Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case

We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogue...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of performability engineering 2015-11, Vol.11 (6), p.569-569
Hauptverfasser: Fuchs, Daniela, Gazso, Andre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 569
container_issue 6
container_start_page 569
container_title International journal of performability engineering
container_volume 11
creator Fuchs, Daniela
Gazso, Andre
description We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915326396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1915326396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p164t-20eed13313288ecc1c68b85c725b177716f43cf70e837b212cfe92de9a5e07ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNz8FKxDAUheEsFBxH3yHgQjeF3NwmN3E3FB2FQUHG9ZBmbrFjbcam9fkt6MqVq7P5OPCfiIXyhAUguDNxnvNBKatJw0JcP4U-yZc2v8t1-uKhD33kW7l9Y7ma8ji0oZdVyHwhTpvQZb783aV4vb_bVg_F5nn9WK02xRFsORZaMe8BEVA7xzFCtK52JpI2NRAR2KbE2JBih1Rr0LFhr_fsg2FFHHEpbn5-j0P6nDiPu482R-660HOa8g48GNQWvf0HVbY01pVmpld_6CFNc2s3K0LjgUARfgNqT1Wr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735917107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fuchs, Daniela ; Gazso, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Daniela ; Gazso, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-1318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jaipur: RAMS Consultants</publisher><subject>Control ; Health ; Integrals ; Nanostructure ; Nanotechnology ; Regulation ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Safety ; Safety standards ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of performability engineering, 2015-11, Vol.11 (6), p.569-569</ispartof><rights>Copyright RAMS Consultants Nov 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazso, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</title><title>International journal of performability engineering</title><description>We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information.</description><subject>Control</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0973-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNz8FKxDAUheEsFBxH3yHgQjeF3NwmN3E3FB2FQUHG9ZBmbrFjbcam9fkt6MqVq7P5OPCfiIXyhAUguDNxnvNBKatJw0JcP4U-yZc2v8t1-uKhD33kW7l9Y7ma8ji0oZdVyHwhTpvQZb783aV4vb_bVg_F5nn9WK02xRFsORZaMe8BEVA7xzFCtK52JpI2NRAR2KbE2JBih1Rr0LFhr_fsg2FFHHEpbn5-j0P6nDiPu482R-660HOa8g48GNQWvf0HVbY01pVmpld_6CFNc2s3K0LjgUARfgNqT1Wr</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Fuchs, Daniela</creator><creator>Gazso, Andre</creator><general>RAMS Consultants</general><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</title><author>Fuchs, Daniela ; Gazso, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p164t-20eed13313288ecc1c68b85c725b177716f43cf70e837b212cfe92de9a5e07ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Control</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazso, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of performability engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuchs, Daniela</au><au>Gazso, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case</atitle><jtitle>International journal of performability engineering</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>569-569</pages><issn>0973-1318</issn><abstract>We examine the role of the Technology Assessment in Austrian nanotechnology governance. Within the Austrian debate on nanotechnology focusing mainly on environmental, health and safety issues within the limits of regulation practise, TA fulfils its role as a facilitator of multi-stakeholder dialogues and a communicator of relevant information on nanotechnology to several interest groups, mainly authorities. As integral part of most of the safety relevant nanotechnology activities in Austria, the role of TA -- in form of the specific project NanoTrust -- can be characterized as tool for anticipatory risk management according to national and international risk management standards, as element in conducting responsible research and innovation (RRI), and as representing an "honest broker" of scientific information.</abstract><cop>Jaipur</cop><pub>RAMS Consultants</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0973-1318
ispartof International journal of performability engineering, 2015-11, Vol.11 (6), p.569-569
issn 0973-1318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1915326396
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Control
Health
Integrals
Nanostructure
Nanotechnology
Regulation
Risk assessment
Risk management
Safety
Safety standards
Studies
title Nano Risk Governance: The Austrian Case
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nano%20Risk%20Governance:%20The%20Austrian%20Case&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20performability%20engineering&rft.au=Fuchs,%20Daniela&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=569-569&rft.issn=0973-1318&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1915326396%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735917107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true