Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis

Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2017-09, Vol.56 (5), p.1058-1064
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Jian, PhD, MD, Ma, Xin, PhD, MD, Wang, Daping, PhD, MD, Lu, Wei, PhD, MD, Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD, Ouyang, Kan, MM, Liu, Haifeng, MM, Li, Hao, MM, Jiang, Luoyong, MM
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1064
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1058
container_title The Journal of foot and ankle surgery
container_volume 56
creator Xu, Jian, PhD, MD
Ma, Xin, PhD, MD
Wang, Daping, PhD, MD
Lu, Wei, PhD, MD
Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD
Ouyang, Kan, MM
Liu, Haifeng, MM
Li, Hao, MM
Jiang, Luoyong, MM
description Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910800540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1067251617302958</els_id><sourcerecordid>1910800540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-P0zAQxSMEYv_AF-CAfOSSMnbiNEEIqapaqLSIwy5na2qPkYsTd2MHUa588XXUhQMHTjPSvPek95uieMVhwUFWbw-Lg8W4EMCXC5ALgO5JccllLUohRP0079AsSyF5c1FcxXgAEKJr5fPiQrSNqKDhl8XvdeiPOLoYBhYs2_xMI4YYKUyR3aEPCceInt0m3DvvfmFyWbjrjx6HFJkbGM63b8R2O7Yyk0_lSt9PbiTDth6TDSGxz8GQf8dWbOsGl4htPPU0JLYa0J-iiy-KZxZ9pJeP87r4ut3crT-VN18-7tarm1LXnKeyWXZYWbRUS9Ea08kGLAitjYWGhOmstPtKNl2bGwuU2BoULdUoGkCqYFldF2_Ouccx3E8Uk-pd1ORzl7mv4h2HFkDWkKXiLNVjpjGSVcfR9TieFAc1w1cHNcNXM3wFUmX42fT6MX_a92T-Wv7QzoL3ZwHllj8cjSpqR4Mmk4HppExw_8__8I9d-0xUo_9OJ4qHMI2ZaO6holCgbuf3z9_nywpEJ9vqAZgjq5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910800540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD ; Ma, Xin, PhD, MD ; Wang, Daping, PhD, MD ; Lu, Wei, PhD, MD ; Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD ; Ouyang, Kan, MM ; Liu, Haifeng, MM ; Li, Hao, MM ; Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD ; Ma, Xin, PhD, MD ; Wang, Daping, PhD, MD ; Lu, Wei, PhD, MD ; Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD ; Ouyang, Kan, MM ; Liu, Haifeng, MM ; Li, Hao, MM ; Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28623061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; arthroereisis ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Computer Simulation ; extraosseous talotarsal stabilization ; Finite Element Analysis ; flatfoot ; Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging ; Flatfoot - surgery ; Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging ; Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery ; Humans ; Joint Prosthesis ; Male ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery ; Orthopedics ; peritalar subluxation ; pes planus ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; sinus tarsi implants ; Stress, Mechanical ; Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Subtalar Joint - surgery ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2017-09, Vol.56 (5), p.1058-1064</ispartof><rights>American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><rights>2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28623061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Kan, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haifeng, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</title><title>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>arthroereisis</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>extraosseous talotarsal stabilization</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>flatfoot</subject><subject>Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Flatfoot - surgery</subject><subject>Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>peritalar subluxation</subject><subject>pes planus</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>sinus tarsi implants</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Subtalar Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>1067-2516</issn><issn>1542-2224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-P0zAQxSMEYv_AF-CAfOSSMnbiNEEIqapaqLSIwy5na2qPkYsTd2MHUa588XXUhQMHTjPSvPek95uieMVhwUFWbw-Lg8W4EMCXC5ALgO5JccllLUohRP0079AsSyF5c1FcxXgAEKJr5fPiQrSNqKDhl8XvdeiPOLoYBhYs2_xMI4YYKUyR3aEPCceInt0m3DvvfmFyWbjrjx6HFJkbGM63b8R2O7Yyk0_lSt9PbiTDth6TDSGxz8GQf8dWbOsGl4htPPU0JLYa0J-iiy-KZxZ9pJeP87r4ut3crT-VN18-7tarm1LXnKeyWXZYWbRUS9Ea08kGLAitjYWGhOmstPtKNl2bGwuU2BoULdUoGkCqYFldF2_Ouccx3E8Uk-pd1ORzl7mv4h2HFkDWkKXiLNVjpjGSVcfR9TieFAc1w1cHNcNXM3wFUmX42fT6MX_a92T-Wv7QzoL3ZwHllj8cjSpqR4Mmk4HppExw_8__8I9d-0xUo_9OJ4qHMI2ZaO6holCgbuf3z9_nywpEJ9vqAZgjq5I</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Ouyang, Kan, MM</creator><creator>Liu, Haifeng, MM</creator><creator>Li, Hao, MM</creator><creator>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</title><author>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD ; Ma, Xin, PhD, MD ; Wang, Daping, PhD, MD ; Lu, Wei, PhD, MD ; Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD ; Ouyang, Kan, MM ; Liu, Haifeng, MM ; Li, Hao, MM ; Jiang, Luoyong, MM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>arthroereisis</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>extraosseous talotarsal stabilization</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>flatfoot</topic><topic>Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Flatfoot - surgery</topic><topic>Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>peritalar subluxation</topic><topic>pes planus</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>sinus tarsi implants</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Subtalar Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Kan, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haifeng, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</au><au>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</au><au>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</au><au>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</au><au>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</au><au>Ouyang, Kan, MM</au><au>Liu, Haifeng, MM</au><au>Li, Hao, MM</au><au>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1058-1064</pages><issn>1067-2516</issn><eissn>1542-2224</eissn><abstract>Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28623061</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-2516
ispartof The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2017-09, Vol.56 (5), p.1058-1064
issn 1067-2516
1542-2224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910800540
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
arthroereisis
Biomechanical Phenomena
Computer Simulation
extraosseous talotarsal stabilization
Finite Element Analysis
flatfoot
Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging
Flatfoot - surgery
Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging
Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery
Humans
Joint Prosthesis
Male
Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging
Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery
Orthopedics
peritalar subluxation
pes planus
Prosthesis Implantation - methods
sinus tarsi implants
Stress, Mechanical
Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging
Subtalar Joint - surgery
Weight-Bearing - physiology
title Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A37%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Extraosseous%20Talotarsal%20Stabilization%20Implants%20in%20a%20Stage%20II%20Adult-Acquired%20Flatfoot%20Model:%20A%20Finite%20Element%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Xu,%20Jian,%20PhD,%20MD&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1058-1064&rft.issn=1067-2516&rft.eissn=1542-2224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910800540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910800540&rft_id=info:pmid/28623061&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1067251617302958&rfr_iscdi=true