Effects of bedding with recycled sand on lying behaviors, udder hygiene, and preference of lactating Holstein dairy cows

Effects of bedding with recycled sand and season on lying behaviors, hygiene, and preferences of late-lactation Holstein cows were studied. It was hypothesized that recycled sand will decrease lying time and increase hygiene scores due to increased moisture content and organic matter, and thus a pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2017-09, Vol.100 (9), p.7379-7389
Hauptverfasser: Kull, J.A., Ingle, H.D., Black, R.A., Eberhart, N.L., Krawczel, P.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7389
container_issue 9
container_start_page 7379
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 100
creator Kull, J.A.
Ingle, H.D.
Black, R.A.
Eberhart, N.L.
Krawczel, P.D.
description Effects of bedding with recycled sand and season on lying behaviors, hygiene, and preferences of late-lactation Holstein cows were studied. It was hypothesized that recycled sand will decrease lying time and increase hygiene scores due to increased moisture content and organic matter, and thus a preference for the control sand will be evident. Cows (n = 64) were divided into 4 groups (n = 8 per group) per season. In summer (August to September), cows were balanced by days in milk (268.1 ± 11.9 d) and parity (2.0 ± 0.2). In winter (January to February), mean DIM was 265.5 ± 34.1 d. Cows were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments using a crossover design with each treatment lasting 7 d (no-choice phase): bedding with recycled sand (RS; n = 32) or control (CO; clean sand; n = 32). Stocking density was maintained at 100%. The choice phase allowed cows to have access to either treatment with stocking density at 50%. Accelerometers recorded daily lying time, number of lying bouts per day, lying bout duration (min/bout), and total steps per day. Teat swabs, milk, sand samples, and udder hygiene scores were collected on d 0, 3, and 7 of each experimental week. Samples were cultured for streptococci, staphylococci, and gram-negative bacteria. Video data were used to assess bedding preferences. All data were analyzed using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Lying time was not affected by treatment, but cows did take more steps during winter. Bacterial counts were elevated for cows on recycled sand. A preference was observed for clean sand during the summer, but no preference was observed for sand during the winter. Regardless of bedding, the most commonly observed behavior was lying in the stalls, which suggested either bedding might be suitable. Caution should be used with this interpretation of preference, as sand was recycled only once. This limited reclamation was still sufficient to potentially alter the composition of sand, driving the observed preference. If these changes in composition continue, then the strength of the preference may also change. However, considering all variables within the current study, recycled sand is a viable bedding source to use for dairy cows.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2016-12307
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913831357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030217306057</els_id><sourcerecordid>2000480662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c66c0fd1a767ae3b6469227d006331ebd7872faa62aca98b180aa64fc35aa4c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhi1UBMvHlWPlYw9kGduJ7T1WiI9KSL3A2XLsCWuUjbd2Fpp_X4eF3qqeRqN55pVmHkIuGCwFk_rqxeclByYrxgWoA7JgDW8qwVb6C1kAcF6BAH5MTnJ-KS3j0ByRY65lrYQQC_L7puvQjZnGjrbofRie6VsY1zShm1yPnmY7eBoH2k_zrMW1fQ0x5Uu68x4TXU_PAQe8pDO2TdhhwsHhnNdbN9px3rqPfR4xDNTbkCbq4ls-I4ed7TOef9RT8nR783h9Xz38vPtx_f2hcjVTY-WkdNB5ZpVUFkUra7niXHkAKQTD1iuteGet5NbZlW6ZhtLUnRONtbVj4pR82-duU_y1wzyaTcgO-94OGHfZcACoNUjJ_4uyFRNaMNGogi73qEsx53K12aawsWkyDMwsxhQxZhZj3sWUha8f2bt2g_4v_mmiAHoPYHnGa8BksgvzJ30oKkbjY_hX9h_SIpy_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1913831357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of bedding with recycled sand on lying behaviors, udder hygiene, and preference of lactating Holstein dairy cows</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kull, J.A. ; Ingle, H.D. ; Black, R.A. ; Eberhart, N.L. ; Krawczel, P.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kull, J.A. ; Ingle, H.D. ; Black, R.A. ; Eberhart, N.L. ; Krawczel, P.D.</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of bedding with recycled sand and season on lying behaviors, hygiene, and preferences of late-lactation Holstein cows were studied. It was hypothesized that recycled sand will decrease lying time and increase hygiene scores due to increased moisture content and organic matter, and thus a preference for the control sand will be evident. Cows (n = 64) were divided into 4 groups (n = 8 per group) per season. In summer (August to September), cows were balanced by days in milk (268.1 ± 11.9 d) and parity (2.0 ± 0.2). In winter (January to February), mean DIM was 265.5 ± 34.1 d. Cows were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments using a crossover design with each treatment lasting 7 d (no-choice phase): bedding with recycled sand (RS; n = 32) or control (CO; clean sand; n = 32). Stocking density was maintained at 100%. The choice phase allowed cows to have access to either treatment with stocking density at 50%. Accelerometers recorded daily lying time, number of lying bouts per day, lying bout duration (min/bout), and total steps per day. Teat swabs, milk, sand samples, and udder hygiene scores were collected on d 0, 3, and 7 of each experimental week. Samples were cultured for streptococci, staphylococci, and gram-negative bacteria. Video data were used to assess bedding preferences. All data were analyzed using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Lying time was not affected by treatment, but cows did take more steps during winter. Bacterial counts were elevated for cows on recycled sand. A preference was observed for clean sand during the summer, but no preference was observed for sand during the winter. Regardless of bedding, the most commonly observed behavior was lying in the stalls, which suggested either bedding might be suitable. Caution should be used with this interpretation of preference, as sand was recycled only once. This limited reclamation was still sufficient to potentially alter the composition of sand, driving the observed preference. If these changes in composition continue, then the strength of the preference may also change. However, considering all variables within the current study, recycled sand is a viable bedding source to use for dairy cows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12307</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28647333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>accelerometers ; Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; bedding ; behavior ; Behavior, Animal ; Cattle ; cross-over studies ; dairy cows ; Female ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Holstein ; Housing, Animal ; Hygiene ; lactating females ; late lactation ; Mammary Glands, Animal ; milk ; organic matter ; plate count ; preference ; Pregnancy ; sand ; Seasons ; Silicon Dioxide ; Staphylococcus ; stocking rate ; Streptococcus ; summer ; udders ; water content ; winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2017-09, Vol.100 (9), p.7379-7389</ispartof><rights>2017 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c66c0fd1a767ae3b6469227d006331ebd7872faa62aca98b180aa64fc35aa4c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c66c0fd1a767ae3b6469227d006331ebd7872faa62aca98b180aa64fc35aa4c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030217306057$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kull, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingle, H.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhart, N.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawczel, P.D.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of bedding with recycled sand on lying behaviors, udder hygiene, and preference of lactating Holstein dairy cows</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Effects of bedding with recycled sand and season on lying behaviors, hygiene, and preferences of late-lactation Holstein cows were studied. It was hypothesized that recycled sand will decrease lying time and increase hygiene scores due to increased moisture content and organic matter, and thus a preference for the control sand will be evident. Cows (n = 64) were divided into 4 groups (n = 8 per group) per season. In summer (August to September), cows were balanced by days in milk (268.1 ± 11.9 d) and parity (2.0 ± 0.2). In winter (January to February), mean DIM was 265.5 ± 34.1 d. Cows were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments using a crossover design with each treatment lasting 7 d (no-choice phase): bedding with recycled sand (RS; n = 32) or control (CO; clean sand; n = 32). Stocking density was maintained at 100%. The choice phase allowed cows to have access to either treatment with stocking density at 50%. Accelerometers recorded daily lying time, number of lying bouts per day, lying bout duration (min/bout), and total steps per day. Teat swabs, milk, sand samples, and udder hygiene scores were collected on d 0, 3, and 7 of each experimental week. Samples were cultured for streptococci, staphylococci, and gram-negative bacteria. Video data were used to assess bedding preferences. All data were analyzed using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Lying time was not affected by treatment, but cows did take more steps during winter. Bacterial counts were elevated for cows on recycled sand. A preference was observed for clean sand during the summer, but no preference was observed for sand during the winter. Regardless of bedding, the most commonly observed behavior was lying in the stalls, which suggested either bedding might be suitable. Caution should be used with this interpretation of preference, as sand was recycled only once. This limited reclamation was still sufficient to potentially alter the composition of sand, driving the observed preference. If these changes in composition continue, then the strength of the preference may also change. However, considering all variables within the current study, recycled sand is a viable bedding source to use for dairy cows.</description><subject>accelerometers</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bedding</subject><subject>behavior</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>cross-over studies</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Holstein</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>lactating females</subject><subject>late lactation</subject><subject>Mammary Glands, Animal</subject><subject>milk</subject><subject>organic matter</subject><subject>plate count</subject><subject>preference</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>sand</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide</subject><subject>Staphylococcus</subject><subject>stocking rate</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>udders</subject><subject>water content</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhi1UBMvHlWPlYw9kGduJ7T1WiI9KSL3A2XLsCWuUjbd2Fpp_X4eF3qqeRqN55pVmHkIuGCwFk_rqxeclByYrxgWoA7JgDW8qwVb6C1kAcF6BAH5MTnJ-KS3j0ByRY65lrYQQC_L7puvQjZnGjrbofRie6VsY1zShm1yPnmY7eBoH2k_zrMW1fQ0x5Uu68x4TXU_PAQe8pDO2TdhhwsHhnNdbN9px3rqPfR4xDNTbkCbq4ls-I4ed7TOef9RT8nR783h9Xz38vPtx_f2hcjVTY-WkdNB5ZpVUFkUra7niXHkAKQTD1iuteGet5NbZlW6ZhtLUnRONtbVj4pR82-duU_y1wzyaTcgO-94OGHfZcACoNUjJ_4uyFRNaMNGogi73qEsx53K12aawsWkyDMwsxhQxZhZj3sWUha8f2bt2g_4v_mmiAHoPYHnGa8BksgvzJ30oKkbjY_hX9h_SIpy_</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Kull, J.A.</creator><creator>Ingle, H.D.</creator><creator>Black, R.A.</creator><creator>Eberhart, N.L.</creator><creator>Krawczel, P.D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Effects of bedding with recycled sand on lying behaviors, udder hygiene, and preference of lactating Holstein dairy cows</title><author>Kull, J.A. ; Ingle, H.D. ; Black, R.A. ; Eberhart, N.L. ; Krawczel, P.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-c66c0fd1a767ae3b6469227d006331ebd7872faa62aca98b180aa64fc35aa4c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>accelerometers</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bedding</topic><topic>behavior</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>cross-over studies</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Holstein</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>lactating females</topic><topic>late lactation</topic><topic>Mammary Glands, Animal</topic><topic>milk</topic><topic>organic matter</topic><topic>plate count</topic><topic>preference</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>sand</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide</topic><topic>Staphylococcus</topic><topic>stocking rate</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>udders</topic><topic>water content</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kull, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingle, H.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eberhart, N.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawczel, P.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kull, J.A.</au><au>Ingle, H.D.</au><au>Black, R.A.</au><au>Eberhart, N.L.</au><au>Krawczel, P.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of bedding with recycled sand on lying behaviors, udder hygiene, and preference of lactating Holstein dairy cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>7379</spage><epage>7389</epage><pages>7379-7389</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Effects of bedding with recycled sand and season on lying behaviors, hygiene, and preferences of late-lactation Holstein cows were studied. It was hypothesized that recycled sand will decrease lying time and increase hygiene scores due to increased moisture content and organic matter, and thus a preference for the control sand will be evident. Cows (n = 64) were divided into 4 groups (n = 8 per group) per season. In summer (August to September), cows were balanced by days in milk (268.1 ± 11.9 d) and parity (2.0 ± 0.2). In winter (January to February), mean DIM was 265.5 ± 34.1 d. Cows were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments using a crossover design with each treatment lasting 7 d (no-choice phase): bedding with recycled sand (RS; n = 32) or control (CO; clean sand; n = 32). Stocking density was maintained at 100%. The choice phase allowed cows to have access to either treatment with stocking density at 50%. Accelerometers recorded daily lying time, number of lying bouts per day, lying bout duration (min/bout), and total steps per day. Teat swabs, milk, sand samples, and udder hygiene scores were collected on d 0, 3, and 7 of each experimental week. Samples were cultured for streptococci, staphylococci, and gram-negative bacteria. Video data were used to assess bedding preferences. All data were analyzed using the MIXED and GLIMMIX procedures of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Lying time was not affected by treatment, but cows did take more steps during winter. Bacterial counts were elevated for cows on recycled sand. A preference was observed for clean sand during the summer, but no preference was observed for sand during the winter. Regardless of bedding, the most commonly observed behavior was lying in the stalls, which suggested either bedding might be suitable. Caution should be used with this interpretation of preference, as sand was recycled only once. This limited reclamation was still sufficient to potentially alter the composition of sand, driving the observed preference. If these changes in composition continue, then the strength of the preference may also change. However, considering all variables within the current study, recycled sand is a viable bedding source to use for dairy cows.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28647333</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2016-12307</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2017-09, Vol.100 (9), p.7379-7389
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913831357
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects accelerometers
Animal Husbandry - methods
Animals
bedding
behavior
Behavior, Animal
Cattle
cross-over studies
dairy cows
Female
Gram-negative bacteria
Holstein
Housing, Animal
Hygiene
lactating females
late lactation
Mammary Glands, Animal
milk
organic matter
plate count
preference
Pregnancy
sand
Seasons
Silicon Dioxide
Staphylococcus
stocking rate
Streptococcus
summer
udders
water content
winter
title Effects of bedding with recycled sand on lying behaviors, udder hygiene, and preference of lactating Holstein dairy cows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A49%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20bedding%20with%20recycled%20sand%20on%20lying%20behaviors,%20udder%20hygiene,%20and%20preference%20of%20lactating%20Holstein%20dairy%20cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Kull,%20J.A.&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=7379&rft.epage=7389&rft.pages=7379-7389&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2016-12307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2000480662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1913831357&rft_id=info:pmid/28647333&rft_els_id=S0022030217306057&rfr_iscdi=true