Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation
ABSTRACT Background The Iowa Model is a widely used framework for the implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP). Changes in health care (e.g., emergence of implementation science, emphasis on patient engagement) prompted the re‐evaluation, revision, and validation of the model. Methods A syste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Worldviews on evidence-based nursing 2017-06, Vol.14 (3), p.175-182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Worldviews on evidence-based nursing |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Buckwalter, Kathleen C. Cullen, Laura Hanrahan, Kirsten Kleiber, Charmaine McCarthy, Ann Marie Rakel, Barbara Steelman, Victoria Tripp‐Reimer, Toni Tucker, Sharon |
description | ABSTRACT
Background
The Iowa Model is a widely used framework for the implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP). Changes in health care (e.g., emergence of implementation science, emphasis on patient engagement) prompted the re‐evaluation, revision, and validation of the model.
Methods
A systematic multi‐step process was used capturing information from the literature and user feedback via an electronic survey and live work groups. The Iowa Model Collaborative critically assessed and synthesized information and recommendations before revising the model.
Results
Survey participants (n = 431) had requested access to the Model between years 2001 and 2013. Eighty‐eight percent (n = 379) of participants reported using the Iowa Model and identified the most problematic steps as: topic priority, critique, pilot, and institute change. Users provided 587 comments with rich contextual rationale and insightful suggestions. The revised model was then evaluated by participants (n = 299) of the 22nd National EBP Conference in 2015. They validated the model as a practical tool for the EBP process across diverse settings. Specific changes in the model are discussed.
Conclusion
This user driven revision differs from other frameworks in that it links practice changes within the system. Major model changes are expansion of piloting, implementation, patient engagement, and sustaining change.
Linking Evidence to Action
The Iowa Model‐Revised remains an application‐oriented guide for the EBP process. Intended users are point of care clinicians who ask questions and seek a systematic, EBP approach to promote excellence in health care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/wvn.12223 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912194915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1920559959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-46a5b2e8f1e08eebd9a27d4313e7547bde74852a9fad842ab5b780fa941cc1063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFFurC19AAm50kXaumYy7WqoW6gXR6i5MZk4gJU1qpmnpzkfwGX0SR6suBGdz5sDHz-FH6JDgLvGvt1qWXUIpZVuoTSQnYSRjue3_gouQYPrcQnvOTTGmkaRsF7VoHDGqGGmj_qha6eC6slAEVRYMl7mF0sD769u5dmCDu1qbRW7gLLiHZe7yqnSBLm0w0UVu9cLv-2gn04WDg-_ZQY8Xw4fBVTi-vRwN-uPQMMVYyCMtUgpxRgDHAKlVmkrLGWEgBZepBcljQbXKtI051alIZYwzrTgxhuCIddDJJndeVy8NuEUyy52BotAlVI1LiCKUKK6I8PT4D51WTV3667yiWAilhPLqdKNMXTlXQ5bM63ym63VCcPLZa-J7Tb569fboO7FJZ2B_5U-RHvQ2YJUXsP4_KXma3GwiPwBF9YD1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920559959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Buckwalter, Kathleen C. ; Cullen, Laura ; Hanrahan, Kirsten ; Kleiber, Charmaine ; McCarthy, Ann Marie ; Rakel, Barbara ; Steelman, Victoria ; Tripp‐Reimer, Toni ; Tucker, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Buckwalter, Kathleen C. ; Cullen, Laura ; Hanrahan, Kirsten ; Kleiber, Charmaine ; McCarthy, Ann Marie ; Rakel, Barbara ; Steelman, Victoria ; Tripp‐Reimer, Toni ; Tucker, Sharon ; Iowa Model Collaborative ; Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative ; Iowa Model Collaborative ; Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Background
The Iowa Model is a widely used framework for the implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP). Changes in health care (e.g., emergence of implementation science, emphasis on patient engagement) prompted the re‐evaluation, revision, and validation of the model.
Methods
A systematic multi‐step process was used capturing information from the literature and user feedback via an electronic survey and live work groups. The Iowa Model Collaborative critically assessed and synthesized information and recommendations before revising the model.
Results
Survey participants (n = 431) had requested access to the Model between years 2001 and 2013. Eighty‐eight percent (n = 379) of participants reported using the Iowa Model and identified the most problematic steps as: topic priority, critique, pilot, and institute change. Users provided 587 comments with rich contextual rationale and insightful suggestions. The revised model was then evaluated by participants (n = 299) of the 22nd National EBP Conference in 2015. They validated the model as a practical tool for the EBP process across diverse settings. Specific changes in the model are discussed.
Conclusion
This user driven revision differs from other frameworks in that it links practice changes within the system. Major model changes are expansion of piloting, implementation, patient engagement, and sustaining change.
Linking Evidence to Action
The Iowa Model‐Revised remains an application‐oriented guide for the EBP process. Intended users are point of care clinicians who ask questions and seek a systematic, EBP approach to promote excellence in health care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-102X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12223</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28632931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>change ; Delivery of Health Care - standards ; evaluation ; Evidence-based medicine ; Evidence-based nursing ; Evidence-Based Practice - methods ; Evidence-Based Practice - standards ; evidence‐based practice ; Humans ; implementation ; Iowa ; Iowa Model ; Organizational Objectives ; Revisions ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; translation research ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2017-06, Vol.14 (3), p.175-182</ispartof><rights>2017 University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, © 2017 Sigma Theta Tau International</rights><rights>2017 University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing © 2017 Sigma Theta Tau International.</rights><rights>2017 Sigma Theta Tau International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-46a5b2e8f1e08eebd9a27d4313e7547bde74852a9fad842ab5b780fa941cc1063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-46a5b2e8f1e08eebd9a27d4313e7547bde74852a9fad842ab5b780fa941cc1063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwvn.12223$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwvn.12223$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28632931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buckwalter, Kathleen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanrahan, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiber, Charmaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakel, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steelman, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp‐Reimer, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><title>Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation</title><title>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing</title><addtitle>Worldviews Evid Based Nurs</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Background
The Iowa Model is a widely used framework for the implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP). Changes in health care (e.g., emergence of implementation science, emphasis on patient engagement) prompted the re‐evaluation, revision, and validation of the model.
Methods
A systematic multi‐step process was used capturing information from the literature and user feedback via an electronic survey and live work groups. The Iowa Model Collaborative critically assessed and synthesized information and recommendations before revising the model.
Results
Survey participants (n = 431) had requested access to the Model between years 2001 and 2013. Eighty‐eight percent (n = 379) of participants reported using the Iowa Model and identified the most problematic steps as: topic priority, critique, pilot, and institute change. Users provided 587 comments with rich contextual rationale and insightful suggestions. The revised model was then evaluated by participants (n = 299) of the 22nd National EBP Conference in 2015. They validated the model as a practical tool for the EBP process across diverse settings. Specific changes in the model are discussed.
Conclusion
This user driven revision differs from other frameworks in that it links practice changes within the system. Major model changes are expansion of piloting, implementation, patient engagement, and sustaining change.
Linking Evidence to Action
The Iowa Model‐Revised remains an application‐oriented guide for the EBP process. Intended users are point of care clinicians who ask questions and seek a systematic, EBP approach to promote excellence in health care.</description><subject>change</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - standards</subject><subject>evidence‐based practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implementation</subject><subject>Iowa</subject><subject>Iowa Model</subject><subject>Organizational Objectives</subject><subject>Revisions</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>translation research</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1545-102X</issn><issn>1741-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFFurC19AAm50kXaumYy7WqoW6gXR6i5MZk4gJU1qpmnpzkfwGX0SR6suBGdz5sDHz-FH6JDgLvGvt1qWXUIpZVuoTSQnYSRjue3_gouQYPrcQnvOTTGmkaRsF7VoHDGqGGmj_qha6eC6slAEVRYMl7mF0sD769u5dmCDu1qbRW7gLLiHZe7yqnSBLm0w0UVu9cLv-2gn04WDg-_ZQY8Xw4fBVTi-vRwN-uPQMMVYyCMtUgpxRgDHAKlVmkrLGWEgBZepBcljQbXKtI051alIZYwzrTgxhuCIddDJJndeVy8NuEUyy52BotAlVI1LiCKUKK6I8PT4D51WTV3667yiWAilhPLqdKNMXTlXQ5bM63ym63VCcPLZa-J7Tb569fboO7FJZ2B_5U-RHvQ2YJUXsP4_KXma3GwiPwBF9YD1</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Buckwalter, Kathleen C.</creator><creator>Cullen, Laura</creator><creator>Hanrahan, Kirsten</creator><creator>Kleiber, Charmaine</creator><creator>McCarthy, Ann Marie</creator><creator>Rakel, Barbara</creator><creator>Steelman, Victoria</creator><creator>Tripp‐Reimer, Toni</creator><creator>Tucker, Sharon</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation</title><author>Buckwalter, Kathleen C. ; Cullen, Laura ; Hanrahan, Kirsten ; Kleiber, Charmaine ; McCarthy, Ann Marie ; Rakel, Barbara ; Steelman, Victoria ; Tripp‐Reimer, Toni ; Tucker, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-46a5b2e8f1e08eebd9a27d4313e7547bde74852a9fad842ab5b780fa941cc1063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>change</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - standards</topic><topic>evidence‐based practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implementation</topic><topic>Iowa</topic><topic>Iowa Model</topic><topic>Organizational Objectives</topic><topic>Revisions</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>translation research</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buckwalter, Kathleen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanrahan, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiber, Charmaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakel, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steelman, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp‐Reimer, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buckwalter, Kathleen C.</au><au>Cullen, Laura</au><au>Hanrahan, Kirsten</au><au>Kleiber, Charmaine</au><au>McCarthy, Ann Marie</au><au>Rakel, Barbara</au><au>Steelman, Victoria</au><au>Tripp‐Reimer, Toni</au><au>Tucker, Sharon</au><aucorp>Iowa Model Collaborative</aucorp><aucorp>Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative</aucorp><aucorp>Iowa Model Collaborative</aucorp><aucorp>Authored on behalf of the Iowa Model Collaborative</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation</atitle><jtitle>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Worldviews Evid Based Nurs</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>175-182</pages><issn>1545-102X</issn><eissn>1741-6787</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Background
The Iowa Model is a widely used framework for the implementation of evidence‐based practice (EBP). Changes in health care (e.g., emergence of implementation science, emphasis on patient engagement) prompted the re‐evaluation, revision, and validation of the model.
Methods
A systematic multi‐step process was used capturing information from the literature and user feedback via an electronic survey and live work groups. The Iowa Model Collaborative critically assessed and synthesized information and recommendations before revising the model.
Results
Survey participants (n = 431) had requested access to the Model between years 2001 and 2013. Eighty‐eight percent (n = 379) of participants reported using the Iowa Model and identified the most problematic steps as: topic priority, critique, pilot, and institute change. Users provided 587 comments with rich contextual rationale and insightful suggestions. The revised model was then evaluated by participants (n = 299) of the 22nd National EBP Conference in 2015. They validated the model as a practical tool for the EBP process across diverse settings. Specific changes in the model are discussed.
Conclusion
This user driven revision differs from other frameworks in that it links practice changes within the system. Major model changes are expansion of piloting, implementation, patient engagement, and sustaining change.
Linking Evidence to Action
The Iowa Model‐Revised remains an application‐oriented guide for the EBP process. Intended users are point of care clinicians who ask questions and seek a systematic, EBP approach to promote excellence in health care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28632931</pmid><doi>10.1111/wvn.12223</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-102X |
ispartof | Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2017-06, Vol.14 (3), p.175-182 |
issn | 1545-102X 1741-6787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1912194915 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | change Delivery of Health Care - standards evaluation Evidence-based medicine Evidence-based nursing Evidence-Based Practice - methods Evidence-Based Practice - standards evidence‐based practice Humans implementation Iowa Iowa Model Organizational Objectives Revisions Surveys and Questionnaires translation research Validity |
title | Iowa Model of Evidence‐Based Practice: Revisions and Validation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iowa%20Model%20of%20Evidence%E2%80%90Based%20Practice:%20Revisions%20and%20Validation&rft.jtitle=Worldviews%20on%20evidence-based%20nursing&rft.au=Buckwalter,%20Kathleen%20C.&rft.aucorp=Iowa%20Model%20Collaborative&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=175-182&rft.issn=1545-102X&rft.eissn=1741-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wvn.12223&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920559959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920559959&rft_id=info:pmid/28632931&rfr_iscdi=true |