Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children
Background The clinical application of the multi-echo, multi-delay technique of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates multiple sequences in a single acquisition but has mainly been used in adults. Objective To evaluate the image quality of synthetic brain MR in children compared with...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric radiology 2017-11, Vol.47 (12), p.1638-1647 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1647 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1638 |
| container_title | Pediatric radiology |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Lee, So Mi Choi, Young Hun Cheon, Jung-Eun Kim, In-One Cho, Seung Hyun Kim, Won Hwa Kim, Hye Jung Cho, Hyun-Hae You, Sun-Kyoung Park, Sook-Hyun Hwang, Moon Jung |
| description | Background
The clinical application of the multi-echo, multi-delay technique of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates multiple sequences in a single acquisition but has mainly been used in adults.
Objective
To evaluate the image quality of synthetic brain MR in children compared with that of conventional images.
Materials and methods
Twenty-nine children (median age: 6 years, range: 0–16 years) underwent synthetic and conventional imaging. Synthetic (T2-weighted, T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) images with settings matching those of the conventional images were generated. The overall image quality, gray/white matter differentiation, lesion conspicuity and image degradations were rated on a 5-point scale. The relative contrasts were assessed quantitatively and acquisition times for the two imaging techniques were compared.
Results
Synthetic images were inferior due to more pronounced image degradations; however, there were no significant differences for T1- and T2-weighted images in children |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912613954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912613954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a6a555bb13cc6c375fa716edac5d0a8b4a3cf19f4c34d6d0c99acfa927b99fd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EoqXwA1iQJRYWgy-2k3hEFRSkSiwwW47jtKlSp7WTIf8elxSEkJis8_vu3d1D6BroPVCaPQRKE54RChlhEhgZTtAUOEsISJmfoillFAjlXE7QRQgbSikTwM7RJMlTlss8maLF61avLN73uqm7AesOh8F1a9vVBhde1w5H3X2V3obWaWcsruNf7VY4qmZdN6W37hKdVboJ9ur4ztDH89P7_IUs3xav88clMZzlHdGpFkIUBTBjUsMyUekMUltqI0qq84JrZiqQFTeMl2lJjZTaVFomWSFlVQKbobvRd-fbfW9Dp7Z1MLZptLNtHxRISFJgUvCI3v5BN23vXdwuUiJL87jJwRBGyvg2BG8rtfPxPj8ooOqQshpTVjFldUhZDbHn5ujcF1tb_nR8xxqBZARClNzK-l-j_3X9BOVkiIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957685551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lee, So Mi ; Choi, Young Hun ; Cheon, Jung-Eun ; Kim, In-One ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung ; Cho, Hyun-Hae ; You, Sun-Kyoung ; Park, Sook-Hyun ; Hwang, Moon Jung</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, So Mi ; Choi, Young Hun ; Cheon, Jung-Eun ; Kim, In-One ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung ; Cho, Hyun-Hae ; You, Sun-Kyoung ; Park, Sook-Hyun ; Hwang, Moon Jung</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The clinical application of the multi-echo, multi-delay technique of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates multiple sequences in a single acquisition but has mainly been used in adults.
Objective
To evaluate the image quality of synthetic brain MR in children compared with that of conventional images.
Materials and methods
Twenty-nine children (median age: 6 years, range: 0–16 years) underwent synthetic and conventional imaging. Synthetic (T2-weighted, T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) images with settings matching those of the conventional images were generated. The overall image quality, gray/white matter differentiation, lesion conspicuity and image degradations were rated on a 5-point scale. The relative contrasts were assessed quantitatively and acquisition times for the two imaging techniques were compared.
Results
Synthetic images were inferior due to more pronounced image degradations; however, there were no significant differences for T1- and T2-weighted images in children <2 years old. The quality of T1- and T2-weighted images were within the diagnostically acceptable range. FLAIR images showed greatly reduced quality. Gray/white matter differentiation was comparable or better in synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images, but poorer in FLAIR images. There was no effect on lesion conspicuity. Synthetic images had equal or greater relative contrast. Acquisition time was approximately two-thirds of that for conventional sequences.
Conclusion
Synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images were diagnostically acceptable, but synthetic FLAIR images were not. Lesion conspicuity and gray/white matter differentiation were comparable to conventional MRI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28638982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adults ; Brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Conspicuity ; Differentiation ; Female ; Humans ; Image acquisition ; Image contrast ; Image degradation ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Image quality ; Imaging ; Imaging techniques ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neuroimaging ; Neuroradiology ; Newborn babies ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pediatrics ; Prospective Studies ; Quality ; Radiology ; Resonance ; Substantia alba ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Pediatric radiology, 2017-11, Vol.47 (12), p.1638-1647</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>Pediatric Radiology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a6a555bb13cc6c375fa716edac5d0a8b4a3cf19f4c34d6d0c99acfa927b99fd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a6a555bb13cc6c375fa716edac5d0a8b4a3cf19f4c34d6d0c99acfa927b99fd13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1842-9062</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28638982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, So Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Jung-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, In-One</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hyun-Hae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Sun-Kyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sook-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Moon Jung</creatorcontrib><title>Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children</title><title>Pediatric radiology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><description>Background
The clinical application of the multi-echo, multi-delay technique of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates multiple sequences in a single acquisition but has mainly been used in adults.
Objective
To evaluate the image quality of synthetic brain MR in children compared with that of conventional images.
Materials and methods
Twenty-nine children (median age: 6 years, range: 0–16 years) underwent synthetic and conventional imaging. Synthetic (T2-weighted, T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) images with settings matching those of the conventional images were generated. The overall image quality, gray/white matter differentiation, lesion conspicuity and image degradations were rated on a 5-point scale. The relative contrasts were assessed quantitatively and acquisition times for the two imaging techniques were compared.
Results
Synthetic images were inferior due to more pronounced image degradations; however, there were no significant differences for T1- and T2-weighted images in children <2 years old. The quality of T1- and T2-weighted images were within the diagnostically acceptable range. FLAIR images showed greatly reduced quality. Gray/white matter differentiation was comparable or better in synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images, but poorer in FLAIR images. There was no effect on lesion conspicuity. Synthetic images had equal or greater relative contrast. Acquisition time was approximately two-thirds of that for conventional sequences.
Conclusion
Synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images were diagnostically acceptable, but synthetic FLAIR images were not. Lesion conspicuity and gray/white matter differentiation were comparable to conventional MRI.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Conspicuity</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image degradation</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Resonance</subject><subject>Substantia alba</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0301-0449</issn><issn>1432-1998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EoqXwA1iQJRYWgy-2k3hEFRSkSiwwW47jtKlSp7WTIf8elxSEkJis8_vu3d1D6BroPVCaPQRKE54RChlhEhgZTtAUOEsISJmfoillFAjlXE7QRQgbSikTwM7RJMlTlss8maLF61avLN73uqm7AesOh8F1a9vVBhde1w5H3X2V3obWaWcsruNf7VY4qmZdN6W37hKdVboJ9ur4ztDH89P7_IUs3xav88clMZzlHdGpFkIUBTBjUsMyUekMUltqI0qq84JrZiqQFTeMl2lJjZTaVFomWSFlVQKbobvRd-fbfW9Dp7Z1MLZptLNtHxRISFJgUvCI3v5BN23vXdwuUiJL87jJwRBGyvg2BG8rtfPxPj8ooOqQshpTVjFldUhZDbHn5ujcF1tb_nR8xxqBZARClNzK-l-j_3X9BOVkiIQ</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Lee, So Mi</creator><creator>Choi, Young Hun</creator><creator>Cheon, Jung-Eun</creator><creator>Kim, In-One</creator><creator>Cho, Seung Hyun</creator><creator>Kim, Won Hwa</creator><creator>Kim, Hye Jung</creator><creator>Cho, Hyun-Hae</creator><creator>You, Sun-Kyoung</creator><creator>Park, Sook-Hyun</creator><creator>Hwang, Moon Jung</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-9062</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children</title><author>Lee, So Mi ; Choi, Young Hun ; Cheon, Jung-Eun ; Kim, In-One ; Cho, Seung Hyun ; Kim, Won Hwa ; Kim, Hye Jung ; Cho, Hyun-Hae ; You, Sun-Kyoung ; Park, Sook-Hyun ; Hwang, Moon Jung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a6a555bb13cc6c375fa716edac5d0a8b4a3cf19f4c34d6d0c99acfa927b99fd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Conspicuity</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image degradation</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Resonance</topic><topic>Substantia alba</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, So Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Jung-Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, In-One</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Seung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hye Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Hyun-Hae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Sun-Kyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Sook-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Moon Jung</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, So Mi</au><au>Choi, Young Hun</au><au>Cheon, Jung-Eun</au><au>Kim, In-One</au><au>Cho, Seung Hyun</au><au>Kim, Won Hwa</au><au>Kim, Hye Jung</au><au>Cho, Hyun-Hae</au><au>You, Sun-Kyoung</au><au>Park, Sook-Hyun</au><au>Hwang, Moon Jung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric radiology</jtitle><stitle>Pediatr Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Pediatr Radiol</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1638</spage><epage>1647</epage><pages>1638-1647</pages><issn>0301-0449</issn><eissn>1432-1998</eissn><abstract>Background
The clinical application of the multi-echo, multi-delay technique of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) generates multiple sequences in a single acquisition but has mainly been used in adults.
Objective
To evaluate the image quality of synthetic brain MR in children compared with that of conventional images.
Materials and methods
Twenty-nine children (median age: 6 years, range: 0–16 years) underwent synthetic and conventional imaging. Synthetic (T2-weighted, T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]) images with settings matching those of the conventional images were generated. The overall image quality, gray/white matter differentiation, lesion conspicuity and image degradations were rated on a 5-point scale. The relative contrasts were assessed quantitatively and acquisition times for the two imaging techniques were compared.
Results
Synthetic images were inferior due to more pronounced image degradations; however, there were no significant differences for T1- and T2-weighted images in children <2 years old. The quality of T1- and T2-weighted images were within the diagnostically acceptable range. FLAIR images showed greatly reduced quality. Gray/white matter differentiation was comparable or better in synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images, but poorer in FLAIR images. There was no effect on lesion conspicuity. Synthetic images had equal or greater relative contrast. Acquisition time was approximately two-thirds of that for conventional sequences.
Conclusion
Synthetic T1- and T2-weighted images were diagnostically acceptable, but synthetic FLAIR images were not. Lesion conspicuity and gray/white matter differentiation were comparable to conventional MRI.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28638982</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-9062</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-0449 |
| ispartof | Pediatric radiology, 2017-11, Vol.47 (12), p.1638-1647 |
| issn | 0301-0449 1432-1998 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912613954 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adults Brain Brain - diagnostic imaging Child Child, Preschool Children Conspicuity Differentiation Female Humans Image acquisition Image contrast Image degradation Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Image quality Imaging Imaging techniques Infant Infant, Newborn Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neuroimaging Neuroradiology Newborn babies NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Nuclear Medicine Oncology Original Article Pediatrics Prospective Studies Quality Radiology Resonance Substantia alba Ultrasound |
| title | Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A59%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image%20quality%20at%20synthetic%20brain%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20radiology&rft.au=Lee,%20So%20Mi&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1638&rft.epage=1647&rft.pages=1638-1647&rft.issn=0301-0449&rft.eissn=1432-1998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912613954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957685551&rft_id=info:pmid/28638982&rfr_iscdi=true |