Effect of nutritional immunomodulation and heat stress during the dry period on subsequent performance of cows

Heat stress in dairy cows during the dry period impairs milk yield in the next lactation. Feeding OmniGen-AF (OG; Phibro Animal Health Corp., Teaneck, NJ) to lactating cows during heat stress may increase dry matter intake (DMI) and lowers respiration rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT), but the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2017-08, Vol.100 (8), p.6733-6742
Hauptverfasser: Fabris, Thiago F., Laporta, Jimena, Corra, Fabiana N., Torres, Yazielis M., Kirk, David J., McLean, Derek J., Chapman, J.D., Dahl, Geoffrey E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6742
container_issue 8
container_start_page 6733
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 100
creator Fabris, Thiago F.
Laporta, Jimena
Corra, Fabiana N.
Torres, Yazielis M.
Kirk, David J.
McLean, Derek J.
Chapman, J.D.
Dahl, Geoffrey E.
description Heat stress in dairy cows during the dry period impairs milk yield in the next lactation. Feeding OmniGen-AF (OG; Phibro Animal Health Corp., Teaneck, NJ) to lactating cows during heat stress may increase dry matter intake (DMI) and lowers respiration rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT), but the effects in dry cows are not known. We hypothesized that OG supplementation before, during, and after the dry period (approximately 160 d total) would overcome the effects of heat stress and improve cow performance in the next lactation. Cows were randomly assigned to OG or control (placebo) treatments for the last 60 d in milk (DIM), based on mature-equivalent milk yield in the previous lactation. Cows were dried off 45 d before expected calving and randomly assigned to heat stress (HT) or cooling (CL) treatments. Thus, cows received dietary supplementation during late lactation before they were exposed to either CL or HT. After dry-off, treatment groups included heat stress with placebo (HT, only shade, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 17), HT with OG supplementation (HTOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 19), cooling with placebo (CL, shade, fans, and soakers, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 16), and CL with OG supplementation (CLOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 11). After parturition, all cows were kept under the same CL system and management, and all cows continued to receive OG or control treatment until 60 DIM. Cooling cows during the dry period reduced afternoon RT (CL vs. HT; 38.9 ± 0.05 vs. 39.3 ± 0.05°C) and RR (CL vs. HT; 45 ± 1.6 vs. 77 ± 1.6 breaths/min). Respiration rate was also decreased by OG supplementation under HT conditions (HTOG vs. HT; 69.7 ± 1.6 vs. 77.2 ± 1.6 breaths/min). An interaction was observed between OG supplementation and HT; HTOG cows tended to have lower morning RT compared with HT cows. During the dry period, OG reduced DMI relative to control cows. Birth weight was greater in calves from CL cows (CL vs. HT; 40.6 ± 1.09 vs. 38.7 ± 1.09 kg). No differences were detected among treatments in hematocrit, total protein, and body condition score. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments had greater body weight during the dry period (794.9 ± 17.9, 746.8 ± 16.7, and 762.9 ± 14.9 kg, respectively) than HT cows (720 ± 16.2 kg). Gestation length was approximately 4 d longer for CL cows compared with HT cows. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments produced more milk (41.3 ± 1.6, 40.7 ± 1.6, and 40.5 ± 1.6 kg/d, respectively) than HT treatment (35.9 ± 1.6 kg/d). Body weight af
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2016-12313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1911198864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030217305878</els_id><sourcerecordid>1911198864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cdfa458bf3951c97f394a11ca7925d902c87ac31cbc4fd9cf4b4b9e5297adc5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtv2zAQh4miQew81o4Fxy5y-ZIljkGQPgADXZKZoMhjwkAiXZJK4P8-VO10y3S4w3c_3H0IfaFkw-m2__5s84YRum0o45R_QmvasrbhVPaf0ZoQxhrCCVuhi5yfa0sZac_RivVbJlgn1ijcOQem4OhwmEvyxcegR-ynaQ5xinYe9TLCOlj8BLrgXBLkjO2cfHjE5QmwTQe8h-SjxRXM85Dh7wyhLEMX06SDgSXfxNd8hc6cHjNcn-olevhxd3_7q9n9-fn79mbXGN6L0hjrtGj7wXHZUiO7WoWm1OhOstZKwkzfacOpGYxwVhonBjFIaJnstDUt8Ev07Zi7T7Eek4uafDYwjjpAnLOiktLqqN-Kim6OqEkx5wRO7ZOfdDooStTiWFXHanGs_jmuC19P2fMwgf2Pv0utQH8EoH744iGpbDxUC9an6lrZ6D_KfgOAHY1t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1911198864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of nutritional immunomodulation and heat stress during the dry period on subsequent performance of cows</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Fabris, Thiago F. ; Laporta, Jimena ; Corra, Fabiana N. ; Torres, Yazielis M. ; Kirk, David J. ; McLean, Derek J. ; Chapman, J.D. ; Dahl, Geoffrey E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabris, Thiago F. ; Laporta, Jimena ; Corra, Fabiana N. ; Torres, Yazielis M. ; Kirk, David J. ; McLean, Derek J. ; Chapman, J.D. ; Dahl, Geoffrey E.</creatorcontrib><description>Heat stress in dairy cows during the dry period impairs milk yield in the next lactation. Feeding OmniGen-AF (OG; Phibro Animal Health Corp., Teaneck, NJ) to lactating cows during heat stress may increase dry matter intake (DMI) and lowers respiration rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT), but the effects in dry cows are not known. We hypothesized that OG supplementation before, during, and after the dry period (approximately 160 d total) would overcome the effects of heat stress and improve cow performance in the next lactation. Cows were randomly assigned to OG or control (placebo) treatments for the last 60 d in milk (DIM), based on mature-equivalent milk yield in the previous lactation. Cows were dried off 45 d before expected calving and randomly assigned to heat stress (HT) or cooling (CL) treatments. Thus, cows received dietary supplementation during late lactation before they were exposed to either CL or HT. After dry-off, treatment groups included heat stress with placebo (HT, only shade, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 17), HT with OG supplementation (HTOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 19), cooling with placebo (CL, shade, fans, and soakers, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 16), and CL with OG supplementation (CLOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 11). After parturition, all cows were kept under the same CL system and management, and all cows continued to receive OG or control treatment until 60 DIM. Cooling cows during the dry period reduced afternoon RT (CL vs. HT; 38.9 ± 0.05 vs. 39.3 ± 0.05°C) and RR (CL vs. HT; 45 ± 1.6 vs. 77 ± 1.6 breaths/min). Respiration rate was also decreased by OG supplementation under HT conditions (HTOG vs. HT; 69.7 ± 1.6 vs. 77.2 ± 1.6 breaths/min). An interaction was observed between OG supplementation and HT; HTOG cows tended to have lower morning RT compared with HT cows. During the dry period, OG reduced DMI relative to control cows. Birth weight was greater in calves from CL cows (CL vs. HT; 40.6 ± 1.09 vs. 38.7 ± 1.09 kg). No differences were detected among treatments in hematocrit, total protein, and body condition score. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments had greater body weight during the dry period (794.9 ± 17.9, 746.8 ± 16.7, and 762.9 ± 14.9 kg, respectively) than HT cows (720 ± 16.2 kg). Gestation length was approximately 4 d longer for CL cows compared with HT cows. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments produced more milk (41.3 ± 1.6, 40.7 ± 1.6, and 40.5 ± 1.6 kg/d, respectively) than HT treatment (35.9 ± 1.6 kg/d). Body weight after parturition and DMI were evaluated up to 60 DIM and averaged 661.5 ± 15.8 and 19.4 ± 0.7 kg/d, respectively, with no differences observed among treatments. These results confirm that exposure of dry cows to heat stress negatively affects milk yield in the subsequent lactation. Active cooling of dry cows and OG supplementation can reduce the negative effects of heat stress in the dry period on subsequent performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12313</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28624274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - immunology ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology ; Animals ; Cattle - physiology ; cooling system ; dairy cow ; dry period ; Female ; heat stress ; Heat Stress Disorders ; Hot Temperature ; Immunomodulation ; Lactation - physiology ; Milk ; OmniGen-AF</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2017-08, Vol.100 (8), p.6733-6742</ispartof><rights>2017 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cdfa458bf3951c97f394a11ca7925d902c87ac31cbc4fd9cf4b4b9e5297adc5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cdfa458bf3951c97f394a11ca7925d902c87ac31cbc4fd9cf4b4b9e5297adc5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12313$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28624274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabris, Thiago F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laporta, Jimena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corra, Fabiana N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Yazielis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Geoffrey E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of nutritional immunomodulation and heat stress during the dry period on subsequent performance of cows</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Heat stress in dairy cows during the dry period impairs milk yield in the next lactation. Feeding OmniGen-AF (OG; Phibro Animal Health Corp., Teaneck, NJ) to lactating cows during heat stress may increase dry matter intake (DMI) and lowers respiration rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT), but the effects in dry cows are not known. We hypothesized that OG supplementation before, during, and after the dry period (approximately 160 d total) would overcome the effects of heat stress and improve cow performance in the next lactation. Cows were randomly assigned to OG or control (placebo) treatments for the last 60 d in milk (DIM), based on mature-equivalent milk yield in the previous lactation. Cows were dried off 45 d before expected calving and randomly assigned to heat stress (HT) or cooling (CL) treatments. Thus, cows received dietary supplementation during late lactation before they were exposed to either CL or HT. After dry-off, treatment groups included heat stress with placebo (HT, only shade, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 17), HT with OG supplementation (HTOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 19), cooling with placebo (CL, shade, fans, and soakers, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 16), and CL with OG supplementation (CLOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 11). After parturition, all cows were kept under the same CL system and management, and all cows continued to receive OG or control treatment until 60 DIM. Cooling cows during the dry period reduced afternoon RT (CL vs. HT; 38.9 ± 0.05 vs. 39.3 ± 0.05°C) and RR (CL vs. HT; 45 ± 1.6 vs. 77 ± 1.6 breaths/min). Respiration rate was also decreased by OG supplementation under HT conditions (HTOG vs. HT; 69.7 ± 1.6 vs. 77.2 ± 1.6 breaths/min). An interaction was observed between OG supplementation and HT; HTOG cows tended to have lower morning RT compared with HT cows. During the dry period, OG reduced DMI relative to control cows. Birth weight was greater in calves from CL cows (CL vs. HT; 40.6 ± 1.09 vs. 38.7 ± 1.09 kg). No differences were detected among treatments in hematocrit, total protein, and body condition score. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments had greater body weight during the dry period (794.9 ± 17.9, 746.8 ± 16.7, and 762.9 ± 14.9 kg, respectively) than HT cows (720 ± 16.2 kg). Gestation length was approximately 4 d longer for CL cows compared with HT cows. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments produced more milk (41.3 ± 1.6, 40.7 ± 1.6, and 40.5 ± 1.6 kg/d, respectively) than HT treatment (35.9 ± 1.6 kg/d). Body weight after parturition and DMI were evaluated up to 60 DIM and averaged 661.5 ± 15.8 and 19.4 ± 0.7 kg/d, respectively, with no differences observed among treatments. These results confirm that exposure of dry cows to heat stress negatively affects milk yield in the subsequent lactation. Active cooling of dry cows and OG supplementation can reduce the negative effects of heat stress in the dry period on subsequent performance.</description><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - immunology</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>cooling system</subject><subject>dairy cow</subject><subject>dry period</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>heat stress</subject><subject>Heat Stress Disorders</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Immunomodulation</subject><subject>Lactation - physiology</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>OmniGen-AF</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtv2zAQh4miQew81o4Fxy5y-ZIljkGQPgADXZKZoMhjwkAiXZJK4P8-VO10y3S4w3c_3H0IfaFkw-m2__5s84YRum0o45R_QmvasrbhVPaf0ZoQxhrCCVuhi5yfa0sZac_RivVbJlgn1ijcOQem4OhwmEvyxcegR-ynaQ5xinYe9TLCOlj8BLrgXBLkjO2cfHjE5QmwTQe8h-SjxRXM85Dh7wyhLEMX06SDgSXfxNd8hc6cHjNcn-olevhxd3_7q9n9-fn79mbXGN6L0hjrtGj7wXHZUiO7WoWm1OhOstZKwkzfacOpGYxwVhonBjFIaJnstDUt8Ev07Zi7T7Eek4uafDYwjjpAnLOiktLqqN-Kim6OqEkx5wRO7ZOfdDooStTiWFXHanGs_jmuC19P2fMwgf2Pv0utQH8EoH744iGpbDxUC9an6lrZ6D_KfgOAHY1t</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Fabris, Thiago F.</creator><creator>Laporta, Jimena</creator><creator>Corra, Fabiana N.</creator><creator>Torres, Yazielis M.</creator><creator>Kirk, David J.</creator><creator>McLean, Derek J.</creator><creator>Chapman, J.D.</creator><creator>Dahl, Geoffrey E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Effect of nutritional immunomodulation and heat stress during the dry period on subsequent performance of cows</title><author>Fabris, Thiago F. ; Laporta, Jimena ; Corra, Fabiana N. ; Torres, Yazielis M. ; Kirk, David J. ; McLean, Derek J. ; Chapman, J.D. ; Dahl, Geoffrey E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-cdfa458bf3951c97f394a11ca7925d902c87ac31cbc4fd9cf4b4b9e5297adc5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - immunology</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>cooling system</topic><topic>dairy cow</topic><topic>dry period</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>heat stress</topic><topic>Heat Stress Disorders</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Immunomodulation</topic><topic>Lactation - physiology</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>OmniGen-AF</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabris, Thiago F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laporta, Jimena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corra, Fabiana N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Yazielis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Derek J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, Geoffrey E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabris, Thiago F.</au><au>Laporta, Jimena</au><au>Corra, Fabiana N.</au><au>Torres, Yazielis M.</au><au>Kirk, David J.</au><au>McLean, Derek J.</au><au>Chapman, J.D.</au><au>Dahl, Geoffrey E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of nutritional immunomodulation and heat stress during the dry period on subsequent performance of cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>6733</spage><epage>6742</epage><pages>6733-6742</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Heat stress in dairy cows during the dry period impairs milk yield in the next lactation. Feeding OmniGen-AF (OG; Phibro Animal Health Corp., Teaneck, NJ) to lactating cows during heat stress may increase dry matter intake (DMI) and lowers respiration rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT), but the effects in dry cows are not known. We hypothesized that OG supplementation before, during, and after the dry period (approximately 160 d total) would overcome the effects of heat stress and improve cow performance in the next lactation. Cows were randomly assigned to OG or control (placebo) treatments for the last 60 d in milk (DIM), based on mature-equivalent milk yield in the previous lactation. Cows were dried off 45 d before expected calving and randomly assigned to heat stress (HT) or cooling (CL) treatments. Thus, cows received dietary supplementation during late lactation before they were exposed to either CL or HT. After dry-off, treatment groups included heat stress with placebo (HT, only shade, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 17), HT with OG supplementation (HTOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 19), cooling with placebo (CL, shade, fans, and soakers, 56 g/d of placebo, n = 16), and CL with OG supplementation (CLOG, 56 g/d of OG, n = 11). After parturition, all cows were kept under the same CL system and management, and all cows continued to receive OG or control treatment until 60 DIM. Cooling cows during the dry period reduced afternoon RT (CL vs. HT; 38.9 ± 0.05 vs. 39.3 ± 0.05°C) and RR (CL vs. HT; 45 ± 1.6 vs. 77 ± 1.6 breaths/min). Respiration rate was also decreased by OG supplementation under HT conditions (HTOG vs. HT; 69.7 ± 1.6 vs. 77.2 ± 1.6 breaths/min). An interaction was observed between OG supplementation and HT; HTOG cows tended to have lower morning RT compared with HT cows. During the dry period, OG reduced DMI relative to control cows. Birth weight was greater in calves from CL cows (CL vs. HT; 40.6 ± 1.09 vs. 38.7 ± 1.09 kg). No differences were detected among treatments in hematocrit, total protein, and body condition score. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments had greater body weight during the dry period (794.9 ± 17.9, 746.8 ± 16.7, and 762.9 ± 14.9 kg, respectively) than HT cows (720 ± 16.2 kg). Gestation length was approximately 4 d longer for CL cows compared with HT cows. Cows offered CLOG, CL, and HTOG treatments produced more milk (41.3 ± 1.6, 40.7 ± 1.6, and 40.5 ± 1.6 kg/d, respectively) than HT treatment (35.9 ± 1.6 kg/d). Body weight after parturition and DMI were evaluated up to 60 DIM and averaged 661.5 ± 15.8 and 19.4 ± 0.7 kg/d, respectively, with no differences observed among treatments. These results confirm that exposure of dry cows to heat stress negatively affects milk yield in the subsequent lactation. Active cooling of dry cows and OG supplementation can reduce the negative effects of heat stress in the dry period on subsequent performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28624274</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2016-12313</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2017-08, Vol.100 (8), p.6733-6742
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1911198864
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - immunology
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena - physiology
Animals
Cattle - physiology
cooling system
dairy cow
dry period
Female
heat stress
Heat Stress Disorders
Hot Temperature
Immunomodulation
Lactation - physiology
Milk
OmniGen-AF
title Effect of nutritional immunomodulation and heat stress during the dry period on subsequent performance of cows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A56%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20nutritional%20immunomodulation%20and%20heat%20stress%20during%20the%20dry%20period%20on%20subsequent%20performance%20of%20cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Fabris,%20Thiago%20F.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=6733&rft.epage=6742&rft.pages=6733-6742&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2016-12313&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1911198864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1911198864&rft_id=info:pmid/28624274&rft_els_id=S0022030217305878&rfr_iscdi=true