Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?

Objective To assess the relationship between robotic surgical simulation performance and the real-life surgical skill of attending surgeons. We hypothesized that simulation performance would not correlate with real-life robotic surgical skill in attending surgeons. Design In 2013, Birkmeyer et al. d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical education 2017-11, Vol.74 (6), p.1052-1056
Hauptverfasser: Mills, James T., MD, MSCR, Hougen, Helen Y., MD, Bitner, Daniel, BS, Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH, Schenkman, Noah S., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1056
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1052
container_title Journal of surgical education
container_volume 74
creator Mills, James T., MD, MSCR
Hougen, Helen Y., MD
Bitner, Daniel, BS
Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH
Schenkman, Noah S., MD
description Objective To assess the relationship between robotic surgical simulation performance and the real-life surgical skill of attending surgeons. We hypothesized that simulation performance would not correlate with real-life robotic surgical skill in attending surgeons. Design In 2013, Birkmeyer et al. demonstrated an association between laparoscopic surgical performance as determined by expert review of video clips and surgical outcomes. Using that model of expert review, we studied the relationship between robotic simulator performance and real-life surgical skill. Ten attending robotic surgeons performed 4 tasks on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (Camera Targeting 1, Ring Walk 3, Suture Sponge 3, and Energy Dissection 3). Two video clips of a robotic-assisted operation were then recorded for each surgeon. Three expert robotic surgeons reviewed the recordings and rated surgical technique using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills. Setting University of Virginia; Charlottesville, VA; tertiary hospital Participants All attending surgeons who perform robotic-assisted surgery at our institution were enrolled and completed the study. Results The surgeons had a median of 7.25 years of robotic surgical experience with a median of 91 cases (ranging: 20-346 cases) in the last 4 years. Median scores for each simulator task were 87.5%, 39.0%, 77.5%, and 81.5%. Using Pearson’s correlation, scores for each of the individual tasks correlated poorly with expert review of intraoperative performance. There was also no correlation ( r = −0.0304) between overall simulation score (mean: 70.7 ± 9.6%) and expert video ratings (mean: 3.66 ± 0.32 points). Conclusions There was no correlation between attending surgeons’ simulator performance and expert ratings of intraoperative videos based on the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills scale. Although novice surgeons may put considerable effort into training on robotic simulators, performance on a simulator may not correlate with attending robotic surgical performance. Development of simulation exercises that guide novice surgeons toward expert performance is needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910799106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1931720417301344</els_id><sourcerecordid>1910799106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-8b35c1dabf2075b5701e3076da9b2640a8c444da64dd3e8999b508aea5d952aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXwC5BQjlwSPP6I4wOgavkoVSUQC-JoOfYsOE3WxU6Q-u9x2BahXrjYlvW8M5pnCHkKtAEK7YuhGfKSvjeMgmqobCjAPXIMnepqJSS7X96aQ60YFUfkUc4DpVJoph-SI9a1jAPwY3L-JmKuPsc-zsFV21IvODtW2zAto51jqj5h2sU02b3DahNTwvKN1bcw__iHvgzj-PoxebCzY8YnN_cJ-fru7ZfNWX3x8f2HzelF7QSIue56Lh142-8YVbKXigJyqlpvdc9aQW3nhBDetsJ7jp3Wupe0s2il15JZy0_I80PdqxR_LphnM4XscBztHuOSDWigSpejLSg_oC7FnBPuzFUKk03XBqhZJZrB_JFoVomGSlMkltSzmwZLP6H_m7m1VoCXBwDLmL8CJpNdwGLIh4RuNj6G_zR4dSfvxrBfVV7iNeYhLmlfDBowmRlqtuse1zWC4hS4EPw3BA-YdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910799106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mills, James T., MD, MSCR ; Hougen, Helen Y., MD ; Bitner, Daniel, BS ; Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH ; Schenkman, Noah S., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Mills, James T., MD, MSCR ; Hougen, Helen Y., MD ; Bitner, Daniel, BS ; Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH ; Schenkman, Noah S., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To assess the relationship between robotic surgical simulation performance and the real-life surgical skill of attending surgeons. We hypothesized that simulation performance would not correlate with real-life robotic surgical skill in attending surgeons. Design In 2013, Birkmeyer et al. demonstrated an association between laparoscopic surgical performance as determined by expert review of video clips and surgical outcomes. Using that model of expert review, we studied the relationship between robotic simulator performance and real-life surgical skill. Ten attending robotic surgeons performed 4 tasks on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (Camera Targeting 1, Ring Walk 3, Suture Sponge 3, and Energy Dissection 3). Two video clips of a robotic-assisted operation were then recorded for each surgeon. Three expert robotic surgeons reviewed the recordings and rated surgical technique using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills. Setting University of Virginia; Charlottesville, VA; tertiary hospital Participants All attending surgeons who perform robotic-assisted surgery at our institution were enrolled and completed the study. Results The surgeons had a median of 7.25 years of robotic surgical experience with a median of 91 cases (ranging: 20-346 cases) in the last 4 years. Median scores for each simulator task were 87.5%, 39.0%, 77.5%, and 81.5%. Using Pearson’s correlation, scores for each of the individual tasks correlated poorly with expert review of intraoperative performance. There was also no correlation ( r = −0.0304) between overall simulation score (mean: 70.7 ± 9.6%) and expert video ratings (mean: 3.66 ± 0.32 points). Conclusions There was no correlation between attending surgeons’ simulator performance and expert ratings of intraoperative videos based on the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills scale. Although novice surgeons may put considerable effort into training on robotic simulators, performance on a simulator may not correlate with attending robotic surgical performance. Development of simulation exercises that guide novice surgeons toward expert performance is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28623113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; clinical competence in medical education ; Cohort Studies ; Computer Simulation ; education ; Education, Medical, Continuing - methods ; Female ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Staff, Hospital - education ; Operating Rooms ; Patient Care ; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - education ; robotics ; simulation center ; Simulation Training - methods ; Surgery ; Task Performance and Analysis ; training ; Virginia</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical education, 2017-11, Vol.74 (6), p.1052-1056</ispartof><rights>Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-8b35c1dabf2075b5701e3076da9b2640a8c444da64dd3e8999b508aea5d952aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-8b35c1dabf2075b5701e3076da9b2640a8c444da64dd3e8999b508aea5d952aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720417301344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28623113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mills, James T., MD, MSCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hougen, Helen Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bitner, Daniel, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenkman, Noah S., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?</title><title>Journal of surgical education</title><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><description>Objective To assess the relationship between robotic surgical simulation performance and the real-life surgical skill of attending surgeons. We hypothesized that simulation performance would not correlate with real-life robotic surgical skill in attending surgeons. Design In 2013, Birkmeyer et al. demonstrated an association between laparoscopic surgical performance as determined by expert review of video clips and surgical outcomes. Using that model of expert review, we studied the relationship between robotic simulator performance and real-life surgical skill. Ten attending robotic surgeons performed 4 tasks on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (Camera Targeting 1, Ring Walk 3, Suture Sponge 3, and Energy Dissection 3). Two video clips of a robotic-assisted operation were then recorded for each surgeon. Three expert robotic surgeons reviewed the recordings and rated surgical technique using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills. Setting University of Virginia; Charlottesville, VA; tertiary hospital Participants All attending surgeons who perform robotic-assisted surgery at our institution were enrolled and completed the study. Results The surgeons had a median of 7.25 years of robotic surgical experience with a median of 91 cases (ranging: 20-346 cases) in the last 4 years. Median scores for each simulator task were 87.5%, 39.0%, 77.5%, and 81.5%. Using Pearson’s correlation, scores for each of the individual tasks correlated poorly with expert review of intraoperative performance. There was also no correlation ( r = −0.0304) between overall simulation score (mean: 70.7 ± 9.6%) and expert video ratings (mean: 3.66 ± 0.32 points). Conclusions There was no correlation between attending surgeons’ simulator performance and expert ratings of intraoperative videos based on the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills scale. Although novice surgeons may put considerable effort into training on robotic simulators, performance on a simulator may not correlate with attending robotic surgical performance. Development of simulation exercises that guide novice surgeons toward expert performance is needed.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>clinical competence in medical education</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Continuing - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - education</subject><subject>Operating Rooms</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Practice-Based Learning and Improvement</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - education</subject><subject>robotics</subject><subject>simulation center</subject><subject>Simulation Training - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>training</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><issn>1931-7204</issn><issn>1878-7452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXwC5BQjlwSPP6I4wOgavkoVSUQC-JoOfYsOE3WxU6Q-u9x2BahXrjYlvW8M5pnCHkKtAEK7YuhGfKSvjeMgmqobCjAPXIMnepqJSS7X96aQ60YFUfkUc4DpVJoph-SI9a1jAPwY3L-JmKuPsc-zsFV21IvODtW2zAto51jqj5h2sU02b3DahNTwvKN1bcw__iHvgzj-PoxebCzY8YnN_cJ-fru7ZfNWX3x8f2HzelF7QSIue56Lh142-8YVbKXigJyqlpvdc9aQW3nhBDetsJ7jp3Wupe0s2il15JZy0_I80PdqxR_LphnM4XscBztHuOSDWigSpejLSg_oC7FnBPuzFUKk03XBqhZJZrB_JFoVomGSlMkltSzmwZLP6H_m7m1VoCXBwDLmL8CJpNdwGLIh4RuNj6G_zR4dSfvxrBfVV7iNeYhLmlfDBowmRlqtuse1zWC4hS4EPw3BA-YdQ</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Mills, James T., MD, MSCR</creator><creator>Hougen, Helen Y., MD</creator><creator>Bitner, Daniel, BS</creator><creator>Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Schenkman, Noah S., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?</title><author>Mills, James T., MD, MSCR ; Hougen, Helen Y., MD ; Bitner, Daniel, BS ; Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH ; Schenkman, Noah S., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-8b35c1dabf2075b5701e3076da9b2640a8c444da64dd3e8999b508aea5d952aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>clinical competence in medical education</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Continuing - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - education</topic><topic>Operating Rooms</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Practice-Based Learning and Improvement</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - education</topic><topic>robotics</topic><topic>simulation center</topic><topic>Simulation Training - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>training</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mills, James T., MD, MSCR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hougen, Helen Y., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bitner, Daniel, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenkman, Noah S., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mills, James T., MD, MSCR</au><au>Hougen, Helen Y., MD</au><au>Bitner, Daniel, BS</au><au>Krupski, Tracey L., MD, MPH</au><au>Schenkman, Noah S., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical education</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Educ</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1052</spage><epage>1056</epage><pages>1052-1056</pages><issn>1931-7204</issn><eissn>1878-7452</eissn><abstract>Objective To assess the relationship between robotic surgical simulation performance and the real-life surgical skill of attending surgeons. We hypothesized that simulation performance would not correlate with real-life robotic surgical skill in attending surgeons. Design In 2013, Birkmeyer et al. demonstrated an association between laparoscopic surgical performance as determined by expert review of video clips and surgical outcomes. Using that model of expert review, we studied the relationship between robotic simulator performance and real-life surgical skill. Ten attending robotic surgeons performed 4 tasks on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (Camera Targeting 1, Ring Walk 3, Suture Sponge 3, and Energy Dissection 3). Two video clips of a robotic-assisted operation were then recorded for each surgeon. Three expert robotic surgeons reviewed the recordings and rated surgical technique using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills. Setting University of Virginia; Charlottesville, VA; tertiary hospital Participants All attending surgeons who perform robotic-assisted surgery at our institution were enrolled and completed the study. Results The surgeons had a median of 7.25 years of robotic surgical experience with a median of 91 cases (ranging: 20-346 cases) in the last 4 years. Median scores for each simulator task were 87.5%, 39.0%, 77.5%, and 81.5%. Using Pearson’s correlation, scores for each of the individual tasks correlated poorly with expert review of intraoperative performance. There was also no correlation ( r = −0.0304) between overall simulation score (mean: 70.7 ± 9.6%) and expert video ratings (mean: 3.66 ± 0.32 points). Conclusions There was no correlation between attending surgeons’ simulator performance and expert ratings of intraoperative videos based on the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills scale. Although novice surgeons may put considerable effort into training on robotic simulators, performance on a simulator may not correlate with attending robotic surgical performance. Development of simulation exercises that guide novice surgeons toward expert performance is needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28623113</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7204
ispartof Journal of surgical education, 2017-11, Vol.74 (6), p.1052-1056
issn 1931-7204
1878-7452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910799106
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Clinical Competence
clinical competence in medical education
Cohort Studies
Computer Simulation
education
Education, Medical, Continuing - methods
Female
Hospitals, University
Humans
Male
Medical Staff, Hospital - education
Operating Rooms
Patient Care
Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
Robotic Surgical Procedures - education
robotics
simulation center
Simulation Training - methods
Surgery
Task Performance and Analysis
training
Virginia
title Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A01%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Robotic%20Surgical%20Simulator%20Performance%20Correlate%20With%20Surgical%20Skill?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20education&rft.au=Mills,%20James%20T.,%20MD,%20MSCR&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1052&rft.epage=1056&rft.pages=1052-1056&rft.issn=1931-7204&rft.eissn=1878-7452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910799106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910799106&rft_id=info:pmid/28623113&rft_els_id=S1931720417301344&rfr_iscdi=true