Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment

Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.546-563
Hauptverfasser: Colen, David L., Lin, Ines C., Levin, L. Scott, Chang, Benjamin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 563
container_issue 7
container_start_page 546
container_title The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)
container_volume 42
creator Colen, David L.
Lin, Ines C.
Levin, L. Scott
Chang, Benjamin
description Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915556939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036350231630805X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1915556939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlZfwIXM0oUzJpOfdsSN1lqFglDqOqTJHU2ZTmoyU-jbm7HVpYtL7gnnHLgfQpcEZwQTcbvKVp9BZTkmwwyzDJP8CPUJpyQVXLBj1MdU0JTjnPbQWQgrjGOK8lPUy0dCFCzHfVTNlbGqSmau_rBNa2wdxROUVluo9e4umYOGuolfW6jcZh33cJOMXd14twUfLESpahMnmWytiSFIH1UAk0zbKJPGJQsPqumS5-ikVFWAi8M7QO_Pk8X4JZ29TV_HD7NUUy6alAIBTMxyxEpWKiKAssLwXCjQRhSj4ZJE3whjYBpzBUsCrOQFK4GXxdAYRQfoet-78e6rhdDItQ0aqkrV4NogSUE456KgRbTme6v2LgQPpdx4u1Z-JwmWHWW5kh1l2VGWmMlIOYauDv3tcg3mL_KLNRru9waIV24teBl-eIKxHnQjjbP_9X8DvvWPJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915556939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Colen, David L. ; Lin, Ines C. ; Levin, L. Scott ; Chang, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Colen, David L. ; Lin, Ines C. ; Levin, L. Scott ; Chang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5023</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28669420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>centralization ; Humans ; pollicization ; Radial dysplasia ; radial longitudinal deficiency ; Radius - abnormalities ; thumb hypoplasia ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology ; Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.546-563</ispartof><rights>2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28669420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colen, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ines C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</title><title>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><description>Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.</description><subject>centralization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>pollicization</subject><subject>Radial dysplasia</subject><subject>radial longitudinal deficiency</subject><subject>Radius - abnormalities</subject><subject>thumb hypoplasia</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology</subject><subject>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy</subject><issn>0363-5023</issn><issn>1531-6564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlZfwIXM0oUzJpOfdsSN1lqFglDqOqTJHU2ZTmoyU-jbm7HVpYtL7gnnHLgfQpcEZwQTcbvKVp9BZTkmwwyzDJP8CPUJpyQVXLBj1MdU0JTjnPbQWQgrjGOK8lPUy0dCFCzHfVTNlbGqSmau_rBNa2wdxROUVluo9e4umYOGuolfW6jcZh33cJOMXd14twUfLESpahMnmWytiSFIH1UAk0zbKJPGJQsPqumS5-ikVFWAi8M7QO_Pk8X4JZ29TV_HD7NUUy6alAIBTMxyxEpWKiKAssLwXCjQRhSj4ZJE3whjYBpzBUsCrOQFK4GXxdAYRQfoet-78e6rhdDItQ0aqkrV4NogSUE456KgRbTme6v2LgQPpdx4u1Z-JwmWHWW5kh1l2VGWmMlIOYauDv3tcg3mL_KLNRru9waIV24teBl-eIKxHnQjjbP_9X8DvvWPJQ</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Colen, David L.</creator><creator>Lin, Ines C.</creator><creator>Levin, L. Scott</creator><creator>Chang, Benjamin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</title><author>Colen, David L. ; Lin, Ines C. ; Levin, L. Scott ; Chang, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3e1e01db84f4fa16e349d526aecd6987b1c35800e4c05aeb1e4f594fe5f97dda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>centralization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>pollicization</topic><topic>Radial dysplasia</topic><topic>radial longitudinal deficiency</topic><topic>Radius - abnormalities</topic><topic>thumb hypoplasia</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology</topic><topic>Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colen, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ines C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colen, David L.</au><au>Lin, Ines C.</au><au>Levin, L. Scott</au><au>Chang, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>546-563</pages><issn>0363-5023</issn><eissn>1531-6564</eissn><abstract>Radial longitudinal deficiency (RLD) is the most common congenital longitudinal deficiency at birth and represents a wide spectrum of upper extremity anomalies, from mild thumb hypoplasia to absent radius. Radial dysplasia may be isolated or associated with an array of systemic anomalies that should be familiar to pediatric hand surgeons. The management of RLD has evolved greatly since its inception in the late 19th century, largely due to decades of innovation that followed the thalidomide catastrophe of the 1960s. Yet controversy still exists regarding many aspects of RLD. Traditional treatments of radial dysplasia (ie, centralization) are unfortunately wrought with poor outcomes and high rates of recurrence, leading some authors to recommend alternative techniques for this condition. Reconstruction of the hypoplastic thumb, although less controversial, is just starting to see long-term outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, classification, and treatment options for RLD, highlighting recent developments and outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28669420</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5023
ispartof The Journal of hand surgery (American ed.), 2017-07, Vol.42 (7), p.546-563
issn 0363-5023
1531-6564
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915556939
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects centralization
Humans
pollicization
Radial dysplasia
radial longitudinal deficiency
Radius - abnormalities
thumb hypoplasia
Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - classification
Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - etiology
Upper Extremity Deformities, Congenital - therapy
title Radial Longitudinal Deficiency: Recent Developments, Controversies, and an Evidence-Based Guide to Treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T19%3A54%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radial%20Longitudinal%20Deficiency:%20Recent%20Developments,%20Controversies,%20and%20an%20Evidence-Based%20Guide%20to%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery%20(American%20ed.)&rft.au=Colen,%20David%20L.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=546-563&rft.issn=0363-5023&rft.eissn=1531-6564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1915556939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915556939&rft_id=info:pmid/28669420&rft_els_id=S036350231630805X&rfr_iscdi=true