Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members

We conducted a survey to understand how specific pathologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) influence surgeons toward an anterior or posterior surgical approach in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). A questionnaire was sent out to 6179 AOSpine International members via e-mail. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World neurosurgery 2017-09, Vol.105, p.864-874
Hauptverfasser: Nouri, Aria, Martin, Allan R., Nater, Anick, Witiw, Christopher D., Kato, So, Tetreault, Lindsay, Reihani-Kermani, Hamed, Santaguida, Carlo, Fehlings, Michael G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 874
container_issue
container_start_page 864
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 105
creator Nouri, Aria
Martin, Allan R.
Nater, Anick
Witiw, Christopher D.
Kato, So
Tetreault, Lindsay
Reihani-Kermani, Hamed
Santaguida, Carlo
Fehlings, Michael G.
description We conducted a survey to understand how specific pathologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) influence surgeons toward an anterior or posterior surgical approach in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). A questionnaire was sent out to 6179 AOSpine International members via e-mail. This included 18 questions on a 7-point Likert scale regarding how MRI features influence the respondent's decision to perform an anterior or posterior surgical approach. Influence was classified based on the mean and mode. Variations in responses were assessed by region and training. Of 513 respondents, 51.7% were orthopedic surgeons, 36.8% were neurosurgeons, and the remainder were fellows, residents, or other. In ascending order, multilevel bulging disks, cervical kyphosis, and a high degree of anterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence toward an anterior approach. A high degree of posterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence, whereas multilevel compression, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum enlargement, and congenital stenosis had a moderate influence toward a posterior approach. Neurosurgeons chose anterior approaches more and posterior approaches less in comparison with orthopedic surgeons (P < 0.01). Of note, 59.8% of respondents were equally comfortable performing multilevel (3 or more levels) anterior and posterior procedures, whereas 61.5% did not feel comfortable in determining the surgical approach based on MRI alone. Specific DCM pathology influences the choice for anterior or posterior surgical approach. These data highlight factors based on surgeon experience, training, and region of practice. They will be helpful in defining future areas of investigation in an effort to provide individualized surgical strategies and optimize patient outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1911199667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875017309178</els_id><sourcerecordid>1911199667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-6c3c14011093f7e2cc38a0d88e2d57ceb6cfa78842067325d86139916e42ad7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotXSF-CAfOSSYDuJ7SAu1ULLSl1VonC2vM4keEnsxXYW7VPxijhs6RFfbI2--WasH6HXlJSUUP5uX_5yMJeMUFESXhLWPEOXVApZSMHb50_vhlygqxj3JJ-K1lJUL9EFk5w1LWku0e-N68cZnAHse7zVg4NkDf4C0Tu9VDeTHqwb8A3oNAeI2Dv8MIfBGj3ij2BstN4VW_1jgazLpQEcBJ3sEfAawvEvuD3B6A86fT-9X9zzmCLug5-wxrej32UiO49wWpa4vn84WJcnuwTBZVHeJBtg2kGIr9CLXo8Rrh7vFfp28-nr-nNxd3-7WV_fFaZmLBXcVIbWhFLSVr0AZkwlNemkBNY1wsCOm14LKWtGuKhY00lOq7alHGqmO9FVK_T27D0E_3OGmNRko4Fx1A78HBVtKaVty3P3CrEzaoKPMUCvDsFOOpwUJWrJSu3VkpVaslKEq5xVbnrz6J93E3RPLf-SycCHMwD5l0cLQUVjl5w6G8Ak1Xn7P_8f-COn1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1911199667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nouri, Aria ; Martin, Allan R. ; Nater, Anick ; Witiw, Christopher D. ; Kato, So ; Tetreault, Lindsay ; Reihani-Kermani, Hamed ; Santaguida, Carlo ; Fehlings, Michael G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nouri, Aria ; Martin, Allan R. ; Nater, Anick ; Witiw, Christopher D. ; Kato, So ; Tetreault, Lindsay ; Reihani-Kermani, Hamed ; Santaguida, Carlo ; Fehlings, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted a survey to understand how specific pathologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) influence surgeons toward an anterior or posterior surgical approach in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). A questionnaire was sent out to 6179 AOSpine International members via e-mail. This included 18 questions on a 7-point Likert scale regarding how MRI features influence the respondent's decision to perform an anterior or posterior surgical approach. Influence was classified based on the mean and mode. Variations in responses were assessed by region and training. Of 513 respondents, 51.7% were orthopedic surgeons, 36.8% were neurosurgeons, and the remainder were fellows, residents, or other. In ascending order, multilevel bulging disks, cervical kyphosis, and a high degree of anterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence toward an anterior approach. A high degree of posterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence, whereas multilevel compression, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum enlargement, and congenital stenosis had a moderate influence toward a posterior approach. Neurosurgeons chose anterior approaches more and posterior approaches less in comparison with orthopedic surgeons (P &lt; 0.01). Of note, 59.8% of respondents were equally comfortable performing multilevel (3 or more levels) anterior and posterior procedures, whereas 61.5% did not feel comfortable in determining the surgical approach based on MRI alone. Specific DCM pathology influences the choice for anterior or posterior surgical approach. These data highlight factors based on surgeon experience, training, and region of practice. They will be helpful in defining future areas of investigation in an effort to provide individualized surgical strategies and optimize patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28625905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anterior ; Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) ; Cervical Vertebrae - pathology ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Decision Making - physiology ; Decompression, Surgical - methods ; Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) ; Humans ; Imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - pathology ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Kyphosis - surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Neck - pathology ; Neck - surgery ; Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament - surgery ; Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) ; Posterior ; Spinal Cord Diseases - pathology ; Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery ; Surgical approach</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2017-09, Vol.105, p.864-874</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-6c3c14011093f7e2cc38a0d88e2d57ceb6cfa78842067325d86139916e42ad7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-6c3c14011093f7e2cc38a0d88e2d57ceb6cfa78842067325d86139916e42ad7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875017309178$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28625905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nouri, Aria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Allan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nater, Anick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witiw, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, So</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetreault, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reihani-Kermani, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santaguida, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fehlings, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>We conducted a survey to understand how specific pathologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) influence surgeons toward an anterior or posterior surgical approach in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). A questionnaire was sent out to 6179 AOSpine International members via e-mail. This included 18 questions on a 7-point Likert scale regarding how MRI features influence the respondent's decision to perform an anterior or posterior surgical approach. Influence was classified based on the mean and mode. Variations in responses were assessed by region and training. Of 513 respondents, 51.7% were orthopedic surgeons, 36.8% were neurosurgeons, and the remainder were fellows, residents, or other. In ascending order, multilevel bulging disks, cervical kyphosis, and a high degree of anterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence toward an anterior approach. A high degree of posterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence, whereas multilevel compression, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum enlargement, and congenital stenosis had a moderate influence toward a posterior approach. Neurosurgeons chose anterior approaches more and posterior approaches less in comparison with orthopedic surgeons (P &lt; 0.01). Of note, 59.8% of respondents were equally comfortable performing multilevel (3 or more levels) anterior and posterior procedures, whereas 61.5% did not feel comfortable in determining the surgical approach based on MRI alone. Specific DCM pathology influences the choice for anterior or posterior surgical approach. These data highlight factors based on surgeon experience, training, and region of practice. They will be helpful in defining future areas of investigation in an effort to provide individualized surgical strategies and optimize patient outcomes.</description><subject>Anterior</subject><subject>Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM)</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - pathology</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - pathology</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Kyphosis - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Neck - pathology</subject><subject>Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)</subject><subject>Posterior</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical approach</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EotXSF-CAfOSSYDuJ7SAu1ULLSl1VonC2vM4keEnsxXYW7VPxijhs6RFfbI2--WasH6HXlJSUUP5uX_5yMJeMUFESXhLWPEOXVApZSMHb50_vhlygqxj3JJ-K1lJUL9EFk5w1LWku0e-N68cZnAHse7zVg4NkDf4C0Tu9VDeTHqwb8A3oNAeI2Dv8MIfBGj3ij2BstN4VW_1jgazLpQEcBJ3sEfAawvEvuD3B6A86fT-9X9zzmCLug5-wxrej32UiO49wWpa4vn84WJcnuwTBZVHeJBtg2kGIr9CLXo8Rrh7vFfp28-nr-nNxd3-7WV_fFaZmLBXcVIbWhFLSVr0AZkwlNemkBNY1wsCOm14LKWtGuKhY00lOq7alHGqmO9FVK_T27D0E_3OGmNRko4Fx1A78HBVtKaVty3P3CrEzaoKPMUCvDsFOOpwUJWrJSu3VkpVaslKEq5xVbnrz6J93E3RPLf-SycCHMwD5l0cLQUVjl5w6G8Ak1Xn7P_8f-COn1w</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Nouri, Aria</creator><creator>Martin, Allan R.</creator><creator>Nater, Anick</creator><creator>Witiw, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Kato, So</creator><creator>Tetreault, Lindsay</creator><creator>Reihani-Kermani, Hamed</creator><creator>Santaguida, Carlo</creator><creator>Fehlings, Michael G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members</title><author>Nouri, Aria ; Martin, Allan R. ; Nater, Anick ; Witiw, Christopher D. ; Kato, So ; Tetreault, Lindsay ; Reihani-Kermani, Hamed ; Santaguida, Carlo ; Fehlings, Michael G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-6c3c14011093f7e2cc38a0d88e2d57ceb6cfa78842067325d86139916e42ad7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anterior</topic><topic>Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM)</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - pathology</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - pathology</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Kyphosis - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Neck - pathology</topic><topic>Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)</topic><topic>Posterior</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nouri, Aria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Allan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nater, Anick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witiw, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, So</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetreault, Lindsay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reihani-Kermani, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santaguida, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fehlings, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nouri, Aria</au><au>Martin, Allan R.</au><au>Nater, Anick</au><au>Witiw, Christopher D.</au><au>Kato, So</au><au>Tetreault, Lindsay</au><au>Reihani-Kermani, Hamed</au><au>Santaguida, Carlo</au><au>Fehlings, Michael G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>105</volume><spage>864</spage><epage>874</epage><pages>864-874</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>We conducted a survey to understand how specific pathologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) influence surgeons toward an anterior or posterior surgical approach in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). A questionnaire was sent out to 6179 AOSpine International members via e-mail. This included 18 questions on a 7-point Likert scale regarding how MRI features influence the respondent's decision to perform an anterior or posterior surgical approach. Influence was classified based on the mean and mode. Variations in responses were assessed by region and training. Of 513 respondents, 51.7% were orthopedic surgeons, 36.8% were neurosurgeons, and the remainder were fellows, residents, or other. In ascending order, multilevel bulging disks, cervical kyphosis, and a high degree of anterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence toward an anterior approach. A high degree of posterior cord compression had a moderate to strong influence, whereas multilevel compression, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum enlargement, and congenital stenosis had a moderate influence toward a posterior approach. Neurosurgeons chose anterior approaches more and posterior approaches less in comparison with orthopedic surgeons (P &lt; 0.01). Of note, 59.8% of respondents were equally comfortable performing multilevel (3 or more levels) anterior and posterior procedures, whereas 61.5% did not feel comfortable in determining the surgical approach based on MRI alone. Specific DCM pathology influences the choice for anterior or posterior surgical approach. These data highlight factors based on surgeon experience, training, and region of practice. They will be helpful in defining future areas of investigation in an effort to provide individualized surgical strategies and optimize patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28625905</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.025</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2017-09, Vol.105, p.864-874
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1911199667
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anterior
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM)
Cervical Vertebrae - pathology
Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
Decision Making - physiology
Decompression, Surgical - methods
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM)
Humans
Imaging
Intervertebral Disc Displacement - pathology
Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery
Kyphosis - surgery
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Neck - pathology
Neck - surgery
Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament - surgery
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)
Posterior
Spinal Cord Diseases - pathology
Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery
Surgical approach
title Influence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features on Surgical Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results from a Global Survey of AOSpine International Members
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A35%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20Features%20on%20Surgical%20Decision-Making%20in%20Degenerative%20Cervical%20Myelopathy:%20Results%20from%20a%20Global%20Survey%20of%20AOSpine%20International%20Members&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Nouri,%20Aria&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=864&rft.epage=874&rft.pages=864-874&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1911199667%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1911199667&rft_id=info:pmid/28625905&rft_els_id=S1878875017309178&rfr_iscdi=true