzHfVTNlbGqSmau_rBNa2wdxROUVluo9e4umYOGuolfW6jcZh33cJOMXd14twUfLESpahMnmWytiSFIH1UAk0zbKJPGJQsPqumS5-ikVFWAi8M7QO_Pk8X4JZ29TV_HD7NUUy6alAIBTMxyxEpWKiKAssLwXCjQRhSj4ZJE3whjYBpzBUsCrOQFK4GXxdAYRQfoet-78e6rhdDItQ0aqkrV4NogSUE456KgRbTme6v2LgQPpdx4u1Z-JwmWHWW5kh1l2VGWmMlIOYauDv3tcg3mL_KLNRru9waIV24teBl-eIKxHnQjjbP_9X8DvvWPJQ</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Colen, David L.</creator><creator>Lin, Ines C.</creator><creator>Levin, L. Scott</creator><creator>Chang, Benjamin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</title><author>Colen, David L. ; Lin, Ines C. ; Levin, L. Scott ; Chang, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>centralization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>pollicization</topic><topic>Radial dysplasia</topic><topic>radial longitudinal deficiency</topic><topic>Radius - abnormalities</topic><topic>thumb hypoplasia</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colen, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ines C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colen, David L.</au><au>Lin, Ines C.</au><au>Levin, L. Scott</au><au>Chang, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>546-563</pages><issn>0363-5023</issn><eissn>1531-6564</eissn><abstract>Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28669420</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-5023 |
ispartof | The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.546-563 |
issn | 0363-5023 1531-6564 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915556939 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | centralization Humans pollicization Radial dysplasia radial longitudinal deficiency Radius - abnormalities thumb hypoplasia Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy |
title | Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T19%3A54%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radial%20Longitudinal%20Deficiency:%20Recent%20Developments,%20Controversies,%20and%20an%20Evidence-Based%20Guide%20to%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery%20(American%20ed.)&rft.au=Colen,%20David%20L.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=546-563&rft.issn=0363-5023&rft.eissn=1531-6564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1915556939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915556939&rft_id=info:pmid/28669420&rft_els_id=S036350231630805X&rfr_iscdi=true |