Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case
We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogue...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of performability engineering 2015-11, Vol.11 (6), p.569-569 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 569 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 569 |
container_title | International journal of performability engineering |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Fuchs, Daniela Gazso, Andre |
description | We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915326396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1915326396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p164t-20eed13313288ecc1c68b85c725b177716f43cf70e837b212cfe92de9a5e07ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz8FKxDAUheEsFBxH3yHgQjeF3NwmN3E3FB2FQUHG9ZBmbrFjbcam9fkt6MqVq7P5OPCfiIXyhAUguDNxnvNBKatJw0JcP4U-yZc2v8t1-uKhD33kW7l9Y7ma8ji0oZdVyHwhTpvQZb783aV4vb_bVg_F5nn9WK02xRFsORZaMe8BEVA7xzFCtK52JpI2NRAR2KbE2JBih1Rr0LFhr_fsg2FFHHEpbn5-j0P6nDiPu482R-660HOa8g48GNQWvf0HVbY01pVmpld_6CFNc2s3K0LjgUARfgNqT1Wr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735917107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fuchs, Daniela ; Gazso, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Daniela ; Gazso, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-1318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jaipur: RAMS Consultants</publisher><subject>Control ; Health ; Integrals ; Nanostructure ; Nanotechnology ; Regulation ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Safety ; Safety standards ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of performability engineering, 2015-11, Vol.11 (6), p.569-569</ispartof><rights>Copyright RAMS Consultants Nov 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazso, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</title><title>International journal of performability engineering</title><description>We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information.</description><subject>Control</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0973-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNz8FKxDAUheEsFBxH3yHgQjeF3NwmN3E3FB2FQUHG9ZBmbrFjbcam9fkt6MqVq7P5OPCfiIXyhAUguDNxnvNBKatJw0JcP4U-yZc2v8t1-uKhD33kW7l9Y7ma8ji0oZdVyHwhTpvQZb783aV4vb_bVg_F5nn9WK02xRFsORZaMe8BEVA7xzFCtK52JpI2NRAR2KbE2JBih1Rr0LFhr_fsg2FFHHEpbn5-j0P6nDiPu482R-660HOa8g48GNQWvf0HVbY01pVmpld_6CFNc2s3K0LjgUARfgNqT1Wr</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Fuchs, Daniela</creator><creator>Gazso, Andre</creator><general>RAMS Consultants</general><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</title><author>Fuchs, Daniela ; Gazso, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p164t-20eed13313288ecc1c68b85c725b177716f43cf70e837b212cfe92de9a5e07ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Control</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazso, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of performability engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuchs, Daniela</au><au>Gazso, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</atitle><jtitle>International journal of performability engineering</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>569-569</pages><issn>0973-1318</issn><abstract>We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information.</abstract><cop>Jaipur</cop><pub>RAMS Consultants</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0973-1318 |
ispartof | International journal of performability engineering, 2015-11, Vol.11 (6), p.569-569 |
issn | 0973-1318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915326396 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Control Health Integrals Nanostructure Nanotechnology Regulation Risk assessment Risk management Safety Safety standards Studies |
title | Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nano%20Risk%20Governance:%20The%20Austrian%20Case&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20performability%20engineering&rft.au=Fuchs,%20Daniela&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=569-569&rft.issn=0973-1318&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1915326396%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735917107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |