Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis
Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2017-09, Vol.56 (5), p.1058-1064 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1064 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1058 |
container_title | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Xu, Jian, PhD, MD Ma, Xin, PhD, MD Wang, Daping, PhD, MD Lu, Wei, PhD, MD Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD Ouyang, Kan, MM Liu, Haifeng, MM Li, Hao, MM Jiang, Luoyong, MM |
description | Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910800540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1067251617302958</els_id><sourcerecordid>1910800540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-P0zAQxSMEYv_AF-CAfOSSMnbiNEEIqapaqLSIwy5na2qPkYsTd2MHUa588XXUhQMHTjPSvPek95uieMVhwUFWbw-Lg8W4EMCXC5ALgO5JccllLUohRP0079AsSyF5c1FcxXgAEKJr5fPiQrSNqKDhl8XvdeiPOLoYBhYs2_xMI4YYKUyR3aEPCceInt0m3DvvfmFyWbjrjx6HFJkbGM63b8R2O7Yyk0_lSt9PbiTDth6TDSGxz8GQf8dWbOsGl4htPPU0JLYa0J-iiy-KZxZ9pJeP87r4ut3crT-VN18-7tarm1LXnKeyWXZYWbRUS9Ea08kGLAitjYWGhOmstPtKNl2bGwuU2BoULdUoGkCqYFldF2_Ouccx3E8Uk-pd1ORzl7mv4h2HFkDWkKXiLNVjpjGSVcfR9TieFAc1w1cHNcNXM3wFUmX42fT6MX_a92T-Wv7QzoL3ZwHllj8cjSpqR4Mmk4HppExw_8__8I9d-0xUo_9OJ4qHMI2ZaO6holCgbuf3z9_nywpEJ9vqAZgjq5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910800540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD ; Ma, Xin, PhD, MD ; Wang, Daping, PhD, MD ; Lu, Wei, PhD, MD ; Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD ; Ouyang, Kan, MM ; Liu, Haifeng, MM ; Li, Hao, MM ; Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD ; Ma, Xin, PhD, MD ; Wang, Daping, PhD, MD ; Lu, Wei, PhD, MD ; Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD ; Ouyang, Kan, MM ; Liu, Haifeng, MM ; Li, Hao, MM ; Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28623061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; arthroereisis ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Computer Simulation ; extraosseous talotarsal stabilization ; Finite Element Analysis ; flatfoot ; Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging ; Flatfoot - surgery ; Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging ; Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery ; Humans ; Joint Prosthesis ; Male ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery ; Orthopedics ; peritalar subluxation ; pes planus ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; sinus tarsi implants ; Stress, Mechanical ; Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Subtalar Joint - surgery ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2017-09, Vol.56 (5), p.1058-1064</ispartof><rights>American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><rights>2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28623061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Kan, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haifeng, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</title><title>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>arthroereisis</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>extraosseous talotarsal stabilization</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>flatfoot</subject><subject>Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Flatfoot - surgery</subject><subject>Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>peritalar subluxation</subject><subject>pes planus</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>sinus tarsi implants</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Subtalar Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>1067-2516</issn><issn>1542-2224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-P0zAQxSMEYv_AF-CAfOSSMnbiNEEIqapaqLSIwy5na2qPkYsTd2MHUa588XXUhQMHTjPSvPek95uieMVhwUFWbw-Lg8W4EMCXC5ALgO5JccllLUohRP0079AsSyF5c1FcxXgAEKJr5fPiQrSNqKDhl8XvdeiPOLoYBhYs2_xMI4YYKUyR3aEPCceInt0m3DvvfmFyWbjrjx6HFJkbGM63b8R2O7Yyk0_lSt9PbiTDth6TDSGxz8GQf8dWbOsGl4htPPU0JLYa0J-iiy-KZxZ9pJeP87r4ut3crT-VN18-7tarm1LXnKeyWXZYWbRUS9Ea08kGLAitjYWGhOmstPtKNl2bGwuU2BoULdUoGkCqYFldF2_Ouccx3E8Uk-pd1ORzl7mv4h2HFkDWkKXiLNVjpjGSVcfR9TieFAc1w1cHNcNXM3wFUmX42fT6MX_a92T-Wv7QzoL3ZwHllj8cjSpqR4Mmk4HppExw_8__8I9d-0xUo_9OJ4qHMI2ZaO6holCgbuf3z9_nywpEJ9vqAZgjq5I</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</creator><creator>Ouyang, Kan, MM</creator><creator>Liu, Haifeng, MM</creator><creator>Li, Hao, MM</creator><creator>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</title><author>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD ; Ma, Xin, PhD, MD ; Wang, Daping, PhD, MD ; Lu, Wei, PhD, MD ; Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD ; Ouyang, Kan, MM ; Liu, Haifeng, MM ; Li, Hao, MM ; Jiang, Luoyong, MM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-679a3fafe4528dd9560f02ccdf06e2d9f5fb356982512a5a8da28e4a260ae3073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>arthroereisis</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>extraosseous talotarsal stabilization</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>flatfoot</topic><topic>Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Flatfoot - surgery</topic><topic>Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>peritalar subluxation</topic><topic>pes planus</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>sinus tarsi implants</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Subtalar Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Kan, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haifeng, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao, MM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Jian, PhD, MD</au><au>Ma, Xin, PhD, MD</au><au>Wang, Daping, PhD, MD</au><au>Lu, Wei, PhD, MD</au><au>Zhu, Weimin, PhD, MD</au><au>Ouyang, Kan, MM</au><au>Liu, Haifeng, MM</au><au>Li, Hao, MM</au><au>Jiang, Luoyong, MM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1058-1064</pages><issn>1067-2516</issn><eissn>1542-2224</eissn><abstract>Abstract Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28623061</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-2516 |
ispartof | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2017-09, Vol.56 (5), p.1058-1064 |
issn | 1067-2516 1542-2224 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910800540 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult arthroereisis Biomechanical Phenomena Computer Simulation extraosseous talotarsal stabilization Finite Element Analysis flatfoot Flatfoot - diagnostic imaging Flatfoot - surgery Foot Deformities, Acquired - diagnostic imaging Foot Deformities, Acquired - surgery Humans Joint Prosthesis Male Metatarsophalangeal Joint - diagnostic imaging Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery Orthopedics peritalar subluxation pes planus Prosthesis Implantation - methods sinus tarsi implants Stress, Mechanical Subtalar Joint - diagnostic imaging Subtalar Joint - surgery Weight-Bearing - physiology |
title | Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A37%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Extraosseous%20Talotarsal%20Stabilization%20Implants%20in%20a%20Stage%20II%20Adult-Acquired%20Flatfoot%20Model:%20A%20Finite%20Element%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Xu,%20Jian,%20PhD,%20MD&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1058-1064&rft.issn=1067-2516&rft.eissn=1542-2224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910800540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910800540&rft_id=info:pmid/28623061&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1067251617302958&rfr_iscdi=true |