Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways

In the past decade, a new field has formed to investigate the concept of mind-wandering, or task-unrelated thought. The state of mind-wandering is typically contrasted with being on-task, or paying attention to the task at hand, and is related to decrements in performance on cognitive tasks. The mos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavior Research Methods 2018-04, Vol.50 (2), p.642-661
1. Verfasser: Weinstein, Yana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 661
container_issue 2
container_start_page 642
container_title Behavior Research Methods
container_volume 50
creator Weinstein, Yana
description In the past decade, a new field has formed to investigate the concept of mind-wandering, or task-unrelated thought. The state of mind-wandering is typically contrasted with being on-task, or paying attention to the task at hand, and is related to decrements in performance on cognitive tasks. The most widely used method for collecting mind-wandering data—the probe-caught method—involves stopping participants during a task and asking them where their attention is directed. In this review, 145 studies from 105 articles published between 2005 and 2015 were classified according to the framing and wording of the thought probe and response options. Five distinct methodologies were identified: neutral (in which counterbalancing was used to equally emphasize on-task and off-task states), dichotomous (say “yes” or “no” to one thought state), dichotomous (choose between two thought states), categorical, and scale. The review identifies at least 69 different methodological variants, catalogues the verbatim probes and response options used in each study, and suggests important considerations for future empirical work.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913399746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714174141</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714174141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-cd7103e69e223d75aff32f09804f46ce016ec658c9772c79bf013d34c68bb4da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9P3DAQxS1UxMLCB-BS-dhDs_hfYvtUIVRgpa24wNly7DEbtIm3dqIV375eBaqeqpE8I7_3RqMfQteUrLis1U2mXDBVESorojSt9Ak6p3UtKl4z9eWfeYEucn4jhCtGxRlaMNUIXtRz9PirG3x1sIOH1A2v3_E2HrCPeI17sHlKgMctAD504xbvU2wh_8AbGIuKXZyG8Sjjg33Pl-g02F2Gq4--RC_3P5_vHqvN08P67nZTOVGLsXJeUsKh0cAY97K2IXAWiFZEBNE4ILQB19TKaSmZk7oNhHLPhWtU2wpv-RJ9m_eWa35PkEfTd9nBbmcHiFM2VFPOtZaiKdbVbH21OzDdEOKYrCvloe9cHCB05f9WUkGlKE8J0DngUsw5QTD71PU2vRtKzJG4mYmbQtwciRtdMl8_7pnaHvzfxCfiYmCzIe-PhCGZtziloTD6z9Y_X6uJ0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1913399746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Weinstein, Yana</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Yana</creatorcontrib><description>In the past decade, a new field has formed to investigate the concept of mind-wandering, or task-unrelated thought. The state of mind-wandering is typically contrasted with being on-task, or paying attention to the task at hand, and is related to decrements in performance on cognitive tasks. The most widely used method for collecting mind-wandering data—the probe-caught method—involves stopping participants during a task and asking them where their attention is directed. In this review, 145 studies from 105 articles published between 2005 and 2015 were classified according to the framing and wording of the thought probe and response options. Five distinct methodologies were identified: neutral (in which counterbalancing was used to equally emphasize on-task and off-task states), dichotomous (say “yes” or “no” to one thought state), dichotomous (choose between two thought states), categorical, and scale. The review identifies at least 69 different methodological variants, catalogues the verbatim probes and response options used in each study, and suggests important considerations for future empirical work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-3528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28643155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Attention - physiology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Data Collection - methods ; Humans ; Psychology ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Thinking</subject><ispartof>Behavior Research Methods, 2018-04, Vol.50 (2), p.642-661</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-cd7103e69e223d75aff32f09804f46ce016ec658c9772c79bf013d34c68bb4da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-cd7103e69e223d75aff32f09804f46ce016ec658c9772c79bf013d34c68bb4da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Yana</creatorcontrib><title>Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways</title><title>Behavior Research Methods</title><addtitle>Behav Res</addtitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><description>In the past decade, a new field has formed to investigate the concept of mind-wandering, or task-unrelated thought. The state of mind-wandering is typically contrasted with being on-task, or paying attention to the task at hand, and is related to decrements in performance on cognitive tasks. The most widely used method for collecting mind-wandering data—the probe-caught method—involves stopping participants during a task and asking them where their attention is directed. In this review, 145 studies from 105 articles published between 2005 and 2015 were classified according to the framing and wording of the thought probe and response options. Five distinct methodologies were identified: neutral (in which counterbalancing was used to equally emphasize on-task and off-task states), dichotomous (say “yes” or “no” to one thought state), dichotomous (choose between two thought states), categorical, and scale. The review identifies at least 69 different methodological variants, catalogues the verbatim probes and response options used in each study, and suggests important considerations for future empirical work.</description><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><issn>1554-3528</issn><issn>1554-3528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9P3DAQxS1UxMLCB-BS-dhDs_hfYvtUIVRgpa24wNly7DEbtIm3dqIV375eBaqeqpE8I7_3RqMfQteUrLis1U2mXDBVESorojSt9Ak6p3UtKl4z9eWfeYEucn4jhCtGxRlaMNUIXtRz9PirG3x1sIOH1A2v3_E2HrCPeI17sHlKgMctAD504xbvU2wh_8AbGIuKXZyG8Sjjg33Pl-g02F2Gq4--RC_3P5_vHqvN08P67nZTOVGLsXJeUsKh0cAY97K2IXAWiFZEBNE4ILQB19TKaSmZk7oNhHLPhWtU2wpv-RJ9m_eWa35PkEfTd9nBbmcHiFM2VFPOtZaiKdbVbH21OzDdEOKYrCvloe9cHCB05f9WUkGlKE8J0DngUsw5QTD71PU2vRtKzJG4mYmbQtwciRtdMl8_7pnaHvzfxCfiYmCzIe-PhCGZtziloTD6z9Y_X6uJ0g</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Weinstein, Yana</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways</title><author>Weinstein, Yana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-cd7103e69e223d75aff32f09804f46ce016ec658c9772c79bf013d34c68bb4da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Yana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavior Research Methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinstein, Yana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways</atitle><jtitle>Behavior Research Methods</jtitle><stitle>Behav Res</stitle><addtitle>Behav Res Methods</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>642</spage><epage>661</epage><pages>642-661</pages><issn>1554-3528</issn><eissn>1554-3528</eissn><abstract>In the past decade, a new field has formed to investigate the concept of mind-wandering, or task-unrelated thought. The state of mind-wandering is typically contrasted with being on-task, or paying attention to the task at hand, and is related to decrements in performance on cognitive tasks. The most widely used method for collecting mind-wandering data—the probe-caught method—involves stopping participants during a task and asking them where their attention is directed. In this review, 145 studies from 105 articles published between 2005 and 2015 were classified according to the framing and wording of the thought probe and response options. Five distinct methodologies were identified: neutral (in which counterbalancing was used to equally emphasize on-task and off-task states), dichotomous (say “yes” or “no” to one thought state), dichotomous (choose between two thought states), categorical, and scale. The review identifies at least 69 different methodological variants, catalogues the verbatim probes and response options used in each study, and suggests important considerations for future empirical work.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28643155</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1554-3528
ispartof Behavior Research Methods, 2018-04, Vol.50 (2), p.642-661
issn 1554-3528
1554-3528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913399746
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Attention - physiology
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Data Collection - methods
Humans
Psychology
Task Performance and Analysis
Thinking
title Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mind-wandering,%20how%20do%20I%20measure%20thee%20with%20probes?%20Let%20me%20count%20the%20ways&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20Research%20Methods&rft.au=Weinstein,%20Yana&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=642&rft.epage=661&rft.pages=642-661&rft.issn=1554-3528&rft.eissn=1554-3528&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714174141%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1913399746&rft_id=info:pmid/28643155&rft_galeid=A714174141&rfr_iscdi=true