A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-use fibrin sealant as an adjunct to hemostasis during vascular surgery

Abstract Purpose Anastomotic or “stitch hole” bleeding is common during vascular surgery with synthetic material such as Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Hemostatic adjuncts such as fibrin sealant (FS) may reduce blood loss and operating time in such circumstances. We evaluated the safety a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2017-11, Vol.45, p.127-137
Hauptverfasser: Chetter, Ian, Stansby, Gerard, Sarralde, José Aurelio, Riambau, Vicente, Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio, MacKenzie, Kent, Acín, Francisco, Navarro-Puerto, Jordi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue
container_start_page 127
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 45
creator Chetter, Ian
Stansby, Gerard
Sarralde, José Aurelio
Riambau, Vicente
Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio
MacKenzie, Kent
Acín, Francisco
Navarro-Puerto, Jordi
description Abstract Purpose Anastomotic or “stitch hole” bleeding is common during vascular surgery with synthetic material such as Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Hemostatic adjuncts such as fibrin sealant (FS) may reduce blood loss and operating time in such circumstances. We evaluated the safety and the hemostatic effectiveness of a ready-to-use human plasma-derived FS in vascular surgery. Methods Patients with mild / moderate suture line bleeding during elective, open, vascular surgery using synthetic grafts or patches were studied. In an initial Exploratory Study all patients were treated with FS Grifols, and in a subsequent Primary Study were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to FS Grifols or manual compression (MC). The primary efficacy endpoint was time to hemostasis (TTH), assessed at defined intervals from the start of treatment application, during a 10-minute observational period. Safety endpoints (in Exploratory+Primary Studies) included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical assessments, common clinical laboratory tests (coagulation; complete blood count; serum clinical chemistry parameters; microscopic urinalysis), viral markers, and immunogenicity. Results In the Primary Study the proportion of patients who achieved hemostasis at the 3 minute time point was higher in FS Grifols group (46.4%; n=51/110) than in MC group (26.3%; n=15/57) (P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913831058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0890509616313061</els_id><sourcerecordid>1913831058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4701913c9ca948e73558c4357e562e17ad5611a49e7fc7d65806bb36eca7fea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVigu2TRBDs_jiMhpKriT6rEAlhbHudm6pDEg689Ungf3hNH07JgwcZe-Jxj-3w3y15yVnDGxZux0Cc6FCXjbcFEwerqUbbjgjd509Xt42zHZMfyhnXiIntGNDLGS1nLp9lFKUXdiorvst_XcPSOjmiCPeEVeL30bra_sL-COU7BGlwCejCTXazREwRv0-oWCHcIpAcMKyQP4DCkc7OCG0CDR92veXB5JITB7r1dgFBPegmgKRlA92NcTIDg4A5nR0GTJehjUh7gpMnESXug6A_o1-fZk0FPhC_u98vs-4f3324-5bdfPn6-ub7NTS15yLFuGe94ZTqju1piWzWNNHXVtNiIEnmr-0ZwrusO28G0vWgkE_t9JdDodkBdXWavz7mpk58RKajZksEpvRtdJLWFy4qzRiZpeZaaVB95HNTR21n7VXGmNjxqVBseteFRTKiEJ5le3efH_Yz9X8sDjyR4exZg-uXJoldkLC4Ge-sTItU7-__8d__YH7j9wBVpdNEvqT_FFZWKqa_bgGzzwbe7meDVH_TxuSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1913831058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-use fibrin sealant as an adjunct to hemostasis during vascular surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chetter, Ian ; Stansby, Gerard ; Sarralde, José Aurelio ; Riambau, Vicente ; Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio ; MacKenzie, Kent ; Acín, Francisco ; Navarro-Puerto, Jordi</creator><creatorcontrib>Chetter, Ian ; Stansby, Gerard ; Sarralde, José Aurelio ; Riambau, Vicente ; Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio ; MacKenzie, Kent ; Acín, Francisco ; Navarro-Puerto, Jordi ; Investigators of the Fibrin Sealant Grifols Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Anastomotic or “stitch hole” bleeding is common during vascular surgery with synthetic material such as Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Hemostatic adjuncts such as fibrin sealant (FS) may reduce blood loss and operating time in such circumstances. We evaluated the safety and the hemostatic effectiveness of a ready-to-use human plasma-derived FS in vascular surgery. Methods Patients with mild / moderate suture line bleeding during elective, open, vascular surgery using synthetic grafts or patches were studied. In an initial Exploratory Study all patients were treated with FS Grifols, and in a subsequent Primary Study were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to FS Grifols or manual compression (MC). The primary efficacy endpoint was time to hemostasis (TTH), assessed at defined intervals from the start of treatment application, during a 10-minute observational period. Safety endpoints (in Exploratory+Primary Studies) included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical assessments, common clinical laboratory tests (coagulation; complete blood count; serum clinical chemistry parameters; microscopic urinalysis), viral markers, and immunogenicity. Results In the Primary Study the proportion of patients who achieved hemostasis at the 3 minute time point was higher in FS Grifols group (46.4%; n=51/110) than in MC group (26.3%; n=15/57) (P&lt;0.05). The benefit was maintained at successive time intervals: 69 FS Grifols patients (62.7%) and 18 MC patients (31.6%) at 4 min; 82 FS Grifols patients (74.5%) and 28 MC patients (49.1%) at 5 min. The differences between the groups persisted for TTH ≤7 minutes and TTH ≤10 minutes. Treatment failure was reported for 13 FS Grifols patients (11.8%) and 16 MC patients (28.1%).TTH was shorter after FS Grifols application than after MC application. Differences were statistically significant in favor of FS Grifols for each TTH category and for the overall comparison (p &lt;0.001) as well as for each TTH category (cumulative) and for treatment failure (p =0.016). Overall AE experience and types of AEs reported were those expected in this patient population and were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The most frequently reported AE were procedural pain (59.9% and 69.2% of patients in the FS Grifols [n=72+111] and MC [n=57] groups, respectively) and nausea (23.5% and 19.2% of patients, respectively). Conclusion FS Grifols was efficacious and safe as an adjunct to anastomotic hemostasis in patients undergoing arterial surgery using prosthetic material with mild to moderate bleeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28647631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control ; Canada ; Female ; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - adverse effects ; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use ; Hemostasis - drug effects ; Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects ; Hemostatics - adverse effects ; Hemostatics - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Single-Blind Method ; Spain ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United Kingdom ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2017-11, Vol.45, p.127-137</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4701913c9ca948e73558c4357e562e17ad5611a49e7fc7d65806bb36eca7fea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4701913c9ca948e73558c4357e562e17ad5611a49e7fc7d65806bb36eca7fea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509616313061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chetter, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stansby, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarralde, José Aurelio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riambau, Vicente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acín, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro-Puerto, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Investigators of the Fibrin Sealant Grifols Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-use fibrin sealant as an adjunct to hemostasis during vascular surgery</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Anastomotic or “stitch hole” bleeding is common during vascular surgery with synthetic material such as Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Hemostatic adjuncts such as fibrin sealant (FS) may reduce blood loss and operating time in such circumstances. We evaluated the safety and the hemostatic effectiveness of a ready-to-use human plasma-derived FS in vascular surgery. Methods Patients with mild / moderate suture line bleeding during elective, open, vascular surgery using synthetic grafts or patches were studied. In an initial Exploratory Study all patients were treated with FS Grifols, and in a subsequent Primary Study were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to FS Grifols or manual compression (MC). The primary efficacy endpoint was time to hemostasis (TTH), assessed at defined intervals from the start of treatment application, during a 10-minute observational period. Safety endpoints (in Exploratory+Primary Studies) included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical assessments, common clinical laboratory tests (coagulation; complete blood count; serum clinical chemistry parameters; microscopic urinalysis), viral markers, and immunogenicity. Results In the Primary Study the proportion of patients who achieved hemostasis at the 3 minute time point was higher in FS Grifols group (46.4%; n=51/110) than in MC group (26.3%; n=15/57) (P&lt;0.05). The benefit was maintained at successive time intervals: 69 FS Grifols patients (62.7%) and 18 MC patients (31.6%) at 4 min; 82 FS Grifols patients (74.5%) and 28 MC patients (49.1%) at 5 min. The differences between the groups persisted for TTH ≤7 minutes and TTH ≤10 minutes. Treatment failure was reported for 13 FS Grifols patients (11.8%) and 16 MC patients (28.1%).TTH was shorter after FS Grifols application than after MC application. Differences were statistically significant in favor of FS Grifols for each TTH category and for the overall comparison (p &lt;0.001) as well as for each TTH category (cumulative) and for treatment failure (p =0.016). Overall AE experience and types of AEs reported were those expected in this patient population and were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The most frequently reported AE were procedural pain (59.9% and 69.2% of patients in the FS Grifols [n=72+111] and MC [n=57] groups, respectively) and nausea (23.5% and 19.2% of patients, respectively). Conclusion FS Grifols was efficacious and safe as an adjunct to anastomotic hemostasis in patients undergoing arterial surgery using prosthetic material with mild to moderate bleeding.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Hemostasis - drug effects</subject><subject>Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemostatics - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemostatics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVigu2TRBDs_jiMhpKriT6rEAlhbHudm6pDEg689Ungf3hNH07JgwcZe-Jxj-3w3y15yVnDGxZux0Cc6FCXjbcFEwerqUbbjgjd509Xt42zHZMfyhnXiIntGNDLGS1nLp9lFKUXdiorvst_XcPSOjmiCPeEVeL30bra_sL-COU7BGlwCejCTXazREwRv0-oWCHcIpAcMKyQP4DCkc7OCG0CDR92veXB5JITB7r1dgFBPegmgKRlA92NcTIDg4A5nR0GTJehjUh7gpMnESXug6A_o1-fZk0FPhC_u98vs-4f3324-5bdfPn6-ub7NTS15yLFuGe94ZTqju1piWzWNNHXVtNiIEnmr-0ZwrusO28G0vWgkE_t9JdDodkBdXWavz7mpk58RKajZksEpvRtdJLWFy4qzRiZpeZaaVB95HNTR21n7VXGmNjxqVBseteFRTKiEJ5le3efH_Yz9X8sDjyR4exZg-uXJoldkLC4Ge-sTItU7-__8d__YH7j9wBVpdNEvqT_FFZWKqa_bgGzzwbe7meDVH_TxuSk</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Chetter, Ian</creator><creator>Stansby, Gerard</creator><creator>Sarralde, José Aurelio</creator><creator>Riambau, Vicente</creator><creator>Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio</creator><creator>MacKenzie, Kent</creator><creator>Acín, Francisco</creator><creator>Navarro-Puerto, Jordi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-use fibrin sealant as an adjunct to hemostasis during vascular surgery</title><author>Chetter, Ian ; Stansby, Gerard ; Sarralde, José Aurelio ; Riambau, Vicente ; Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio ; MacKenzie, Kent ; Acín, Francisco ; Navarro-Puerto, Jordi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e4701913c9ca948e73558c4357e562e17ad5611a49e7fc7d65806bb36eca7fea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Hemostasis - drug effects</topic><topic>Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemostatics - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemostatics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chetter, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stansby, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarralde, José Aurelio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riambau, Vicente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acín, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro-Puerto, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Investigators of the Fibrin Sealant Grifols Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chetter, Ian</au><au>Stansby, Gerard</au><au>Sarralde, José Aurelio</au><au>Riambau, Vicente</au><au>Giménez-Gaibar, Antonio</au><au>MacKenzie, Kent</au><au>Acín, Francisco</au><au>Navarro-Puerto, Jordi</au><aucorp>Investigators of the Fibrin Sealant Grifols Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-use fibrin sealant as an adjunct to hemostasis during vascular surgery</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><spage>127</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>127-137</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Anastomotic or “stitch hole” bleeding is common during vascular surgery with synthetic material such as Dacron or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Hemostatic adjuncts such as fibrin sealant (FS) may reduce blood loss and operating time in such circumstances. We evaluated the safety and the hemostatic effectiveness of a ready-to-use human plasma-derived FS in vascular surgery. Methods Patients with mild / moderate suture line bleeding during elective, open, vascular surgery using synthetic grafts or patches were studied. In an initial Exploratory Study all patients were treated with FS Grifols, and in a subsequent Primary Study were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to FS Grifols or manual compression (MC). The primary efficacy endpoint was time to hemostasis (TTH), assessed at defined intervals from the start of treatment application, during a 10-minute observational period. Safety endpoints (in Exploratory+Primary Studies) included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical assessments, common clinical laboratory tests (coagulation; complete blood count; serum clinical chemistry parameters; microscopic urinalysis), viral markers, and immunogenicity. Results In the Primary Study the proportion of patients who achieved hemostasis at the 3 minute time point was higher in FS Grifols group (46.4%; n=51/110) than in MC group (26.3%; n=15/57) (P&lt;0.05). The benefit was maintained at successive time intervals: 69 FS Grifols patients (62.7%) and 18 MC patients (31.6%) at 4 min; 82 FS Grifols patients (74.5%) and 28 MC patients (49.1%) at 5 min. The differences between the groups persisted for TTH ≤7 minutes and TTH ≤10 minutes. Treatment failure was reported for 13 FS Grifols patients (11.8%) and 16 MC patients (28.1%).TTH was shorter after FS Grifols application than after MC application. Differences were statistically significant in favor of FS Grifols for each TTH category and for the overall comparison (p &lt;0.001) as well as for each TTH category (cumulative) and for treatment failure (p =0.016). Overall AE experience and types of AEs reported were those expected in this patient population and were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The most frequently reported AE were procedural pain (59.9% and 69.2% of patients in the FS Grifols [n=72+111] and MC [n=57] groups, respectively) and nausea (23.5% and 19.2% of patients, respectively). Conclusion FS Grifols was efficacious and safe as an adjunct to anastomotic hemostasis in patients undergoing arterial surgery using prosthetic material with mild to moderate bleeding.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28647631</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.043</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2017-11, Vol.45, p.127-137
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913831058
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Loss, Surgical - prevention & control
Canada
Female
Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - adverse effects
Fibrin Tissue Adhesive - therapeutic use
Hemostasis - drug effects
Hemostatic Techniques - adverse effects
Hemostatics - adverse effects
Hemostatics - therapeutic use
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Spain
Surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
title A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of a ready-to-use fibrin sealant as an adjunct to hemostasis during vascular surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A23%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective,%20randomized,%20multicenter%20clinical%20trial%20on%20the%20safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20a%20ready-to-use%20fibrin%20sealant%20as%20an%20adjunct%20to%20hemostasis%20during%20vascular%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Chetter,%20Ian&rft.aucorp=Investigators%20of%20the%20Fibrin%20Sealant%20Grifols%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=127-137&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1913831058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1913831058&rft_id=info:pmid/28647631&rft_els_id=S0890509616313061&rfr_iscdi=true