Stroke Volume Variation–Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure–Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND:We previously demonstrated the usefulness of milrinone for living donor hepatectomy. However, a less-invasive alternative to central venous catheterization and perioperative contributors to good surgical outcomes remain undetermined. The current study evaluated whether the stroke volume v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2017-08, Vol.125 (2), p.423-430
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jiwon, Kim, Won Ho, Ryu, Ho-Geol, Lee, Hyung-Chul, Chung, Eun-Jin, Yang, Seong-Mi, Jung, Chul-Woo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 430
container_issue 2
container_start_page 423
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 125
creator Lee, Jiwon
Kim, Won Ho
Ryu, Ho-Geol
Lee, Hyung-Chul
Chung, Eun-Jin
Yang, Seong-Mi
Jung, Chul-Woo
description BACKGROUND:We previously demonstrated the usefulness of milrinone for living donor hepatectomy. However, a less-invasive alternative to central venous catheterization and perioperative contributors to good surgical outcomes remain undetermined. The current study evaluated whether the stroke volume variation (SVV)–guided method can substitute central venous catheterization during milrinone-induced profound vasodilation. METHODS:We randomly assigned 42 living liver donors to receive either SVV guidance or central venous pressure (CVP) guidance to obtain milrinone-induced low CVP. Target SVV of 9% was used as a substitute for CVP of 5 mm Hg. The surgical field grade evaluated by 2 attending surgeons on a 4-point scale was compared between the CVP- and SVV-guided groups (n = 19, total number of scores = 38 per group) as a primary outcome variable. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with the best surgical field as a post hoc analysis. RESULTS:Surgical field grades, which were either 1 or 2, were not found to be different between the 2 groups via Mann-Whitney U test (P = .358). There was a very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation such as CVP ≤ 5 mm Hg (R = −0.06; 95% confidence interval, −0.09 to −0.04; P < .001). Additional post hoc analysis suggested that younger age, lower baseline CVP, and longer duration of milrinone infusion might be helpful in providing the best surgical field. CONCLUSIONS:Milrinone-induced vasodilation resulted in favorable surgical environment regardless of guidance methods of low CVP during living donor hepatectomy. However, SVV was not a useful indicator of low CVP because of very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation. In addition, factors contributing to the best surgical field such as donor age, proactive fasting, and proper dosing of milrinone need to be investigated further, ideally through prospective studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002197
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912195659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1912195659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-7fdcb4e570ba02da1489854476652fac7f85d5e179aa6c3a0ab6201982a97cfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAYtBCILoU3QMhHLmljJ7ZjbstuaZGWH0Epx8hxvrCmjr3YDqv2xDvwQLwLT4JXW36EBL6Mx5pv5rMGoYekPCKUVMfzlydH5R-HEiluoRlhlBeCyeY2muXXqqBSygN0L8aPmZKy4XfRAW14RVldzdC3tyn4S8AX3k5jBhWMSsa771--nk6mhx5fQIhTxAtwKSibqfOZvg4Q4xTgt27lt_8S4fcmrfELY4Nx3gFeTvnyAa_M5x0svfMBn8FGJdDJj1dP8By_Ua73o7nOxks_dRaKp9a4Xc4io9E55Dyvau-jO4OyER7c4CF69-zkfHFWrF6dPl_MV4WuGBeFGHrd1cBE2amS9orUjWxYXQvOGR2UFkPDegZESKW4rlSpOk5LIhuqpNBDVx2ix3vfTfCfJoipHU3UYK1ykL_aEplLkYwzmaX1XqqDjzHA0G6CGVW4aknZ7qprc3Xt39XlsUc3CVM3Qv9r6GdXWdDsBVtvUy7l0k5bCO0alE3r_3v_AG3jqqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912195659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stroke Volume Variation–Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure–Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lee, Jiwon ; Kim, Won Ho ; Ryu, Ho-Geol ; Lee, Hyung-Chul ; Chung, Eun-Jin ; Yang, Seong-Mi ; Jung, Chul-Woo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiwon ; Kim, Won Ho ; Ryu, Ho-Geol ; Lee, Hyung-Chul ; Chung, Eun-Jin ; Yang, Seong-Mi ; Jung, Chul-Woo</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:We previously demonstrated the usefulness of milrinone for living donor hepatectomy. However, a less-invasive alternative to central venous catheterization and perioperative contributors to good surgical outcomes remain undetermined. The current study evaluated whether the stroke volume variation (SVV)–guided method can substitute central venous catheterization during milrinone-induced profound vasodilation. METHODS:We randomly assigned 42 living liver donors to receive either SVV guidance or central venous pressure (CVP) guidance to obtain milrinone-induced low CVP. Target SVV of 9% was used as a substitute for CVP of 5 mm Hg. The surgical field grade evaluated by 2 attending surgeons on a 4-point scale was compared between the CVP- and SVV-guided groups (n = 19, total number of scores = 38 per group) as a primary outcome variable. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with the best surgical field as a post hoc analysis. RESULTS:Surgical field grades, which were either 1 or 2, were not found to be different between the 2 groups via Mann-Whitney U test (P = .358). There was a very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation such as CVP ≤ 5 mm Hg (R = −0.06; 95% confidence interval, −0.09 to −0.04; P &lt; .001). Additional post hoc analysis suggested that younger age, lower baseline CVP, and longer duration of milrinone infusion might be helpful in providing the best surgical field. CONCLUSIONS:Milrinone-induced vasodilation resulted in favorable surgical environment regardless of guidance methods of low CVP during living donor hepatectomy. However, SVV was not a useful indicator of low CVP because of very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation. In addition, factors contributing to the best surgical field such as donor age, proactive fasting, and proper dosing of milrinone need to be investigated further, ideally through prospective studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28632543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Catheterization ; Catheterization, Central Venous ; Central Venous Pressure - drug effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Liver - drug effects ; Living Donors ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Milrinone - administration &amp; dosage ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Multivariate Analysis ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Sample Size ; Stroke Volume - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2017-08, Vol.125 (2), p.423-430</ispartof><rights>2017 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-7fdcb4e570ba02da1489854476652fac7f85d5e179aa6c3a0ab6201982a97cfb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-7fdcb4e570ba02da1489854476652fac7f85d5e179aa6c3a0ab6201982a97cfb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28632543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Ho-Geol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyung-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Eun-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Seong-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Chul-Woo</creatorcontrib><title>Stroke Volume Variation–Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure–Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:We previously demonstrated the usefulness of milrinone for living donor hepatectomy. However, a less-invasive alternative to central venous catheterization and perioperative contributors to good surgical outcomes remain undetermined. The current study evaluated whether the stroke volume variation (SVV)–guided method can substitute central venous catheterization during milrinone-induced profound vasodilation. METHODS:We randomly assigned 42 living liver donors to receive either SVV guidance or central venous pressure (CVP) guidance to obtain milrinone-induced low CVP. Target SVV of 9% was used as a substitute for CVP of 5 mm Hg. The surgical field grade evaluated by 2 attending surgeons on a 4-point scale was compared between the CVP- and SVV-guided groups (n = 19, total number of scores = 38 per group) as a primary outcome variable. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with the best surgical field as a post hoc analysis. RESULTS:Surgical field grades, which were either 1 or 2, were not found to be different between the 2 groups via Mann-Whitney U test (P = .358). There was a very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation such as CVP ≤ 5 mm Hg (R = −0.06; 95% confidence interval, −0.09 to −0.04; P &lt; .001). Additional post hoc analysis suggested that younger age, lower baseline CVP, and longer duration of milrinone infusion might be helpful in providing the best surgical field. CONCLUSIONS:Milrinone-induced vasodilation resulted in favorable surgical environment regardless of guidance methods of low CVP during living donor hepatectomy. However, SVV was not a useful indicator of low CVP because of very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation. In addition, factors contributing to the best surgical field such as donor age, proactive fasting, and proper dosing of milrinone need to be investigated further, ideally through prospective studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous</subject><subject>Central Venous Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Liver - drug effects</subject><subject>Living Donors</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Milrinone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - drug effects</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAYtBCILoU3QMhHLmljJ7ZjbstuaZGWH0Epx8hxvrCmjr3YDqv2xDvwQLwLT4JXW36EBL6Mx5pv5rMGoYekPCKUVMfzlydH5R-HEiluoRlhlBeCyeY2muXXqqBSygN0L8aPmZKy4XfRAW14RVldzdC3tyn4S8AX3k5jBhWMSsa771--nk6mhx5fQIhTxAtwKSibqfOZvg4Q4xTgt27lt_8S4fcmrfELY4Nx3gFeTvnyAa_M5x0svfMBn8FGJdDJj1dP8By_Ua73o7nOxks_dRaKp9a4Xc4io9E55Dyvau-jO4OyER7c4CF69-zkfHFWrF6dPl_MV4WuGBeFGHrd1cBE2amS9orUjWxYXQvOGR2UFkPDegZESKW4rlSpOk5LIhuqpNBDVx2ix3vfTfCfJoipHU3UYK1ykL_aEplLkYwzmaX1XqqDjzHA0G6CGVW4aknZ7qprc3Xt39XlsUc3CVM3Qv9r6GdXWdDsBVtvUy7l0k5bCO0alE3r_3v_AG3jqqQ</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Lee, Jiwon</creator><creator>Kim, Won Ho</creator><creator>Ryu, Ho-Geol</creator><creator>Lee, Hyung-Chul</creator><creator>Chung, Eun-Jin</creator><creator>Yang, Seong-Mi</creator><creator>Jung, Chul-Woo</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Stroke Volume Variation–Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure–Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial</title><author>Lee, Jiwon ; Kim, Won Ho ; Ryu, Ho-Geol ; Lee, Hyung-Chul ; Chung, Eun-Jin ; Yang, Seong-Mi ; Jung, Chul-Woo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-7fdcb4e570ba02da1489854476652fac7f85d5e179aa6c3a0ab6201982a97cfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous</topic><topic>Central Venous Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Liver - drug effects</topic><topic>Living Donors</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Milrinone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Won Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Ho-Geol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyung-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Eun-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Seong-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Chul-Woo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jiwon</au><au>Kim, Won Ho</au><au>Ryu, Ho-Geol</au><au>Lee, Hyung-Chul</au><au>Chung, Eun-Jin</au><au>Yang, Seong-Mi</au><au>Jung, Chul-Woo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stroke Volume Variation–Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure–Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>423-430</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:We previously demonstrated the usefulness of milrinone for living donor hepatectomy. However, a less-invasive alternative to central venous catheterization and perioperative contributors to good surgical outcomes remain undetermined. The current study evaluated whether the stroke volume variation (SVV)–guided method can substitute central venous catheterization during milrinone-induced profound vasodilation. METHODS:We randomly assigned 42 living liver donors to receive either SVV guidance or central venous pressure (CVP) guidance to obtain milrinone-induced low CVP. Target SVV of 9% was used as a substitute for CVP of 5 mm Hg. The surgical field grade evaluated by 2 attending surgeons on a 4-point scale was compared between the CVP- and SVV-guided groups (n = 19, total number of scores = 38 per group) as a primary outcome variable. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with the best surgical field as a post hoc analysis. RESULTS:Surgical field grades, which were either 1 or 2, were not found to be different between the 2 groups via Mann-Whitney U test (P = .358). There was a very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation such as CVP ≤ 5 mm Hg (R = −0.06; 95% confidence interval, −0.09 to −0.04; P &lt; .001). Additional post hoc analysis suggested that younger age, lower baseline CVP, and longer duration of milrinone infusion might be helpful in providing the best surgical field. CONCLUSIONS:Milrinone-induced vasodilation resulted in favorable surgical environment regardless of guidance methods of low CVP during living donor hepatectomy. However, SVV was not a useful indicator of low CVP because of very weak correlation between SVV and CVP during profound vasodilation. In addition, factors contributing to the best surgical field such as donor age, proactive fasting, and proper dosing of milrinone need to be investigated further, ideally through prospective studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>28632543</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000002197</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2017-08, Vol.125 (2), p.423-430
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912195659
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Catheterization
Catheterization, Central Venous
Central Venous Pressure - drug effects
Double-Blind Method
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Linear Models
Liver - drug effects
Living Donors
Male
Middle Aged
Milrinone - administration & dosage
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
Multivariate Analysis
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Sample Size
Stroke Volume - drug effects
title Stroke Volume Variation–Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure–Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stroke%20Volume%20Variation%E2%80%93Guided%20Versus%20Central%20Venous%20Pressure%E2%80%93Guided%20Low%20Central%20Venous%20Pressure%20With%20Milrinone%20During%20Living%20Donor%20Hepatectomy:%20A%20Randomized%20Double-Blinded%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Lee,%20Jiwon&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=423-430&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912195659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912195659&rft_id=info:pmid/28632543&rfr_iscdi=true