Women in surgery: A longer term follow-up
Abstract Background There are an increasing number of women in surgery. Previously, many questions focused upon their ability to complete surgical training and contribute fully to the surgical workforce. More meaningful information lies in identifying the long-term follow-up of where, and in what sp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2018-08, Vol.216 (2), p.189-193 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 193 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 189 |
| container_title | The American journal of surgery |
| container_volume | 216 |
| creator | Carter, Jane V Polk, Hiram C Galbraith, Norman J McMasters, Kelly M Cheadle, William G Poole, Molly, BS Galandiuk, Susan, MD |
| description | Abstract Background There are an increasing number of women in surgery. Previously, many questions focused upon their ability to complete surgical training and contribute fully to the surgical workforce. More meaningful information lies in identifying the long-term follow-up of where, and in what specialty, women residents eventually practice. Methods All residents entering general surgery training at the University of Louisville between 1996 and 2009 were studied. Comparison between men and women was performed for program completion, length of residency training, and eventual specialty practice. Results One-hundred and eight residents entered general surgery residency. Twenty-three (21%) did not complete training. There was no difference in attrition rates between men or women (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.77). Women completing residency were just as likely to practice general surgery (either private or academic practice) as their male counterparts (67% vs. 67% p = 0.96). Conclusions Women are a valuable resource in surgery and are able to complete a vigorous residency. Long-term follow-up is crucial and permits us to evaluate this important group of trainees practicing surgery today. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915347971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961017307110</els_id><sourcerecordid>1915347971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-af9426c6c1ad235815d48b5ef3ef80b590114660d5fed8bc2e79702602792f533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpabZJf0KLoZf0YGdGsmQ5h4QQ-hEI9NCUHoVXHhe5trWR1gn77yuz2xxyyUkfPO87M-8w9gGhQEB11hfN2Mc5_Ck4YFWALAD4K7ZCXdU5ai1esxWkr7xWCEfsXYx9eiKW4i074lopJat6xT7_9iNNmZuyxYvC7jy7ygY_pWu2pTBmnR8G_5jPmxP2pmuGSO8P5zH79fXL3fX3_PbHt5vrq9vclqXe5k1Xl1xZZbFpuZAaZVvqtaROUKdhLeulB6WglR21em05VXUFXAGvat5JIY7Z6d53E_z9THFrRhctDUMzkZ-jwRqlKJMIE_rpGdr7OUypO8OhWjCpy0TJPWWDjzFQZzbBjU3YGQSzZGl6c8jSLFkakCYFl3QfD-7zeqT2SfU_vARc7gFKcTw4CiZaR5Ol1gWyW9N692KJi2cOdnCTs83wl3YUn6ZBE7kB83NZ6LJPrESaD0H8A0mEmWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071534584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women in surgery: A longer term follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Carter, Jane V ; Polk, Hiram C ; Galbraith, Norman J ; McMasters, Kelly M ; Cheadle, William G ; Poole, Molly, BS ; Galandiuk, Susan, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jane V ; Polk, Hiram C ; Galbraith, Norman J ; McMasters, Kelly M ; Cheadle, William G ; Poole, Molly, BS ; Galandiuk, Susan, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background There are an increasing number of women in surgery. Previously, many questions focused upon their ability to complete surgical training and contribute fully to the surgical workforce. More meaningful information lies in identifying the long-term follow-up of where, and in what specialty, women residents eventually practice. Methods All residents entering general surgery training at the University of Louisville between 1996 and 2009 were studied. Comparison between men and women was performed for program completion, length of residency training, and eventual specialty practice. Results One-hundred and eight residents entered general surgery residency. Twenty-three (21%) did not complete training. There was no difference in attrition rates between men or women (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.77). Women completing residency were just as likely to practice general surgery (either private or academic practice) as their male counterparts (67% vs. 67% p = 0.96). Conclusions Women are a valuable resource in surgery and are able to complete a vigorous residency. Long-term follow-up is crucial and permits us to evaluate this important group of trainees practicing surgery today.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28666579</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Attrition ; Career Choice ; College professors ; Divorce ; Education, Medical - trends ; Family leave ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General surgery ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - trends ; Laboratories ; Long-term follow-up ; Male ; Medical residencies ; Pediatrics ; Physicians, Women ; Resident training ; Restrictions ; Retrospective Studies ; Scholarships & fellowships ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Training ; Women</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2018-08, Vol.216 (2), p.189-193</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-af9426c6c1ad235815d48b5ef3ef80b590114660d5fed8bc2e79702602792f533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-af9426c6c1ad235815d48b5ef3ef80b590114660d5fed8bc2e79702602792f533</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9994-5263 ; 0000-0002-7985-2008</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961017307110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28666579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jane V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polk, Hiram C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Norman J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMasters, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheadle, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poole, Molly, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galandiuk, Susan, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Women in surgery: A longer term follow-up</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background There are an increasing number of women in surgery. Previously, many questions focused upon their ability to complete surgical training and contribute fully to the surgical workforce. More meaningful information lies in identifying the long-term follow-up of where, and in what specialty, women residents eventually practice. Methods All residents entering general surgery training at the University of Louisville between 1996 and 2009 were studied. Comparison between men and women was performed for program completion, length of residency training, and eventual specialty practice. Results One-hundred and eight residents entered general surgery residency. Twenty-three (21%) did not complete training. There was no difference in attrition rates between men or women (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.77). Women completing residency were just as likely to practice general surgery (either private or academic practice) as their male counterparts (67% vs. 67% p = 0.96). Conclusions Women are a valuable resource in surgery and are able to complete a vigorous residency. Long-term follow-up is crucial and permits us to evaluate this important group of trainees practicing surgery today.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Attrition</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Education, Medical - trends</subject><subject>Family leave</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General surgery</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - trends</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Long-term follow-up</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical residencies</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physicians, Women</subject><subject>Resident training</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scholarships & fellowships</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpabZJf0KLoZf0YGdGsmQ5h4QQ-hEI9NCUHoVXHhe5trWR1gn77yuz2xxyyUkfPO87M-8w9gGhQEB11hfN2Mc5_Ck4YFWALAD4K7ZCXdU5ai1esxWkr7xWCEfsXYx9eiKW4i074lopJat6xT7_9iNNmZuyxYvC7jy7ygY_pWu2pTBmnR8G_5jPmxP2pmuGSO8P5zH79fXL3fX3_PbHt5vrq9vclqXe5k1Xl1xZZbFpuZAaZVvqtaROUKdhLeulB6WglR21em05VXUFXAGvat5JIY7Z6d53E_z9THFrRhctDUMzkZ-jwRqlKJMIE_rpGdr7OUypO8OhWjCpy0TJPWWDjzFQZzbBjU3YGQSzZGl6c8jSLFkakCYFl3QfD-7zeqT2SfU_vARc7gFKcTw4CiZaR5Ol1gWyW9N692KJi2cOdnCTs83wl3YUn6ZBE7kB83NZ6LJPrESaD0H8A0mEmWU</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Carter, Jane V</creator><creator>Polk, Hiram C</creator><creator>Galbraith, Norman J</creator><creator>McMasters, Kelly M</creator><creator>Cheadle, William G</creator><creator>Poole, Molly, BS</creator><creator>Galandiuk, Susan, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-5263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-2008</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Women in surgery: A longer term follow-up</title><author>Carter, Jane V ; Polk, Hiram C ; Galbraith, Norman J ; McMasters, Kelly M ; Cheadle, William G ; Poole, Molly, BS ; Galandiuk, Susan, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-af9426c6c1ad235815d48b5ef3ef80b590114660d5fed8bc2e79702602792f533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Attrition</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Education, Medical - trends</topic><topic>Family leave</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General surgery</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - trends</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Long-term follow-up</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical residencies</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physicians, Women</topic><topic>Resident training</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scholarships & fellowships</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carter, Jane V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polk, Hiram C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Norman J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMasters, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheadle, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poole, Molly, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galandiuk, Susan, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carter, Jane V</au><au>Polk, Hiram C</au><au>Galbraith, Norman J</au><au>McMasters, Kelly M</au><au>Cheadle, William G</au><au>Poole, Molly, BS</au><au>Galandiuk, Susan, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women in surgery: A longer term follow-up</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>216</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>189-193</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background There are an increasing number of women in surgery. Previously, many questions focused upon their ability to complete surgical training and contribute fully to the surgical workforce. More meaningful information lies in identifying the long-term follow-up of where, and in what specialty, women residents eventually practice. Methods All residents entering general surgery training at the University of Louisville between 1996 and 2009 were studied. Comparison between men and women was performed for program completion, length of residency training, and eventual specialty practice. Results One-hundred and eight residents entered general surgery residency. Twenty-three (21%) did not complete training. There was no difference in attrition rates between men or women (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.77). Women completing residency were just as likely to practice general surgery (either private or academic practice) as their male counterparts (67% vs. 67% p = 0.96). Conclusions Women are a valuable resource in surgery and are able to complete a vigorous residency. Long-term follow-up is crucial and permits us to evaluate this important group of trainees practicing surgery today.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28666579</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9994-5263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-2008</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
| ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2018-08, Vol.216 (2), p.189-193 |
| issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915347971 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Accreditation Attrition Career Choice College professors Divorce Education, Medical - trends Family leave Female Follow-Up Studies General surgery General Surgery - education Humans Internship and Residency - trends Laboratories Long-term follow-up Male Medical residencies Pediatrics Physicians, Women Resident training Restrictions Retrospective Studies Scholarships & fellowships Surgeons Surgery Training Women |
| title | Women in surgery: A longer term follow-up |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A07%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%20in%20surgery:%20A%20longer%20term%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Carter,%20Jane%20V&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=216&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=189-193&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1915347971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071534584&rft_id=info:pmid/28666579&rft_els_id=S0002961017307110&rfr_iscdi=true |