Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases

Abstract Introduction The conservative surgery is more and more indicated for breast cancer. However, we still fear local recurrence which is mostly due to residual tumors?. Several techniques have been used to minimize theses residual tumors; one of them is the systematic circumferential tumor cavi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast (Edinburgh) 2017-10, Vol.35, p.27-31
Hauptverfasser: Bouzaiene, H, Triki, A, Ghalleb, M, Chemlali, M, Benzarti, Z, Ben Hassouna, J, Gammoudi, A, Rahal, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue
container_start_page 27
container_title Breast (Edinburgh)
container_volume 35
creator Bouzaiene, H
Triki, A
Ghalleb, M
Chemlali, M
Benzarti, Z
Ben Hassouna, J
Gammoudi, A
Rahal, K
description Abstract Introduction The conservative surgery is more and more indicated for breast cancer. However, we still fear local recurrence which is mostly due to residual tumors?. Several techniques have been used to minimize theses residual tumors; one of them is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving (SCTCS). Methods We sampled 75 female patients who had conservative surgery with positive shaved margins in the anatomopathology examination and to whom a complementary treatment with mastectomy have been decided. Results The median age was 48 years old. The median tumor size was 23 mm. In the histological examination of the tumors, 93% were invasive ductal carcinoma associated in 50% of the cases to the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where all the lumpectomies had clear margin. For the SCTCS, 62,2% were DCIS and in 17,6% of the cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. A complementary treatment with mastectomy was indicated to all the patients. A residual tumor was detected in the remaining mammary gland in 47,7% of the cases out of which 50% were DCIS. Local recurrence happened in three patients (4,6%) after a median of follow up of 36 months. The overall survival and the disease free survival at five years were respectively 83,6% and 75,5%. Conclusion Standardized lumpectomy cavity shaving provides a backup to lumpectomy margins in conservative breast surgery but it can also be used as a sample for the remaining breast, helping to detect the residual tumor, and decreasing the rates of local recurrence after BCT.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913394879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960977617304691</els_id><sourcerecordid>1913394879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-bf17740d8d629398b6151e214e81b0d6a597e3faeb521e393bbae6a681bea8143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5eEcZzY8QVUVXxUqsQBOFuOM2m95GPxOCvtpb8dR1s4cOE0Bz_zjucZxl4LKAUI9W5fdhEdpbICoUtQJUD7hO1EI6tCQgtP2Q6MgsJorS7YC6I9ABip2ufsompVXRtT79jDDfF0j5xOlHByKXjuQ_TrNGDEOQU38rROS-TeHUM6cbrPdb7jjkc8RKTM5KZjDnDTYUQ-ZHTLizkszBs5uWly8cTvRjf3H_hVt6yJ6yYHEtJL9mxwI-Grx3rJfnz6-P36S3H79fPN9dVt4aVSqegGoXUNfdurykjTdko0AitRYys66JVrjEY5OOyaSqA0suscKqfyK7pW1PKSvT3nHuLya0VKdgrkccx_wmUlK4yQ0tStNhmtz6iPC1HEwR5i2DawAuxm3u7t2bzdzFtQNpvPbW8eJ6zdhP3fpj-qM_D-DGDe8xgwWvIBZ499iOiT7Zfwvwn_BvgxK_Zu_IknpP2yxjk7tMJSZcF-266_HV9oCbXKC_4GZtOtgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1913394879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bouzaiene, H ; Triki, A ; Ghalleb, M ; Chemlali, M ; Benzarti, Z ; Ben Hassouna, J ; Gammoudi, A ; Rahal, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouzaiene, H ; Triki, A ; Ghalleb, M ; Chemlali, M ; Benzarti, Z ; Ben Hassouna, J ; Gammoudi, A ; Rahal, K</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction The conservative surgery is more and more indicated for breast cancer. However, we still fear local recurrence which is mostly due to residual tumors?. Several techniques have been used to minimize theses residual tumors; one of them is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving (SCTCS). Methods We sampled 75 female patients who had conservative surgery with positive shaved margins in the anatomopathology examination and to whom a complementary treatment with mastectomy have been decided. Results The median age was 48 years old. The median tumor size was 23 mm. In the histological examination of the tumors, 93% were invasive ductal carcinoma associated in 50% of the cases to the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where all the lumpectomies had clear margin. For the SCTCS, 62,2% were DCIS and in 17,6% of the cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. A complementary treatment with mastectomy was indicated to all the patients. A residual tumor was detected in the remaining mammary gland in 47,7% of the cases out of which 50% were DCIS. Local recurrence happened in three patients (4,6%) after a median of follow up of 36 months. The overall survival and the disease free survival at five years were respectively 83,6% and 75,5%. Conclusion Standardized lumpectomy cavity shaving provides a backup to lumpectomy margins in conservative breast surgery but it can also be used as a sample for the remaining breast, helping to detect the residual tumor, and decreasing the rates of local recurrence after BCT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28644994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery ; Conservative treatment ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Lumpectomy shaving ; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm, Residual - pathology ; Neoplasm, Residual - surgery ; Organ Sparing Treatments - methods ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2017-10, Vol.35, p.27-31</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-bf17740d8d629398b6151e214e81b0d6a597e3faeb521e393bbae6a681bea8143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977617304691$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28644994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouzaiene, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triki, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghalleb, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chemlali, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzarti, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Hassouna, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gammoudi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahal, K</creatorcontrib><title>Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction The conservative surgery is more and more indicated for breast cancer. However, we still fear local recurrence which is mostly due to residual tumors?. Several techniques have been used to minimize theses residual tumors; one of them is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving (SCTCS). Methods We sampled 75 female patients who had conservative surgery with positive shaved margins in the anatomopathology examination and to whom a complementary treatment with mastectomy have been decided. Results The median age was 48 years old. The median tumor size was 23 mm. In the histological examination of the tumors, 93% were invasive ductal carcinoma associated in 50% of the cases to the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where all the lumpectomies had clear margin. For the SCTCS, 62,2% were DCIS and in 17,6% of the cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. A complementary treatment with mastectomy was indicated to all the patients. A residual tumor was detected in the remaining mammary gland in 47,7% of the cases out of which 50% were DCIS. Local recurrence happened in three patients (4,6%) after a median of follow up of 36 months. The overall survival and the disease free survival at five years were respectively 83,6% and 75,5%. Conclusion Standardized lumpectomy cavity shaving provides a backup to lumpectomy margins in conservative breast surgery but it can also be used as a sample for the remaining breast, helping to detect the residual tumor, and decreasing the rates of local recurrence after BCT.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</subject><subject>Conservative treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumpectomy shaving</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - surgery</subject><subject>Organ Sparing Treatments - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5eEcZzY8QVUVXxUqsQBOFuOM2m95GPxOCvtpb8dR1s4cOE0Bz_zjucZxl4LKAUI9W5fdhEdpbICoUtQJUD7hO1EI6tCQgtP2Q6MgsJorS7YC6I9ABip2ufsompVXRtT79jDDfF0j5xOlHByKXjuQ_TrNGDEOQU38rROS-TeHUM6cbrPdb7jjkc8RKTM5KZjDnDTYUQ-ZHTLizkszBs5uWly8cTvRjf3H_hVt6yJ6yYHEtJL9mxwI-Grx3rJfnz6-P36S3H79fPN9dVt4aVSqegGoXUNfdurykjTdko0AitRYys66JVrjEY5OOyaSqA0suscKqfyK7pW1PKSvT3nHuLya0VKdgrkccx_wmUlK4yQ0tStNhmtz6iPC1HEwR5i2DawAuxm3u7t2bzdzFtQNpvPbW8eJ6zdhP3fpj-qM_D-DGDe8xgwWvIBZ499iOiT7Zfwvwn_BvgxK_Zu_IknpP2yxjk7tMJSZcF-266_HV9oCbXKC_4GZtOtgw</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Bouzaiene, H</creator><creator>Triki, A</creator><creator>Ghalleb, M</creator><creator>Chemlali, M</creator><creator>Benzarti, Z</creator><creator>Ben Hassouna, J</creator><creator>Gammoudi, A</creator><creator>Rahal, K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases</title><author>Bouzaiene, H ; Triki, A ; Ghalleb, M ; Chemlali, M ; Benzarti, Z ; Ben Hassouna, J ; Gammoudi, A ; Rahal, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-bf17740d8d629398b6151e214e81b0d6a597e3faeb521e393bbae6a681bea8143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</topic><topic>Conservative treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumpectomy shaving</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - surgery</topic><topic>Organ Sparing Treatments - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouzaiene, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triki, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghalleb, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chemlali, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzarti, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Hassouna, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gammoudi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahal, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouzaiene, H</au><au>Triki, A</au><au>Ghalleb, M</au><au>Chemlali, M</au><au>Benzarti, Z</au><au>Ben Hassouna, J</au><au>Gammoudi, A</au><au>Rahal, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><spage>27</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>27-31</pages><issn>0960-9776</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction The conservative surgery is more and more indicated for breast cancer. However, we still fear local recurrence which is mostly due to residual tumors?. Several techniques have been used to minimize theses residual tumors; one of them is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving (SCTCS). Methods We sampled 75 female patients who had conservative surgery with positive shaved margins in the anatomopathology examination and to whom a complementary treatment with mastectomy have been decided. Results The median age was 48 years old. The median tumor size was 23 mm. In the histological examination of the tumors, 93% were invasive ductal carcinoma associated in 50% of the cases to the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where all the lumpectomies had clear margin. For the SCTCS, 62,2% were DCIS and in 17,6% of the cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. A complementary treatment with mastectomy was indicated to all the patients. A residual tumor was detected in the remaining mammary gland in 47,7% of the cases out of which 50% were DCIS. Local recurrence happened in three patients (4,6%) after a median of follow up of 36 months. The overall survival and the disease free survival at five years were respectively 83,6% and 75,5%. Conclusion Standardized lumpectomy cavity shaving provides a backup to lumpectomy margins in conservative breast surgery but it can also be used as a sample for the remaining breast, helping to detect the residual tumor, and decreasing the rates of local recurrence after BCT.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28644994</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-9776
ispartof Breast (Edinburgh), 2017-10, Vol.35, p.27-31
issn 0960-9776
1532-3080
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913394879
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery
Conservative treatment
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Lumpectomy shaving
Mastectomy, Segmental - methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasm, Residual - pathology
Neoplasm, Residual - surgery
Organ Sparing Treatments - methods
Surgery
title Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T10%3A54%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20systematic%20circumferential%20tumor%20cavity%20shaving%20a%20representative%20sample%20for%20the%20remaining%20mammary%20gland?%20About%2075%20cases&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Bouzaiene,%20H&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=27-31&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1913394879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1913394879&rft_id=info:pmid/28644994&rft_els_id=S0960977617304691&rfr_iscdi=true